PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Biological and Ecological Traits of Terrestrial Arthropods (Arthropoda: Insecta) in North-West Morocco

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In order to understand the relationship between the biological characteristics of insects and their environment, an entomological study was conducted at 5 stations (agricultural and natural) in the region of northwest Morocco (Sidi Kacem) between March 2019 and September 2020. Three sampling techniques were used (sweep nets, pitfall traps, and sight hunting). The inventory of insect species captured by these different methods in the various stations reveals the presence of 105 species distributed among 7 orders belonging to 35 families. According to the results, the presented adaptive parameters such as diet, flying ability, body size, and humidity sensitivity of the species showed that predators, macropterous, small size, and hygrophilic species are more frequent.
Rocznik
Strony
252--263
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 65 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Department of Biology, Laboratory of Plant, Animal and Agro-Industry Productions, Faculty of Sciences, University Ibn Tofail, Kenitra, Morocco
autor
  • Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University Mohamed Premier, Oujda, Morocco
  • Department of Biology, Laboratory of Plant, Animal and Agro-Industry Productions, Faculty of Sciences, University Ibn Tofail, Kenitra, Morocco
autor
  • Department of Biology, Laboratory of Plant, Animal and Agro-Industry Productions, Faculty of Sciences, University Ibn Tofail, Kenitra, Morocco
  • Department of Biology, Laboratory of Plant, Animal and Agro-Industry Productions, Faculty of Sciences, University Ibn Tofail, Kenitra, Morocco
  • Department of Biology, Laboratory of Plant, Animal and Agro-Industry Productions, Faculty of Sciences, University Ibn Tofail, Kenitra, Morocco
Bibliografia
  • 1. Andrew N.R., Hill S.J., Binns M., Md Bahar H., Ridley E.V., Jung M.P., Fyfe C., Yates M., Khusro M. 2013. Assessing insect responses to climate change: What are we testing for? Where should we be heading? Peer J, 1–11.
  • 2. A ntoine M. 1955. Coléoptères Carabiques du Maroc (1ère partie). Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc. Nouvelle série, Zoologie, 1, 1–176.
  • 3. Antoine M. 1961. Coléptères Carabiques du Maroc. IV Partie. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles et Physiques du Maroc. Nouvelle série, Zoologie, 8, 466–534.
  • 4. Archaimbault V. , Tison-Rosebery J., Morin S. 2010. Traits biologiques et écologiques, intérêt et perspectives pour la bio-indication des pollutions toxiques. Sciences Eaux & Territoires, 46–51
  • 5. Aviron S., Burel F ., Baudry J., Schermann N. 2005. Carabid assemblages in agricultural landscapes: impacts of habitat features, landscape context at different spatial scales and farming intensity. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 108(3), 205–217.
  • 6. Ågren G.I., Stenberg J.A., Björkman C. 2012. Omnivores as plant bodyguards: A model of the importance of plant quality. Basic Appl. Ecol, 13, 441–448.
  • 7. Bedel L. 1895. Catalogue raisonné des coléoptères du nord de l’afrique (maroc, algérie, Tunisie et Tripolitaine) avec notes sur la faune des iles canaries et de Madère. Paris. Société Entomologique de France, pp. 402.
  • 8. Benkhellil M. 1991. Les techniques de récoltes et de piégeage utilisées en entomologie terrestre. Ed. Office des publications universitaires, Alger, 57.
  • 9. Borer ET., Seabloom EW., Tilman D., Novotny V. 2012. Plant diversity controls arthropod biomass and temporal stability. Ecology letters, 15, 1457–1464.
  • 10. Brandmayr P., Pizzoloto R., Zetto-Brandmayr T. 2005. I coleoptteri carabidi per la valutazione ambientale e la conservazione del la biodiversità. Manuali e line Guida, Rome.
  • 11. Burel F., Butet A., Delettre YR, Millan de la pena N. 2004. Differential response of selected taxa to landscape context and agricultural intensificatio. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67, 195–204.
  • 12. Cardwell C., Hassall M., White P. 1994. Effects of headland management on carabid beetle communities in Breckland cereal fields. Pedobiologia, 38, 50–62.
  • 13. Cardarelli E., Bogliani G. 2014. Effects of grass management intensity on ground beetle assemblages in rice field banks. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 195, 120–126.
  • 14. Charvet S., Kosmala A., Statzner B. 1998. Biomonitoring through biological traits of benthic macroinvertebrates: Perspectives for a general tool in stream management. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 142, 415–432
  • 15. Cole L.J., McCracken D.I., Dennis P., Downie I.S., Griffin, A.L., Foster G.N., Murphy K.J., Waterhouse T. 2002. Relationships between agricultural management and ecological groups of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) on Scottish farmland. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 93, 323–336.
  • 16. Cosim S. 2011. Effetti di differenti sistemi di gestione agronomica su alcuni gruppi di Artropodi indicatori di biodiversità. Ph.D. Thesis. Universita’ Degli Studi Di Pisa. Italia.
