PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Wpływ zjawiska neokartografii na rozwój serwisów internetowych udostępniających informacje przestrzenne

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
EN
The influence of the phenomenon of neocartography on the development of internet services providing access to spatial information
Języki publikacji
PL
Abstrakty
PL
W artykule zwrócono uwagę na wiele nowych i innowacyjnych przykładów tworzenia opracowań kartograficznych przez osoby i firmy spoza środowiska kartografów i producentów map. Działalność ta, nazywana neokartografią, nabiera w ostatnich latach coraz większego znaczenia i będzie wpływać na teorię i praktykę kartograficzną. Popularność i znaczenie tzw. kartografii społecznościowej dostrzegły i starają się wykorzystać największe firmy komercyjne. Autorzy zwracają uwagę na przyczyny rozwoju tego zjawiska oraz jego wpływ na działalność firm komercyjnych i instytucji publicznych zajmujących się udostępnianiem informacji przestrzennych, w szczególności poprzez serwisy internetowe. Wskazano również na wynikające z tego szansę i zagrożenia dla poprawności przekazu kartograficznego oraz na konieczność profesjonalnego wspomagania działań neokartografów.
EN
The aim of the article is to draw attention to the new phenomenon of neocartography and its growing popularity. Many new and innovative examples of the usage of cartography come from outside the circle of cartographers and map producers. The term "neocartography" is used with reference to map makers without traditional cartographic education. This kind of cartographic productions most frequently use the data and software licensed by Free Open Software. The availability of data and tools allows neocartogra-phers to create their own maps and present "whatever they want however they want", often breaking the rules of traditional cartography. One of the examples of this area of research and activity is social media cartography, in which the users of internet services, create and update internet maps and geoinformational services by themselves, in compliance to the idea of Web 2.0. The popularity and significance of social media cartography has been noted by the biggest commercial companies, which are trying to use it. These trends have also been observed by International Cartographic Association (ICA), which in 2011 established the new Commission on Neocartography. Practical examples of using Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) show that these solutions are especially interesting in situations when the time of reaction and updating is essential, e.g. in crisis management, when social commitment of users allows to acquire current and reliable data of spatial reference. Neocartography also means new non-standard forms of presentation which, created by simple users or software designers, allow to benefit from interactivity and new possibilities of multimedia, such as 3D presentation and computer animation. In the light of the swift development of neocartography it becomes necessary to design solutions which would ensure adequate usage of cartographic methodology and good cartographic practice. In this context, the tasks of a professional cartographer as a moderator of the work of neocartographers would include such issues as: defining patterns of geocom-positon, creating graphic templates, designing rules of data harmonization, facilitating the selection of cartographic presentation methods, map design control, as well as education and promotion of cartographic methodology.
Rocznik
Strony
34--46
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 37 poz., mapy.
Twórcy
autor
  • Zakład Kartografii Politechniki Warszawskiej
autor
  • Zakład Kartografii Politechniki Warszawskiej
Bibliografia
  • Ball M., 2010, What's the distinction between crowd-sourcing, volunteered geographic information and authoritative data?, http://www.sensysmag.com/ spatialsustain/whats-the-distinction-between-crowd-sourcing-volunteered-geographic-information-and-authoritatlve-data.html
  • Dagognet, R, 1997, Une epistemologie de I'espace concret: Neogeographie. Paris: J. Vrin.
  • Goodchild M., 2007, Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. ,,GeoJournal" Vol. 69, no. 4, s. 211-221.
  • Haklay M., 2010, How good is volunteered geographical information? A comparative study of Open-StreetMaps and Ordnance Survey dataset. ,,Environmentanal and Planing B: Planning and Design" Vol. 37, s. 682-703.
  • Hennig B., 2013, From geovisualisation to neocarto-graphy: Maps in a digital world. W: Materiaty pierwszej sesji Komisji Neokartografii, http://icaci.org/ category/commission-news/commission-on-neo-cartography/
  • Kunze C, Hecht R., Hahmann S., 2013, Assessing the completeness of building footprints in Open-StreetMap: An example from Germany. 26 International Cartographic Conference, Dresden 25-30.08.2013.
  • Rice M., Paez F., Mulhollen A., Shore B., 2012, Crowdsourced Geospatial Data. A report on the emerging phenomena of crowdsourced and user-generated geospatial data. W: Materiały MAK, http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a576607.pdf
  • Szott R., 2006a, Psychogeography vs. neogeography. A weblog posting, posted on Placekrafton 7th April 2006, http://placekraft.blogspot.com/2006/04/psy-chogeography-vs-neogeography.html
  • Szott R., 2006b, Neogeography defined. A weblog posting, posted on Placekraft on 26th April 2006, http://placekraft.blogspot.com/2006/04/neogeography-defined.html
  • Szott, R., 2006c, What is neogeography anyway?. A weblog posting, posted on Placekraft on Platial News and Neogeography: The official weblog of Platial, on 27th May 2006, http://platial.typepad. com/news/2006/05/what_is_neogeog.html
  • Turner A., 2006, Introduction to neogeography. O'Reilly Short Cuts series, O'Reilly Media.
  • Turner A., 2007, Neogeography - towards a definition. A weblog posting, posted on High Earth Orbit, 6th December 2007, http://highearthorbit.com/ neogeography-towards-a-definition/
  • Zielstra D., Zipf A, 2013, Comparative study of proprietary geodata and volunteered geographic information for Germany. 13th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science 2010, 1-15 Guimaraes, Portugal.
  • Źródła internetowe
  • [1] http://www.vicchi.org/2011/03/07/after-neogeography-here-comes-neo cartography/
  • [2] http://wroclaw.rdos.gov.pl/images/gis/04_zalacznik_a.pdf
  • [3] http://openstreetmap.org.pl/osm/mapa/
  • [4] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Typhoon_Haiyan_%282013%29
  • [5] http://google.org/crisismap/2013-yolanda?gl=en
  • [6] http://www.arcgis.com/apps/MapTour/index.html? appid=18ea32008c3f43a898096f4e30e85e79& webmap=dee921 d4f2344e448b66c747f5f508f6& folderid=d6f13810af40480daeba32fd4ae7ea27#
  • [7] http://www.geoportal.rdos.katowice.pl/geoportal/
  • [8] http://orca.casa.ucl.ac.uk/~ollie/osmcompare/
  • [9] http://epsh.pgi.gov.pl/epsh/ [10] http://neocartography.icaci.org/
  • [11] http://neocartography.icaci.org/2012/09/commision-workshop-at-uclslide-decks-reports-videos/
  • [12] http://www.geocrowd.eu/workshop_2013/
  • [13] http://www.sensysmag.com/spatialsustain/whats-the-distinction-between-crowdsourcing-volunteered-geographic-information-and-authoritative-data.html
  • [14] http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/community-maps-program
  • [15] http://www.sensysmag.com/spatialsustain/where-do-the-divergent-paths-of-crowdsourcing-and-automated-data-collection-merge.html
  • [16] http://neocartography.icaci.org/2012/09/commision-workshop-at-ucl-slide-decks-reports-videos/
  • [17] http://www.sensysrnag.com/spatialsustain/whats-the-distinction-between-crowdsourcing-volunteered-geographic-information-and-authoritative-data.html
  • [18] http://www.viewsoftheworld.net
  • [19] http://povesham.wordpress.com/2011/05/20/open-streetmap-and-ordnance-survey-meridian-2-comparison-2008-2011 /
  • [20] http://www.theguardian.com/news/2007/mar/24/mainsection.stephenmossi
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-5d3a928e-be4f-4ee3-bbbf-f12d0cc13ee9
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.