Innovative Architectural Learning: A Case Study on Multidisciplinary and Experiential Teaching Methods

• Autorzy: Moreira Pinto Luis , Guner Muhammet Emin

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/teka.7014

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This study explores an innovative approach to architectural education, integrating multidisciplinary and experiential practices to enhance student creativity, spatial perception, and problem-solving skills. Traditional studio-based teaching meth-ods are reimagined by incorporating diverse activities such as storytelling, sketching, filmmaking, and scenario development. These methods encourage students to develop multidimensional thinking and effectively communicate complex design ideas.The research unfolds in two main phases: the transformation of a mundane urban space into a city attraction and the subsequent marketing of the design. Students engage in hands-on activities, including observational drawing, narrative con-struction, comic book creation, and short film production, fostering a deeper understanding of spatial dynamics and user engagement. Feedback sessions and peer evaluations ensure iterative learning and practical application.A case study involving the redesign of a “boring” street demonstrates the efficacy of this methodology, revealing in-creased student motivation, creativity, and interdisciplinary collaboration. However, challenges such as balancing regulatory compliance with creative exploration and the limited integration of advanced digital tools like 3D modeling and virtual reality were identified. The study underscores the necessity of adapting architectural curricula to meet contemporary professional demands, emphasizing user-centered design and advanced technological integration.This alternative pedagogical framework highlights the importance of fostering cultural exchange, peer learning, and profes-sional preparedness. While the findings suggest a positive impact on student engagement and skill development, maintaining academic rigor within this gamified and interactive learning environment remains crucial. Ultimately, this approach not only prepares students for the complexities of modern architectural practice but also inspires innovative contributions to society.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

architectural education; multidisciplinary learning; creative pedagogy; spatial perception; design thinking; experiential learning

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej ; Polska Akademia Nauk, Oddział w Lublinie
• Czasopismo: Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: T. 20, nr 2
• Strony: 23--41
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., fig., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Moreira Pinto Luis

• CIAUD-UBI, Beira Interior University (UBI), Civil Engeneering and Architecture Department (DECA), Covilhã, Portugal

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-0294

autor

Guner Muhammet Emin

• Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Architecture, Isparta, Turkey

Bibliografia

• [1] Achten, Henri; Koszewski, Krzysztof; Martens, Bob. “What Happened after the ‘Hype’ on Virtual Design Studios? Some Considerations for a Roundtable Discussion.” In: University of Ljubljana (ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International eCAADe Conference, Ljubljana, 2011, s.24.
• [2] Akyıldız, E. C. (2020). The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, October 2020 Volume 10 Issue 4, p. 389-407. DOI: 10.7456/11004100/005
• [3] Alburgawi, S.A. and Al-Gamdi, M.A. (2022). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on architecture design studio pedagogy in Saudi Arabia. Open House International. https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OHI-12-2020-0178 /13.04.2021
• [4] Amidon, Edmund J. (1967). The Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A manual for understanding and improving teach-ers’ classroom behavior. Association for Productive Teaching. New York
• [5] Aydınlı, S. (2014). “Paralaks oda: ‘Öğrenmeyi öğrenme’ ortamı olarak stüdyo.” Semra Aydınlı ve Burçin Kürtüncü (der.), Paralaks Oda, İstanbul: Yapı Endüstri Merkezi, s.10-31.
• [6] Buchanan, R. (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056
• [7] Çobanoğlu, Y. Ş. (2018). 6 mimar ve akademisyenin mimarlık eğitim modeli üzerine düşünceleri. Yapı Dergisi. https://yapidergisi.com/6-mimar-ve-akademisyenin-mimarlik-egitim-modeli-uzerine-dusunceleri/
• [8] Deldjoo, Y.; Elahi, M.; Cremonesi, P.; Garzotto, F.; Piazzolla, P. (2016). Recommending Movies Based on Mise-en-Scene Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ‘16), New York, NY, USA, 7–12 May 2016; pp. 1540–1547. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.289255
• [9] Dutton, T. A. (Ed.). (1991). Voices in architectural education: Cultural politics and pedagogy. Bergin & Garvey. https://doi.org/10.2307/1425098
• [10] Evans, R. (1997). Translations from Drawing to Building and Other Essays. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA.
• [11] Gagné, R. and Briggs, L.J. (1974). Principles of Instructional Design. Holton, Rinehart & Winston, New York Press
• .[12] Jansen, S.; Boumeester, H.; Coolen, H.; Goetgeluk, R.; Molin, E. (2011). The effect of presentation: What you see is what you value. J. Archit. Plan. Res., 28, 181–193. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030940
• [13] Kim, J. J.-Y. (2024, February 28). Rethinking architecture education: Learning from practice. DesignIntelligence. https://www.di.net/di-media/articles/2024-quarterly/09-rethinking-architecture-education-learning-from-practice-julie-kim/
• [14] Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Architectural Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979
• [15] Malec-Zięba, E. (2023). Habitat – structure and form, design experience in teaching interior design. Teka Komisji Ar-chitektury, Urbanistyki I Studiów Krajobrazowych, 19(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.5627
• [16] Park, Eun Joo, and Mi Jeong Kim. (2021). Visual Communication for Students’ Creative Thinking in the Design Studio: Translating Filmic Spaces into Spatial Design. Buildings, 11(3): 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings1103009
• [17] Park, J.; Jin, Y.; Ahn, S.; Lee, S. (2019). The Impact of Design Representation on Visual Perception: Comparing Eye-Tracking Data of Architectural Scenes Between Photography and Line Drawing. Arch. Des. Res., 32, 5–29. https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2019.02.32.1.5
• [18] Rajagopalan, I. (2019). Concept of Teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(2), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v7i2.329
• [19] Runco, M. (2008). Commentary: Divergent Thinking Is Not Synonymous With Creativity. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts, 2, 93–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93
• [20] Saghafi, R. M., Mozaffar, F., Moosavi, S. M., Fathi, N. (2015). Teaching Methods in Architectural Design Basics. Ciência e Natura, 37(6-1), 378–387. http://doi.org/105902/2179460X
• [21] Pinto, L.M., Rodrigues, T.(2022). The importance of art and architecture regarding the idea that we have about a city.AIP Conf. Proc. 15 November 2022; 2574 (1): 030001. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0117647.
• [22] Şekerci, Y., Danacı, M. H., Kaynakçı, Z. K. E. (2021). Uzaktan eğitimin uygulamalı derslerde sürdürülebilirliği: mimarlık bölümleri örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.874055
• [23] Swarooprani, K. (2022). An Study of Research Methodology. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, En-gineering and Technology, 9(3), 537–543. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRSET2293175
• [24] Şuta, O. (2022). Covid-19 Pandemisi ile Değişen Mimari Tasarım Eğitiminin Öğrenci Üzerindeki Etkileri: Trakya Üniversitesi Mimarlık Bölümü Örneği. Kent Akademisi Dergisi, 15(4), 1549. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1129614%20x
• [25] Yılmaz, D. R., Polat, S. (2020). Mimarlık ve Yaşam Dergisi Cilt: 5, No: 2, Published at Architecture and Life, 2020 (443). DOI: 10.26835/my.746719