PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Priority Areas for Initiating Land Consolidations Related to Erosion and Water Retention in the Landscape, Czech Republic

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Land consolidations represent a unique tool for managing the problems of the rural space. They help to settle the land property rights and meet the current requirements associated with the protection and formation of a stable, permanently sustainable rural landscape. In the Czech Republic, complex land consolidations have been completed in 1,965 cadastral areas out of the total 13,100, and in 2,134 more they are in the preparation phase (up to 1st September 2015). It means that about 60% of cadastral areas in CR still await land consolidation. Our study aimed to localize the priority localities (cadastral areas and regions) for preferential implementation of land consolidation. The authors selected three thematic factors to determine the risk of their occurrence in particular localities and, consequently, the need to initiate the land consolidation. The analysis is based on the assumption that the cadastral areas where land consolidations have been completed or are under way have already dealt with the above-mentioned risk factors or will do so soon. Therefore, such areas have not been included into our study. The key selected thematic factors relevant for the preferential implementation of land consolidation include: the risk of water and wind erosion in arable land, water management, and water retention in the landscape. For each of these three factors, a map of preferential localities (based on the degree of risk/suitability) was processed for initiation of land consolidation. At the same time, a simple multi-criteria analysis of the extent of the Czech Republic’s erosion (water and wind) has been prepared. The result of this analysis is the ranking of regions according to the degree of risk of erosion. The most vulnerable regions of the Czech Republic include Jihomoravský (South Moravian Region), Středočeský (Central Bohemia) and Pardubice.
Rocznik
Strony
16--28
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 33 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Land Consolidations and Land Use Planning, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
autor
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Land Consolidations and Land Use Planning, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
autor
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Land Consolidations and Land Use Planning, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
autor
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Land Consolidations and Land Use Planning, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
  • Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Department of Land Consolidations and Land Use Planning, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
  • Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Bibliografia
  • 1. Hartvigsen, M. 2014. Land mobility in Central and Eastern Europe land consolidation context. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 10(1), 23-46.
  • 2. Janeček, M. et al. 2012. Protection of agricultural land against erosion. Methodology. Prague: Power-print, s.r.o. (in Czech).
  • 3. Karásek, P., Stejskalová, D., Ulčák, Z. 2014. Analysis of Rural Social Aspects in the Context of Land Consolidations and Land Use Planning, the Case Study, Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(3), 507-515.
  • 4. Karásek, P., Tlapáková, L., Podhrázská, J. 2015. The location and extent of systematic drainage in relation to land use in the past and at present and in relation to soil vulnerability to accelerater infiltration in the protected landscape area Železné Hory. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(4), 1121-1131.
  • 5. Konečná, J., Pražan, J. et. al. 2014. Assessment of economic aspects of erosion control of agricultural land. Certified methodology. Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, v.v.i. (in Czech).
  • 6. Konečná J. et al. 2011. Soil and water conservation in the frame of the land consolidation process in the Hubenov cadastre (Czech Republic). Moravian Geographical Reports, (19)3, 8-11.
  • 7. Krása, J. et al. 2013. Assessment of the risk of sediment deposition and eutrophication of water reservoirs caused by agricultural land erosion. Certified methodology. Czech Technical University in Prague.
  • 8. Kulhavý, Z., et al. 2007. Management of agricultural drainage systems in the Czech Republic. Irrigation and drainage, 56, 141-149.
  • 9. Kyselý J., Beranová R. 2009. Climate-change effects on extreme precipitation in central Europe: uncertainties of scenarios based on regional climate models. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 95(3-4), 361.
  • 10. Langhammer, J., Vilímek, V. 2008. Landscape changes as a factor affecting the course and consequences of extreme floods in the Otava River basin, Czech Republic. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 144, 53-66.
  • 11. Leń, P., Noga, K. 2018. Prioritization of Land Consolidation Interventions in the Villages of Central Poland. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 19(2):246-254.
