Accessibility to various destinations by public and private transport in Szczecin

• Autorzy: Goliszek Sławomir , Wójcik Julia , Duma Patryk

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.4467/2543859XPKG.22.010.16268

Warianty tytułu

PL

Dostępność do różnych destynacji za pomocą komunikacji miejskiej i prywatnej w Szczecinie

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The analysis presented herein is aimed at indicating disparities in accessibility to some selected travel destinations by means of private and public transport in the city of Szczecin. Accessibility is a simple measure of potential interactions between two points in space. For the purpose of the study, an original model of an individual transportation system has been developed using Google Maps API data. In order to do so, some GTFS and pedestrian-related data have been downloaded. To calculate source-destination travel times at certain times of the day for four different parameters of pedestrian motion speed, ArcGIS Network Analyst software has been used. Five research methods have been applied: the proximity measure, the population percentage measure, the cumulative accessibility measure, the potential accessibility index and the potential accessibility quotient. In order to develop an ultimate accessibility rating for housing estates in Szczecin, a synthetic accessibility measure has been developed. The synthetic accessibility measure consists of 9 standardised components/values for both public and private (car) transport. The potential accessibility to the population is part of the synthetic accessibility sub-measure. The isochrones have been drawn in order to analyse the workplaces and secondary schools. Moreover, data concerning accessibility to the nearest kindergarten, primary school, hospital, cinema, shopping centre and indoor swimming pool have also been taken into consideration when calculating the synthetic measure. In the case of potential accessibility measures, it is usually the highest in the city centre. Obviously, the nearer a particular facility, the higher its accessibility measure is. The only disparities between the measures for public and private transport are observed in areas which are not covered by the public transportation network.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

GTFS; public transport; private transport; transport accessibility

PL

GTFS; transport publiczny; transport prywatny; dostępność transportowa

• Wydawca: Komisja Geografii Komunikacji Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego ; Uniwersytet Gdański. Katedra Geografii Rozwoju Regionalnego
• Czasopismo: Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: nr 25(2)
• Strony: 27--41
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 53 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Goliszek Sławomir

• Stanisław Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0908-1487

autor

Wójcik Julia

• Stanisław Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland

autor

Duma Patryk

• Stanisław Leszczycki Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-818 Warsaw, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0802-3835