  • 17. Dajoz R. 2002. Les Coléoptères Carabidés et Ténébrionidés: Ecologie et Biologie. Ed, Lavoisier Tec & Doc., Londres, Paris, New York, 522.
  • 18. Dolédec S., Statzner B., Bournaud M. 1999. Species traits for future biomonitoring across ecoregions: Patterns along a human-impacted river. Freshwater Biology, 42, 737–758.
  • 19. Dix M.E., Baxendale F.P. 1997. Insect Pests and Arthropod Predators Associated with Tree-Turf Landscapes. Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology, 142.
  • 20. Döring TF., Kromp B. 2003. Which carabid species benefit from organic agriculture? A review of comparative studies in winter cereals from Germany and Switzerland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98, 153–161.
  • 21. Fumanal B. 2007. Caractérisation des traits biologiques et des processus évolutifs d’une espèce en-vahissante en France: Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. Ecologie, Environnement. Université de Bourgogne.
  • 22. Gerisch M. 2011. Habitat disturbance and hydrological parameters determine the body size and reproductive strategy of alluvial ground beetles. ZooKeys, 100, 353–370.
  • 23. Gobbi M., Fontaneto D. 2008. Biodiversity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in different habitats of the Italian Po lowland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 127, 273–276.
  • 24. Gutierrez D., Menendez R. 1997. Patterns in the distribution, abundance and body size of carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Caraboidea) in relation to dispersal ability. Journal of Biogeography, 24, 903–914.
  • 25. Hedde M., Mazzia C., Decaëns T., Nahmani JP., Thénard J., Capowiez Y. 2015. Orchard management influences both functional and taxonomic ground beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) diversity in South-East France. Applied Soil Ecology, 88, 26–31.
  • 26. Holland J.M., Reynolds C J M. 2003. The impact of soil cultivation on arthropod (Coleoptera and Araneae) emergence on arable land. Pedobiologia, 47, 181–191.
  • 27. Jeannel R. 1941. Faune de France, Coléoptères Carabiques. Paul Lechevalier et Fils. 1ere Part., Paris, 1–571.
  • 28. Jeannel R. 1942. Faune de France, Coléoptères Carabiques. Paul Lechevalier et Fils. 2ème Part, Paris, 573–1173.
  • 29. Kromp B. 1999. Carabid beetles in sustainable agriculture: A review on pest control efficacy, cultivation impacts and enhancement. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ, 74, 187–228.
  • 30. Kotze D.J., Assmann T., Noordijk J., Turin H., Vermeulen R. 2011. Carabid Beetles as Bioindicators: Biogeographical, Ecological and Environmental Studies: Proceedings of the XIV European Carabidologists Meeting, Westerbork, 14–18 September, 2009, 573.
  • 31. Larochelle A. 1990. The Food Of Carabid Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Including Cicindelinae. Association des entomologistes amateurs du Quebec, 132.
  • 32. Larochelle A., Larivière M.C. 2003. A Natural History of the Ground-Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of America north of Mexico. Ed. Pensoft, Moscow, 583.
  • 33. Lessel T., Marx MT., and Eisenbeis G. 2011. Effet of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. Zookeys, 100, 421–446.
  • 34. Letourneau D.K., Armbrecht I., Salguero Rivera B., Montoya Lerma J., Jimenez Carmona E., Constanza Daza M. 2011. Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review. Ecol. Appl., 21, 9–21.
  • 35. Lessel T., Marx M.T., Eisenbeis G. 2011. Effet of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. Zookeys, 100, 421–446.
  • 36. Lövei G.L., Sunderland K.D. 1996. Ecology and behavior of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol., 41, 231–256.
  • 37. Lövei G.L., Magura T. 2006. Body size changes in ground beetle assemblages–a reanalysis of Braun et al. (2004)’s data. Ecol. Entomol, 31, 411–414.
  • 38. Luff M.L. 2002. The Carabid assemblage organization and species composition. In: Holland J. M. (ed.). Agroecology of Carabid Beetles, 65.
  • 39. Lindroth C.H., Bangsholt F. 1985. The Carabidae (Coleoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark; Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, Part 1. Brill Archive: Leiden, The Netherlands, 225.
  • 40. Magura T., Tothmeresz B., Bordan Z. 2003. Diversity and composition of carabids during a forestry cycle. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 73–85.
  • 41. MERRA-2. 2016. Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis de la NASA: Météo habituelle à Sidi Kacem Maroc. Weather Spark
  • 42. Melnychuk N.A., Olfert O., Youngs B., Gillott C. 2003. Abundance and diversity of Carabidae (Coleoptera) in different farming systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 95, 69–72.
  • 43. Michael G. 2011. Habitat disturbance and hydrological parameters determine the body size and reproductive strategy of alluvial ground beetles. ZooKeys, 100, 353–370.
