Structural integrity of three dimensional printed carbon fiber composites/nanocomposites for aeronautical components—current scenarios and opportunities

Kausar, Ayesha

doi:10.2478/adms-2024-0024

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Structural integrity of three dimensional printed carbon fiber composites/nanocomposites for aeronautical components—current scenarios and opportunities

Autorzy

Kausar Ayesha

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://sciendo.com/pl/journal/ADMS

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/adms-2024-0024

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

This state-of-the-art innovatory overview essentially debates practical worth of three-dimensional printed composites/nanocomposites (especially carbon fiber designs) for aerospace sector. Recently, three-dimensional printing (additive manufacturing) has competently transpired for designing high performance space structures. The manuscript systematically frameworks fundamentals of three-dimensional printing approach, ensuing high-tech aeronautical carbon fiber composites/nanocomposite systems, and space components/structural applications. Amongst carbonaceous fillers, short/continuous carbon fibers were inspected as outperforming reinforcements for aerospace. Additionally, surface modified/composited carbon fibers with nanocarbons (carbon nanotube, graphene) have been reported. Accordingly, polyamide, poly(lactic acid), poly(ether ether ketone), epoxies, etc. have been documented as substantial thermoplastic/thermosetting matrices. Ensuing radical polymer/carbon fiber or polymer/carbon fiber/nanocarbon hybrids have benefits regarding low-cost manufacturing, structural precision, complex geometries, high efficiency, least structural defects/voids, superior tensile and shear strength/modulus, compression strength, interlaminar strength, wear properties, thermo-dimensional constancy, and heat stability features, under extreme space environments. Consequently, cutting-edge three-dimensional printed carbon fiber hybrids offered myriad of promising opportunities for mechanically robust (nozzle wearing, strengthened wing spar/ribs, resilient rotating components, interlaminar strength/dimensional stability) and high temperature stable (cryogenic fuel storage, lower earth orbital stability, thermal-dimensional steadiness, thermal conductivity) for aerospace modules. Henceforth, three-dimensional printing owns enormous engineering potential to meet aeronautical manufacturing demands by overcoming challenges of traditional techniques.

Słowa kluczowe

3D printing carbon fiber composites aerospace structures mechanical thermal

drukowanie 3D włókno węglowe kompozyt lotnictwo struktura mechanika termiczny

Wydawca

Politechnika Gdańska

Czasopismo

Advances in Materials Science

Rocznik

2024

Tom

Vol. 24, nr 4(82)

Strony

67--97

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 123 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Kausar Ayesha

dr.ayeshakausar@yahoo.com

National Center For Physics, Quaid-i-Azam University Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan

