Bioremediation of fluazifop-p-butyl herbicide by some soil bacteria isolated from various regions of Turkey in an artificial agricultural field

• Autorzy: Erguven Gokhan Onder , Nuhoglu Yasar

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37190/epe200301

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The bioremediation rate of fluazifop-p-butyl (C₁₉H₂₀F₃NO₄) was monitored. Bacteria were isolated in agricultural soil samples. Fifteen sterilised glass jars were inoculated with 2, 5, 10, 20 cm³ of a homogenised bacterial mixture (10⁹ CFU/cm ³), then sterile agricultural soil and 60 μg of fluazifop-p-butyl (in liquid form) were added to each jar. Each week, filtrated water drained from bottles was analysed for fluazifop-p-butyl concentration, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD₅) and total organic carbon (TOC). Additionally, pH and dissolved oxygen concentration were monitored. The highest biodegradation rate was observed in the soil sample containing 20 cm ³ of the culture media. In this media, fluazifop-p-butyl, COD, BOD₅ and TOC removals were measured as 91, 83, 96 and 86%, respectively, at the end of the 2 months. The DO level was measured between 3 and 6 mg O₂/dm ³ in the first month for all cultures. An increase of pH was recorded during the first month and after this time a pH decrease was noted.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

soil bacteria; COD; bioremediation

PL

bakterie glebowe; ChZT; bioremediacja

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Environment Protection Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 46, nr 3
• Strony: 5--15
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 30 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Erguven Gokhan Onder

• Munzur University, Tunceli Vocation School, Department of Chemistry and Chemical Processes, 62000, Turkey

autor

Nuhoglu Yasar

• Environmental Engineering Department, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul 34220, Turkey

