The Pinus rotundata Link bog forests on mined peat bogs - is the conservation of undisturbed edge an effective tool for its protection?

• Autorzy: Unar P. , Janík D. , Souček J. , Vrška T. , Adam D. , Král K. , Hort L.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Peat mining has a serious impact on the Pinus rotundata Link habitat. The possibility of sustaining a vital Pinus rotundata bog forest on undisturbed edges of mined peat bog was assessed. 28.7 ha of undisturbed edge of Borkovická blata peat bog were sampled by regular grid of circular sample plots. Data about tree layer, natural regeneration of woody species as well as herb layer were collected. The impact of mined area drainage on vegetation communities in the undisturbed edge of peat bogs was discovered. The original Pinus rotundata bog forest is getting older and it is gradually being replaced by forest stands dominated by Picea abies (L.) Karsten, Betula pendula Roth and B. pubescens Ehrh. The character of vegetation changes more rapidly with the increasing vertical distance of the remaining fragment and the mined part. This secondary elevation represents a serious problem in the water regime restoration and consequent revitalisation of the Pinus rotundata bog forest on the undisturbed edge of the mined peat bog.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Pinus rotundata; bog forest; water table; peat mining; natural regeneration

PL

Sosna błotna; poziom wód gruntowych; wydobycie; torf; naturalna regeneracja

• Wydawca: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Ecology
• Rocznik: 2012
• Tom: Vol. 60, nr 4
• Strony: 707--715
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., il.

Twórcy

autor

Unar P.

• The Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Department of Forest Ecology, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Janík D.

• The Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Department of Forest Ecology, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Souček J.

• The Forestry and Game Management Research Institute Jíloviště-Strnady, Forest Research station Opočno, Na Olivě 550, 517 73, Opočno, Czech Republic

autor

Vrška T.

• The Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Department of Forest Ecology, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Adam D.

• The Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Department of Forest Ecology, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Král K.

• The Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Department of Forest Ecology, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

autor

Hort L.

