Distribution of Crataegus (Rosaceae) along a gradient of anthropogenic influence

• Autorzy: Oklejewicz K. , Chwastek E. , Szewczyk M. , Bobiec A. , Mitka J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The impact of land use intensity on the taxonomic composition of hawthorns in four regions of south-eastern Poland was investigated. As a result of different human settlement histories, two of the regions are 54–64% forested nowadays, and the remaining two regions are 70–78% transformed into arable land. Numerical analysis and Monte Carlo permutation tests showed that the purely geographical component of the species distribution, linked with the land use intensity, was statistically significant (1.97%, P = 0.002), as well the pure site component (1.17%, P = 0.010). The human-induced opening of the landscape promotes Crataegus monogyna. Forests are occupied by C. laevigata, C. rhipidiphylla, C. rhipidophylla Gand. var. lindmanii and the hybrid C. × macrocarpa (C. rhipidophylla × C. laevigata); on forest edges the hybrid C. × media (C. monogyna × C. laevigata) tends to occur. Crataegus × subsphaericea (C. monogyna × C. rhipidophylla) is rare and tends to occur in thickets, and a triple hybrid C. monogyna × C. rhipidophylla × C. laevigata colonizes recently abandoned fields. Hybridization seems to be an efficient evolutionary strategy of hawthorns in the face of human-induced transformations of the landscape.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

CORINE Land Cover; hawthorn; human impact; hybrids; landscape transformation; land use; species distribution

PL

Corine Land Cover; głóg; wpływ człowieka; hybryda; transformacja krajobrazu; użytkowanie gruntów; dystrybucja gatunków

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 61, nr 4
• Strony: 683--691
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Oklejewicz K.

• Department of Botany, University of Rzeszów, Zelwerowicza 4, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Chwastek E.

• Bielsko-Biała Academy of Józef Tyszkiewicz, Nadbrzeżna 12, 43–300 Bielsko–Biała, Poland

autor

Szewczyk M.

• Institute of Agriculture, Jan Grodek State Higher Vocational Academy in Sanok, Mickiewicza 21 38–500 Sanok, Poland

autor

Bobiec A.

• Department of Agroecology, University of Rzeszów, Ćwiklińskiej 2A, 35–601 Rzeszów, Poland

autor

Mitka J.