Bibliografia

• [1] Berežný R., Konečný V., 2019, The quality standardisation in suburban bus transport by the transformation of the service quality loop, Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 955-962.
• [2] Beria P., Debernardi A., Ferrara E., 2017, Measuring the long-distance accessibility of Italian cities, Journal of Transport Geography, 62, 66-79.
• [3] Catling S., 2005, Children’s personal geographies and the English primary school geography curriculum, Children’s Geographies, 3, 325-34.
• [4] de Kadt J., Norris S. A., Fleisch B., Richter L., Alvanides S., 2014, Children’s daily travel to school in Johannesburg Soweto, South Africa: geography and school choice in the Birth to Twenty cohort study, Children’s Geographies, 12 (2), 170-188.
• [5] El-Geneidy A., Levinson D., Diab E., 2016, The cost of equity: Assessing transit accessibility and social disparity using total travel cost, Washington: In 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
• [6] Geurs K.T., Boon W., Van Wee B., 2009, Social impacts of transport: literature review and the state of practice of transport appraisal in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, Transport Reviews, 29(1), 69–90.
• [7] Geurs K.T., Ritsema Van Eck J.R., 2003, Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use scenarios: The implications of job competition, land-use, and infrastructure developments for the Netherlands, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 69-87.
• [8] Geurs K.T., van Wee B., 2004, Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions, Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127-140.
• [9] Gilliam L., Gulløv E., 2019, Children as potential – a window to cultural ideals, anxieties and conflicts, Children’s Geographies, 1-12.
• [10] Goch K., Ochota Sz., Piotrkowska M., Kunert Z., 2018, Measuring dynamic public transit accessibility to local centres in Warsaw, Urban Development Issues, 58, 29–40.
• [11] Goliszek S., 2017a, Space-time variation of accessibility to jobs by public transport – a case study of Szczecin, Europa XXI, 33, 49-66.
• [12] Goliszek S., 2017b, Udział transportu zbiorowego w poprawie dostępności do usług w Gdyni, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 20(1), 36-49.
• [13] Goliszek S., 2018, Identyfikacja transportowego i przestrzennego komponentu dostępności komunikacyjnej w wybranych nadmorskich ośrodkach miejskich, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 21(2), 7–16.
• [14] Goliszek S., 2019, Time deviations in the operation of public transport providing access to selected services in the city of Szczecin, Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 22(1), 22-30.
• [15] Goliszek S., 2021, GIS tools and programming languages for creating models of public and private transport potential accessibility in Szczecin, Poland, Journal of Geographical Systems, 23, 115-137.
• [16] Goliszek S., 2022a, Znaczenie komponentów dostępności transportowej w Szczecinie w latach 2009-2018, Prace Geograficzne, 277 [in print].
• [17] Goliszek S., 2022b, The potential accessibility to workplaces and working-age population by means of public and private car transport in Szczecin, Miscellanea Geographica, 26(1), 31-41.
• [18] Goliszek S., Połom M., 2016, The use of general transit feed specification (GTFS) application to identify deviations in the operation of public transport at morning peak hours on the example of Szczecin, Europa XXI, 31, 51-60.
• [19] Goliszek S., Połom M., Duma P., 2020, Potential and cumulative accessibility of workplaces by public transport in Szczecin, Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, 50, 133-146.
• [20] Gutierrez J., 2001, Location, economic potential and daily accessibility impact of the high speed line Madrid–Barcelona–French border, Journal of Transport Geography, 9, 229–242.
• [21] Hansen W.G., 1959, How Accessibility Shapes Land-use, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73-76.
• [22] Ingram D.R. 1971, The Concept of Accessibility: a Search for an Operational Form, Regional Studies, 5, 101-107.
• [23] Isard W. 1954, Location Theory and Trade Theory: Short-Run Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, (1), 305-322.
• [24] Karner A., 2018, Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data, Journal of Transport Geography, 67, 24–32.
• [25] Kučerová S.R., Bláha J.D., Kučera Z., 2015, Transformations of spatial relationships in elementary education: A case study of changes in two Czech rural areas since the second half of the 20 th century, Moravian Geographical Reports, 23(1), 34–44.
• [26] Lin J.J., Huang J.Ch., Ho, Ch.L., 2014, School accessibility and academic achievement in a rural area of Taiwan, Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 232-248.
• [27] Loo B.P.Y., Lam W.W.Y. 2015, Does neighbourhood count in affecting children’s journeys to schools?. Children’s Geographies, 13(1), 89-113.
• [28] MacKenzie C.A., Moffatt S.P., Ogwang J., Ahabyona P., Sengupta, R.R. 2017, Spatial and temporal patterns in primary school enrolment and exam achievement in Rural Uganda, Children’s Geographies, 15(3), 334-348.
• [29] Mercurio R., 2008, Improving operation, marketing and customer service with Google maps, Stockholm: Malaya business insight.
• [30] Merlin L.S. 2020, A new method using medians to calibrate single-parameter spatial interaction models. The Journal of Transport and Land Use, 13(1), 49–70.
• [31] Miller H.J., 1991, Modelling accessibility using space–time prism concepts within geographical information systems, International Journal of Geographical Systems, 5(3), 287–301.
• [32] Niedzielski M.A., Boschmann E.E. 2014, Travel time and distance as relative accessibility in the journey to work, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(6), 1156-1182.
• [33] Niedzielski M.A., Kucharski R. 2019, Impact of commuting, time budgets, and activity durations on modal disparity in accessibility to supermarkets, Transportation Research Part D – Transport and Environment, 75, 106-120.
• [34] Niedzielski M.A., 2021, Grocery store accessibility: Different metrics – Different modal disparity results and spatial patterns, Journal of Transport Geography, 9611.
• [35] O’Kelly M.E., Lee W. 2005, Disaggregate journey-to-work data: implications for excess commuting and jobs-housing balance, Environment and Planning A, 37(12), 2233–2252.
• [36] O’Kelly M.E., Niedzielski M.A. 2009, Are long commute distances inefficient and disorderly?, Environment & Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(11), 2741-2759.
• [37] Parnell R., Patsarika M., 2011, Young people’s participation in school design: exploring diversity and power in a UK governmental policy case-study, Children’s Geographies, 9(3-4), 457-475.
• [38] Rosik P., Goliszek S., Komornicki T., Duma P., 2021a, Forecast of the impact of electric car battery performance and infrastructural and demographic changes on cumulative accessibility for the five most populous cities in Poland, Energies, 14, 2412.
• [39] Rosik P., Pomianowski W., Komornicki T., Goliszek S., Szejgiec-Kolenda B., Duma P., 2020, Regional dispersion of potential accessibility quotient at the intra-European and intranational level. Core-periphery pattern, discontinuity belts and distance decay tornado effect, Journal of Transport Geography, 8215.
• [40] Rosik P., Puławska-Obiedowska S., Goliszek S., 2021b, Public transport accessibility to upper secondary schools measured by the potential quotient: The case of Kraków, Moravian Geographical Reports, 29(1), 15-26.
• [41] Salonen M., Toivonen T., 2013, Modelling travel time in urban networks: comparable measures for private car and public transport, Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 143–153.
• [42] Schwartz B., 2010, How does Google’s predictive traffic maps work?.
• [43] Shen Q., 1998, Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 25(3), 345–365.
• [44] Stephens L., Spalding K., Aslam H., Scott H., Ruddick S., Young, N.L., McKeever P., 2017, Inaccessible childhoods: evaluating accessibility in homes, schools and neighbourhoods with disabled children, Children’s Geographies, 15(5), 583-599.
• [45] Stępniak M., Goliszek S., 2017, Spatio-temporal variation of accessibility by public transport – the equity perspective. I. Ivan, A. Singleton, J. Horák, T. Inspektor (red.), The rise of big spatial data, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (241-261). Springer International Publishing.
• [46] Stępniak M., Pritchard J., Geurs K., Goliszek S., 2019, The impact of temporal resolution on public transport accessibility measurement: Review and case study in Poland, Journal of Transport Geography, 75(2), 8-24.
• [47] Talen E., 1996, After the plans: Methods to evaluate the implementation success of plans, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(2), 79-91.
• [48] Talen E.L., Anselin L., 1998, Assessing spatial equity: an evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds, Environment & Planning A, 30, 595-613.
• [49] Thompson C.A., Saxberg K., Lega J., Tong D., Brown H.E. 2019, A cumulative gravity model for inter-urban spatial interaction at different scales, Journal of Transport Geography, 79, 102461.
• [50] Vickerman R.W., 1974, A demand model for leisure travel, Environment and Planning A, 6, 65-77.
• [51] Wang F., Xu Y., 2011, Estimating O-D matrix of travel time by Google Maps API: Implementation, advantages and implications, Annals of GIS, 17, 199–209.
• [52] ZDiTM Szczecin Zarząd Dróg i Transportu Miejskiego w Szczecinie (Roads and Public Transport Authority in Szczecin): https://www.zditm.szczecin.pl/pl (accessed: 20th November 2018).
• [53] Zelinsky T., Kubak M., 2014, Distance to Education and Health Services by Pupils from Marginalized Roma Communities, Central European Conference in Regional Science CERS, 1180–1187.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)