• The Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening, Department of Forest Ecology, Lidická 25/27, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• 1. Albrecht J. 2003 – Českobudějovicko [České Budějovice region] (In: Chráněná území ČR, svazek VIII [Protected areas of the Czech Republic, volume VIII], Eds: P. Mackovčin, M. Sedláček) – Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Ekocentrum, Brno, Praha, 807 pp.
• 2. Bastl M., Burian M., Kučera J., Prach K., Rektoris L., Štech M. 2008 – Central European pine bogs change along an altitudinal gradient – Preslia, 80: 349–363.
• 3. Bastl M., Štechová T., Prach K. 2009 – Effect of disturbance on the vegetation of peat bogs with Pinus rotundata in the Třeboň Basin, Czech Republic – Preslia, 81: 105–117.
• 4. Braun-Blanquet J. 1964 – Plantzensoziologie Springer Verlag, Wien, New York, 865 pp.
• 5. Businský R. 2009 – Borovice blatka v novém pojetí [A new concept in bog pine] – Zprávy Čes. Bot. Společ. 44: 35–43.
• 6. Chytrý M., Kučera T., Kočí M. 2001 – Katalog biotopů České republiky [Catalogue of biotopes of the Czech Republic] – Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR, Praha, 304 pp.
• 7. Černý M., Kučera M., Cienciala E., Beranová J. 2010 – Czech Republic (In: National Forest inventories. Pathways for Common Reporting, Eds: E. Tomppo, T. Gschwanter, M. Lawrence, R.E. McRoberts) – Springer, IBAN 978-90-481-3232-4. pp.145–156.
• 8. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E, Düll R., Wirth V., Werner W., Paulißen D. 1992 – Indicator values of plants in Central Europe – Scripta Geobot. 18: 1–248
• 9. Girard M., Lavoie C. and Thériault M. 2002 – The regeneration of a highly disturbed ecosystem: A mined peatland in Southern Québec – Ecosystems, 5: 274–288.
• 10. Goodburn J.M., Lormer C.G. 1999 – Population structure in old-growth and managed northern hardwoods: an examination of the balanced diameter distribution concept – For. Ecol. Manag. 118: 11–29.
• 11. Hédl R., Svátek M., Dančák M., Rodzay A.W., Salleh A.B., Kamariah A.S. 2009 A new technique for inventory of permanent plots in tropical forests: a case study from lowland dipterocarp forest in Kuala Belalong, Brunei Darussalam – Blumea, 54: 124–130
• 12. Hejný S., Slavík B. 1988 – Květena ČSRI [Flora of the Czech Republic I] – Academia, Praha, 557 pp.
• 13. Hennekens S.M., Schaminée J.H.J. 2001 TURBOVEG, a comprehensive data base management system for vegetation data – J. Veg. Sci. 12: 589–591.
• 14. Horn P., Bastl M. 2000 – Successional changes of vegetation at the “Multerberské rašeliniště” peat bog in the Šumava Mts during the last 50 years – Příroda, 17: 109–118.
• 15. Kangas A., Maltamo M. 2006 – Forest Inventory. Methodology and Applications – Springer, Dordrecht, 362 pp.
• 16. Konvalinková P. 2006 – Spontánní sukcese vegetace na těžených rašeliništích: možná cesta obnovy? (předběžné sdělění) [Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands: a possible tool of restoration? (preliminary results] – Zprávy Čes. Bot. Společ. 21: 135–140.
• 17. Konvalinková P., Prach K. 2010 – Spontaneous succession of vegetation in mined peatlands: a multi-site study – Preslia, 82: 423–435.
• 18. Kubát K., Hrouda L., Chrtek J. jun., Kaplan Z., Kirschner J., Štěpánek J. 2002 Klíč ke květeně České republiky [Key to the flora of the Czech Republic] – Academia, Praha, 927 pp.
• 19. Kučerová A., Rektoris L., Přibáň K. 2000 Vegetation changes of Pinus rotundata bog forest in the “Žofinka” Nature Reserve, Třeboň Biosphere Reserve – Příroda, 17: 119–138.
• 20. Laiho R. 2006 – Decomposition in peatlands: Reconciling seemingly contrasting results on the impacts of lowered water levels – Soil Biol. Biochem. 38: 2011–2024.
• 21. Laiho R., Laine J., Trettin C.C., Finér L. 2004 – Scots pine litter decomposition along drainage succession and soil nutrient gradients in peatland forests, and effect of interannual weather variation – Soil Biol. Biochem. 36: 1095–1109.
• 22. Laine J., Vasander H., Laiho R. 1995 – Long-term effects of water level drawdown on the vegetation of drained pine mires in southern Finland – J. Appl. Ecol. 32: 785–802.
• 23. Lavoie C., Grosvernier P., Girard M., Marcoux K. 2003 – Spontaneous revegetation of mined peatlands: A useful restoration tool? – Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 11: 97–107.
• 24. Lepš J., Šmilauer P. 2003 – Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO – University Press, Cambridge, UK, 269 pp.
• 25. Mach J., L anta V., Bastl M. 2009 – The effect of mining and vegetation scarification of the survival and establishment of Pinus rotundata Link and Pinus sylvestris L. in contrasting peat bog habitats – Pol. J. Ecol. 57: 239–250.
• 26. Mälson K., Backéus I., Rydin H. 2008 – Long-term effects of drainage and initial effects of hydrological restoration on rich fen vegetation – Appl. Veg. Sci. 11: 99–106.
• 27. Neuhäuslová Z. 1998 – Mapa potenciální přirozené vegetace České republiky [Map of potential vegetation of the Czech Republic] – Academia, Praha, 341 pp.
• 28. Pellerin S., Mercure M., Desauliners A.S., Lavoie C. 2008 – Changes in plant communities over three decades on two disturbed bogs in southeastern Québec – Appl. Veg. Sci. 12: 107–118.
• 29. Poulin M., Rochefort L., Desrochers A. 1999 – Conservation of bog plant species assemblages: Assessing the role of natural remnants in mined sites – Appl. Veg. Sci. 2: 169–180.
• 30. Prach K., Pyšek P. 2001 – Using spontaneous succession for restoration of human-disturbed habitats: Experience from Central Europe – Ecol. Eng. 17: 55–62.
• 31. Price J.S., Heathwaite A.L., Baird A.J. 2003 – Hydrological processes in abandoned and restored peatlands: An overview of management approaches – Wetlands Ecol. Manag. 11: 65–83.
• 32. Randuška D., Vorel J. and Plíva K. 1986 Fytocenológia a lesnícka typológia [Phytosociology and forest typology] – Príroda, Bratislava, 337 pp.
• 33. Rektoris L., Rauch O., Přibáň K. 1997 Hynutí borovice blatky (Pinus rotundata Link.) a sukcesní změny blatkových borů jako reakce na měnící se hydrologické a klimatické podmínky v NPR Červené blato [Dieback of Bog Pine (Pinus rotundata Link.) and successional changes in the Červené blato bog as a response to hydrological and climatological fluctuations] – Příroda, 11: 67–87.
• 34. Salonen V. 1987 – Relationship between the seed rain and the establishment of vegetation in two areas abandoned after peat harvesting – Holarctic Ecol. 10: 171–174.
• 35. ter Braak C.J.F, Šmilauer P. 2002 – CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows Users guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5) – Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA.
• 36. Tichý L. 2002 – JUICE, software for vegetation classification – J. Veg. Sci. 13: 451–453.
• 37. Tuittila E.S., Vasander H., Laine J. 2000 Impact of rewetting on the vegetation of a cut away peatland – Appl. Veg. Sci. 3: 205–212.
• 38. Westphal C., Tremer N., Oheimb G., Hansen J., Gadow K., Härdtle W. 2006 – Is the reverse J-shaped diameter distribution universally applicable in European virgin beech forests? – Forest Ecol. Manag. 223: 75–83.