Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Habitat heterogeneity and fine-scale environmental gradients are key drivers of plant biodiversity in mosaic landscapes. I examined how small-scale habitat structure and neighbouring land use influence plant communities within meadow plots bordered by forest, shrubland, fallow land, or orchard. Using a nested quadrat design (1 m2, 5 m2, 25 m2), I assessed species richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity, and environmental conditions at multiple spatial scales. Plots adjacent to structurally complex habitats (forest or shrubland) supported higher species diversity (Shannon), whereas species richness increased mainly with quadrat size and showed mixed patterns among plots. Smaller quadrats also captured greater fine-scale variation, particularly in vegetation structure and species turnover, while microclimatic gradients in light and soil moisture strongly influenced diversity patterns. Moist, partially shaded plots supported the highest diversity, whereas open, high-light sites were dominated by a few heliophilous species. Among Ellenberg indicators, soil moisture values showed the strongest positive relationship with diversity, while other factors remained relatively stable; only fertility values declined slightly between years. These findings demonstrate that even in very small patches, subtle within-plot gradients can function as fine-scale analogues of habitat transition zones. Conserving structurally heterogeneous habitats and the fine-scale gradients they generate is crucial for maintaining species-rich and functionally diverse plant communities in fragmented landscapes.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
1--20
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 18 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Institute of Soil Science, Engineering and Environmental Management, University of Life Science in Lublin, Leszczyńskiego 7, 20-069 Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
- 1. Benton T.G., Vickery J.A., Wilson J. D. 2003 – Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? – Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(4): 182–188.
- 2. Billeter R., Liira J., Bailey D., Bugter R., Arens P., Augenstein I., Aviron S., Baudry J., Bukacek R., Burel F., Cerny M., De Blust G., De Cock R., Diekötter T., Dietz H., Dirk-sen J., Dormann C., Durka W., Frenzel M., Hamersky R., Hendrickx F., Herzog F., Klotz S., Koolstra B., Lausch A., Le Coeur D., Maelfait J.P., Opdam P., Roubalova M., Schermann A., Schermann N., Schmidt T., Schweiger O., Smulders M.J.M., Speelmans M., Simova P., Verboom J., Van Wingerden W.K.R.E., Zobel M., Edwards P.J. 2008 – Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study – Journal of Applied Ecology, 45: 141–150.
- 3. Bobbink R., Willems J.H. 1987 – Increasing dominance of Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) Beauv. in chalk grasslands: a threat to a species-rich ecosystem – Biological Conservation, 40(4): 301–314.
- 4. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W., Paulißen D. 1992 – Zeigerwerte von pflanzen in Mitteleuropa 18: 1–248.
- 5. Fahrig L. 2003 – Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity – Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 34(1): 487–515.
- 6. Fahrig L. 2013 – Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis – Journal of Biogeography, 40(9): 1649–1663.
- 7. Foster B.L., Tilman D. 2000 – Dynamic and static views of succession: testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach – Plant Ecology, 146: 1–10.
- 8. Haddad N.M., Brudvig L.A., Clobert J., Davies K.F., Gonzalez A., Holt R.D., Love-joy T.E., Sexton J. O., Austin M.P., Collins C.D., Cook W.M., Damschen E.I., Ewers R.M., Foster B. L., Jenkins C.N., King A.J., Laurance W. F., Levey D.J., Margules C. R., Melbourne B.A., Nicholls A.O., Orrock J.L., Song D., Townshend J.R. 2015 – Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth's ecosystems – Science Advances, 1(2): e1500052.
- 9. Haddad N.M., Tewksbury J.J. 2005 – Low-quality habitat corridors as movement conduits for two butterfly species – Ecological Applications, 15(1): 250–257.
- 10. Honnay O., Hermy M., Coppin A.P. 1999 – Effects of area, age and diversity of forest patches in Belgium on plant species richness, and implications for conservation and reforestation – Biological Conservation, 87(1): 73–84.
- 11. Laurance W.F., Nascimento H.E., Laurance S.G., Andrade A., Ewers R.M., Harms K.E., Luizão R.C.C., Ribeiro J.E. 2007 – Habitat fragmentation, variable edge effects, and the landscape-divergence hypothesis – PLoS One, 2(10): e1017.
- 12. Lindborg R., Eriksson O. 2004 – Effects of restoration on plant species richness and composition in Scandinavian semi-natural grasslands – Restoration Ecology, 12(3): 318–326.
- 13. Murcia C. 1995 – Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation – Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 10(2): 58–62.
- 14. Ries L., Fletcher Jr R.J., Battin J., Sisk T.D. 2004 – Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained – Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35(1): 491–522.
- 15. Silvertown J., Araya Y., Gowing D. 2015 – Hydrological niches in terrestrial plant communities: a review – Journal of Ecology, 103(1): 93–108.
- 16. Tokarska-Guzik B., Dajdok Z., Zając M., Zając A., Urbisz A., Danielewicz W., Hołdyński C. 2012 – [Alien plants in Poland with particular reference to invasive species] – Generalna Dyrekcja Ochrony Środowiska, Warszawa. (in Polish with English summary)
- 17. Tscharntke T., Tylianakis J.M., Rand T.A., Didham R.K., Fahrig L., Batáry P., Bengtsson J., Clough Y., Crist T.O., Dormann C.F., Ewers R.M., Fründ J., Holt R.D., Holzschuh A., Klein A.M., Kleijn D., Kremen C., Landis D.A., Laurance W., Lindenmayer D., Scherber C., Sodhi N., Steffan-Dewenter I., Thies C., van der Putten W.H., Westphal C. 2012 – Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes-eight hypotheses – Biological Reviews, 87(3): 661–685.
- 18. Wardle D.A., Bardgett R.D., Klironomos J.N., Setälä H., van der Putten W. H., Wall D.H. 2004 – Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota – Science, 304(5677): 1629–1633.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-633c9fac-fd5f-4616-b2bb-491681adf2c2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.