PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Multiple-criteria decision-making for the choice of equipment in mining using the AHP method

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Rational solution for mining equipment based on the use of haul trucks, excavators, wheel loaders and crunchers should result from thorough analysis of technical and economic issues – both cost-related and exploitational - which can have a crucial impact on the cost of minerals extraction. Moreover mining equipment should be selected with consideration for all vital parameters in specific exploitational conditions and even the exploiter’s preferences. This selection should consider hitherto disregarded criteria, such as mean availability and structure utilization of machinery systems with the aim to improve the same. Methodology presented in the paper illustrates practical application of MCDM and one particular method of this type – the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) – for resolving the problem in specific exploitational conditions of mineral resource in surface mining AHP method covers a multi-criteria approach based on a compensation strategy to model preferences and assuming variant comparability. Taking into account the preferences of the evaluator, which determine the subjectivity of comparative evaluation, is the core of the multi-criteria approach, which treats such preferences Considering the above issues, the following paper is an attempt to develop new and universal criteria as well as a method of evaluation and selection of means of mining equipment for mineral resource surface mines.
Rocznik
Strony
404--415
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 6 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • AGH University of Science and Technology, Poland
  • AGH University of Science and Technology, Poland
  • AGH University of Science and Technology, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Bodziony P., Kasztelewicz, Z., Sawicki, P. (2016). The Problem of Multiple Criteria Selection of the Surface Mining Haul Trucks (Archives of Mining Sciences 2016), no. 61 pp. 223-243.
  • 2. Gulati, R., Smith, R. (2009). Maintenance and Reliability Best Practices. [Electronic] New York: Industrial Press.
  • 3. Hebda M., (2005). Eksploatacja samochodów, Instytut Technologi i Eksploatacji – Panstwowy Instytut Badawczy, Radom.
  • 4. Patyk, M.,Bodziony, P. (2018). Analysis of multiple criteria selection and application of APEKS method in haul truck mining transport process, E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 71 no. 00003, s. 1-6, XVIII Conference of PhD Students and Young Scientists ”Interdisciplinary Topics in Mining and Geology”, Szklarska Poręba, Poland, May 22-25, 2018;
  • 5. Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • 6. Saaty, T. (1990). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, European Journal of Operational Research 1990, vol. 48, pp. 9-26.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-5fb79374-097d-4e5f-a9c6-e64faa32a581
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.