Navigational decision support system during approach manoeuvre in emergency STS transfer operation

• Autorzy: Witkowska A. , Śmierzchalski R. , Wilczyński P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper is concerned with the problem of safe trajectory planning for approaching during emergency STS (Ship to Ship) transfer operation with oil spill. The safe trajectory means that the way points does not cross in the area of the environment with the static and dynamic obstacles and at the same time satisfies ship's stopping and speed deceleration performance. The evolutionary path planning algorithm is used to determine trajectory designed as way points and straight line segments between them. The way points - ship positions and velocity can be treated as reference value to support navigator in decision making during Approach Manoeuvre and to mitigate the risk of collision which mostly results from exceed velocity of approaching. The task of trajectory planning is defined as constant optimization process to minimize trajectory length, course alteration and maximize safety in a navigational environment. This paper examines exemplary navigational scenario based on emergency STS accident.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

lightering; trajectory planning; approach manoeuver

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Bezpieczeństwa i Niezawodności
• Czasopismo: Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 8, No. 1
• Strony: 175--182
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 12 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Witkowska A.

• Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland

autor

Śmierzchalski R.

• Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland

autor

Wilczyński P.

• Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] ABS 2006. ABS Guide for Vessel Maneuverability. 2006. American Bureau of Shipping, Houston, TX 77060 USA.
• [2] EMSA 2015. European Maritime Safety Agency. Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents.
• [3] Fossen, T., 2011. Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, A John Wiley & Sons.
• [4] Husjord, D. & Pedersen, E. (2009). Operational Aspects on Decision-making in STS Lightering. Proc. of the 19th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference and Exhibition (ISOPE 2009), Osaka, Japan, 21 - 26 June 2009.
• [5] Husjord, D. (2016). Development of a Decision Support System in Ship-To-Ship Lightering, The Journal of Navigation, pp. 1-29. doi:10.1017/S0373463316000126
• [6] Kuczkowski, L. &_Smierzchalski, R. (2014). Termination functions for evolutionary path planplaning algorithm. The 19th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR). Miedzyzdroje, POLAND. 636-640.
• [7] Łazuga, K. & Gucma, L.& Juszkiewicz, W., (2012). Optimal Planning of Pollution Emergency Response with Application of Navigational Risk Management. Annu. Navig. 19.
• [8] OCIMF/ICS 2005. Oil Companies International Marine Forum. Ship to Ship transfer guide, petroleum, 4th edition, Withebys Publications. 3236 Aylesbury Street. London EC1R0ET. UK.
• [9] OCIMF 2009. Oil Companies International Marine Forum. Ship to Ship Transfers-Considerations Applicable to Reverse Lightering Operations.
• [10] Pedersen, E.& Shimizu, E.& Berg, T. et al. 2008 On the development of guidance system design for ships operating in close proximity. IEEE Position, Location and Navigation Symposium, Vol 1-3 Pages: 636-641.
• [11] Ventikos N. & Stavrou, D. (2013). Ship to Ship (STS) Transfer οf Cargo: Latest Developments and Operational Risk Assessment. Spoundai Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 63, Issue 3-4, pp. 172-180.
• [12] Wilczynski, P. (2014). STS Transfer Plan. Technical Ship Management m/t ICARUS III 2014

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).