PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Agroecological Assessment of Soybean Varieties under the Conditions of the Right Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Agroecological testing of soybean varieties of domestic and foreign selection was carried out during 2020-2022 on the experimental field Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS, which is located in the zone of the right-bank forest-steppe of Ukraine. The subject of research was domestic soybean varieties (Diadema Podillia, Tytan, Kobuko, Monada, Triada (Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS); Vorskla, Lehenda (National Research Center “Institute of Agriculture of the National Academy of Sciences”) and foreign (Merlin, Kardiff, Kent, Padua (SAATBAU LINZ eGen); Kioto, Kordoba, Briunensis (Semences Prograin Ink.); Senator, Alihator (Euralis Semences); Sultana (RAGT Semences) selection. All soybean varieties studied during 2020‒2022 were entered into the State Register of plant varieties suitable for distribution in Ukraine. The maximum seed yield in the zone of the right-bank forest-steppe of Ukraine was recorded in the following varieties: Triada (3.41 t/ha), Kioto (3.29 t/ha), Alihator (3.25 t/ha), Kobuko (3.19 t/ha), Monada (3.15 t/ha), Kardiff (3.06 t/ha) and Tytan (3.05 t/ha). According to the results of the analysis of the mass of 1000 seeds, its highest indicators were noted in soybean varieties: Tytan–194 g, Alihator–192 g, Kent–193 g, Sultana–200 g. According to the results of the biochemical analysis of soybean seeds, it was found that most of the studied varieties provided the content crude protein is more than 40%, while the Merlin, Alihator, Triada, Cardiff and Kent varieties had a crude protein content of 37.1-39.1%. The obtained results of the content of amino acids in soybean seeds show more noticeable indicators in the Tytan soybean variety. Thus, on the basis of a comprehensive approach to soybean productivity indicators, such varieties of domestic selection as Tytan and Kobuko, as well as foreign selection of Kioto, are recommended for agricultural production in the areas of seed production, animal feed and raw material in the selection process.
Rocznik
Strony
60--69
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 37 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS, Av. Yunosti. 16, 21021 Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS, Av. Yunosti. 16, 21021 Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS, Av. Yunosti. 16, 21021 Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS, Av. Yunosti. 16, 21021 Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS, Av. Yunosti. 16, 21021 Vinnytsia, Ukraine
  • Institute of Feed Research and Agriculture of Podillya of NAAS, Av. Yunosti. 16, 21021 Vinnytsia, Ukraine
Bibliografia
  • 1. Alpert P, Simms E. 2002. The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust. Evol Ecol, 16, 285297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019684612767
  • 2. Babich, A.O., Petrychenko, V.F., Kulyk, M.F., periments on fodder production and animal feeding. Kyiv: Agrarian Science, 78.
  • 3. Bakhmat M., Padalko T., Krachan T., Tkach O., Pantsyreva H., Tkach L. 2023. Formation of the Yield of Matricaria recutita and Indicators of Food Value of Sychorium intybus by Technological Methods of Co-Cultivation in the Interrows of an Orchard. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 24(8), 250–259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/166553
  • 4. Bondarenko V., Havrylianchik R., Ovcharuk O., Pantsyreva H., Krusheknyckiy V., Tkach O., Niemec M. 2022. Features of the soybean photosynthetic productivity indicators formation depending on the foliar nutrition. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 28, 20–26. https://doi.org/10.53550/EEC.2022.v28i04s.004.
  • 5. Brzozowska A., Dacko M., Kalinichenko A., Petrychenko V.F., Tokovenko I.P. 2018. Phytoplasmosis of bioenergy cultures. Mikrobiolohichnyi Zhurnal. 80(4), 108–127.
