Influence of global security environment on collective security and defence science

• Autorzy: Mitrovic Miroslav

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35467/sdq/106088

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Globalisation is a phenomenon which influences every aspect of contemporary life. Neo-liberal ideas lead to the multifunctional interdependence of geopolitics, the political economy, international relations, security, and defence issues. In the globalised world, many issues can be raised: Where are the roots of modern conflict? Who are the stakeholders in international relations? What are the dominant forms of contemporary conflicts? Do the forms of collective security fulfill the legitimacy of objectivity? What are the new challenges for modern defence science? Through the multidisciplinary approach, based on academic literature, as well scholars research papers, this work aims to contribute to the clarifying a rational approach to modern defence science in the contemporary, global security environment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

globalisation; defence science; international relations; global security; hybrid warfare; asymmetric threats

• Wydawca: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej
• Czasopismo: Security and Defence Quarterly
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 24, No. 2
• Strony: 5--20
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 52 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Mitrovic Miroslav

• Strategic Research Institute, University of Defence, Republic of Serbia

Bibliografia

• 1. Arquilla, J., and Ronfeldt, D., 2001. Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
• 2. Čaušević, F., 2017. A Study into Financial Globalization, Economic Growth and (In)Equality. Palgrave Macmillan.
• 3. Cazdyn, E., and Szeman, I., 2011. After Globalization. Blackwell Publishing.
• 4. Cebrowski, A., and Garstka J., 1998. Network - Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future. U.S. Naval Institute.
• 5. Cox, R.W., 1996. Perspective of Globalization. In: Mittelman, J.H., ed., Globalization-critical reflections. London: Lynne Rienner Publisher.
• 6. Cull, N. 2006. Public Diplomacy Before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. [online]. USC Center on Public Diplomacy. Available from https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org... [Accessed 14 May 2017].
• 7. Curran, G., 2007. 21st Century Dissent Anarchism, Anti-Globalization and Environmentalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• 8. Darius, M., 2014. Iraq and Syria are Burning, ‘Constructive Chaos’ and America’s Broader Strategy to Conquer Eurasia [online]. GlobalResearch.ca. Available from https://www.globalresearch.ca/... [Accessed 15 Mar 2019].
• 9. DOA - Department of the Army, 2008. Field Manual No. 3-0: Operations. Washington, DC.
• 10. Edmunds, T. and Malešič, M., 2005. Defence Transformation in Europe: Evolving Military Roles. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
• 11. Fraile, L., 2010. Blunting Neoliberalism Tripartism and Economic Reforms in the Developing World. Palgrave Macmillan.
• 12. Goncalves, M., Alves, J., Frota, C., Xia, H., and Arcot, R., 2014. Advanced Economies and Emerging Markets: Prospects for Globalization. New York: Business Expert Press.
• 13. Hart, L., 1954.The Strategy of Indirect Approach. Internet Archive. National War College.
• 14. Hewson, M.M. and Sincler, T.J., 1999. The Emergency of Global Governance Theory. In Hewson, M.M., and Sincler, T.J., eds, Approach to Global Governance Theory. New York: State University of New York Press.
• 15. Hoffman., F., G., 2016. On Not-So-New Warfare: Political Warfare vs. Hybrid Threats. [online]. War on The Rocks. Available from: http://warontherocks.com/2014/... hybridthreats [Accessed 15 Mar 2019].
• 16. Hofman., F., G., 2007. Conflict in the 21st Century-The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.
• 17. Huntington, S.P., 1996. The Clash of Civilization-Remaking of World Order. Simon&Schuster.
• 18. Kofman, M., Rojansky, M., 2015. A Closer look at Russia’s ‘Hybrid War’, Kennan Cable No. 7, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
• 19. Korybko, A., 2015. Hybrid Wars: the indirect adaptive approach to regime change. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia.
• 20. Lambakis, S., Kiras, J., and Kolet, K., 2002. Understanding ‘Asymmetric’ Threats to the United States. Fairfax: National Institute for Public Policy.
• 21. Lamborn, A.C.,1998. Theoretical and Historical Perspectives on Collective Security. In Lepgold, J.,and Weiss, T.G., 1998. Collective Confl ict Management and Changing World Politics. New York: State University of New York.
