Science Based Targets and the factors contributing to the sustainable development of an organisation from a Literature review to a conceptual model

• Autorzy: Sá José Carlos , Carvalho Afonso , Fonseca Luís , Santos Gilberto , Dinis-Carvalho José

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.30657/pea.2023.29.28

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Sustainable development is a subject of intense discussion, mainly due to climate change, pollution, and increased waste, among other factors. The governments of various countries worldwide have been setting environmental targets for emissions and consumption to combat climate change and improve the state of our planet. Therefore, it is necessary to have an environmental policy with stakeholder engagement. The literature review method, bibliometric analysis, and visual mappings were applied to understand how these sustainable targets are formulated and used by companies to comply with the limits proposed by governments. The Web of Science platform allowed data collection about Lean and Green, Key Performance Indicators (KPI), and Science-Based Targets (SBT). The carried analyses identified the most relevant papers using the PRISMA method, including their authors, their temporal distribution, and a correlation map using the VOSviewer tool. Hence, mapping the current state of the art concerning the SBT topic. Furthermore, a novel conceptual model is proposed to integrate lean and green and create new KPI applied to the definition of SBT to give companies a path and tools to achieve the climate targets efficiently. Future research should focus on the implementation of the conceptual model in several companies to understand its impact to correct and improve the conceptual model proposed.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainability; lean; green; key performance indicators; science based targets

PL

zrównoważony rozwój; wskaźniki efektywności; zmiany klimatyczne; ochrona środowiska

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Stowarzyszenia Menedżerów Jakości i Produkcji
• Czasopismo: Production Engineering Archives
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 29, Iss. 3
• Strony: 241--253
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 112 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Sá José Carlos

• School of Engineering - Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431 - 4200-072 Porto, Portugal

autor

Carvalho Afonso

• School of Engineering - Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431 - 4200-072 Porto, Portugal

autor

Fonseca Luís

• School of Engineering - Polytechnic of Porto, Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 431 - 4200-072 Porto, Portugal

autor

Santos Gilberto

• School of Design - Polytechnic Institute Cávado and Ave, Campus do IPCA - 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal

autor

Dinis-Carvalho José

• Production and Systems Department, University of Minho, Campus de Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal

Bibliografia

• 1. Abualfaraa, W., Salonitis, K., A-Ashaab, A., Ala’raj, M., 2020. Lean-Green Manufacturing Practices and Their Link with Sustainability: A Critical Review. Sustainability, 12(3), DOI: 10.3390/su12030981
• 2. Arici, H. E., Köseoglu, M. A., Sökmen, A., 2022. The intellectual structure of customer experience research in service scholarship: a bibliometric analysis. Service Industries Journal, 42(7–8), 514–550, DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2022.2043286
• 3. Ayoub, A. N., Gaigneux, A., Le Brun, N., Acha, S., Shah, N., 2020. The development of a low-carbon roadmap investment strategy to reach Science Based Targets for commercial organisations with multisite properties. Building And Environment, 186, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107311
• 4. Becchetti, L., Cordella, M., Morone, P., 2022. Measuring investments progress in ecological transition: The Green Investment Financial Tool (GIFT) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131915
• 5. Bendig, D., Wagner, A., Lau, K., 2022. Does it pay to be science-based green? The impact of science-based emission-reduction targets on corporate financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13341
• 6. Bhattacharya, A., Nand, A., Castka, P., 2019. Lean-green integration and its impact on sustainability performance: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117697
• 7. Bjorn, A., Bey, N., Georg, S., Ropke, I., Hauschild, M. Z., 2017. Is Earth recognized as a finite system in corporate responsibility reporting? Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 106–117, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2015.12.095
• 8. Bjorn, A., Lloyd, S., Matthews, D., 2021. From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting `science-based’ emission targets. Environmental Research Letters, 16(5), DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe57b
• 9. Bjorn, A., Lloyd, S., Matthews, D., 2022. Reply to Comment on `From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting ``science-based’’ emission targets’. Environmental Research Letters, 17(3), DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac548e
• 10. Bjorn, A., Richardson, K., Hauschild, M. Z., 2019. A Framework for Development and Communication of Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment Methods. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(4), 838–854, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12820
• 11. Bjorn, A., Tilsted, J. P., Addas, A., Lloyd, S. M., 2022. Can Science-Based Targets Make the Private Sector Paris-Aligned? A Review of the Emerging Evidence. Current Climate Change Reports, 8(2), 53–69, DOI: 10.1007/s40641-022-00182-w
• 12. Bringezu, S., 2019. Toward Science-Based and Knowledge-Based Targets for Global Sustainable Resource Use. Resources-Basel, 8(3), DOI: 10.3390/resources8030140
• 13. Caldera, H. T. S., Desha, C., Dawes, L., 2017. Exploring the role of lean thinking in sustainable business practice: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1546-1565, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2017.05.126
• 14. Chang, A., Farsan, A., Carrillo Pineda, A., Cummis, C., Weber, C., 2022. Comment on `From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting "science-based’’ emission targets’ Comment. Environmental Research Letters, 17(3), DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac548c
• 15. Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., Benhida, K., 2016. The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828–846, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.101
• 16. Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Benhida, K., Mokhlis, A., 2017. Barriers in Green Lean implementation: a combined systematic literature review and interpretive structural modelling approach. Production Plan-ning & Control, 28(10), 829-842, DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2017. 1324184
• 17. Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Govindan, K., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Benhida, K., Mokhlis, A., 2017. A framework for the integration of Green and Lean Six Sigma for superior sustainability performance. International Journal of Production Research, 55(15), 4481–4515, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1266406
• 18. Chugani, N., Kumar, V., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Rocha-Lona, L., Upadhyay, A., 2017. Investigating the green impact of Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(1,SI), 7-32, DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-11-2015-0043
• 19. Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J., Purvis, L., 2018. Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future re-search directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2336–2350, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.176
• 20. Cipolletta, M., D’Ambrosio, M., Moreno Valeria Casson and Cozzani, V., 2022. Enhancing the sustainability of biodiesel fuels by inherently safer production processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131075
• 21. Contini, G., Peruzzini, M., 2022. Sustainability and Industry 4.0: Definition of a Set of Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability, 14(17), DOI: 10.3390/su141711004
• 22. Cooper, J., Lee, A., Jones, K., 2020. Sustainable built asset management per-formance indicators and attributes A UK social housing case study example. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(3), 508–522, DOI: 10.1108/IJBPA-08-2019-0069
