Poznawcze uwarunkowania uwikłania w mobbing - rozważania teoretyczne

• Autorzy: Merecz-Kot Dorota

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.54215/BP.2023.11.24.Merecz-Kot

Warianty tytułu

EN

Cognitive determinants of mobbing entanglement - theoretical considerations

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Od lat 90. XX w. na świecie realizowane są badania zmierzające do ustalenia przyczyn wchodzenia w przemocowe relacje w pracy. Badane są korelaty agresji wewnątrzorganizacyjnej, mobbingu, molestowania psychicznego i seksualnego w pracy. Uwaga badaczy skupia się przede wszystkim na czynnikach organizacyjnych i społecznych, które mogą sprzyjać występowaniu tych zjawisk. W ostatnich latach coraz częściej zwraca się uwagę na różnice indywidualne, które mogą predysponować pracowników do wikłania się w przemoc w pracy. W tym kontekście w artykule przedstawiono rozważania dotyczące roli przekonań i schematów w rozwoju mobbingu.

EN

Since the 1990s, research has been conducted to identify the causes of entering into violent relationships at work. The correlates of intra-organisational aggression, bullying, psychological and sexual harassment at work are being studied. In doing so, the attention of researchers focuses primarily on the organisational and social factors that may favour the occurrence of these phenomena. In recent years, however, increasing attention has been paid to individual differences that may predispose employees to become embroiled in violence at work. The article presents considerations on the role of beliefs and patterns in the development of mobbing in the above-mentioned context.

• Wydawca: Centralny Instytut Ochrony Pracy - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
• Czasopismo: Bezpieczeństwo Pracy : nauka i praktyka
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: nr 11
• Strony: 22--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 36 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Merecz-Kot Dorota

• Zakład Psychologii Pracy, Organizacji i Doradztwa Kariery Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Łódzki

