PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Komunikacja społeczna oraz zarządzanie konfliktami interpersonalnymi jako metody kształtowania relacji w strukturze organizacyjnej

Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
Social Communications and Interpersonal Conflict Management as the Metods of Shaping Relatings in an Organizational Structure
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
EN
The purpose of communication is to transmit certain information that is necessary in everyday life. Communicating in other words is informing, influencing someone, disclosing our feelings, cooperation. We can distinguish the following elements in the structure of the communication process: message, code, channel of communication, information gap, noise, feedback and reference frame. Sender in a process of communication is a person aware of the need to communicate a particular message. This entity in an organization is a person who has the information. Receiver is a person to whom the message is directed. Communicating is carried out via symbols. Thus decoding is about converting the information into symbols. By decoding the message the receiver tries to read it correctly. Then there is the specific receipt of the message. Another element of the communication process is a channel for transmitting signals from the source of information to the addressee. There is also an information gap in the process of communication. It can be divided into the gap of hope with which the receiver agrees hoping to receive more information in order to eliminate it, and the gap of disagreement that is the difference in the content of the information the receiver does not agree with. The last element is feedback. This is nothing but a Receiver’s reaction to the Senders message. In case when there is no feedback, we deal with informing. Feedback is a prerequisite for effective communication. The process of communication is one of the elements forming the relations in the group in the frame of organizational structure. Managing such a group has many advantages provided that it is well-considered and efficiently done. Similarly to the individual relations, the group relations may have a formal nature, for example in order to implement a certain action, or an informal nature, basing on the actual shared interests of its members. We can also deal with a conflict in an organization. It occurs when an individual or a group seeks to achieve a certain goal, while the other individual or group tries to prevent it. In classical terms a conflict in the workplace is a discrepancy of the purposes, values and benefits. Interpersonal conflict is experienced by everyone when their beliefs and values are incompatible with each other, or when too much information hinders them to make a decision. Those conflicts additionally make it harder to make even the simplest of decisions. Work environment is often characterised by different kinds of destructive conflicts, which have negative consequences. They include: decrease in self-esteem, deterioration of physical and psychological welfare, as well as loss of confidence. Intensification of difficulties in the action largely depends on the nature of the conflict, its significance and duration. The course of the conflict largely depends on the individual character traits of the people involved. Only few people are able to react without emotion to the conflict. Most, however, is frustrated when there is an obstacle while they pursue the objective, the identification of the conflict, examining its sources and destructive influence on an individual or a group allow taking steps in order to restrict or suppress it. the conflict may be resolved successfully only when both Parties feel encouraged to do so. The belief of one Party that it is not responsible for the present situation and that the effort should be made by the other Party may be the reason for the lack of motivation to reconcile. Also the belief that it may cause losses may be the reason for hindering changes. That is why one of the basis to terminate a conflict is to understand that a long-term conflict entails a mutual loss in the form of huge energy resources which instead of in work are used in continuous fights.
Rocznik
Strony
241--252
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 17 poz., schem.
Twórcy
autor
  • Uniwersytet Humanistyczno-Przyrodniczy J. Kochanowskiego w Kielcach, SKN Koncept
Bibliografia
  • [1] Błaszczyk W., Metody organizacji i zarządzania. Kształtowanie relacji organizacyjnych, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2005.
  • [2] Borkowski J., O konflikcie i negocjacjach, WSISiZ, Warszawa 2000.
  • [3] Bugdol M., Gry i zachowania nieetyczne w organizacji, Difin, Warszawa 2007.
  • [4] Drozdowicz J., Społeczne problemy kierowania ludźmi w zakładach pracy, PWE, Warszawa 1973.
  • [5] Edelmann R.J., Konflikty w pracy, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 2003.
  • [6] Griffin R.W., Podstawy zarządzania organizacjami, PWN, Warszawa 1996.
  • [7] Gros U., Analiza systemu porozumiewania się w organizacji, „Przegląd Organizacji” 1993, nr 3.
  • [8] Gros U., Organizacyjne aspekty zachowania się ludzi w procesach pracy, „Prace Naukowe” nr 131, Akademia Ekonomiczna w Katowicach, Katowice 1994.
  • [9] Mckay M., Davis M., Fanning P., Sztuka skutecznego porozumiewania się, GWP, Gdańsk 2002.
  • [10] Katz D., Kahn R., Społeczna psychologia organizacji, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 1979.
  • [11] Kożusznik B., Zachowania człowieka w organizacji, Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa 2002.
  • [12] Piotrowski K., Organizacja i zarządzanie, Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomiczna, Warszawa 2006.
  • [13] Potocki A., Komunikacja wewnętrzna w przedsiębiorstwie, Wydawnictwo AE w Krakowie, Kraków 2001.
  • [14] Pszczołowski T., Mała encyklopedia prakseologii i teorii organizacji, Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wrocław 1978.
  • [15] Stewart J., Mosty zamiast murów. O komunikowaniu się między ludźmi, Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2002.
  • [16] Stoner J.A.F., Wankel Ch., Kierowanie, PWE, Warszawa 1992.
  • [17] Szewczuk W., Słownik psychologiczny, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-636700c9-2d08-4a66-9250-1b6c9523e525
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.