Comparison between numerical analysis and actual results for a pull-out test

• Autorzy: Gontarz Jakub , Podgórski Jerzy , Jonak Józef , Kalita Marek , Siegmund Michał

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24423/EngTrans.1005.20190815

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper describes a computer analysis of the pull-out test used to determine the force needed to pull out a fragment of rock and the shape of this broken fragment. The analyzed material is sandstone and porphyry. The analysis included a comparison of different methods of propagation of cracks in the Abaqus computer program using the Finite Element Method. The work also contains a description of laboratory tests and analytical considerations.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pull-out test; rock mechanics; fracture mechanics; numerical modeling of fracture

• Wydawca: Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki PAN
• Czasopismo: Engineering Transactions
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 67, iss. 3
• Strony: 311--331
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 18 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Gontarz Jakub

• Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Lublin University of Technology Lublin, Poland

autor

Podgórski Jerzy

• Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Lublin University of Technology Lublin, Poland

autor

Jonak Józef

• Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Lublin University of Technology Lublin, Poland

autor

Kalita Marek

• KOMAG Institute of Mining Technology Gliwice, Poland

autor

Siegmund Michał

• KOMAG Institute of Mining Technology Gliwice, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. European Technical Assessment ETA-99/0009 of 06/01/2015 for Hilti HDA and HDA-R anchor.
• 2. Contrafatto L., Cosenza R., Behaviour of post-installed adhesive anchors in natural stone, Construction and Building Materials, 68: 355–369, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.099.
• 3. Upadhyaya P., Kumar S., Pull-out capacity of adhesive anchors: An analytical solution, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 60: 54–62, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.03.006.
• 4. Tistel J., Grimstad G., Eiksund G., Testing and modeling of cyclically loaded rock anchors, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9(6): 1010–1030, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.07.005.
• 5. Barenblatt G.I., The mathematical theory of equilibrium of crack in brittle fracture, Advances in Applied Mechanics, 7: 55–129, 1962, doi: 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2.
• 6. Bower A.F., Applied mechanics of solids, CRC Press, 2010.
• 7. Elices M., Guinea G.V.G., Gómez J., Planas J., Gomez J., The cohesive zone model: advantages, limitations and challenges, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 69(2): 137–163, 2002.
• 8. Brown W.F., Srawley J.E., Plane Strain Crack Toughness Testing of High Strength Metallic Materials, Philadelphia: ASTM International, 1966.
• 9. van Mier J.G.M., Fracture processes of concrete, CRC Press, 1996.
• 10. Hasanpour R., Choupani N., Mixed-mode study of rock fracture mechanics by using the modified arcan specimen test, International Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2(5): 716–721, 2008.
• 11. Gontarz J., Podgórski J., Explanation of the mechanism of destruction of the cylindrical sample in the Brazilian test, [in:] Advances in mechanics?: theoretical, computational and interdisciplinary issue, [Eds: Kleiber M., Burczyński T., Wilde K., Górski J., Winkelmann K., Smakosz Ł.], pp. 479–483, Boca Raton, Gdańsk 2016,
• 12. Goodier J.N., Compression of rectangular blocks, and the bending of beams by non-linear distributions of bending forces, J. Appl. Mech., 54(18): 173–183, 1932.
• 13. Mohammadi S., Extended finite element method: for fracture analysis of structures, WieyBlackwell, 2008.
• 14. Jirasek M., Zimmermann T., Embedded crack model. Part II: Combination with smeared cracks, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 50(6): 1291–1305, 2001, doi: 10.1002/1097-0207(20010228)50:63.0.CO;2-Q.
• 15. Tejchman J., Bobiński J., Continuous and discontinuous modelling of fracture in concrete using FEM, Springer-Verlag, 2013, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-28463-2.
• 16. Abaqus V 6.14.2 Users Manual, 2014.
• 17. Bazant Z. P., Kazemi M. T., Hasegawa T., Mazars J., Size effect in Brazilian split-cylinder tests. Measurements and fracture analysis, ACI Materials Journal, 88(3): 325–332, 1991.
• 18. Podgórski J., The criterion for determining the direction of crack propagation in a random pattern composites, Meccanica, 52(8): 1923–1934, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11012-016- 0523-y.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).