PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Cultural Ecosystem Services – Framework, Theories and Practices

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Usługi kulturowe pełnione przez ekosystemy – struktura, teoria i praktyka
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The article above is an attempt to present main issues of conceptual background and research practices for cultural ecosystem services, seen as an important part of sustainable development, for its practical implementation. The author begins with conceptual background of ecosystems services as whole, then goes to cultural ecosystem services conceptual background and finally to cultural ecosystem services research practice. The last part of the article gives an overview of participant disciplines (their methodologies and perspectives), main research topics, national/ geographical background of authors, and finally – main weaknesses of contemporary researches and main challenges for the future ones.
PL
Artykuł stanowi próbę przedstawienia głównych zagadnień odnoszących się do teoretycznego tła i praktyk badawczych odnoszących się do usług kulturowych pełnionych przez ekosystemy. Jest to ważna kwestia związana z wdrażaniem rozwoju zrównoważonego. Autorka rozpoczyna od ogólnej analizy usług pełnionych przez ekosystemy, przechodząc następnie do uwarunkowań teoretycznych usług kulturowych, aby potem odnieść się także do praktyk badawczych. Ostatnia część artykułu to przegląd dyscyplin powiązanych (ich metodologii i perspektyw), głównych tematów badawczych, krajowego/geograficznego pochodzenia autorów, a także głównych słabości obecnie prowadzonych badań i zarysu wyzwań jakie staną przed nami w przyszłości.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
101--110
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 79 poz.
Twórcy
  • Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej, Wydział Nauk o Ziemi i Gospodarki Przestrzennej, Al. Kraśnicka 2 cd, 20-718 Lublin, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. ADEKOLA O., MITCHEL G., 2011, The Niger Delta wetlands: threats to ecosystem services, their importance to dependent communities and possible management measures, in: Interna-tional Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosys-tem Services & Management, no 7, p. 50-68.
  • 2. ALESSA L., KLISKEY A., BROWN G., 2008, Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecolog-ical space, in: Landscape Urban Planning, no 85, p. 27-39.
  • 3. BEAUMONT, N. J., AUSTEN M. C, MANGI S.C., TOWNSEND M., 2008, Economic valuation for the conservation of marine biodiversity, in: Marine Pollution Bulletin, no 56, p. 386-396.
  • 4. BENNETT E. M., PETERSON G. D., GORDON L. J., 2009, Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services, in: Ecology let-ters, vol. 12, no 12, p. 1394-1404.
  • 5. BOLUND P., HUNHAMMAR S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas, in: Ecological economics, vol. 29, no 2, p. 293-301.
  • 6. BILLS, N., GROSS, D., 2005, Sustaining multi-functional agricultural landscapes: comparing stakeholder perspectives in New York (US) and England (UK), in: Land Use Policy, no 22, p. 313-321.
  • 7. BOYD, J., BANZHAF S., 2007, What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units, in: Ecological Economics, no 63, p. 616-626.
  • 8. BROWN, G., RAYMOND C., 2007, The relation-ship between place attachment and landscape values: toward mapping place attachment, in: Applied Geography, no 27, p. 89-111.
  • 9. CHAN, K.M.A., GOLDSTEIN, J., SATTERFIELD, T.,HANNAHS, N., KIKILOI, K., NAIDOO, R., VADEBONCOEUR, N.,WOODSIDE, U., 2011, Cultural services and non-use values, in: Natural Capital: Theory & Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services, eds. Kareiva et al., Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, p. 206-228.
  • 10. CHAN, K. M. A., RUCKELSHAUS M., 2010, Char-acterizing changes in marine ecosystem ser-vices, in: F1000 Biology Reports, 2, p. 54.
  • 11. CHAN K.M.A, SATTERFIELD T., GOLDSTEIN J., 2012, Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values, in: Ecolog-ical economics, vol. 74, p. 8-18.
  • 12. CHARLES, H., DUKES J.S., 2007, Impacts of invasive species on ecosystem services, in: Bio-logical invasions, ed. Nentwig W., Springer, Berlin, Germany, p. 217-237.
  • 13. CARPENTER, S. R., ET AL., 2009, Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, in: Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Sciences no 106.5, p. 1305-1312.
