Factors shaping the Venice Charter and its usefulness – on the example of heritage protection in Poland

• Autorzy: Szmygin Bogusław

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/teka.2861

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the collection of dozens of doctrinal documents on the protection of heritage, the Venice Charter occupies a unique position. The Venice Charter was created more than half a century ago, but it is still treated as the universal, basic document of the heritage protection. This is confirmed by numerous declarations emphasizing the validity of the Venice Charter, contained in many doctrinal documents adopted by ICOMOS, and even in the Operational Guidelines of the UNESCO World Heritage Committee. The Venice Charter is therefore a kind of decalogue for the monument protection [1]. However, every few years there are discussions whether Venice Charter still retains this position. This problem is not resolved unequivocally. However, in the twenty-first century, it can be stated that Venice Charter is not an universal document and cannot be a document shaping the entire heritage protection. This is shown by the reception of the Venice Charter by the Polish conservation community over the past decades. The change of the Venice Charter position is particularly clear in the context of the system transformation that took place as a result of the fall of communism in 1989. This change shows well that doctrinal documents of the heritage protection reflect the external conditions in which they are created. Their importance and usefulness is in principle limited to specific conditions and a specific group of heritage. This is also how the Venice Charter should be treated.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

heritage; factors; protection; UNESCO; Venice Charter

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej ; Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział w Lublinie
• Czasopismo: Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: T. 17, nr 3
• Strony: 84--90
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 10 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Szmygin Bogusław

• Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Lublin University of Technology (Poland)

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0629-4495

Bibliografia

• [1] Jeleński T., Practices of Built Heritage Post-Disaster Reconstruction for Resilient Cities, Buildings, t. 8, nr 4, Art. nr 4, kwi. 2018, doi: 10.3390/buildings8040053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8040053 Google Scholar
• [2] Zhiwen H., The Venice Charter: International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (1964), sty. 17, 2016, http://orcp.hustoj.com/venice-charter-1964/ (dostęp grudz. 21, 2021). Google Scholar
• [3] Pabijan M., Palomar García G., Flores Antunes B., Antoł W., Zieliński P., Babik W., Evolutionary principles guiding amphibian conservation, Evol. Appl., t. 13, nr 5, 2020, doi: 10.1111/eva.12940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12940 Google Scholar
• [4] Fuglewicz S., System służb ochrony zabytków w Polsce a społeczna partycypacja w ochronie zabytków, Prot. Cult. Herit., nr 1, Art. nr 1, maj 2016, doi: 10.24358/ODK_2016_01_05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24358/ODK_2016_01_05 Google Scholar
• [5] Gyurkovich M., Gyurkovich J., New Housing Complexes in Post-Industrial Areas in City Centres in Poland Versus Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection—With a Particular Focus on Cracow, Sustainability, t. 13, nr 1, Art. nr 1, sty. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13010418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010418 Google Scholar
• [6] Pielas M., To learn – to value – to protect. The role of documenting cultural heritage in the construction of social support for the idea of the protection of historical monuments, Muzealnictwo, t. 47, s. 129−135, 2006. Google Scholar
• [7] Huang J., Obracht-Prondzynska H., Kamrowska-Zaluska D., Sun Y., Li L., The image of the City on social media: A comparative study using “Big Data” and “Small Data” methods in the Tri-City Region in Poland, Landsc. Urban Plan., t. 206, s. 103977, luty 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103977 Google Scholar
• [8] Forrest C., International Law and the Protection of Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge, 2009. doi: 10.4324/9780203865194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203865194 Google Scholar
• [9] Merryman J.H., Protection of the Cultural Heritage, Am. J. Comp. Law Suppl., t. 38, s. 513, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/840556 Google Scholar
• [10] Ferretti V., Bottero M., Mondini G., Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings, J. Cult. Herit., t. 15, nr 6, s. 644−655, lis. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007 Google Scholar