• 23. de Bortoli, A., Feraille, A., Leurent, F., 2022. Towards Road Sustainability-Part II: Applied Holistic Assessment and Lessons Learned from French Highway Resurfacing Strategies. Sustainability, 14(12), DOI: 10.3390/su14127336
• 24. de Silva, G. C., Regan, E. C., Pollard, E. H. B., Addison, P. F. E., 2019. The evolution of corporate no net loss and net positive impact biodiversity commitments: Understanding appetite and addressing challenges. Business Strategy And The Environment, 28(7), 1481–1495, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2379
• 25. Dhingra, R., Kress, R., Upreti, G., 2014. Does lean mean green? Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 1–7, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.032
• 26. Dieste, M., Panizzolo, R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Anosike, A., 2019. The relationship between lean and environmental performance: Practices and measures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 120–131, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.243
• 27. Dües, C. M., Tan, K. H., Lim, M., 2013. Green as the new Lean: how to use Lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 93-100, DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.12.023
• 28. Egas, D., Ponsa, S., Llenas, L., Colon, J., 2021. Towards energy-efficient small dairy production systems: An environmental and economic assess-ment. Sustainable Production And Consumption, 28, 39-51, DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.021
• 29. Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. Z., Howard, M., Bennun, L., Addison, P. F. E., Bull, J. W., Loveridge, R., Pollard, E., Starkey, M., 2022. Are corporate biodiversity commitments consistent with delivering `nature-positive’ out-comes? A review of `nature-positive’ definitions, company progress and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(2), DOI: 10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2022.134798
• 30. Faria, P. C. S., Labutong, N., 2020. A description of four science-based corporate GHG target-setting methods. Sustainability Accounting Management And Policy Journal, 11(3, SI), 591–612, DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2017-0031
• 31. Feleki, E., Moussiopoulos, N., 2021. Setting Emission Reduction Trajectories in Mediterranean Cities with the Use of Science-Based Targets: The Path-way towards Climate Neutrality and the Ambitious European Goals by 2050. ATMOSPHERE, 12(11), DOI: 10.3390/atmos12111505
• 32. Francis, A., Thomas, A., 2020. Exploring the relationship between lean con-struction and environmental sustainability: A review of existing literature to decipher broader dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119913
• 33. Gackowiec, P., Podobinska-Staniec, M., Brzychczy Edyta and Kuhlbach, C., Oezver, T., 2020. Review of Key Performance Indicators for Process Monitoring in the Mining Industry. Energies, 13(19), DOI: 10.3390/en13195169
• 34. Garza-Reyes, J. A., 2015a. Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. International Journal Of Lean Six Sigma, 6(3), 226–248, DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-04-2014-0010
• 35. Garza-Reyes, J. A., 2015b. Lean and green - a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 18–29, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.064
• 36. Gibassier, D., Michelon, G., Cartel, M., 2020. The future of carbon account-ing research: we’ve pissed mother nature off, big time’’. Sustainability Accounting Management And Policy Journal, 11(3, SI), 477-485, DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2020-0028
• 37. Giesekam, J., Norman, J., Garvey, A., Betts-Davies, S., 2021. Science-Based Targets: On Target? Sustainability, 13(4), Doi: 10.3390/Su13041657
• 38. Giesekam, J., Tingley, D. D., Cotton, I., 2018. Aligning carbon targets for construction with (inter)national climate change mitigation commitments. Energy And Buildings, 165, 106–117, DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.023
• 39. Goncalves, A., Silva, C., 2021. Looking for Sustainability Scoring in Apparel: A Review on Environmental Footprint, Social Impacts and Transparency. ENERGIES, 14(11), DOI: 10.3390/en14113032
• 40. Govindan, K., Aditi, Darbari, J. D., Kaul Arshia and Jha, P. C., 2021. Structural model for analysis of key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturer-supplier collaboration: A grey-decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory-based approach. Business Strategy And The Environment, 30(4), 1702–1722, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2703
• 41. Gunduz, M., Abu-Hijleh, A., 2020. Assessment of Human Productivity Drivers for Construction Labor through Importance Rating and Risk Mapping. Sustainability, 12(20), DOI: 10.3390/su12208614
• 42. Gunduz, M., Lutfi, H. M. A., 2021. Go/No-Go Decision Model for Owners Using Exhaustive CHAID and QUEST Decision Tree Algorithms. Sustainability, 13(2), DOI: 10.3390/su13020815
• 43. Guo, R., Wu, Z., n.d.. Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP-DEMATEL-VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises. Environment Development and Sustainability, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02565-3
• 44. Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., McGuinness, L. A., 2022. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230, DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1230
• 45. Hadziosmanovic, M., Lloyd, S. M., Bjorn, A., Paquin, R. L., Mengis, N., Mat-thews, H. D., 2022. Using cumulative carbon budgets and corporate car-bon disclosure to inform ambitious corporate emissions targets and long-term mitigation pathways. Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 26(5), 1747–1759, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13322
