PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Wpływ wstępnej ultradźwiękowej sonifikacji serwatki kwaśnej na efektywność procesu fermentacji metanowej

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
Effect of ultrasound sonication on the effectiveness of acidic whey anaerobic methane fermentation conditions
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
EN
Whey is almost clear liquid which is formed as a residue after cutting cow's milk. In its composition contains about 5% of sugar - lactose, protein and 1% and 0.5% fat, as well as minerals and vitamins. Whey may be about 50% dry milk was-was a part is separated from the whey clot, which is produced cheese or casein. 1 part by volume of the resulting cheese falls nearly 10 parts of whey. Rennet in cheese production and ripening sweet whey is obtained, the production of cottage cheese whey acidic. The resulting large quantities of whey in dairy plants could be environmentally dangerous waste from the manufacture of cheese or casein. Because of the huge loads of organic compounds directly from crude whey-operation to the environment threatens to strong contamination. At the same time whey can be a valuable starting material for further processing, eg in the food industry. One possible means of disposal of whey is its use as a substrate for methane fermentation process. Thanks to this potentially dangerous and onerous for the dairy whey can be converted into valuable biogas energy. In this study analyzed the extent to which the application of ultrasound to condition the whey can improve its performance in the process of anaerobic mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Studies on the effects of ultrasound sonication on the effectiveness of the distribution of acid whey was carried out in five series of varying amounts of energy input during conditioning. After the disintegration of the whey, analyzed its susceptibility to anaerobic digestion in the mesophilic anaerobic digestion. For this purpose, respirometric measurements were performed using, as inoculum anaerobic sludge adapted to degrade whey. With the respirometric test performed simultaneous measurements of anaerobic sludge pH. Research in all series including the control series was performed in triplicate. For statistical calculations used the program Statistica 9.0. The obtained results indicate that by sonication can significantly increase the value of energy produced in the process of anaerobic digestion biogas. Despite the sonication energy inputs, increased production of biogas with high methane content makes it advisable to appropriate preparatory treatments of the substrate. The results of series 4 and 5 with the largest dose of ultrasound energy demonstrated that the amount of energy input must be selected very carefully, and the increase in the number entering the ultrasound does not translates into a linear increase in the production of methane. In the series, with shorter times of exposure to ultrasound was shorter acid phase and increase the rate of formation of biogas in comparison to a series of links.
Słowa kluczowe
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
471--480
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 23 poz., tab., rys.
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Warmińsko Mazurski, Olsztyn
autor
  • Uniwersytet Warmińsko Mazurski, Olsztyn
autor
  • Uniwersytet Warmińsko Mazurski, Olsztyn
autor
  • Uniwersytet Warmińsko Mazurski, Olsztyn
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abu-Dayeh Matouq M., Al-Anber Z.A.: The application of high frequency ultrasound waves to remove ammonia from simulated industrial wastewater. Ultrason. Sonochem. 14, 393–397 (2007).
  • 2. Blume T., Neis U.: Improved wastewater disinfection by ultrasonic pretreatment. Ultrason. Sonochem. 11, 333–336 (2004).
  • 3. Elbeshbishy E., Aaldin S. Hafez H., Nakhla G., Ray M.: Impact of ultrasonication of hog manure on anaerobic digestibility. Ultrason. Sonochem. 18, 164–171 (2011).
  • 4. Erden G., Filibeli A.: Ultrasonic pretreatment of biological sludge: consequences for disintegration, anaerobic biodegradability, and filterability. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 85,145–150 (2010).
  • 5. Ergurder T.H., Tezele U., Guven E., Demirer G.N.: Anaerobic biotransformation and methane generation potential of Cheese whey in batch and UASB reactors. Waste Management. 21, 643-650 (2001).
  • 6. Fernández-Cegrí V., M.A. De la Rubia, Raposo F., Borja R.: Impact of ultrasonic pretreatment under different operational conditions on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of sunflower oil cake in batch mode. Ultrason. Sonochem. 19, 1003–1010 (2012).
  • 7. Gogate P.R.: Cavitation: an auxiliary technique in wastewater treatment schemes. Adv. Env. Res. 6, 335–358, (2002).
  • 8. Gonze E., Fourel L., Gonthier Y., Boldo P., Bernis A.: Wastewater pretreatment with ultrasonic irradiation to reduce toxicity. Chem. Enging. J. 73, 93–100 (1999).
  • 9. Janczukowicz W., Zieliński M., Dębowski M.: Biodegradability evaluation of dairy effluents originated in selected sections of dairy production, Bioresour. Technol. 99, 4199–4205 (2008).
  • 10. Kobayashi T., Kobayashi T., Hosaka Y., Fujii N.: Ultrasound-enhanced membrane-cleaning processes applied water treatments: influence of sonic frequency on filtration treatments. Ultrason. Sonochem. 41, 185–190 (2003).
  • 11. Kyllonen H., Pirkonen P., Nystrom M., Nuortila-Jokinen J., Gronroos A.: Experimental aspects of ultrasonically enhanced cross-flow membrane filtration of industrial wastewater. Ultrason. Sonochem. 13, 295–302 (2006).
  • 12. Meegoda J.N., Perera R.: Ultrasound to decontaminate heavy metals in dredged sediments. J. Haz. Mat. 85, 73–89 (2001).
  • 13. Miłowska K.: Ultrasound – mechanisms of action and application in sonodynamic therapy. Postepy Hig. Med. Dosw. 67, 338–349 (2007).
  • 14. Naffrechoux E., Chanoux S., Petrier C., Suptil J.: Sonochemical and photochemical oxidation of organic matter. Ultrason. Sonochem. 7, 255– 259 (2000).
  • 15. Neczaj E., Kacprzak M., Lach J., Okoniewska E.: Effect of sonication on combined treatment of landfill leachate and domestic sewage in SBR reactor. Desalination 204, 227–233 (2007).
  • 16. Phull S. S., Newman A. P., Lorimer J.P., Pollet B., Mason T. J.: The development and evaluation of ultrasound in the biocidal treatment of water. Ultrason. Sonochem. 4, 157–164 (1997).
  • 17. Pilli S., Bhunia P., Yan S., Leblanc R.J, Tyagi R.D, Suram-Palli R. Y.: Ultrasonic pretreatment of sludge: A review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 18, 1–18 (2011).
  • 18. Sangave C.P., Pandit B.A.: Ultrasound pre-treatment for enhanced biodegradability of the distillery wastewater. Ultrason. Sonochem. 11, 197–203 (2004).
  • 19. Seungmin N., Young-Uk K., Jeehyeong K.: Physiochemical properties of digested sewage sludge with ultrasonic treatment. Ultrason. Sonochem. 14, 281–285 (2007).
  • 20. Ward A.J., Hobbs P.J., Holliman P.J., Jones D.L.: Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 7928–7940 (2008).
  • 21. Wolski P., Zawieja I.: Effect of ultrasound field on dewatering of sewage sludge. Archives of Environmental Protection, vol. 38, no. 2, 25–31 (2012).
  • 22. Yin X., Lu X., Han P., Wang Y.: Ultrasonic treatment on activated sewage sludge from petro-plant for reduction. Ultrasonics. 44 397–399 (2006).
  • 23. Zieliński M., Krzemieniewski M., Dębowski M.: Technological effects of dairy wastewater treatment on anaerobic bed with activated medium. Pol. J. Env. Stud. Series of Monographs. 5, 83–87 (2009).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-5d91bf27-e24a-4c3d-b9be-32fd94eedcc5
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.