  • 6. Petrychenko V., Petrychenko O., Fedoryshyna L., Kravchuk O., Korniichuk O., Nitsenko V. Agricultural production in Ukraine: ecological challenges and impact on the quality of life. Financial And Credit Activity-problems Of Theory And Practice. 2022. 4(45), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.4.45.2022.3782
  • 7. Callahan H., Dhanoolal N., Ungerer M. 2005. Plasticity genes and plasticity costs: a new approach using an Arabidopsis recombinant inbred population. New Phytol, 166, 129–139. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01368.x).
  • 8. Chernyshenko P.V. 2014. Characterization of soybean varieties in terms of ecological plasticity of yield and seed quality in the conditions of the eastern forest-steppe of Ukraine. Taurian Scientific Bulletin, 87, 96–99.
  • 9. Didur I., Сhynchyk O., Pantsyreva H., Olifirovych S., Olifirovych V., Tkachuk O. 2021. Effect of fertilizers for Phaseolus vulgaris L. productivity in Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology. 11(1), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.15421/2021_61
  • 10. Dimitrov V.G. 2017. Evaluation of the stability and plasticity of the main economic and valuable traits of mid-early soybean varieties. Scientific reports of NUBiP of Ukraine, 4, 12
  • 11. Dubik V., Kamishlov V., Tkach O., Horbovy O., Mazur V., Kupchuk I., Pantsyreva H., Alieksieieva O. 2024. Analysis and calculation of the dynamic voltage reserve of the converter when working under load in systems of subject regulation by electric drives of direct current. Przeglad Elektrotechniczny, 100(5), 117–123.
  • 12. Eberhart S.A., Russell W.A. 1966. Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties. Crop Sci., 6(1), 36–40.
  • 13. Hetman, N., Veklenko, Yu., Petrychenko, V., Korniichuk, O., Buhaiov, V. 2024. Agrobiological substantiation of growing Hungarian vetch in mixed crops. Scientific Horizons, 27(4), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor4.2024.61
  • 14. Hnatiuk T.T., Zhitkevich N.V., Petrychenko V.F., Kalinichenko A.V., Patyka V.P. 2019. Soybean Diseases Caused by Genus Pseudomonas Phytopathenes Bacteria. Mikrobiol. Z., 81(3), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.15407/microbiolj81.03.068
  • 15. Honcharuk I., Matusyak M., Pantsyreva H., Kupchuk I., Prokopchuk V., Telekalo N. 2022. Peculiarities of reproduction of pinus Nigra arn. in Ukraine. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov. Series II: Forestry, Wood Industry, Agricultural Food Engineering, 15(64), 1, 33–42. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.fwiafe.2022.15.64.1.3
  • 16. Mazur V., Didur І., Tkachuk О., Pantsyreva Н., Ovcharuk V. 2021. Agroecological stability of cultivars of sparsely distributed legumes in the context of climate change. Scientific Horizons, 24(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.48077/scihor.24(1).2021.54-60
  • 17. Mazur V., Tkachuk O., Pantsyreva H., Demchuk O. 2021. Quality of pea seeds and agroecological condition of soil when using structured water. Scientific Horizons, 24(7), 53–60. https://10.0.187.205/scihor.24(7).2021.53-60
  • 18. Mazur V.A., Mazur K.V., Pantsyreva G.V. 2022. Production and export of grain and leguminous crops under martial law. Agriculture and forestry, 3(26), 6676. https://doi.org/10.37128/2707-5826-2022-3-5
  • 19. Mazur V.A., Pantsyreva H.V., Mazur K.V., Didur I.M. 2019. Influence of the assimilation apparatus and productivity of white lupine plants. Agronomy Research, 17(1), 206–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.15159/ar.19.024
  • 20. Moiseichenko V.F., Yeschenkou V.O. 1994. Fundamentals of scientific research in agronomy. K.: Higher school, 334.
