PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

RIPRAN – one of the best project risk analysis methodologies

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Project risk management is an important aspect of project management. According to the PMBoK, risk management is one of the ten knowledge areas in which a project manager must be competent. Project risk management remains a relatively undeveloped discipline, distinct from the risk management used by operational, financial, and underwriters’ risk management. This gulf is due to several factors: risk aversion (especially public understanding and risk in social activities), confusion in the application of risk management to projects, and the additional sophistication of probability mechanics above those of accounting, finance, and engineering. The aim of the presented paper is to demonstrate how to use RIPRAN (the Czech project for risk analysis) as a main part of a feasibility study of a new product project in a manufacturing company. To fulfill this primary aim, we formulated these secondary aims: – To provide a critical analysis of the available information sources dealing with risk management in new product projects in manufacturing companies. – To study and profoundly understand RIPRAN, project risk analysis, its history, application, principles, rules, and exceptions. – To discuss with the author of RIPRAN about the RIPRAN application in new product projects in manufacturing companies of non-Czech origin. – To compile a feasibility study of the new product project. All of these highly cited secondary aims were fulfilled. A short overview of the risk management topic as well as RIPRAN’s characteristics and definition are part of the presented paper. To process this theoretical part of the paper, we used mostly analysis, synthesis, comparison, and deduction. We studied monographs, journals, and internet links with the impact of a source's topicality. The used sources are cited in the list of references. During the process of a feasibility study of a new product project provided through the analysis of our own experience, we discussed the application of the RIPRAN method to the new product project with the author of this method. We realized e-mail correspondence, phone discussions, and finally a personal meeting to control the whole RIPRAN analysis document and discuss the method’s application in the non-Czech origin business environment. To fulfill the primary aim of the presented paper, we decided to use the case study method.
Słowa kluczowe
Wydawca
Rocznik
Strony
7--24
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz., tab., wykr.
Twórcy
autor
  • Department of Management and Economy, DTI University, Dubnica nad Váhom, Sládkovičova 533/20, 018 40 Dubnica nad Váhom, Slovakia
autor
  • Department of Management and Economy, DTI University, Dubnica nad Váhom, Sládkovičova 533/20, 018 40 Dubnica nad Váhom, Slovakia
Bibliografia
  • [1] ČSN ISO 31 000: 2009 Management rizik – Principy a směrnice (2010), Praha: Úřad pro technickou normalizaci, metrologii a státní zkušebnictví.
  • [2] Doležal, J. (2016) Co vyplývá z průzkumu projektového řízení, [Online], Available: https://www.hrnews.cz/lidske-zdroje/rizeni-id-2698710/co-vyplyva--z-pruzkumu-projektoveho-rizeni-v-cr-id-2783946 [24 Apr 2017].
  • [3] Doležal, J., Krátký, J., and Cingl, O. (2013) 5 kroků k úspěšnému projektu: 22 šablon klíčových dokumentů a 3 kompletní reálné projekty. Praha: Grada.
  • [4] Doležal, J., Máchal, P., and Lacko, B. (2012) Projektový management podle IPMA (2., aktualiz. a dopl. vyd.), Praha: Grada.
  • [5] Knapp, P., Žák, O., Raizl, A., Kyjonková, P., Kaštier, V. (2015) Průzkum projektového řízení v ČR a na Slovensku, [Online], Available: http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/2015-Pruzkum-projektoveho-rizeni-v-CR-a-SR/$FILE/EY%20pr%C5%AFzkum%20projektov%C3%A9ho%20%C5%99%C3%ADzen%C3%AD%20v%20%C4%8CR%20a%20SR%202015_bro%C5%BEura.pdf [26 Apr 2017].
  • [6] Korecký, M. and Trkovský, V. (2011) Management rizik projektů: se zaměřením na projekty v průmyslových podnicích, Praha: Grada.
  • [7] Krajčík, V. (2006) Project management of information system, Ostrava: Vysoká škola podnikání.
  • [8] Kreslíková, J. and Kubát, L. (2003) Jakost v managementu projektu a ISO 9001, in PROMA 03, Plzeň.
  • [9] Kubiš, J. (2002) Existenčné riziká projektu a k nemu vmazaných subjektov, in Tvorba softwaru 2002, Ostrava: VŠB TU Ostrava, pp. 109–116.
  • [10] Lacko, B. (2017) Inovace metody RIPRAN a řízení rizik softwarových projektů, [Online], Available: http://prog-story.technicalmuseum.cz/images/dokumenty/Programovani-TSW-1975-2014/2017/2017-09.pdf. [24 Apr 2017].
  • [11] Mareš, M., Rektořík, J., Šelešovský, J. (2013) Krizový management, Praha: Ekopress.
  • [12] Marsina, S. (2009) Podmienky a možnosti uplatnenia projektového prístupu v organizáciách, in Zborník seminára “Projektový manažment,” SPPR, Žilina.
  • [13] Mozga, J. and Vítek, M. (2001) Řízení projektu a řízení rizika, Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.
  • [14] PMBOK (2013) A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide). (c2013) (5th ed.). Newtown Square, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
  • [15] Podmolík, L. (2006) Řízení vzdělávací instituce, Olomouc: Palackého univerzita v Olomouci.
  • [16] Projektová rizika (2017) [Online], Available: https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projektov%C3%A1_rizika. [24 Apr 2017].
  • [17] RIPRAN (2017). Charakteristika metody RIPRANTM [Online], Available: http://ripran.cz/ [24 Apr 2017].
  • [18] Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management Guide for Defense Acquisition Programs (2014), [Online], Available: http://www.acq.osd.mil/se/docs/2017-RIO.pdf [1 Apr 2014].
  • [19] Szabo, B. (2005) Vplyv rizik softwarových projektov na výsledky projektov, in Management v softwarovom inžinierstve, Bratislava: STU Bratislava, pp. 1–8.
  • [20] Tichý, M. (2006) Ovládání rizika: analýza a management, Praha: C.H. Beck.
  • [21] Tichý, M. and Valjentová, M. (2011) Experti a expertizy, Praha: Linde. Available: http://toc.nkp.cz/NKC/201105/contents/nkc20102126011_1.pdf [24 Apr 2017].
  • [22] Trávnik, I. (2004) Vyžadovanie a overovanie profesionality riadenia veřejných prác, in Ivanička, K. (ed.) Ekonomické a riadiace procesy vo stavebníctve a investičních projektech, Bratislava: Slovenská technická univerzita v Bratislave.
  • [23] Weinberger, J. (2005) ‘Řízení projektových rizik’, Business World, vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 52–75.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-5edd1bd2-a07b-4cac-981a-a9360eeb2e18
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.