Detection of capillary moisture in a ceramic brick wall using coupled chilled mirror and conductometric method

• Autorzy: Pluta Kamil , Olszewska-Patuszak Dagmara , Tabiś Krzysztof , Suchorab Zbigniew

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/205357

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The salt that appears with dampness is the reason why many non-invasive dampness detection methods are ineffective. This requires resorting to invasive methods, which naturally limits the possibilities of performing building diagnostics. The results from these methods are often not available at the time of testing, as they require specialist laboratory tests. Combining the conductometric detection method with the chilled mirror psychrometer would allow for obtaining qualitative data on the state of dampness. These results would be available at the testing site during the inspection of the building. This would provide valuable data for diagnostics, as well as allow for better optimization of other tests in the form of more optimal selection of samples for testing using other research methods. The obtained mutual correlation of both methods at different levels of dampness is a justification for further research.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

soil water potential; pF; matric force; sorption force; salinity; dump; capillary state

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology ; Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin
• Czasopismo: Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
• Rocznik: 2025
• Tom: Vol. 19, no. 8
• Strony: 467--478
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Pluta Kamil

• Aquapol Poland CPV Research Laboratory Krzysztof Tabiś, ul. Stefana Żeromskiego 12, 58-316 Świebodzice, Poland

autor

Olszewska-Patuszak Dagmara

• Aquapol Poland CPV Research Laboratory Krzysztof Tabiś, ul. Stefana Żeromskiego 12, 58-316 Świebodzice, Poland

autor

Tabiś Krzysztof

• Aquapol Poland CPV Research Laboratory Krzysztof Tabiś, ul. Stefana Żeromskiego 12, 58-316 Świebodzice, Poland

autor

Suchorab Zbigniew

• Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Energy, Lublin University of Technology, ul. Nadbystrzycka 40B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8658-864X