  • 21. Pantsyreva H., Vovk V., Bronnicova L., Zabarna T. 2023. Efficiency of the use of lawn grasses for biology and soil conservation of agricultural systems under the conditions of the Ukraine’s Podillia. Journal of Ecological Engineering. 24(11), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/171649
  • 22. Patyka, V.P., Petrychenko, V.F. 2004. Microbial nitrogen fixation in modern fodder production. Fodder and fodder production, 53, 3–11.
  • 23. Petrichenko V., Zadorozhnyi V., Kornyichuk O., Borona V. 2012. Effect of soil tillage and herbicides on the grain maize yield under conditions of the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine. Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency, 80–85.
  • 24. Petrychenko V., Korniychuk O., Lykhochvor V., Kobak S., Pantsyrev O. Study of sowing quality of soybean seeds depending on pre-sowing treatment of seed. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(7), 33323399. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/188932
  • 25. Petrychenko V., Tarariko O., Syrotenko O. 2014. Space technologies in agri-environmental monitoring system. Agricultural Science and Practice, 1(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp1.01.003
  • 26. Petrychenko V.F., Ivanyuk S.V. 2000. The influence of varietal and hydrothermal resources on the formation of soybean productivity in the conditions of the forest-steppe. ZNP of the Institute of Agriculture of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, 3(4), 19–24.
  • 27. Petrychenko V.F., Kobak S.Ya., Chorna V.M., Kolisnyk S.I., Likhochvor V.V., Pyda S.V. 2018. Formation of the nitrogen-fixing potential and productivity of Soybean varieties selected at the Institute of Feeds and Agriculture of Podillia of NAAS. Mikrobiol. Z., 80(5), 63–75.
  • 28. Petrychenko V.F., Kolisnyk S.I., Kobak S.Ya., Panasyuk O.Ya., Kushnir M.V. 2013. Evaluation of technological methods of soybean cultivation in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest Steppe. Herald of Agrarian Science. 13, 57–62
  • 29. Petrychenko V.F., Korniychuk O.V. 2012. Strategy for the development of fodder production in Ukraine. Fodder and fodder production, 73, 3–10.
  • 30. Petrychenko V.F., Kots S.Y. 2014. Symbiotic systems in modern agricultural production. Bulletin of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. No. 3, 57–66.
  • 31. Petrychenko V.F., Lykhochvor V.V., Ivanyuk S.V., Korniychuk O.V., Kolisnyk S.I., Kobak S.Y. 2016. Soya: A monograph. Vinnytsia: Windruk, 400.
  • 32. Petrychenko, V., Korniychuk, O., Voronetska, I. 2018. Biological farming in conditions of transformational changes in the agrarian production of Ukraine. Agricultural Science and Practice, 5(2), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.15407/agrisp5.02.003
  • 33. Prysiazhnyuk L.M., Shcherbynin N.P., Shayuk L.V. 2005. Assessment of the plasticity and stability of new soybean varieties in different soil and climatic zones. Scientific reports of the NUBiP of Ukraine, 8, 57.
  • 34. Puyu V., Bakhmat M., Pantsyreva H., Khmelianchyshyn Y., Stepanchenko V., Bakhmat O. 2021. Social-and-Ecological Aspects of Forage Production Reform in Ukraine in the Early 21st Century. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(1), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021. v10n1p221
  • 35. Tkachuk O., Pantsyreva H., Kupchuk I., Volynets Y. 2024. Soybean productivity in the Forest-Steppe of Ukraine under ecologization of’ cultivation technology. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 25(5), 279293. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/186494
  • 36. Tsytsiura T.V., Temchenko I.V., Barvinchenko S.V. 2021. Assessment of plasticity and stability of seed quality indicators of soybean varieties of different ecological and geographical origin. Fodder and fodder production, 92, 104–115.
  • 37. Zhou, C.Y., Zhao, S.S., Yang, X., Liu, Z. 2019. Improvement of eco-ester materials on sandy soils and engineering slope protection. Rock Soil Mech, 40, 4828–4837.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-630d2758-3f0f-4212-b57f-22fabd8efd78
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.