  • 14. CHIESURA, A., DE GROOT, R., 2003, Critical natural capital: a socio-cultural perspective, in: Ecological Economics, no 44, p. 219-231.
  • 15. COSTANZA, R., D’ARGE, R., DE GROOT, R., FAR-BER, S., GRASSO, M., HANNON, B., LIMBURG, K.,NAEEM, S., O’NEILL, R.V., PARUELO, J., RASKIN, R.G., SUTTON, P., VAN DEN BELT, M., 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem ser-vices and natural capital, in: Nature, no 387, p. 253-260.
  • 16. CONSTANZA, R., KUBISZEWSKI I, BLUFFSTONE D.E.R., BOYD J., BROWN D., CHANG H., DUJON V., GRANEK E., POLASKY S., SHANDAS V., YEAKLEY A., 2011, Valuing ecological systems and services, in: F1000 Biology Reports, p. 3-14.
  • 17. DAILY, G.C. (ED.), 1997, Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Is-land Press, Washington, DC.
  • 18. DAILY, G. C. 1999, Developing a scientific basis for managing earth's life support systems, in: Conservation Ecology, vol. 3, no 2, p. 14.
  • 19. DAILY, G.C., MATSON, P.A., 2008, Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation, in: PNAS, no 105, p. 9455-9456.
  • 20. DAILY G.C., POLASKY S., GOLDSTEIN J., KA-REIVA P.M., MOONEY H.A., PEJCHAR L., RICK-ETTS, T.H., SALZMAN J., SHALLENBERGER R., 2009, Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, in: Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, no 7, p. 21-28.
  • 21. DAW T., BROWN K., ROSENDO S., POMEROY R., 2011, Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being, in: Environmental Conservation, no 38, p. 370-379.
  • 22. DE GROOT, R.S., 1992, Functions of Nature, Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision Making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, The Nether-lands.
  • 23. DE GROOT R.S., WILSON M.A., BOUMANS R.M.J., 2002, A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services, in: Ecological Economy, no 41, p. 393-408.
  • 24. DE GROOT R., RAMAKRISHNAN P.S., BERG A., KULENTHRAN T., MULLER S., PITT D., WASCHER D., WIJESURIYA G., AMELUNG B., ELIEZER N., GOPAL A.R., RÖSSLER M., 2005, Cultural and amenity services, in: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current Status and Trends. Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 455-476.
  • 25. DE GROOT R. S., ALKEMADE R., BRAAT L., HEIN L., WILLEMEN L., 2010, Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making, in: Ecological Complexity, vol. 7, no 3, p. 260-272.
  • 26. DIETZ T, ROSA EA, YORK R., 2008, Environ-mentally efficient well-being: Rethinking sustainability as the relationship between human well-being and environmental impacts, in: Hu-man Ecology, no 16, p. 113-122.
  • 27. EGOH B., REYERS B., ROUGET M., RICHARDSON D.M., LE MAITRE D.C., VAN JAARSVELD A.S., 2008, Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management, in: Agricultural Ecosystem Environment, no 127, p. 135-140.
  • 28. EICKEN, H., LOVECRAFT A.L., DRUCKENMILLER M.L., 2009, Sea-ice system services: a frame-work to help identify and meet information needs relevant for Arctic observing networks, in: Arctic, no 62, p.119-136.
  • 29. EIGENRAAM M., STRAPPAZZON L., LANSDELL N., BEVERLY C., STONEHAM G., 2007, Designing frameworks to deliver unknown information to support market-based instruments, in: Agricultural Economics, no 37, p. 261-269.
  • 30. ENGEL S., PAGIOLA S., WUNDER S., 2008, De-signing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues, in: Ecological Economics, no 65, p. 663-674.
  • 31. FAO, 1999, Cultivation our futures, FAO/Netherlands Conference on the Multifunctional Character of Agriculture and Land. FAO/LNV, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • 32. FISHER B., TURNER K.R., MORLING P., 2009, Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 68. no 3, p. 643-653.
  • 33. GASPARATOS A., STROMBERG P., TAKEUCHI K., 2011, Biofuels, ecosystem services and human well-being: putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative, in: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, no 142, p. 111-128.
  • 34. GEE K., BURKHARD B., 2010, Cultural ecosystem services in the context of offshore wind farming: a case study from the west coast of Schleswig-Holstein, in: Ecological Complexity, vol. 7, no 3 p. 349-358.
