Engineering production education in e-learning example in Poland

• Autorzy: Rosak-Szyrocka J. , Blaskova M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

It can be observed that the modern world which is subjected to a variety of changes, in particular socio-economic and civilizational ones, known commonly as the so called information revolution creates the need for intense search for new, more effective educational models. All the changes are linked to the formation of network society, information society and knowledge-based economy, which are termed differently in science. The paper discusses research conducted among 698 students of Czestochowa University of Technology and Wroclaw University of Technology in Poland. The aim of the following work is to indicate main problem areas and provide solutions to them.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

e-learning; Moodle platform; education

PL

platforma Moodle; edukacja; zdalne nauczanie

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Stowarzyszenia Menedżerów Jakości i Produkcji
• Czasopismo: Production Engineering Archives
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 12, No. 3
• Strony: 42--45
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 13 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Rosak-Szyrocka J.

• Institute of Production Engineering, Czestochowa University of Technology, Poland

autor

Blaskova M.

• University of Žilina, Faculty of Management Science and Informatics

Bibliografia

• 1. Shopova T. Digital Literacy of Students and Its Improvement at the University, Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, Vol. 7, No. 2, (pp. 26-32), online ISSN 1803-1617, printed ISSN 1803-1617, doi: 10.7160/eriesj.2014.070201, 2014.
• 2. Ardid M., Gómez-Tejedor J. A., Meseguerdueñas, J. M., Riera, J., & Vidaurre A. Online exams for blended assessment. Study of different application methodologies. Computers & Education, 81, 296-303, 2015.
• 3. Wu J. H., Tennyson R. D., Hsia T. L. & Liaoy. W. Analysis of e-learning innovation and core capability using a hypercube model. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1851–1866, 2008.
• 4. Paechter M., Maier M. & B. Online or face-to-face? Students' experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet and Higher Education. 13(4), 292-297, 2010.
• 5. Liaw S. S. Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of elearning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, 864–873, 2008.
• 6. Otter R. R., Seipel S., Graeff T., Boraiko B. A., Gray C., Petersen J., Sadler K. Comparing student and faculty perceptions of online and traditional courses. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 27-35, 2013.
• 7. González-Gómez F., Guardiola J. & Martín Rodríguez Ó. Gender differences in e-learning satisfaction. Computers&Education, 58(1), pp. 283-290, 2012.
• 8. Oztekin A., Delen D., Turkyilmaa A., & Zaim S., A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for e-learning systems, Decision Support Systems, 56 (2013), pp. 63–73, 2013.
• 9. Mulder K. F. Strategic competences for concrete action towards sustainability: An oxymoron? Engineering education for a sustainable future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016.
• 10. Bedrule – Grigoruta M.V., Rusu M.L. Considerations about e-learning tools for adult educations, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 142, pp. 749 – 754, 2014.
• 11. Hooper and Rieber, Teaching, instruction, and technology. In A. C. Ornstein & L. S. Behar-Horenstein (Eds.), Contemporary Issue in Curriculum (2nd ed., pp. 252-264). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon., 1999.
• 12. Castaneda and Soto, Building personal learning environments by using and mixing ICT tools in a professional way. Digital Education Review, 2010.
• 13. Oproiu G.C. A Study about Using E-learning Platform (Moodle) in University Teaching Process, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 180, pp. 426 – 432, 2014.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.