Bibliografia

1. Ciecieląg, K., K. Kęcik, and K. Zaleski, Effect of depth surface defects in carbon fibre reinforced composite material on the selected recurrence quantifications. Advances in Materials Science, 2020. 20(2): p. 71-80.
2. Soni, D.L. and Jagadish, Current Aspects of Additive Manufacturing in the Aerospace Industry. Additive Manufacturing with Novel Materials: Processes, Properties and Applications, 2024: p. 409-427.
3. Kausar, A., Advances in carbon fiber reinforced polyamide-based composite materials. Advances in materials science, 2019. 19(4): p. 67-82.
4. Tamadon, A., et al., 3D-printed tool shoulder design for the analogue modelling of bobbin friction stir weld joint quality. Advances in Materials Science, 2021. 21(1): p. 27-42.
5. Chouhan, G. and G. Bala Murali, Designs, advancements, and applications of three-dimensional printed gyroid structures: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 2024. 238(2): p. 965-987.
6. Ding, Y., et al., Embedded 3D printing of UV-curable thermosetting composites with continuous fiber. Materials Horizons, 2024.
7. Rahman, M., et al., A review on nanomaterial-based additive manufacturing: Dynamics in properties, prospects, and challenges. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2024. 9(4): p. 1197-1224.
8. Cheng, P., et al., 3D printing continuous natural fiber reinforced polymer composites: A review. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2024. 35(1): p. e6242.
9. Khan, N. and A. Riccio, A systematic review of design for additive manufacturing of aerospace lattice structures: Current trends and future directions. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2024. 149: p. 101021.
10. Szafran, K.S. and Ł.A. Jeziorek, Using Own Algorithms to Increase the Quality and Fatigue Resistance of FDM Printing for Use in Drones and Small Aircraft. Fatigue of Aircraft Structures.
11. Huang, J., et al., Structural Analysis and Testing of a Flexible Rudder Using a Cosine Honeycomb Structure. Aerospace, 2024. 11(6): p. 462.
12. Mahshid, R. and M. Heidari-Rarani, 3D printing of thermosets and their corresponding composites, in Additive Manufacturing Materials and Technology. 2024, Elsevier. p. 213-233.
13. Alakas, H.M., et al., Selection of 3D printing technologies for prosthesis production with multi-criteria decision making methods. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 2024. 18(2): p. 911-927.
14. Elahee, G.F., et al., On the cogent formulation of an elastomeric silicone ink material for direct ink write (DIW) 3D printing. Polymer Engineering & Science, 2024. 64(6): p. 2476-2490.
15. Milutinović, B., et al., Comparative analysis of 3D printing technologies (FDM and SLA) for the production of complex geometry parts.
16. BADEA, R., et al., Comparing 3D printing techniques (SLA vs. FDM) for their use in radionuclide metrology. Romanian Reports in Physics, 2024. 76: p. 802.
17. Pandav, G., T. Karanwad, and S. Banerjee, Sketching feasibility of additively manufactured different size gradient conventional hollow capsular shells (HCSs) by selective laser sintering (SLS): From design to applications. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2024. 151: p. 106393.
18. Melenka, G., et al., Advances in 2D and 3D braided composite materials modeling, in Handbook of Advances in Braided Composite Materials. 2024, Elsevier. p. 359-406.
19. Wang, X., et al., 3D printing of polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017. 110: p. 442-458.
20. Subramani, R., et al., Advancements in 3D printing materials: A comparative analysis of performance and applications. Applied Chemical Engineering, 2024: p. 3867-3867.
21. No-Cortes, J., et al., Comparison of 3D-printed single crown outcomes among different computer-aided design software programs. 2024.
22. Fu, W., et al., 3D-printed multi-material pyramids for broadband electromagnetic wave absorption. Materials Science and Engineering: B, 2024. 307: p. 117525.
23. Sans, F.A., et al., Computer‐aided design and computer‐aided manufacturing poly (methyl methacrylate) interim veneers for immediate esthetic restoration of autotransplanted teeth. Dental Traumatology, 2024. 40(3): p. 325-332.
24. Boopathi, S. and P. Kumar, Advanced bioprinting processes using additive manufacturing technologies: Revolutionizing tissue engineering. 3D Printing Technologies: Digital Manufacturing. Artificial Intelligence, Industry, 2024. 4: p. 95.
25. Ford, S. and T. Minshall, Invited review article: Where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Additive Manufacturing, 2019. 25: p. 131-150.
26. Zotti, A., et al., Hierarchical aerospace epoxy composites of carbon fiber and hyperbranched filler: Toughening behavior from nanocomposites to composites. Composite Structures, 2024. 327: p. 117719.
