Оценка баланса парниковых газов при получении возобновляемой биомассы с короткоцикловых энергетических плантаций ивы

• Autorzy: Rodzkin A. , Kostukevich S. , Tanaś W. , Szymanek M.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The assessment of greenhouse gases for biomass production from short rotation coppice energy willow plantations

• Języki publikacji: RU

Abstrakty

EN

Greenhouse gas control it is key aspect for climate protection. The positioning of corporations concerning greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) has changed profoundly in the past two decades. As climate regulation became inevitable, companies started adopting more proactive strategies. One of the effective methods for greenhouse gas emission calculation is based on life cycle analysis. A carbon footprint is defined as the sum of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions caused by an organization, event, or product and is expressed in terms of CO2 equivalents (CO2-e). Our investigations were devoted to greenhouse emission assessment during life cycle of willow wood production from short rotation coppice plantations. In accordance with results about 48% of carbon dioxide gas from all life cycle of willow was emitted during wood harvesting and transportation to energy plants. It is necessary to optimize the logistic scheme of willow wood harvesting and transportation for decreasing of greenhouse gas emission. The substitutions of fossil fuel by willow wood enable to save 11733 ton CO2-e from 30 hectares of willow plantation. The carbon tax for instance in Australia starting at AU$ 23 a ton of Carbon Dioxide equivalent (tCO2e). Thus, the substitute of fossil fuel by willow wood may have profit as for regional so and for local level of production.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

emisja gazów cieplarnianych; bioenergia; wierzba; Salix spp.

EN

greenhouse gas emissions; bioenergy; short rotation coppice; willow

• Wydawca: Sieć Badawcza Łukasiewicz - Poznański Instytut Technologiczny
• Czasopismo: Journal of Research and Applications in Agricultural Engineering
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 63, nr 1
• Strony: 69--74
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Rodzkin A.

• Belarus National Technical University, Minsk, Belarus

autor

Kostukevich S.

• Republican Institute of Professional Education, Minsk, Belarus

autor

Tanaś W.

• University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland

autor

Szymanek M.