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8294-4309

Bibliografia

• [1] SKOGSTAD A. i in. Testing the work environment hypothesis of bullying on a group level of analysis: Psychosocial factors as precursors of observed workplace bullying. Applied Psychology: An International Review. 2011, 60(3): 475-495; https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00444.x.
• [2] SEIGNE E. i in. Personality traits of bullies as a contributory factor in workplace bullying: An exploratory study. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior. 2007, 10(1): 118-132.
• [3] ETTEKAL I., KOCHENDERFER-LADD B., LADD G.W. A synthesis of person-and relational-level factors that influence bullying and bystanding behaviors: Toward an integrative framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2015, 23: 75-86.
• [4] ZAPF D., EINARSEN S. Individual antecedents of bullying. [W:] S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, C.L. Cooper (red.), Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace, Londyn: Taylor & Francis, 2003, s. 165-184.
• [5] BAUGHMAN H.M. i in. Relationships between bullying behaviours and the Dark Triad: A study with adults. Personality and Individual Differences. 2012, 52(5): 571-575.
• [6] KIZUKI M., FUJIWARA T., SHINOZAKI T. Adverse childhood experiences and bullying behaviours at work among workers in Japan. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2020, 77: 9-14.
• [7] ALFORD B.A., BECK A.T. Terapia poznawcza jako teoria integrująca psychoterapię. Kraków: WUJ, 2005.
• [8] BECK A., FREEMAN A. Cognitive therapy for personality disorders. Nowy Jork: Guilford Press, 1990.
• [9] BECK A. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. Nowy Jork: Penguin Books, 1991.
• [10] ELLIS A. Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Nowy Jork: Stuart, 1962.
• [11] ANDERSON J.R. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications (5th ed.). Nowy Jork: Worth Publishers, 2000.
• [12] DAVID A. i in. A search for “hot” cognitions in a clinical and non-clinical context: appraisal, attributions, core relational themes, irrational beliefs, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Psychotherapies. 2005,1: 1-42.
• [13] YOUNG J.E., KLOSKO J.S., WEISHAAR M.E. Terapia Schematów. Przewodnik Praktyka. Sopot: GWP, 2019, s. 25-68.
• [14] BAMBER M.R., PRICE J. A schema focused model of occupational stress. [W:] M.R. Bamber (red.), CBT for occupational stress in health professionals: Introducing a schema focused approach, Londyn - Nowy Jork: Routledge, 2006, s. 149-161.
• [15] BAMBER M., MCMAHON R. Danger-early maladaptive schemas at work!: The role of early maladaptive schemas in career choice and the development of occupational stress in health workers. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2008, 15(2): 96-112.
• [16] BUSHMAN B., BAUMEISTER R. Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence. Journal of Research in Personality. 2002, 36: 543-545.
• [17] SALMIVALLI C. Feeling good about oneself, being bad to others? Remarks on self-esteem, hostility, and aggressive behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2001, 6: 375-393.
• [18] TOBLIN R. i in. Social-cognitive and behavioral attributes of aggressive victims of bullying. Applied Developmental Psychology. 2005, 26: 329-346.
• [19] MILLON T., DAVIS R. Zaburzenia Osobowości. Warszawa: Instytut Psychologii Zdrowia PTP, 2005.
• [20] BAUMEISTER R., BUSHMAN B., CAMPBELL W.K. Self-esteem, narcissism, and aggression: Does violence results from low self-esteem or from threatened egotism? Current Direction in Psychological Science. 2000, 1: 26-29.
• [21] SHAPIRO D. Neurotic styles. Nowy Jork: Basic Books, 1965: 20-29.
• [22] BECK A., FREEMAN A. Cognitive therapy for personality disorders. Nowy Jork: Guilford Press, 1990.
• [23] RASKIN R., NOVACEK J., HOGAN R. Narcissistic self-esteem management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991 60(6): 911-918.
• [24] CARVALHO M., BRANQUINHO C.S.D.S., MATOS M.G. Bullies, victims and provocative victims in context: Discriminant factors in a Portuguese adolescent sample. European Scientifi c Journal. 2017, 13(20): 23-36.
• [25] O’FARRELL G., GRIMARD C.M., POWER J.L., LEE R.T. Targets of Workplace Bullying and Mistreatment: Helpless Victims or Active Provocateurs?. [W:] P. D'Cruz i in. Pathways of Job-related Negative Behaviour. Handbooks of Workplace Bullying, Emotional Abuse and Harassment, t. 2. Singapur: Springer, 2021, s. 297-336.
• [26] DESRUMAUX P. i in. Workplace bullying and victims’ prosocial or antisocial behaviors: What are the effects on equity, responsibility judgments, and help giving? Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment. 2015, 25(6): 509-521.
• [27] MULDER R. i in. Workplace mobbing and bystanders’ helping behaviour towards victims: the role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association. International Journal of Psychology. 2014, 49(4): 304-12.
• [28] THIMM J.C., HOLLAND J.M. Early maladaptive schemas, meaning making, and complicated grief symptoms after bereavement. International Journal of Stress Management. 2017, 24(4): 347-367.
• [29] LÓPEZ-LÓPEZ A. i in. Early maladaptive schemas as a risk factor for fi bromyalgia: A case-control study. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2023, doi: 10.1037/tra0001441.
• [30] THIMM J.C., CHANG M. Early Maladaptive Schemas and Mental Disorders in Adulthood: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2022, 15(4): 371-413.
• [31] HUANG L.S., MOLENBERGHS P., MUSSAP A.J. Cognitive distortions mediate relationships between early maladaptive schemas and aggression in women and men. Aggressive Behavior. 2023, 49(4): 418-430; doi: 10.1002/ab.22083.
• [32] BAMBER M. Work disfunction and their associated early maladaptive schemata and coping styles. [W:] M.R. Bamber (red.), CBT for occupational stress in health professionals: Introducing a schema focused approach, Londyn - Nowy Jork: Routledge, 2006, s. 162-176.
• [33] DRYDEN W. Ujarzmić gniew. Kielce: Wydawnictwo Jedność, 2002.
• [34] BERKOWITZ L. Aggression: its causes, consequences, and control. Nowy Jork: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1993.
• [35] HAM E.M., YOU M.J. Role of Irrational Beliefs and Anger Rumination on Nurses’ Anger Expression Styles. Workplace Health and Safety. 2018, 66(5): 223-232.
• [36] VÎSLĂ A. i in. Irrational beliefs and psycho logical distress: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. 2016, 85: 8-15

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).