27. Rahmatabadi, D., et al., 4D printing and annealing of PETG composites reinforced with short carbon fibers. Physica Scripta, 2024. 99(5): p. 055957.
28. Wang, W., et al., Fiber-laying-assisted material extrusion additive manufacturing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced SiC ceramic matrix composites. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2024. 890: p. 145944.
29. Sahu, R., et al., Interface engineering of carbon fiber composites using CNT: A review. Polymer Composites, 2024. 45(1): p. 9-42.
30. Asyraf, M., et al., Advanced composite in aerospace applications: opportunities, challenges, and future perspective. Advanced Composites in Aerospace Engineering Applications, 2022: p. 471-498.
31. Liu, X., et al. Enhancing Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites by 3D Printing Optimization. in ASME Aerospace Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. 2024. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
32. Zhang, C. and K. Fu, Additively manufactured 3D short carbon fiber scaffold for thermoset composites. MRS Communications, 2024: p. 1-7.
33. Heitkamp, T., et al., Design Principles and Restrictions for Continuous Fiber-Reinforced Additive Manufacturing. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 2024. 146.
34. Varma, M.M.M., P.K. Baghel, and R. Raju, Additive manufacturing of thermosetting resins in-situ carbon fibers: a review. Recent Advances in Materials and Modern Manufacturing: Select Proceedings of ICAMMM 2021, 2022: p. 97-105.
35. Stieven Montagna, L., et al., Recycling of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic and thermoset composites: A review. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 2023. 36(8): p. 3455-3480.
36. Tekinalp, H.L., et al., Highly oriented carbon fiber–polymer composites via additive manufacturing. Composites Science and Technology, 2014. 105: p. 144-150.
37. Ning, F., et al., Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2015. 80: p. 369-378.
38. Tamez, M.B.A. and I. Taha, A review of additive manufacturing technologies and markets for thermosetting resins and their potential for carbon fiber integration. Additive Manufacturing, 2021. 37: p. 101748.
39. Karimi, A., D. Rahmatabadi, and M. Baghani, Various FDM mechanisms used in the fabrication of continuous-fiber reinforced composites: a review. Polymers, 2024. 16(6): p. 831.
40. Kaybal, H.B. and H. Ulus, Comparative analysis of thermoplastic and thermoset adhesives performance and the influence on failure analysis in jointed elium‐based composite structures. Polymer Composites, 2024. 45(4): p. 3474-3492.
41. Wang, F., et al., Fabrication of a novel continuous fiber 3D printed thermoset all-composite honeycomb sandwich structure with polymethacrylimide foam reinforcement. Composites Communications, 2024. 45: p. 101794.
42. Lu, S., et al., High-strength carbon fiber-reinforced polyether-ether-ketone composites with longer fiber retention length manufactured via screw extrusion-based 3D printing. Additive Manufacturing, 2024. 86: p. 104200.
43. Yang, D., et al., Effects of crystallinity control on mechanical properties of 3D-printed short-carbon-fiber-reinforced polyether ether ketone composites. Polymer Testing, 2021. 97: p. 107149.
44. Islam, M.Z., et al., Mechanical Characterization and Production of Various Shapes Using Continuous Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Thermoset Resin-Based 3D Printing. Polymers, 2024. 16(13): p. 1828.
45. Patadia, M. and R. Sweat, Modelling and analysis of multiscale hybrid composite structures for virtual design and performance-driven manufacturing: a review. Advances in Materials and Processing Technologies, 2024: p. 1-36.
46. Dev, B., C.R. Gujjala, and T. Maly, Thermo-mechanical analysis of a probe for electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy operating at cryogenic temperatures. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2019. 90(4).
47. Zach, T.F. and M.C. Dudescu, The Three-Dimensional Printing of Composites: A Review of the Finite Element/Finite Volume Modelling of the Process. Journal of Composites Science, 2024. 8(4): p. 146.
48. Gómez-Fernández, H., et al., Comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art in corneal 3D bioprinting, including regulatory aspects. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2024: p. 124510.
49. Chen, X., et al., Field-based toolpath generation for 3D printing continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites. Additive Manufacturing, 2022. 49: p. 102470.
50. Al Rashid, A., H. Ikram, and M. Koç, Additive manufacturing and mechanical performance of carbon fiber reinforced Polyamide-6 composites. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022. 62: p. 6359-6363.