  • 35. HEIN L., VAN KOPPEN K., DE GROOT R.S., VAN IERLAND E.C., 2006, Spatial scales, stakehold-ers and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, vol. 57, no 2, p. 209-228.
  • 36. HEILIG G.K., 2003, Multifunctionality of landscapes and ecosystem services with respect to rural development, in: Sustainable Development of Multifunctional Landscapes, eds. Helming K., Wiggering H., Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.
  • 37. HOLLANDER G.M., 2004, Agricultural trade liberalization, multifunctionality, and sugar in the south Florida landscape, Geoforum, no 35, p. 299-312.
  • 38. ISCU, UNESCO, UNU, 2008, Ecosystem Change and Human Wellbeing. Research and Monitoring. Report, ICSU, UNESCO and UNU, Paris.
  • 39. JUNIPER, T., 2011, A Historic Move in the Battle to Save Tropical Rainforests, in: The Guardian, London, UK, p. A1.
  • 40. KENTER J. O., HYDE T., CHRISTIE M., FAZEY I., 2011, The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries – evidence from the Solomon Islands, Global Environmental Change, no 21, p. 505-521.
  • 41. KUMAR, P., ED., 2010, The economics of ecosys-tems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 42. KUMAR, M., KUMAR, P., 2008, Valuation of the ecosystem services: a psycho-cultural perspective, in: Ecological economics, vol. 64, no 4, p. 808-819.
  • 43. LUDWIG, D., 2000, Limitations of economic val-uation of ecosystems, in: Ecosystems, no 3, p. 31-35.
  • 44. MARCH, J.G., 1994, A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen, Free Press, New York.
  • 45. MARTÍN-LÓPEZ B., MONTES C., BENAYAS J., 2007, The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation, in: Biological Conservation no 139, p. 67-82.
  • 46. MARTÍN-LÓPEZ,B., GÓMEZ-BAGGETHUN E., LOMAS P.L., MONTES C., 2009, Effects of spatial and temporal scales on cultural services valuation, in: Journal of Environmental Management, no 90, p. 1050-1059.
  • 47. MCCAULEY D.J., 2006, Selling out on nature, in: Nature, no 443, p. 27-28.
  • 48. MEYER B.C., GRABAUM R., 2008, MULBO – model framework for multi critieria landscape assessment and optimisation. A support system for spatial landuse decisions, in: Landscape Re-search, no 33, p. 155-179.
  • 49. MILCU A.I., HANSPACH J., ABSON D., FISCHER J., 2013, Cultural ecosystem services: a litera-ture review and prospects for future research, in: Ecology and Society, vol. 18, no 3, p. 44.
  • 50. MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, 2003, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Frame-work for Assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • 51. MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Syn-thesis/ Current State and Trends/ Scenarios/ Policy responses/ Multiscale Assesments, Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • 52. MUÑOZ-PIÑA, C., GUEVARA, A., TORRES, J.M., BRAÑA, J., 2008, Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: analysis, negotiations and results, in: Ecological Economics, no 65, p. 725-736.
  • 53. NORGAARD, R.B., 2010, Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity Blinder, in: Ecological Economics, no 69, p. 1219-1227.
  • 54. NORTON B.G., NOONAN D., 2007, Ecology and valuation: big changes needed, in: Ecological Economics, no. 63, p. 664-675.
  • 55. OECD, 2001, Multifunctionality. Towards An Analytical Framework, Paris, p. 159.
  • 56. PINTO-CORREIA T., GUSTAVSSON R., PIRNAT J., 2006, Bridging the gap between centrally de-fined policies and local decisions – towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management, in: Landscape Ecology, no 21, p. 333-346.
  • 57. PLIENINGER T., ET AL., 2013, Assessing, map-ping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level, in: Land Use Pol-icy, no 33, p. 118-129.
  • 58. PRESCOTT A. R., 2001, The wellbeing of nations. Island Press.
  • 59. RANDALL A., 2002, Benefit-cost considerations should be decisive when there is nothing more important at stake, in: Economics, eds. Bromley D., Paavola J., Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, Ethics and Environmental Policy, p. 53-68.
