Reengineering of the teaching processes for managers of Industry 4.0

• Autorzy: Jokiel Grzegorz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.173.17

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The aim of this article is to indicate a direction of teaching conditions under the technology development related to industries 4.0, 5.0 and successive N.0. Another dimension of this phenomenon is the change of educational paradigm from teaching to constant selfeducation. Examples of such activities, carried out at the Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, will be presented in the article. Design/methodology/approach: The main method are case studies of different types of classes at the Wroclaw University of Economics and Business. The scope of research paper includes three key elements. First, a description of modern technologies supporting the educational and work-related processes. Second, the imperative of teaching processes change determined by technology development as well as new scientific achievements in business and management. Finally, the combination of two mentioned elements in the context of demand for industry 4.0 managers. Findings: The article advocates the paradigm shift in education. Following methods and directions of this change are discussed: Design Thinking framework; redefinition of the lecturer role; moving away from lectures towards other forms of classes (e.g. workshops, laboratories, exercises, seminars) and withdrawal from grading; courses reorganization; switch from single courses to modules, educational paths or cycles. Practical implications: Case studies from the author’s home academy, the Wroclaw University of Economics and Business. Those studies can be considered good practices and valuable benchmark for other organizations. Social implications: Changing the thinking paradigm of management, teaching conditions, and the lecturer role has the crucial meaning in the information society. Originality/value: The article presents the need of teaching paradigm change across the business higher education. The research paper also discusses the change in work processes due to the usage of newest technologies. In addition, the author believes that popular tools like Teams, Zoom, Slack, Miro, Mural etc., are already outdated, and the new generation of technologies based on augmented reality opens up new perspectives for the organization of work and teaching-related processes. The article is dedicated to academic staff as well as to students, graduates and managers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

managers education; teaching processes reengineering; work processes innovations; Industry 4.0

PL

kształcenie menedżerów; reengineering procesów nauczania; innowacje procesów pracy; Przemysł 4.0

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 173
• Strony: 261--275
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Jokiel Grzegorz

• Wroclaw University of Economics and Business

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3657-3989

Bibliografia

• 1. Anttila, J., Jussila, K. (2018). Universities and smart cities: the challenges to high quality. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 29, Iss. 9-10, pp. 1058-1073.
• 2. Bergmann, J., Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Waszyngton: International Society for Technology in Education.
• 3. Blikle, A. (2018). Doktryna jakości. Rzecz o turkusowej organizacji. Retrieved from: https://moznainaczej.com.pl/Download/DoktrynaJakosci/DoktrynaJako%C5%9Bci_wyda nie_II.pdf, 15.01.2023.
• 4. Chen, J., Yin, X., Mei, L. (2018). Holistic Innovation: An Emerging Innovation Paradigm. International Journal of Innovation Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-13.
• 5. De Jonge, V.N., Pinto, R., Turner, R.K. (2012). Integrating Ecological, Economic and Social Aspects to Generate Useful Management Information under the EU Directives’ Ecosystem Approach. Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 68, pp. 169-188.
• 6. Denning, S. (2018). The Age of Agile: How Smart Companies Are Transforming the Way Work Gets Done. NY: Harpercollins Leadership.
• 7. Durkee, D., Brant, S., Nevin, P., Odell, A., Williams, G., Melomey, D., Roberts, H., Imafidon, C., Perryman, R., Lopes, A. (2009). Implementing E-Learning and Web 2.0 Innovation: Didactical Scenarios and Practical Implications. Industry and Higher Education, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, pp. 293-300.
• 8. Ehiobuche, C., Okolie, U.C., Nwali, A.C., Igwe, P.A. (2022). Is there a link between industry involvement in higher education learning and student job creation intention? Industry and Higher Education, Vol. 37, Iss. 2, pp. 177-189.
• 9. Goldratt, E. (2008). Cel 2. To nie przypadek [Goal 2 Its no luck]. Warszawa: Mint Books.
• 10. Guzik, A. (2010). Pedagogika Marii Montessori - propozycja dla współczesnej edukacji szkolnej. In: A. Janus-Sitarz (Ed.), Edukacja polonistyczna wobec trudnej współczesności. Kraków: Universitas.
• 11. Hammer, M., Champy, J. (2006). Reenginering the corporation, A Manifesto for the Business Revolution. NY: Harper Business.
• 12. Handy, Ch. (1996). Wiek paradoksu [The Age of Unreason]. Warszawa: ABC
• 13. Kozioł, L. (2015). Organizacja warunków i stosunków pracy w przedsiębiorstwie. In: A. Kozina (ed.), Wybrane problemy zarządzania relacjami w przedsiębiorstwie. Kraków: Mfiles.
• 14. Laine, K. (2008). A Finnish Concept for Academic Entrepreneurship: The Case of Satakunta University of Applied Sciences. Industry and Higher Education, Vol. 22, Iss. 1, pp. 19-28.
• 15. Laloux, F. (2015). Pracować inaczej. Nowatorski model organizacji inspirowany kolejnym etapem rozwoju ludzkiej świadomości. Warszawa: Studio EMKA.
• 16. Olszewska, J. (2018). Metoda „odwróconej klasy” - nowy sposób na lekcję. Szkoła. Miesięcznik dyrektora, sierpień, pp. 62-62.
• 17. Rifkin, J. (2001). The age of acess: the new culture of hypercapitalism, where all of life is a paid-for experience. New York: Penguin Putnam Inc.
• 18. Rowland-Jones, R. (2012). Teaching to learn in the workplace: Moving from industrial pedagogy to andragogical gemba. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 4, Iss. 4, pp. 364-373.
• 19. Rutkowski, A.F., Vogel, D.R., Van Genuchten, M., Bemelmans, T.M.A., Favier, M. (2002). E-collaboration: The reality of virtuality. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, Vol. 45, Iss. 4, pp. 219-230.
• 20. Schlechtendahl, J., Keinert, M., Kretschmer, F., Lechler, A., Verl, A. (2015). Making Existing Production Systems Industry 4.0-ready. Production Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 143-148.
• 21. Tofler, A. (2001). Trzecia fala [Third wave]. Warszawa: PIW.
• 22. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0— Inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 61, pp. 530-535.
• 23. Zarychta, J. (2018). Wpływ nowych technologii na zarządzanie-perspektywa Microsoft Polska. Cz. 1. Przemysł 4.0. Przegląd Organizacji, No. 4, pp. 62-64.