Rural development programme in Poland, the Czech Republic and Austria

• Autorzy: Dudzińska M. , Kocur-Bera K.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15576/GLL/2014.4.49

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

For several reasons, rural areas in Poland developed much more slowly than urban areas, and to a large extent, they have been neglected. The situation was much improved ater Poland’s accession to the EU, with continuous flow of funds for the development of agriculture. These actions facilitated faster development of such areas, while the structure of the latter has improved. The current instrument for the implementation of the EU policy for rural areas, operating within the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy, is the Rural Development Programme for the years 2007–2013 (RDP 2007–2013). The present document contains a comparative analysis of the Rural Development Programme 2007–2013 as implemented within three states, namely: Poland, Austria, and the Czech Republic. General conditions and limits to the granted financial assistance have been determined in the EU regulations, therefore they can not differ between Poland, the Czech Republic, and Austria. What differs, however, is the projects and investment tasks implemented within particular measures. In the article, the aforementioned countries have been compared in terms of rural areas, and in terms of measures implemented within the Rural Development Programme in each of them. It has been noted that there have been 44 measures implemented within the Rural Development Programme 2007–2013, while only 19 of these are implemented within thematic axis 2 – improving the environment and countryside. Poland is implementing 26 measures in total, the Czech Republic is implementing 32, and Austria – 31. The highest amount of financing per country’s area went to Austria, and the lowest – to the Czech Republic. The Czech Republic possesses the most favourable structure of the rural areas, while Poland possesses the least favourable structure thereof. In the present work, the method of logical and descriptive analysis was employed, based on the Polish and international subject literature.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

rural areas; European Union; financing

PL

obszary wiejskie; Unia Europejska; finansowanie

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rolniczego w Krakowie
• Czasopismo: Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: no. 4
• Strony: 49--64
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Dudzińska M.

• Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie Katedra Katastru i Zarządzania Przestrzenią 10-724 Olsztyn, ul. Prawocheńskiego 15

autor

Kocur-Bera K.

• Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie Katedra Katastru i Zarządzania Przestrzenią 10-724 Olsztyn, ul. Prawocheńskiego 15

Bibliografia

• Apanowicz J. 2000. Metodologiczne elementy procesu poznania naukowego w teorii, organizacji i zarządzania. Gdynia,Wydawnictwo Diecezji Pelplińskiej.
• Dudzińska M. Kocur-Bera K. 2013. Rural areas in Poland, Austria And Czech Republic – comparative analysis. Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas Nr 1/IV/2013, Kraków, 71–83.
• Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament– Employment in rural areas: closing the jobs gap. 2006. Council Of The European Union, Bruksela, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/reports/ruralemployment/sec1772_en.pdf (accessed: 26 April 2013).
• Council Regulation (EC) no. 1698/2005 of 20 September 2005 on supporting the development of rural areas by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (Dz. U. L 277, 21/10/2005), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32005R16 98&from=EN (accessed: 26 April 2013).
• Evaluierungsbericht 2010. Halbzeitbewertung des Österreichischen Programms für die Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums. 2010. Lebensministerium, Wien.
• http://www.ktn.gv.at/213180_DE-Texte-Halbzeitevaluierung_ELER_Teil_1.pdf (accessed: 14 February 2013).
• Europa. How the EU works. Countries. Chech Republic, http://europa.eu/about-eu/countries/member-countries/czechrepublic/index_en.htm (accessed: 2 March 2013).
• National Strategic Plan For 2007–2013 Rural Development. 2007. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Warszawa, https://www.minrol.gov.pl/eng/content/download/23128/121679/version/2/file/KPS_2007–2013_lipiec_EN.pdf (accessed: 2 March 2013).
• Průběžné hodnocení programu rozvoje venkova ČR za období 2007–2013. Zpráva o střednědobém hodnocení. 2010. Sdružení DHV CR spol. s r.o. & TIMA Liberec s.r.o., Liberec, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rurdev/countries/cs/mte-rep-cz_cs.pdf (accessed: 14 February 2013).
• Przegląd polityki rozwoju obszarów wiejskich, Osie i Działania, 2013, http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/ enrd-static/policy-in-action/rural-development-policy-overview/national-and-regional-programmes/pl/national-and-regional-programmes_pl.html (accessed: 2 March 2013).
• Przegląd unijnych programów rozwoju obszarów wiejskich na lata 2007–2013. Review of the EU rural development programs for the period 2007 – 2013. 2010. Ministerstwo Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Wsi, Warszawa, http://www.minrol.gov.pl/pol/Wsparcie-rolnictwa-i-rybolowstwa/PROW–2007–2013/Dokumenty-analizy-raporty/Analizy-i-raporty (accessed: 13 February 2013).
• Rocznik Statystyczny Rolnictwa. 2011. Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa, http://www.stat. gov.pl/cps/rde/xbcr/gus/rs_rocznik_rolnictwa_2011.pdf (accessed: 16 January 2013).
• Rural Development in the European Union. 2011. Statistical and economic information. Report. Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Union, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/statistics/rural-development/2011/full-text_en.pdf (accessed: 26 April 2013).
• Polityka UE w zakresie rozwoju obszarów wiejskich na lata 2007–2013. 2008. Komisja Europejska Dyrekcja Generalna Rolnictwa i Rozwoju Obszarów Wiejskich. Wspólnota Europejska. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/fact/rurdev2007/2007_pl.pdf (accessed: 26 April 2014).