51. Chen, S., et al., Performance enhancement of 3D‐printed carbon fiber‐reinforced nylon 6 composites. Polymer Composites, 2024. 45(6): p. 5754-5772.
52. Mohammadizadeh, M. and I. Fidan, Tensile performance of 3D-printed continuous fiber-reinforced nylon composites. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2021. 5(3): p. 68.
53. Kim, H.C., R. Tu, and H.A. Sodano, Room temperature 3D printing of high-temperature engineering polymer and its nanocomposites with porosity control for multifunctional structures. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024. 279: p. 111444.
54. Tian, X., et al., Interface and performance of 3D printed continuous carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2016. 88: p. 198-205.
55. Ferreira, R.T.L., et al., Experimental characterization and micrography of 3D printed PLA and PLA reinforced with short carbon fibers. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017. 124: p. 88-100.
56. Acanfora, V., et al., On the effect of printing orientation on the surface roughness of an additive manufactured composite vertical tail. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2024. 130(9): p. 4543-4564.
57. Kumari, S., et al. Advanced Welding of Dissimilar Materials for Aerospace and Automotive Applications. in E3S Web of Conferences. 2023. EDP Sciences.
58. Zaghloul, M.M.Y., M.M.Y. Zaghloul, and M. Fuseini, Recent progress in Epoxy Nanocomposites: Corrosion, structural, flame retardancy and applications—A comprehensive review. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2023.
59. Saxena, A., et al., A short review on machine learning for the purpose of optimizing and predicting the properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2023.
60. Cuellar, C., K. Watson, and E. Smela, Fabrication, characterization, and repair of nanocarbon-loaded aircraft paint-based sensors for real-world SHM: studies at the laboratory scale. Structural Health Monitoring, 2023: p. 14759217231198015.
61. Ogunsola, S.S., et al., Carbon nanotubes for sustainable environmental remediation: A critical and comprehensive review. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects, 2024. 37: p. 101099.
62. K. C, N., et al., Carbon nanotube filled rubber nanocomposites. Frontiers in Carbon, 2024. 3: p. 1339418.
63. Liu, D., et al., Functionalization of carbon nanotubes for multifunctional applications. Trends in Chemistry, 2024.
64. Sui, G., et al., The dispersion of CNT in TPU matrix with different preparation methods: solution mixing vs melt mixing. Polymer, 2019. 182: p. 121838.
65. Belkheir, M., et al., Effect of carbon nanotube (CNT)-reinforced polymers and biopolymer matrix on interface damage of nanocomposite materials. Emergent Materials, 2023: p. 1-14.
66. Patadia, M., et al., Enhanced Multifunctionality in Carbon Fiber/Carbon Nanotube Reinforced PEEK Hybrid Composites: Superior Combination of Mechanical Properties, Electrical Conductivity, and EMI Shielding. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024: p. 111674.
67. Wang, D. and S. Li, Collaborative optimization design of lightweight and crashworthiness of the front-end structures of automobile body using HW–GRA for Pareto mining. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2021: p. 0954406221992802.
68. Özçakır, G., Carbon Fiber and Its Composites: Synthesis, Properties, Applications. Sinop Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 2024. 9(1): p. 240-265.
69. Wang, Y., et al., Sustainable self-healing at ultra-low temperatures in structural composites incorporating hollow vessels and heating elements. Royal Society Open Science, 2016. 3(9): p. 160488.
70. Guadagno, L., et al., Functional structural nanocomposites with integrated self-healing ability. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021. 34: p. 243-249.
71. Ikumapayi, O.M. and E.T. Akinlabi, Efficacy of α-β grade titanium alloy powder (Ti–6Al–2Sn–2Zr–2Mo–2Cr–0.25 Si) in surface modification and corrosion mitigation in 3.5% NaCl on friction stir processed armour grade 7075-T651 aluminum alloys—insight in defence applications. Materials Research Express, 2019. 6(7): p. 076546.
72. Pappas, J.M. and X. Dong. Nanoporous Carbon Nanotube Coating for 3D Printing of High-Performance Continuous Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites. in International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference. 2022. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
73. Mansour, M.T., K. Tsongas, and D. Tzetzis, 3D printed hierarchical honeycombs with carbon fiber and carbon nanotube reinforced acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Journal of Composites Science, 2021. 5(2): p. 62.