• Institute of Botany, Botanical Garden, Jagiellonian University, Kopernika 27, 31–501 Kraków, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Barabasz-Krasny B. 2011 – Vegetation differentiation and secondary succession on abandoned agricultural grand-areas in Przemyśl Foothills (south-eastern Poland) – Instytut Botaniki im. W. Szafera, PAS, Kraków, pp. 179.
• 2. Balon J., German K., Kozak J., Malara H., Widacki W., Z iaja W. 1995 – Physicogeographical Regions of the Polish Carpathians (In: The Polish Carpathians - Nature, Man and his Activities, Ed: J. Warszyńska) – Jagiellonian University, Kraków, pp. 117–130 (in Polish, English summary).
• 3. Borcard P., Legendre P., Drapeau P. 1992 – Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation – Ecology, 73: 1045–1055.
• 4. Christensen K. 1992 – Revision of Crataegus sect. Crataegus and nothosect. Crataeguineae (Rosaceae - Maloideae) in the old world – Syst. Bot. Monogr. 35: 1–199.
• 5. Christensen K. 1997 – Typification of Crataegus kyrtostyla Fingerh (In: Notulae ad Floram Germanicam I, Ed: R. Wisskirchner) – Feddes Repert. 108(1–2): 104.
• 6. Czapik R. 1996 – Problems of apomictic reproduction in the families Composite and Rosaceae – Folia Geobot. 31: 381–387.
• 7. Czekaj-Zastawny A. 2008 – Kultura ceramiki wstęgowej rytej w dorzeczu górnej Wisły [Settlement of Linear Pottery communities in the upper Vistula river basin] – Instytut Archeologii PAS, Kraków, 246 pp. (in Polish, English summary).
• 8. Depypere L., Vander Mijnsbrugge K., De Cock K., Verschelde P., Quataert P., Van Slycken J., Goetghebeur R. 2006 – Indigenous species of Crataegus (Rosaceae-Maloideae) in Flanders (Belgium). An explorative morphometric study – Belg. J. Botany, 139: 139–152.
• 9. Dickinson T.A., Lo E.Y.Y., Talent N., Love R.M. 2008 – Black-fruited hawthorns of western North America - one or more agamic complexes? – Botany, 86: 846–865.
• 10. Górka Z. 1995 – Osadnictwo [Settlement] (In: Karpaty Polskie. Przyroda, człowiek i jego działalność [The Polish Carpathians. Nature, Man and his Activities] Ed: J. Warszyńska) – Jagiellonian University, pp. 219–232 (in Polish).
• 11. Holub J. 1992 – Crataegus L. (In: Květena České republiky [Flora of the Czech Republic], Eds: S. Hejný, B. Slavík, J. Kirschner, B. Křiša) – Academia, Praha, 3: 488–525 (in Czech).
• 12. Jasiewicz A. 1965 – Rośliny naczyniowe Bieszczadów Zachodnich (Karpaty Wschodnie) [The Vascular Plants of the Western Bieszczady Mts. (East Carpathians)] – Monogr. Bot. 20: 1–340 (in Polish).
• 13. Kornaś J. 1981 – Oddziaływanie człowieka na florę: mechanizmy i konsekwencje [Man’s impact on flora: mechanisms and consequences] – Wiad. Bot. 25: 165–182 (in Polish).
• 14. Kornaś J.1983 – Man’s impact upon the flora and vegetation of Central Europe (In: Man’s impact on vegetation, Eds: W. Hozner, M.J.A. Werger, I. Ikushina) – W. Junk, the Hague, pp. 277–286.
• 15. Lach J. 1968 – Zmiany pokrywy leśnej na obszarze powiatu gorlickiego [Changes in wood cover in the Gorlice District] – Rocznik Naukowo-Dydaktyczny WSP w Krakowie, Prace Geogr. 4: 63–73 (in Polish).
• 16. Lach J., Ziętara T. 1989 – Wpływ zmiany granicy rolno-leśnej na ewolucję współczesnych procesów geomorfologicznych na przykładzie górnej Jasiołki w Beskidzie Niskim [Influence of change the agro-forest limit on the evolution the contemporary geomorphological processes on the example the upper Jasiołka in Beskid Niski] – Problemy Zagospodarowania Ziem Górskich, 29: 77–84 (in Polish).
• 17. Landolt E. 1970 – Mitteleuropäische Wiesenpflanzen als hybridogene Abkömmlinge von mittel- und südeuropäischen Gebirgsippen und submediterranean Sippen – Feddes Repert. 81: 61–66.
• 18. Lepš J., Šmilauer P. 1999 – Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data – Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Česke Budĕjovice, 110 pp.
• 19. Lo E.Y., Stefanović S., Dickinson T.A. 2009 – Population genetic structure of diploid sexual and polypoloid apomictic hawthorn (Crataegus; Rosaceae) in the Pacific Northwest – Mol. Ecol. 18: 1145–1160.
• 20. Lo E.Y., Stefanović S., Dickinson T.A. 2010 – Reconstructing reticulation history in a phylogenetic network and the potential of allopatric speciation driven by polyploidy in an agamic complex in Crataegus (Rosaceae) – Evolution, 64: 3593–3608.
• 21. Matuszkiewicz W. 2006 – Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski [A key for the determination of plant communities in Poland] – PWN, Warszawa, 540 pp. (in Polish).
• 22. Oklejewicz K. 1993 – Flora Dołów Jasielsko- Sanockich [The flora of the Jasło–Sanok Basin] – Zesz. Nauk. Jagiellonian University, Prace Bot. 26: 1–167 (in Polish, English summary).
• 23. Pergams O.R.W., R.C. Lacy. 2008 – Rapid morphological and genetic change in Chicago-area Peromyscus – Mol. Ecol. 17: 450–463.
• 24. Rieseberg L.H., Carney S.H. 1998 – Tansley Review No. 102. Plant hybridization – New Phytol. 140: 599–624.
• 25. Scholz H. 1975 – Grassland evolution in Europe – Taxon. 24: 81–90.
• 26. Seechausen O., Takimoto G., Roy D., Jokela J. 2008 – Speciation reversal and bio-diversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments – Mol. Ecol. 17: 30–44.
• 27. Smith T.B., Bernathez L. 2008 – Evolutionary change in human-altered environments – Mol. Ecol. 17: 1–8.
• 28. Ter Braak C.J.F. 1987 – The analysis of vegetation-environment relationships by canoni¬cal correspondence analysis – Vegetatio, 69: 69–77.
• 29. Ter Braak C.J.F, Šmilauer P. 2002 – CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows. User’s guide: software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5) –Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA, 352 pp.
• 30. Talent N. 2009 – Evolution of gametophytic apomixis in flowering plants: an alternative model from Maloid Rosaceae – Theory Biosci. 128: 121–138.
• 31. Talent N., Dickinson T.A. 2005 – Polyploidy in Crataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae, Maloideae): evolutionary inferences from flow cytometry and nuclear DNA amounts – Can. J. Bot. 83: 1268–1304.
• 32. Towpasz K. 1987 – Rośliny naczyniowe Pogórza Strzyżowskiego [The vascular plants of the Strzyżów Foothills (Southern Poland)] – Zesz. Nauk. Jagiellonian University, Prace Bot. 16: 1–157 (in Polish, English summary).
• 33. Zając M., Zając A. 2009 – The geographical elements of native flora of Poland – Laboratory of Computer Chorology, Institute of Botany, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, 94 pp.
• 34. Zemanek B. 1989 – Rośliny naczyniowe Biesczadów Niskich i Otrytu [The vascular plants of Bieszczady Niskie Mts. and Otryt Range (Polish Eastern Carpathians)] – Zesz. Nauk. Jagiellonian University, Prace Bot. 20: 1–185 (in Polish, English summary).
• 35. Zemanek B., Winncki T. 1999 – Rośliny naczyniowe Bieszczadzkiego Parku Nar-odowego [Vascular plants of the Bieszczady National Park] – Monogr. Bieszczadzkie, 3: 1–249 (in Polish, English summary).