Bibliografia

• [1] JILANI S., Comparative assessment of growth and biodegradation potential of soil isolate in the presence of pesticides, Saudi. J. Biol. Sci., 2013, 20, 257–264.
• [2] ANWAR W.A., Biomarker and human exposure to pesticides, Environ. Health Perspect., 1997, 105, 801–806.
• [3] AGRAWAL A., SHARMA B., Pesticide induced oxidative stress in mammalian systems, Int. J. Biol. Med. Res., 2010, 1 (3), 90–104.
• [4] The Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung in a Nutshell, Agriculture Atlas. Facts and Figures on EU Farming Policy, 1st Ed., Berlin 2019.
• [5] RAMANI V., Effect of pesticides on phosphate solubilization by Bacillus sphaericus and Pseudomonas Cepacia, Pest. Biochem. Physiol., 2011, 99, 232–236.
• [6] VISCHETTI C., CORTI G., MONACI E., COCCO S., COPPOLA L., AGNELLI A., Pesticide adsorption and degradation in fine earth and rock fragments of two soils of different origin, Geoderma, 2010, 154, 348–352.
• [7] PALECEK E., TKAC J., BARTOSÍK M., BERTOK T., OSTATNA V., PALECEK J., Electrochemistry of nonconjugated proteins and glycoproteins: toward sensors for biomedicine and glycomics, Chem. Rev., 2015, 115 (5), 2045–2108.
• [8] TSAO D.T., Phytoremediation. Advances in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Springer, Berlin 2003.
• [9] DESAINT S., HARTMANN A., PAREKH N.R., FOURNIER J.C., Genetic diversity of carbofuran degrading soil bacteria, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 2000, 34 (2), 173–180.
• [10] FLOCH C., CHEVREMONT A.C., JOANICO K., CAPOWIEZ K., CRIQUET S., Indicators of pesticide contamination: soil enzyme compared to functional diversity of bacterial communities via Biolog® Ecoplates, Eur. J. Cell Biol., 2011, 47 (4), 256–263.
• [11] PIMMATA P., REUNGSANG A., PLANGKLANG P., Comparative bioremediation of carbofuran contaminated soil by natural attenuation, bioaugmentation and biostimulation, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2013, 85, 196–204.
• [12] DUA M., SINGH A., SETHUNATHAN N., JOHRI A.K., Biotechnology and bioremediation: successes and limitations, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2002, 59 (2–3), 143–152.
• [13] FURUKAWA K., Super bugs for bioremediation, Trends Biotechnol., 2003, 21 (5), 187–190.
• [14] AKBAR S., SULTAN S., Soil bacteria showing a potential of chlorpyrifos degradation and plant growth enhancement, Braz. J. Microbiol., 2016, 47, 563–570.
• [15] WOJCIESZYŃSKA D., HUPERT-KOCUREK K., GUZIK U., Factors affecting activity of catechol 2,3-dioxygenase from 2-chlorophenol-degrading Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain KB2, Biocatal. Biotransform., 2013, 31, 141–147.
• [16] PERELO L.W., Review. In situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments, J. Hazard. Mater., 2010, 177, 81–89.
• [17] TOMEI M.C., DAUGULIS A.J., Ex situ bioremediation of contaminated soils: an overview of conventional innovative technologies, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, 43, 2107–2139.
• [18] BADAWI N., ROSENBOM A.E., OLSEN P., SØRENSEN S.R., Environmental fate of the herbicide fluazifop- -p-butyl and its degradation products in two loamy agricultural soils. A combined laboratory and field study, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2015, 49 (15), 8995–9003.
• [19] APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st Ed., Washington, DC, 2005.
• [20] CHENG Y., HE H., YANG C., ZENG G., LI X., CHEN H., YU G., Challenges and solutions for biofiltration of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds, Biotechnol. Adv., 2016, 34 (6), 1091–1102.
• [21] PARIATAMBY A., KEE Y.L., Persistent organic pollutants management and remediation, Proc. Environ. Sci., 2016, 31, 842–848.
• [22] ERGUVEN G.O., Comparison of some soil fungi in bioremediation of herbicide acetochlor under agitated culture media, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 2018, 100, 570–575.
• [23] MAYA K., SINGH R.S., UPADHYAY S.N., DUBEY S.K., Kinetic analysis reveals bacterial efficacy for biodegradation of chlorpyrifos and its hydrolyzing metabolite TCP, Proc. Biochem., 2011, 46, 2130–2136.
• [24] LAKSHMI C.V., KUMAR M., KHANN S., Biotransformation of chlorpyrifos and bioremediation of contaminated soil, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 2008, 62, 204–209.
• [25] MOHAMMADI A., NASERNEJAD B., Enzymatic degradation of anthracene by the white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium immobilised on sugarcane bagasse, J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 161, 534–537.
• [26] BASAK B., BHUNIA B., DEY A., Studies on the potential use of sugarcane bagasse as carrier matrix for immobilization of Candida tropicalis PHB5 for phenol biodegradation, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2014, 93, 107–117.
• [27] LIN M., LIU Y., CHEN W., WANG H., HU X., Use of bacteria-immobilised cotton fibers to absorb and degrade crude oil, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 2014, 88, 8–12.
• [28] EMTIAZI G., SHAKARAMI H., NAHVI I., MIRDAMADIAN S.H., Utilization of petroleum hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas sp. and transformed Escherichia coli, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2005, 4, 172–176.
• [29] ERGUVEN G.O., DEMIRCI U., Statistical evaluation of the bioremediation performanceof thiophenivoransand Sphingomonas melonis bacteria on Imidacloprid insecticide in artificial agricultural field, J. Environ. Health. Sci., doi: (2019) 10.1007/s40201-019-00391-w.
• [30] YÁÑEZ-OCAMPO G., SANCHEZ-SALINAS E., JIMENEZ-TOBON G.A., PENNINCKX M., ORTIZHERNÁNDEZ M.L., Removal of two organophosphate pesticides by a bacterial consortium immobilized in alginate or tezontle, J. Hazard. Mater., 2009, 168 (2–3), 1554–1561.