  • 44. Mullen K., O’halloran J., Breen J., Giller P., Pithon J., Kelly T. 2008. Distribution and composition of carabid beetle (Coleoptera, Carabidae) communities across the plantation forest cycle-Implications for management. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 624–632.
  • 45. Mulder C., Koricheva J., Huss-Danell K., Högberg P., Joshi J. 1999. Insects affect relationships between plant species richness and ecosystem processes. Ecology letters, 2, 237–246.
  • 46. Nagumanova N.G. 2007. Spatial differentiation of invertebrates in soils of the Transural Steppe Region. Entomological Review, 87(6), 692–700.
  • 47. Nepstad D.C., Moutinho P., Dias-Filho M.B., Davidson E., Cardinot G., Markewitz D., R. Figueiredo R., N. Vianna N., Chambers J., Ray D., Guerreiros J.B.,Lefebvre P., Sternberg L., Moreira M., Barros L., Ishida F.Y., Tohlver I., Belk E., Kalif K., Schwalbe K. 2002. The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes, aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107(D20), 8085.
  • 48. Pakeman R.J., Stockan J.A. 2014. Drivers of carabid functional diversity: abiotic environment, plant functional traits, or plant functional diversity. Ecology, 95(5), 1213–1224.
  • 49. Petremand G. 2015. Pratiques agricoles et biodiversité : impact de l’enherbement viticole sur l’entomofaune auxiliaire (Diptera: Syrphidae, Coleoptera: Carabidae). Maitrise universitaire en Sciences de L’environnement, Université de Genève, 109.
  • 50. Pilskog H., Birkemoe T., Framstad E., SverdrupThygeson A. 2016. Effect of habitat size, quality, and isolation on functional groups of beetles in hollow oaks. Insect Sci. 16, 1–8.
  • 51. Purtauf T., Roschewitz I., Dauber J., Thies C., Tscharntke T., Wolters V. 2005. Landscape context of organic and conventional farms: Influences on carabid beetle diversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 108, 165–174.
  • 52. Purtauf T., Dauber J., Wolters V. 2005. The response of carabids to landscape simplification differs between trophic groups. Oecologia, 142, 458–464.
  • 53. Reiss J., Bailey R.A., Perkins D.M., Pluchinotta A., Woodward G. 2011. Testing effects of consumer richness, evenness and body size on ecosystem functioning. Journal of Animal Ecology, 80, 1145–1154.
  • 54.Ribera I., Doledec S., Downie I.S., Foster G.N. 2001. Effect of land disturbance and stress on species traits of ground beetles assemblages. Ecology, 82, 1112–1129.
  • 55.Rouabah A., Villerd J., Amiaud B., Plantureux S., Lasserre-Joulin F. 2015. Response of carabid beetles diversity and size distribution to the vegetation structure within differently managed field margins. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 200, 21–32.
  • 56. Samu F. 2003. Can small-scale habitat diversification enhance functional diversity of generalist natural enemies in arable systems? Landscape Management for Functional Biodiversity. IOBC WPRS Bulletin, 26, 135–138.
  • 57. Schirmel J., Blindow I., Buchholz S. 2012. Lifehistory trait and functional diversity patterns of ground beetles and spiders along a coastal heathland successional gradient. Basic Applied Ecology, 13, 606–614.
  • 58. Schirmel J., Mantilla-Contreras J., Gauger D., Blindow I. 2014. Carabid beetles as indicators for shrub encroachment in dry grasslands. Ecological Indicators, 49, 76–82.
  • 59. Scherber C., Eisenhauer N., Weisser WW., Schmid B., Voigt W. 2010. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature, 468, 553–556.
  • 60. Šeric J.L., Durbešic P. 2009. Comparison of the body size and wing form of carabid species (Coleoptera: Carabidae) between isolated and continuous forest habitats. Annales de la société entomologique de France, 45(3), 327–338.
  • 61. Siitonen J., Ranius T. 2015. The Importance of Veteran Trees for Saproxylic Insects. In Europe’s Changing Woods and Forests: From Wildwood to Managed Landscapes (eds. Kirby, K. & Watkins, C.) 140–153.
  • 62. Soliveres S., Van Der Plas F., Manning P., Prati, D., Gossner M.M., Renner S.C., Alt F., Arndt H., Baumgartner V., Binkenstein J. 2016. Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature, 536, 456–459.
  • 63. Southwood T. 1977. Habitat, the Templet for Ecological Strategies. Journal of Animal Ecology, 46(2), 337–365.
  • 64. Usseglio P. 1997. Long-term changes in the Ephemeroptera of the river Rhone at Lyon, France, assessed using a fuzzy coding approach. Ephemeroptera & Plecoptera: Biology, Ecology, Systematics. Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Ephemeroptera, Lausanne, Swiss 1995, 227–234.
  • 65. Vannote R.L., Minshall G.W., Cummins K.W., Sedell J.R., Cushing C.E. 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37, 130–137.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-63702178-bbfd-4230-bab6-d55ea64f97ca
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.