  • 12. Ministry of Agriculture of CR. 2015. Soil – situation and prospective report. Prague: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. (in Czech).
  • 13. Ministry of Agriculture of CR. 2016. Report on the state of water management in the Czech Republic. Prague: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. (in Czech).
  • 14. Miranda, D., Crecente, R., Alvarez, M.F. 2006. Land consolidation in inland rural Galicia, N.W. Spain, since 1950: An example of the formulation and use of questions, criteria and indicators for evaluation of rural development policies. Land Use Policy, 23, 511-520.
  • 15. Nikodemus, O., Bell, S., Grine, I., Liepins, I. 2005. The impact of economic, social and political factors on the landscape structure of the Vidzeme Uplands in Latvia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 57-67.
  • 16. Novák, P., et al. 2003. Definition of agriculturally less favourable and vulnerable areas of the Czech Republic and proposals for land use including economic impacts. Project of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic NAZV QC1293, Prague (in Czech).
  • 17. Novák P., Batysta M., Havelková L. 2013. Impact of the intensive soil erosion for the water balance of landscape. In Water, Soil and Plants. Křtiny 29.-30.5.2013.
  • 18. Pašakarnis, G., Maliene, V. 2010. Towards sustainable development in Central and Eastern Europe: applying land consolidation. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 545-549.
  • 19. Pavelková R. et al. 2017. Historical ponds of the Czech Republic: an example of the interpretation of historic maps. Journal of Maps, 12(1), 551-559.
  • 20. Podhrázská, J. et al. 2008. Optimization of wind-breaker functions in agricultural land. Certified methodology. Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, v.v.i. (in Czech).
  • 21. Podhrázská, J. et al. 2011. Evaluation of the effectiveness of permanent vegetation barriers in protection against wind erosion. Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, v.v.i. (in Czech).
  • 22. Podhrázská, J., Kučera, J., Karásek, P., Konečná, J. 2015. Land degradation by erosion and its economic consequences for the region of Jihomoravský (Czech Republic). Soil and Water Research, 10(2), 105-113.
  • 23. Podhrázská J., Kučera J., Středová H. 2015. The Methods of Locating Areas Exposed to Wind Erosion in the Jihomoravský Region. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 113-121.
  • 24. Podhrázská, J., Vaishar, A., Toman, F., Knotek, J., Ševelová, J., Stonawská, K., Vasylchenko, A., Karásek, P. 2015. Evaluation of Land Consolidation Process by Rural Stakeholders. European Countryside, 7(3), 144-155.
  • 25. Rožnovský, J., Fukalová, P., Pokladníková, H. 2010. Prediction of climate in Southern Moravia. In Voda v krajině. Czech Hydro-meteorological Institute, Lednice, 31.5.-1.6.2010. (in Czech).
  • 26. Sklenička, P. 2006. Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 23(4), 502-510.
  • 27. Sky, P. K. 2015. Land consolidation in Norway in an international perspective. Spanish Journal of Rural Development, 6(1-2), 81-90.
  • 28. SLO. 2015. Concept of land consolidations for 2016-2020. Prague: State Land Office. (in Czech).
  • 29. SLO. 2016. Methodological guidelines for application of land consolidations. Prague: State Land Office. (in Czech).
  • 30. Thomas, J. 2006. Property rights, land fragmentation and the emerging structure of agriculture in Central and Eastern European countries. Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, 3(2), 225-275.
  • 31. Tlapáková, K., Stejskalová, D., Karásek, P., Podhrázská, J. 2013. Landscape metric as a tool for evaluation of landscape structure – case study Hustopeče. European Countryside, 5(1), 52-70.
  • 32. Uhlířová J., Kaplická M., Kvítek T. 2009. Water erosion and characteristics of sediment load in the Kopaninský stream basin. Soil and Water Research, 4(1), 39-46.
  • 33. Vitikainen, A. 2004. An overwiev of land consolidation in Europe. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1(1), 25-44.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-638b100c-9637-4f71-8598-a15ce6d6f64b
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.