• 22. Lepgold, J.,and Weiss, T.G., ed. Collective Conflict Management and Changing World Politics. New York: State University of New York.
• 23. Lind, W., Nightengale, K., Schmitt, J., Sutton, J., Wilson, G., 1989. The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation. Marine Corps Gazette.
• 24. Lucarelli, S., 2002. Peace and Democracy: The Rediscovered Link The EU, NATO and the European System of Liberal-Democratic Security Communities, European University Institute: NATO Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council Individual Research Fellowships – 2000-2002.
• 25. Mann, S., 1992. Chaos Theory and Strategic Thought. Parameters.
• 26. Marc, A., 2016. Conflict and violence in the 21st century [online]. United Nations. Available from: https://www.un.org/pga/70/wp-c... [Accessed 30 Jun 2017].
• 27. Mitrović, M., 2017a. Hybrid warfare and asymmetric security threats. Vojno delo, Belgrade, 5.
• 28. Mitrović, M., 2017b. The economic and energy aspects of a hybrid threat to national security. Vojno delo, Belgrade, 6.
• 29. Mitrović, M., 2017c. Savremeni izazovi upravljanja nacionalnom bezbednošću u hibridnom bezbednosnom okruženju [Contemporary challenges of Management with National Security in Hybrid Security environment], Conference Proceedings–Economics and Management: Globalization Challenges, Conference EMAN 2017, Ljubljana, 716-721.
• 30. Mitrović, M., 2018 (in print). Critical National Infrastructure in the scope of Asymmetric Security Threats involved in Hybrid Warfare Concept. Asymmetry and Strategy. Belgrade: Strategic Research Institute.
• 31. Mittelman, J.H., 1996. The Dynamics of Globalization. In: Mittelman, J.H., ed., Globalization-critical reflections. London: Lynne Rienner Publisher.
• 32. Moss, B., ed. 2005. Monetary Union in Crisis - The European Union as a Neo-liberal Construction. Palgrave Macmillan.
• 33. Niezen, R., 2004. A World Beyond Diff erence Cultural Identity in the Age of Globalization, Blackwell Publishing.
• 34. Nye, J., 1990. The misleading metaphor of decline. The Atlantic Monthly. March.
• 35. Nye, J., 2006. Understanding International Confl icts. Belgrade: Stubovi culture.
• 36. Renz, B., Smith, H., 2016. Russia And Hybrid Warfare –Going Beyond The Label, [online]. Finnish Prime Minister’s Office, Government’s analysis. Available from https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/175291/renz_smith_russia_and_hybrid_warfare.pdf?sequence=1 [Accessed 15 March 2019].
• 37. Rosenau, J.N., 1990. Turbulence in World Politics. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
• 38. Rosenau, J.N., 1995a. Distant Proximities: Dynamics and Dialectics of Globalization. In: Hettne, B., ed. International Political Economy: Understanding Global Disorder. London: Zed.
• 39. Rosenau, J.N., 1995b. Governance to the Twenty-first Century. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organisations 1, 13-43.
• 40. Shahskov, S., 2011. The theory of ‘manageable chaos’ put into practice. Strategic Culture Foundation, 1 Mar. 2011.
• 41. Sharma, S., 2008. Achieving Economic Development in the Era of Globalization. New York: Routledge.
• 42. Springborg, R., ed. 2009. Development Models in Muslim Contexts: Chinese, “Islamic” and Neo-Liberal Alternatives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• 43. Stenning, A., Smith, A., Rochovská, A., and Swiatek, D., 2010. Domesticating Neo-Liberalism: Spaces of Economic Practice and Social Reproduction in Post-Socialist Cities. Blackwell Publishing.
• 44. Suranovic, S., 2010. A Moderate Compromise Economic Policy Choice in an Era of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan.
• 45. Turner, R., 2008. Neo-Liberal Ideology History, Concepts and Policies. Edinburgh University Press.
• 46. Tzu, S., 2000. Art of War- Chapter 3: Attack by Stratagem. Leicester: Allandale.
• 47. Vračar, M., 2017. Theoretical-epistemological approach in the study of the “Hybrid Warfare”. Vojno delo, Beograd, 7/2017.
• 48. Wunderlich, J., and Warrier, M., 2010. A Dictionary of Globalization. London: Routledge.
• 49. Ivaniš, Ž., Mitrović, M. and Mledenović, M., 2015. Conflict resolution on Western Balkans by Negotiation In Collection of paper 7 th International Congress „Ecology, health, work, sport, Banja Luka, 287-296.
• 50. Pečujlić, M., 2002. Globalization-Two Worlds. Belgrade: Gutembergova galskija.
• 51. President of Russian Federation 2010. Military Doctrine of Russian Federation. Moscow.
• 52. President of Russian Federation 2014. Military Doctrine of Russian Federation [online]. Available from: http://www.consultant.ru/docum... [Accessed 15 Mar 2019].

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).