• 46. Hallam, C., Contreras, C., 2016. Integrating lean and green management. Management Decision, 54(9), 2157–2187, DOI: 10.1108/MD-04-2016-0259
• 47. Hart, M., Austin, W., Acha, S., Le Brun, N., Markides, C. N., Shah, N., 2020. A roadmap investment strategy to reduce carbon intensive refrigerants in the food retail industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123039
• 48. Henao, R., Sarache, W., Gomez, I., 2019. Lean manufacturing and sustainable performance: Trends and future challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 99-116, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.116
• 49. Hristov, I., Appolloni, A., Chirico, A., 2022. The adoption of the key performance indicators to integrate sustainability in the business strategy: A novel five-dimensional framework. Business Strategy And The Environment, 31(7), 3216–3230, DOI: 10.1002/bse.3072
• 50. Immink, H., Louw, R., Garlick, A., Vosper, S., Brent, A., 2022. Country specific low carbon commitments versus equitable and practical company specific decarbonisation targets. Environment Development And Sustainability, 24(8), 10005–10025, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01854-7
• 51. Janjua, S. Y., Sarker, P. K., Biswas, W. K., 2020. Development of triple bot-tom line indicators for life cycle sustainability assessment of residential bulidings. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110476
• 52. Janjua, S. Y., Sarker, P. K., Biswas, W. K., 2021. Sustainability implications of service life on residential buildings - An application of life cycle sustainability assessment framework. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 10, DOI: 10.1016/j.indic.2021.100109
• 53. Johansson, G., Sundin, E., 2014. Lean and green product development: two sides of the same coin? Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 104-121, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.005
• 54. Jose Martinez-Jurado, P., Moyano-Fuentes, J., 2014. Lean Management, Sup-ply Chain Management and Sustainability: A Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 134–150, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.042
• 55. Karahasanovic, A., Culen, A. L., Skjetne, J. H., Hasle, G., 2020. Key Performance Indicators In Design For Sustainable Rural Transport. Iadis-Inter-national Journal On Computer Science And Information Systems, 15(2), 107-122.
• 56. Karnitis, E., Bicevskis, J., Karnitis, G., Pukis, M., 2021. Sustainable Development Model of EU Cities Compliant with UN Settings. Mathematics, 9(22), DOI: 10.3390/math9222888
• 57. Kassem, E., Trenz, O., 2020. Automated Sustainability Assessment System for Small and Medium Enterprises Reporting. Sustainability, 12(14), DOI: 10.3390/su12145687
• 58. Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Golpira, H., Sharif, A., Mardani, A., 2021. A state-of-the-art review and meta-analysis on sustainable supply chain management: Future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357
• 59. Kumar, S., Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kumar Naveen and Haleem, A., 2016. Barriers in green lean six sigma product development process: an ISM approach. Production Planning Control, 27(7–8, SI), 604–620, DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1165307
• 60. Kuo, L., Chang, B.-G., 2021. Ambitious corporate climate action: Impacts of science-based target and internal carbon pricing on carbon management reputation-Evidence from Japan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1830–1840, DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.025
• 61. Leon, H. C. M., Calvo-Amodio, J., 2017. Towards lean for sustainability: Un-derstanding the interrelationships between lean and sustainability from a systems thinking perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 4384-4402, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.132
• 62. Ma, J., Harstvedt, J. D., Jaradat, R., Smith, B., 2020. Sustainability driven multicriteria project portfolio selection under uncertain decision-making environment. Computers Industrial Engineering, 140, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106236
• 63. Marotta, I., Guarino, F., Longo, S., Cellura, M., 2021. Environmental Sustainability Approaches and Positive Energy Districts: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(23), DOI: 10.3390/su132313063
• 64. Marrucci, L., Daddi, T., 2022. The contribution of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme to the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations. Business Strategy And The Environment, 31(4), 1347–1357, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2958
• 65. Matlock, M., Christie, M., Thoma, G., 2021. Analysis of Life Cycle Environ-mental Impacts of Using Enogen Corn in Beef Cattle Rations. ANIMALS, 11(10), DOI: 10.3390/ani11102916
• 66. Matos, R., Rodrigues, F., Rodrigues, H., Costa, A., 2021. Building condition assessment supported by Building Information Modelling. Journal Of Building Engineering, 38, DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102186
• 67. McGinley, O., Moran, P., Goggins, J., 2022. An Assessment of the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of Energy Efficient Retrofits to Existing Residential Buildings. Energies, 15(1), DOI: 10.3390/en15010334
• 68. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., … Tugwell, P., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses: The PRISMA statement. In PLoS Medicine (Vol. 6, Issue 7), DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