Bibliografia

• 1. Pogorzelski J. A. Zagadnienie cieplno-wilgotnościowe przegród budowlanych. W: Klemmen P. (red.). Budownictwo ogólne. Fizyka budowli, tom 2. Arkady, Warszawa; 2006: 103–364.
• 2. Charola A. E., Wender E. An overview of the water-porous building materials interactions. Restoration of Buildings and Monuments. 2015; 21(2–3): 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1515/rbm-2015-0006
• 3. Tyszkiewicz Z. E., Czybaszek R., Roj-Rojewski S. Podstawowe metody laboratoryjnej analizy gleby. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Białostockiej; 2019: 1–70. https://pb.edu.pl/oficyna-wydawnicza/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/05/Z.-E.-Tyszkiewicz-R.-Czubaszek-R.-Roj-Rojewski-Podstawowe-metody-laboratoryjnej-analizy-gleby.pdf
• 4. EN 16682:2017. Conservation of cultural heritage − Methods of measurement of moisture content, or water content, in materials constituting immovable cultural heritage. British Standards Institution. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/conservation-of-cultural-heritage
• 5. Rolnick L. S. The stability of gypsum and anhydrite in the geologic environment. PhD thesis, MIT; 1954: 1–156. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/59630
• 6. ISO 12570:2000. Hydrothermal performance of building materials and products – Determination of moisture content by drying at elevated temperature. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/2444.html
• 7. Li Y., Hu J., Bai K. Capillary and van der Waals force between microparticles with different sizes in humid air. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology. 2015; 30(5): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1111834
• 8. Koronthályová O., Bágel L., Kullifoyová M. Hygic performance of contemporary and historical ceramic bricks. Technical Transactions Civil Engineering. 2014; 3-B: 213–220. https://repozytorium.biblos.pk.edu.pl/redo/resources/30438/file/suwFiles/KoronthalyovaO_HygricPerformance.pdf
• 9. Sokoll T. Mikrowellensysteme für die in-situ-Feuchtemessung zur Bauwerksüberwachung [PhD thesis]. Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg; 2008: 1–151.
• 10. Monczyński B. Skuteczność wtórnych hydroizolacji poziomych wykonywanych metodą iniekcji chemicznych w murach ceglanych [PhD thesis]. Politechnika Poznańska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej i Transportu; 2021: 1–211.
• 11. Frössel F. Osuszanie murów i renowacja piwnic. Warszawa: Polcen; 2007: 1–267.
• 12. Ö-Norm B 3355:2017. Trockenlegung von feuchtem Mauerwerk – Bauwerksdiagnostik und Planungsgrundlage. Austrian Standards. https://www.austrian-standards.at/en/shop/onorm-b-3355-2017-03-01~p2289197
• 13. ISO 12571:2021. Hygrothermal performance of building materials and products — Determination of hygroscopic sorption properties. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/79595.html
• 14. Greenspan L. Humidity fixed points of binary saturated aqueous solutions. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards - A. Physics and Chemistry. 1977; 81A(1): 89–96. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.081A.011
• 15. Koniorczyk M., Wojciechowski M. Influence of salt on desorption isotherm and hygral state of cement mortar – Modelling using neural networks. Construction and Building Materials. 2009; 23: 2988–2996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.05.001
• 16. Camuffo D. Standardization activity in the evaluation of moisture content. Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2017; 31: 10–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2018.03.021
• 17. Schofield R. K. The pF of water in soil. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Soil Science. 1935; 2: 37–38.
• 18. Aslyng H. C. Soil physics terminology (corrected text). A. Terms relating to the state of water in the soil. Bulletin of the International Society of Soil Science. 1963; 23: 7–10.
• 19. Gee G. W., Ward A. L., Zhang Z., Campbell G. S., Mathison J. The influence of hydraulic nonequilibrium on pressure plate data. Vadose Zone Journal. 2002; 1: 172–178. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2002.1720
• 20. Kirkham M. B. Soil–water terminology and applications. In: Principles of Soil and Plant Water Relations. 2014: 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-12871-1
• 21. Mohamed A. M. O., Paleologos E. Chapter 4: The soil system. In: Fundamentals of Geoenvironmental Engineering: Understanding Soil, Water and Pollutant Interaction and Transport. 2017: 89–127.
• 22. Witkowska-Walczak B., Walczak R., Sławiński C. Determination of water potential-moisture characteristic of soil porous material media. Institute of Agrophysics PAS; 2004: 1–84. http://www.ipan.lublin.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/mat_coe19.pdf
• 23. Van der Harst G. G., Stakman W. P. The use of the Sandbox-apparatus to determine pF-curves in the range pF 0.4 to 2.7. Research Report, Instituut voor Cultuurtechniek en Waterhuishouding; 1961: 1–18.
• 24. Bulut R., Lytton R. L., Wray W. K. Suction Measurements by Filter Paper. In: Expansive Clay Soils and Vegetative Influence on Shallow Foundations. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication 115. ASCE, Reston, Virginia; 2001: 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1061/40592(270)14
• 25. Lu N., Likos W. J. Unsaturated Soil Mechanics. Wiley; 2004: 1–584.
• 26. EN ISO 11274:2019. Soil quality — Determination of the water-retention characteristic — Laboratory methods. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/68256.html
• 27. Skierucha W., Sobczyk H., Malicki M. A. Zastosowanie psychrometru Peltera do pomiaru potencjału wody: Prototyp przyrządu pomiarowego. Acta Agrophysica. 2001; 53: 125–134. http://www.acta-agrophysica.org/pdf-128249-55629?filename=55629.pdf
• 28. Guz Ł., Suchorab Z., Sobczuk H. Modification of the measurement method of relative moisture determination using Peltier probe. Proceedings of ECOpole. 2011; 5(1): 51–56.
• 29. Campbell E. C., Campbell G. S., Barlow W. K. A dewpoint hygrometer for water potential measurement. Agricultural Meteorology. 1973; 12: 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-1571(73)90012-5
• 30. Mantri S., Bulut R. Evaluating performance of a chilled mirror device for soil total suction measurements. In: Geo-Hubei 2014 International Conference on Sustainable Civil Infrastructure, ASCE GSP; 2014: 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784478509.008
• 31. Leong E. C., Tripathy S., Rahardjo H. Total suction measurement of unsaturated soils with a device using the chilled-mirror dew-point technique. Geotechnique. 2003; 53(2): 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.2.173
• 32. Campbell G. S. Soil Physics with BASIC. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 1985: 1–150. https://shop.elsevier.com/books/soil-physics-with-basic/campbell/978-0-444-42557-7
• 33. Matkowski Z. Problems connected with methodology of dampness testing applied to brick walls in historical monuments. Izolacje. 2014; 3: 14–16.
• 34. Pinchin S. E. Techniques for monitoring moisture in wall. Reviews in Conservation. 2008; 9: 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2008.53.Supplement-2.33
• 35. EN ISO 12524:2003. Building materials and products – Hygrothermal properties – Tabulated design values.