Variables state-based software usage model

• Autorzy: Fedasyuk D. , Yakovyna V. , Serdyuk P. , Nytrebych O.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article describes a new mathematical software usage model, which includes the effect of the set of global and external variables values for further analysis of multi-test scenarios to improve the effectiveness of the testing software. This model is represented as a graph of transitions and a set of variables with respective sets of equivalence classes. The proposed approach is particularly relevant for computational algorithms with complex logic.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

software testing process; usage model; test scenario; software reliability

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 3, No 2
• Strony: 15--20
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 24 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Fedasyuk D.

• Software department, Lviv Polytechnic National University; 79013, Lviv, Bandery st. 28

autor

Yakovyna V.

• Software department, Lviv Polytechnic National University; 79013, Lviv, Bandery st. 28

autor

Serdyuk P.

• Software department, Lviv Polytechnic National University; 79013, Lviv, Bandery st. 28

autor

Nytrebych O.

• Software department, Lviv Polytechnic National University; 79013, Lviv, Bandery st. 28

Bibliografia

• 1. Pham H. 2006. System Software reliability, Springer series in reliability engineering, 437.
• 2. Lu Minyan and Chen Xuesong. 2000. Software Reliability Testing and Practice, Testing and Control Technology, Volume 19, 509-512.
• 3. Huang C.-Y. and Kuo S.-Y. and Lyu M.R. 2007. An Assessment of Testing-Effort Dependent Software Reliability Growth Models, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Volume 56, Issue 2, 198-211.
• 4. Rafi M. and Rao K. 2010. Software Reliability Growth Model with Logistic-Exponential Test-Effort Function and Analysis of Software Release Policy, International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, Volume 2, Issue 2, 387-399.
• 5. Jensen F. and Thoft C. 1992. Application of linear decomposition technique in reliability-based structural optimization, System Modelling and Optimization Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Volume 180, 953-962.
• 6. Zhang X.-L., Huang H.-Z. and Yu Liu. 2009. Hierarchical decomposition for optimal reliability allocation. Reliability andMaintainability Symposium, 124-128.
• 7. Meenakshi Kandpal and Anmol Kandpal. 2012. Critical Analysis of Traditional Size Estimation Metrics for Object Oriented Programming, International Journal of Computer Applications, Volume 58, Issue 13, 39-45.
• 8. Fenton N. and Neil M. 1999. A Critique of Software Defect Prediction Models. IEEE Transactions on software engineering, volume 25, Issue 5, 675-689.
• 9. Kamaljit Kaur, Kirti Minhas, Neha Mehan and Namita Kakkar. 2009. Static and Dynamic Complexity Analysis of Software Metrics. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Volume 56, 159-161.
• 10. Bobalo Y.Y., Volochyy B.Y., Lozynskyy O.Y., Mandzyy B.A., Ozirkovskyy L.D., Fedasyuk D.V., Sherbovskyh S.V. and Yakovyna V.S. 2013. Mathematical models and methods for reliability analysis of radio-electronic, electrical and software systems: a monograph, Lviv: Publishing House of Lviv Polytechnic National University, 300. (in Ukrainian)
• 11. Mei-Hwa Chen and Michael R. Lyu. 2001. Effect of Code Coverage on Software Reliability Measurement. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Volume 50, Issue 2, 165-170.
• 12. Rao D.N. and Srinath M.V. and Hiranmani B.P. 2013. Reliable code coverage technique in software testing, International Conference on Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/ICPRIME, 157 – 163.
• 13. McConnell S. 1996. Software quality at top speed, Software Development, Volume 4, Issue 8, 38 – 42.
• 14. Barry Boehm. 2007. Equity Keynote Address.
• 15. Bieman J. M. and Kang B-K. 1995. Cohesion and Reuse in an Object-Oriented System, Proc. ACM Symposium on Software Reusability (SSR'95), 259-262.
• 16. Ott L., Bieman J. M., Kang B-K. and Mehra B. 1995. Developing Measures of Class Cohesion for Object-Oriented Software, Proc. Annual Oregon Workshop on Software Merics (AOWSM'95), 11.
• 17. Izosimov А.V. and Ryzhko А.L. 1989. Metrics assessment of software quality, Mai. (in Russian)
• 18. Chapin N. 1989. An Entropy Metric For Software Maintainability System Sciences, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference, Volume II: Software Track, 522–523.
• 19. Software Complexity Metrics [Internet source] – available: http://metrix.narod.ru/page1.htm [rus]
• 20. Stepanchenko I.V. 2006. Software testing methods, VolgGTU, Volgograd, 74 (in Russian).
• 21. Mohd Ehmer Khan. 2010. Different Forms of Software Testing Techniques for Finding Errors, IJCSI, Volume 7, Issue 3, 11-16.
• 22. Omar Shatnawi. 2009. Discrete Time NHPP Models for Software reliability growth phenomenon, The International Arab Journal of Information technology, Volume 6, Issue2, 124-131
• 23. Shaik M. and Shaheda R. 2011. Software reliability Growth model with bass diffusion test- effort function and analysis of software release policy, International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, Volume 3, Issue 5, 671-680.
• 24. El Emam K. 2000. A methodology for validating software product metrics, Tech. rep. NCR/ERC-1076, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.