• 69. Moktadir, M. A., Mahmud, Y., Banaitis, A., Sarder, T., Khan, M. R., 2021. Key Performance Indicators For Adopting Sustainability Practices In Footwear Supply Chains. E M Ekonomie A Management, 24(1), 197–213, DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2021-1-013
• 70. Moktadir, Md. A., Dwivedi, A., Rahman, A., Jabbour, C. J. C., Paul, S. K., Sultana, R., Madaan, J., 2020. An investigation of key performance indicators for operational excellence towards sustainability in the leather pro-ducts industry. Business Strategy And The Environment, 29(8), 3331–3351, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2575
• 71. Molavi, A., Lim, G. J., Race, B., 2020. A framework for building a smart port and smart port index. International Journal Of Sustainable Transportation, 14(9), 686-700, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2019.1610919
• 72. Mollenkopf, D., Stolze, H., Tate, W. L., Ueltschy, M., 2010. Green, lean, and global supply chains. International Journal Of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, 40(1-2), 14-41, DOI: 10.1108/096000310 11018028
• 73. Morella, P., Lamban, M. P., Royo, J., Sanchez, J. C., Ng Corrales, L. del C., 2020. Development of a New Green Indicator and Its Implementation in a Cyber-Physical System for a Green Supply Chain. Sustainability, 12(20), DOI: 10.3390/su12208629
• 74. Morella, P., Pilar Lamban, M., Royo, J., Carlos Sanchez, J., 2022. Evaluating the impact of new trends in urban freight transportation attending the tri-ple bottom line: A case study. Computers Industrial Engineering, 174, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108756
• 75. Mosca, F., Perini, K., 2022. Reviewing the Role of Key Performance Indicators in Architectural and Urban Design Practices. Sustainability, 14(21), DOI: 10.3390/su142114464
• 76. Naji, K., Gunduz, M., Salat, F., 2021. Assessment of preconstruction factors in sustainable project management performance. Engineering Construction And Architectural Management, 28(10), 3060-3077, DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-05-2020-0333
• 77. Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M., Hamaidi, M. F., 2022. Major Factors Affecting Con-struction Waste Management in Infrastructure Projects Using Structural Equation Model. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 148(10), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002358
• 78. Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M., Naser, A. F., 2022. The Effect of Change-Order Management Factors on Construction Project Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 148(9), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002350
• 79. Nawaz, R., Hussain, I., Noor, S., Habib Tufail and Omair, M., 2020. The sig-nificant impact of the economic sustainability on the cement industry by the assessment of the key performance indicators using Taguchi signal to noise ratio. Cogent Engineering, 7(1), DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2020. 1810383
• 80. O’Flynn, C., Seymour, V., Crawshaw, J., Parrott, T., Reeby, C., Silva, S. R. P., 2021. The Road to Net Zero: A Case Study of Innovative Technologies and Policy Changes Used at a Medium-Sized University to Achieve C-zero by 2030. Sustainability, 13(17), DOI: 10.3390/su13179954
• 81. Othman, A., El-gazzar, S., Knez, M., 2022. A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Smart Sea Port Index. Sustainability, 14(8), DOI: 10.3390/su14084551
• 82. Patidar, A., Sharma, M., Agrawal, R., Sangwan, K. S., n.d.. Supply chain resilience and its key performance indicators: an evaluation under Industry 4.0 and sustainability perspective. Management Of Environmental Quality, DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-03-2022-0091
• 83. Patil, H. R., Javalagi, C. M., 2020. Analysis of key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing in sugar industry using analytical hierarchy process. Indian Journal Of Engineering And Materials Sciences, 27(4), 959–963.
• 84. Patrao, C., Moura, P., de Almeida, A. T., 2020. Review of Smart City Assess-ment Tools. Smart Cities, 3(4), 1117–1132, DOI: 10.3390/smartcities 3040055
• 85. Perroni, M. G., Tortato, U., da Silva, W. V., da Veiga, C. P., Senff, C. O., 2020. Analytical method for sustainability science benchmarking: An indicator decomposition approach. Ecological Indicators, 116, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106470
• 86. Pignatelli, M., Moghadam, S. T., Genta, C., Lombardi, P., 2023. Spatial decision support system for low-carbon sustainable cities development: An interactive storytelling dashboard for the city of Turin. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104310
• 87. Pribicevic, I., Delibasic, B., 2021. Critical sustainability indicators identification and cause-effect relationships analysis for sustainable organization strategy based on fuzzy Dematel. Environment Development And Sustainability, 23(12), 17263-17304, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01360-w
• 88. Radovanovic, D., Hoist, C., Belur, S. B., Srivastava, R., Houngbonon, G. V., Le Quentrec Erwan and Miliza, J., Winkler, A. S., Noll, J., 2020. Digital Literacy Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Development. So-cial Inclusion, 8(2), 151-167, DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2587
• 89. Rahman, T., Moktadir, M. A., Paul, S. K., 2022. Key performance indicators for a sustainable recovery strategy in healthcare supply chains: COVID-19 pandemic perspective. Journal Of Asia Business Studies, 16(3, SI), 472-494, DOI: 10.1108/JABS-05-2021-0200
• 90. Reavis, M., Ahlen, J., Rudek, J., Naithani, K., 2022. Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Mitigation Goals of the Global Food and Beverage Sector. Frontiers In Sustainable Food Systems, 5, DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.789499