  • 60. RAYMOND C. M., BRYAN B.A, HATTON D., CAST A., STRATHEARN S., GRANDGIRARD A., KALIVAS T., 2009, Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services, in: Ecological Economics, no 68, p. 1301-1315.
  • 61. REDFORD K.H., ADAMS W.M., 2009, Payment for ecosystem services and the challenge of saving nature, in: Conservation Biology, no 23, p. 785-787.
  • 62. REES, W.E., 1998, How should a parasite value its host? in: Ecological Economics, no 25, p. 49-52.
  • 63. ROBERTSON M.M., 2004, The neoliberalization of ecosystem services: wetland mitigation bank-ing and problems in environmental governance, in: Geoforum, no 35, p. 361-373.
  • 64. S ARUKHÁN, J., WHYTE A., EDS., 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis (MA). Is-land Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
  • 65. SCHAICH H., BIELING C., PLIENINGER T., 2010, Linking ecosystem services with cultural land-scape research, in: Gaia-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, vol. 19, no 4, p. 269-277.
  • 66. SATTERFIELD T.,KALOF L., 2005, Environmental values: an introduction, in: The Earthscan Reader in Environmental Values, eds. Kalof L., Satterfield T., Earthscan, Sterling, VA, p. xxi-xxxiii.
  • 67. SCULLION J., THOMAS C.W., VOGT K. A, PÉREZ-MAQUEO O., LOGSDON M. G., 2011, Evaluating the environmental impact of payments for eco-system services in Coatepec (Mexico) using re-mote sensing and on-site interviews, in: Envi-ronmental Conservation, no 38, p. 426-434.
  • 68. SHERROUSE B. C., CLEMENT J.M, SEMMENS D.J., 2011, A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services, in: Applied Geography, no 31, p. 748-760.
  • 69. TALLIS, H., KAREIVA, P., MARVIER, M., CHANG, A., 2008, An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development, in: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, no 105, p. 9457-9464.
  • 70. TENGBERG A., ET AL., 2012, Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: assessment of heritage values and identity, in: Ecosystem Ser-vices no 2, p. 14-26.
  • 71. TURNER R.K., DAILY G.C., 2008, The ecosys-tem services framework and natural capital Conservation, in: Environmental and Resource Economics, no 39, p. 25-35.
  • 72. TURPIE J.K., MARAIS C., BLIGNAUT J.N., 2008, The working for water programme: evolution of a payments for ecosystem services mechanism that addresses both poverty and ecosystem service delivery in South Africa, in: Ecological Economics, no 65, p. 788-798.
  • 73. UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PRO-GRAM, 2003, Human Development Report, Ox-ford University Press, New York.
  • 74. VAN BERKEL D. B., VERBURG P.H., 2014, Spa-tial quantification and valuation of cultural eco-system services in an agricultural landscape, in: Ecological indicators, no 37, p. 163-174.
  • 75. VEJRE H., ABILDTRUP J., ANDERSEN E., ANDER-SEN P., BRANDT J., BUSCK A., DALGAARD T., HASLER B., HUUSOM H., KRISTENSEN L., KRIS-TENSEN S., PRĆSTHOLM S., 2007, Multifunc-tional agriculture and multifunctional land-scapes - land use as an interface, in: Multifunc-tional Land Use: Meeting Future Demands for Landscape Goods and Services, eds. Mander U., Helming K., Wiggering H., Springer, Heidel-berg, Berlin, p. 93-104.
  • 76. VERBURG P.H., SCHOT P.P., DIJST M.J., VELDKAMP A., 2004, Land use change model-ling: current practice and research priorities, in: GeoJournal, no 61, p. 309-324.
  • 77. WALLACE, K.J., 2007, Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions, in: Bio-logical Conservation, no 139, p. 235-246.
  • 78. WILLEMEN L., VERBURG P.H., HEIN L., VAN MENSVOORT M.E.F., 2008, Spatial characterization of landscape functions, in: Landscape Urban Planning, no 88, p. 34-43.
  • 79. WILSON, G.A., 2004, The Australian Landcare movement: towards ‘post-productivist’ rural governance?, in: Journal of Rural Studies, no 20, p. 461-484.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-5d336ca4-6e4d-4e0b-b27d-81b0db4901e8
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.