• University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] United nations framework convention on climate change / United nations 1992, p. 25.
• [2] Kyoto protocol to the united nations framework convention on climate change, United nations 1998, p. 22.
• [3] Энергоэффективность и торговля квотами на выбросы. // Секретариат энергетической хартии. – ПЭЭСЭА, 2006.
• [4] Directive 2003/87/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 13 October 2003 / Official Journal № l 338, 2004.
• [5] The Energy and Power Evaluation Program (ENPEP). Model Overview and Summary of Recent Applications / Argonne National Laboratory. – Chicago, Illinois: USA, 2003.
• [6] Why join a carbon club? A study of the banks participating in the Brazilian “Business for Climate Platform”/ Renato J. Orsato, José Guilherme F. de Campos, Simone R. Barakat, Mariana Nicolletti, Mario Monzoni // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 96, 387-396.
• [7] Carbon strategies and management practices in an uncertain carbonomic environment - lessons learned from the coal-face / Dina Wahyuni, Janek Ratnatung // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 96, 397-406.
• [8] Integration of carbon risks and opportunities in enterprise risk management systems: evidence from Australian firms /Nava Subramaniam, Dina Wahyuni, Barry J. Cooper, Philomena Leung, Graeme Wines // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 96, 407-417.
• [9] Assessment of electrically-driven vehicles in terms of emission impacts and energy requirements: a case study for Istanbul, Turkey / Bunyamin Yagcitekin, Mehmet Uzunoglu, Arif Karakas, Ozan Erdinc // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 96, 486-492.
• [10] Carbon footprint in different beef production systems on a southern Brazilian farm: a case study /Clandio F. Ruviaro, Cristiane Maria de Léis, Vinícius do N. Lampert, Júlio Otávio Jardim Barcellos, Homero Dewes // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 96, 435-443.
• [11] Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., Befort, B.L., 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.A. 108, 20260-20264.
• [12] Hertwich, E.G., Peters, G.P., 2009. Carbon footprint of Nations: a global, Trade-Linked analysis // Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 64140-6420.
• [13] Ruviaro, C.F., Gianezini, M., Brandao, F.S., Winck, C.A., Dewes, H., 2012. Life cycle assessment in Brazilian agriculture facing worldwide trends // J. Clean. Prod. 28, 9-24.
• [14] Embodied carbon budget accounting system for calculating carbonfootprint of large hydropower project // Jin Zhang, Linyu Xu // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 96, 444-451.
• [15] Energy production from microalgae biomass: carbon footprint and energy balance / Diego Lima Medeiros, Emerson A. Sales, Asher Kiperstok // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 96, 493-500.
• [16] Dovì, V.G., Friedler, F., Huisingh, D., Klemes, J.J., 2009. Cleaner energy for sustainable future. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (10), 889e895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016 / j.jclepro.2009.02.001.
• [17] Dimitriou, J. Willows for energy and phytoremediation in Sweden. / J. Dimitriou, P. Aronsson, // Unasylva, 2005, 6, 47–50.
• [18] Rytkunen, V-M. Biomass production of Salix viminalis in southern Finland and the effect of soil properties and climate conditions on its production and survival. / V-M. Rytkunen, // Biomass and Bioenergy, 1999, 16, 103–117.
• [19] Schweier, J. Harvesting of short rotation coppice – harvesting trials with a cut and storage system in Germany / J.Schweier, G.Becker // Silva Fennica,, 2012, 46(2), 287–299.
• [20] Stern, B. W.: Stroh als Quelle erneuerbarer Energie, Swiss Bull. angew. Geol. Vol. 15/1, 2010. – P. 95 – 103.
• [21] Willow Biomass Producer’s Handbook / L. P. Abrahamson [et al.]. – State University of New York. – 2002, - 32 p.
• [22] Biomass Production in Energy Forests. p. 196-202 / J. Mosiej, A. Karczmarczyk, K. Wyporska, A. Rodzkin // Ecosystem Health and Sustainable Agriculture 3. Editors: Lars Rydén and Ingrid Karlsson©The Baltic University Programme, - Uppsala University, 2012, - 325 p.
• [23] Родькин О.И.: Производство возобновляемого биотоплива в аграрных ландшафтах: экологические и технологические аспекты: монография/ О.И. Родькин - Минск: МГЭУ им. А.Д. Сахарова, 2011. - 212 с.
• [24] Доспехов, Б. А. Методика полевого опыта / Б. А. Доспехов. – М. : Колос, 1985. - 416 с.
• [25] Global Warming Potentials. Climate Change 1995, The Science of Climate Change: Summary for Policymakers and Technical Summary of the Working Group I Report // http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/items/3825.php.
• [26] Технический кодекс установившейся практики. ТКП 17.09-01-2011 (02120) // Миприроды, Минск, с. 27.
• [27] Sleight, Nathan J. Recently bred willow (Salix spp.). Biomass crops show stable yield trends over three rotations at two sites / Nathan J. Sleight, Timothy A. Volk // Bioenerg. Res., 9(3), New-York, 2016., P. 782-797.
• [28] Sleight, Nathan J. Recently bred willow (Salix spp.). Biomass crops show stable yield trends over three rotations at two sites / Nathan J. Sleight, Timothy A. Volk // Bioenerg. Res. 9(3), New-York, 2016., P. 782-797.
• [29] Greenhouse gas assessment of Brazilian soybean production: a case study of Mato Grosso State / Guilherme Silva Raucci, Cindy Silva Moreira, Priscila Aparecida Alves, Francisco F.C. Mello, Leidivan de Almeida Frazão, Carlos Eduardo P. Cerri, Carlos Clemente Cerri // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 96, 418-425.
• [30] Neglected carbon pools and fluxes in the soil balance of short-rotation woody biomass crops / G. Berhongaray, R. Ceulemans // biomass and bioenergy 2015, 73, 62-66.
• [31] Hillier J, Whittaker C, Dailey G, Aylott M, Casella E, Richter GM, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from four bioenergy crops in England and Wales: integrating spatial estimates of yield and soil carbon balance in life cycle analyses // GCB Bioenergy 2009, Volume 1, Issue 4 August 2009, 267–281.
• [32] Njakou Djomo S, El Kasmioui O, Ceulemans R. Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy production from poplar and willow: a review. GCB Bioenergy, 2011, 3, 181.
• [33] Родькин, О.И. Планирование производства биотоплива из древесины быстрорастущей ивы на основе интерактивной модели / О.И. Родькин, В.А. Иванюкович, А.А Шабанов // Веснiк Вiцебскага дзяржаўнага ўнiверсiтэта. – 2014. - № 2(80). - С. 39-44.
• [34] Ecological and economic importance of energy crops / Aleh Rodzkin, Sasa Orlovich, Andrej Pilipovich, Borivoj Krstich // Proceedings of International eco-conference. “Environmental protection of urban and suburban settlements” / Novi Sad, Serbia, 25–28 September 2013, - Novi Sad, 2013, 501–509.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).