• 91. Romeni, G., Appio, F. P., Martini, A., Mercat, B., Jean-Marie, A., Joubert, C., 2020. Enhancing Ecoinnovation Performance: Evidence From a Water Footprint Assessment in the Manufacturing Industry. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 67(3), 724-739, DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2893968
• 92. Sangwa, N. R., Sangwan, K. S., 2018. Leanness assessment of organizational performance: a systematic literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(5), 768-788, DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-09-2017-0196
• 93. Schipper, C. A., Dekker, G. G. J., de Visser, B., Bolman, B., Lodder, Q., 2021. Characterization of SDGs towards Coastal Management: Sustainability Performance and Cross-Linking Consequences. Sustainability, 13(3), DOI: 10.3390/su13031560
• 94. Seuring, S., Müller, M., 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual frame-work for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
• 95. Sharma, V., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., Narkhede, B. E., Luthra, S., Gokhale, R., 2021. A systematic literature review to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management. Busi-ness Strategy and The Environment, 30(2), 1191–1212, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2679
• 96. Siegel, R., Antony, J., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Cherrafi, A., Lameijer, B., 2019. Integrated green lean approach and sustainability for SMEs: From literature review to a conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118205
• 97. Souza Farias, L. M., Santos, L. C., Gohr, C. F., de Oliveira, L. C., da Silva Amorim, M. H., 2019. Criteria and practices for lean and green performance assessment: Systematic review and conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 746-762, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2019.02.042
• 98. Spanner, M. M., Wein, J., 2020. Carbon risk real estate monitor: making de-carbonisation in the real estate sector measurable. Journal Of European Real Estate Research, 13(3, SI), 277–299, DOI: 10.1108/JERER-05-2020-0031
• 99. Stoknes, P. E., Rockstrom, J., 2018. Redefining green growth within planetary boundaries. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 41-49, DOI: 10.1016/J.Erss.2018.04.030
• 100. Sun, S., Ertz, M., 2021. Dynamic evolution of ride-hailing platforms from a systemic perspective: Forecasting financial sustainability. Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies, 125, DOI: 10.1016/ j.trc.2021.103003
• 101. Torabizadeh, M., Yusof, N. M., Ma’aram, A., Shaharoun, A. M., 2020. Identifying sustainable warehouse management system indicators and proposing new weighting method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119190
• 102. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P., 2003. Towards a Methodology for De-veloping Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. In British Journal of Management 14(3), 207–222, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
• 103. van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
• 104. Varela, L., Araujo, A., Avila, P., Castro Helio and Putnik, G., 2019. Evaluation of the Relation between Lean Manufacturing, Industry 4.0, and Sustainability. Sustainability, 11(5), DOI: 10.3390/su11051439
• 105. Viglia, G., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Joshi, Y., 2022. Forty years of The Service Industries Journal: a bibliometric review. Service Industries Journal, 42(1-2), 1-20, DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2021.2003341
• 106. von Geibler, J., Liedtke, C., Wallbaum, H., Schaller, S., 2006. Accounting for the social dimension of sustainability: Experiences from the biotechnology industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 334-346, DOI: 10.1002/bse.540
• 107. Voukkali, I., Loizia, P., Navarro Pedreno, J., Zorpas, A. A., 2021. Urban strategies evaluation for waste management in coastal areas in the framework of area metabolism. Waste Management Research, 39(3, SI), 448-465, DOI: 10.1177/0734242X20972773
• 108. Walenta, J., 2020. Climate risk assessments and science-based targets: A re-view of emerging private sector climate action tools. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change, 11(2), DOI: 10.1002/wcc.628
• 109. Walkiewicz, J., Lay-Kumar, J., Herzig, C., 2021. The integration of sustainability and externalities into the "corporate DNA": a practice-oriented approach. Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business In Society, 21(3, SI), 479-496, DOI: 10.1108/CG-06-2020-0244
• 110. Watari, T., Nansai, K., Nakajima, K., 2021. Contraction and convergence of in use metal stocks to meet climate goals. Global Environmental Change-Human And Policy Dimensions, 69, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloen-vcha.2021.102284
• 111. Yilan, G., Cordella, M., Morone, P., 2022. Evaluating and managing the sustainability of investments in green and sustainable chemistry: An over-view of sustainable finance approaches and tools. Current Opinion In Green And Sustainable Chemistry, 36, DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100635
• 112. Zaripov, R. N., Murakaev, I. M., Ryapukhin V, A., 2021. Development of the Organization’s Key Performance Indicators System in Order to Improve the Effectiveness of Its Human Capital and Risk Management. Tem. Journal -Technology Education Management Informatics, 10(1), 298–302, DOI: 10.18421/TEM101-37

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).