74. Kasraie, M., et al., Carbon nanotube as a conductive rheological modifier for carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy 3D printing inks. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024. 282: p. 111583.
75. Yu, A., et al., Molten Salt Electrolytic CO2-Derived Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Energy Storage and Electrocatalysis: A Review. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 2024.
76. Yuchang, Q., et al., Temperature dependence of the electromagnetic properties of graphene nanosheet reinforced alumina ceramics in the X-band. Journal of Materials Chemistry C, 2016. 4(22): p. 4853-4862.
77. Obaid, A.N. and E. Al-Bermany, Impact of graphene nanosheets on adhesion and corrosion performance of reinforced polyurethane coating for aerospace aluminium alloy 2024-T3. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2024. 132: p. 103695.
78. Anu, K., et al., Carbon fiber-reinforced, activated carbon-embedded copper oxide nanoparticles/epoxy hybrid composites for EMI shielding in aircraft applications. Polymer Bulletin, 2024: p. 1-28.
79. Tambe, P., M. Tanniru, and B.K. Sai, Structural/load bearing characteristics of polymer-graphene composites, in Polymer Nanocomposites Containing Graphene. 2022, Elsevier. p. 379-400.
80. Ghimire, R. and F. Liou, Quasi-static multifunctional characterization of 3d-printed carbon fiber composites for compressive-electrical properties. Polymers, 2022. 14(2): p. 328.
81. Xiao, R., et al., Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing of carbon fiber-graphene oxide (CF-GO) reinforced polymer lattices. Nanotechnology, 2021. 32(23): p. 235702.
82. Thomas, D., Enhancing the electrical and mechanical properties of graphene nanoplatelet composites for 3D printed microsatellite structures. Additive Manufacturing, 2021. 47: p. 102215.
83. Chinmay, M., et al., Microstructural Modification, Mechanical Properties, and Wear Behaviour of Aged Al-Si-Mg/Si3N4 Composites for Aerospace Applications. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, 2024.
84. Ismail, S.O., et al., Comprehensive study on tool wear during machining of fiber-reinforced polymeric composites. Machining and Machinability of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites, 2021: p. 129-147.
85. Aslantas, K., et al., Effect of cutting conditions on tool wear and wear mechanism in micro-milling of additively manufactured titanium alloy. Tribology International, 2024. 193: p. 109340.
86. Cococcetta, N.M., et al., Investigating surface finish, burr formation, and tool wear during machining of 3D printed carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite. Journal of manufacturing processes, 2020. 56: p. 1304-1316.
87. Bianchi, I., et al., Effect of nozzle wear on mechanical properties of 3D printed carbon fiber-reinforced polymer parts by material extrusion. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014. 130(9): p. 4699-4712.
88. Lin, S., et al., Influence of structural geometry on tensile properties and fracture toughness in 3D printed novel structures. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2024. 161: p. 108277.
89. Tiwary, V.K., A. Padmakumar, and V.R. Malik, Investigations on friction stir spot welding to overcome bed size limits of material extrusion (MEX) 3D printers. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2024. 30(1): p. 106-123.
90. Asmatulu, E., J. Twomey, and M. Overcash, Recycling of fiber-reinforced composites and direct structural composite recycling concept. Journal of Composite Materials, 2014. 48(5): p. 593-608.
91. Huang, Y., et al., 3D printing of topologically optimized wing spar with continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2024. 272: p. 111166.
92. Skomorokhova, A.I., A.O. Glebov, and S.V. Karpov. Numerical modeling of strain-stress state of structures from porous materials. in AIP Conference Proceedings. 2024. AIP Publishing.
93. Pappas, J.M., et al., A parametric study and characterization of additively manufactured continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites for high-speed 3D printing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2021. 113: p. 2137-2151.
94. Subhedar, K.M., et al., Effect of fibre orientation on mechanical properties of carbon fibre composites. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences (IJEMS), 2021. 27(6): p. 1100-1103.
95. Xiang, J., et al., Interlaminar and translaminar fracture toughness of 3D‐printed continuous fiber reinforced composites: A review and prospect. Polymer Composites, 2024. 45(5): p. 3883-3900.
96. Kirmse, S., B. Ranabhat, and K.-T. Hsiao, Experimental and analytical investigation on the interlaminar shear strength of carbon fiber composites reinforced with carbon nanofiber z-threads. Materials Today Communications, 2020. 25: p. 101512.
97. Somireddy, M., C. Singh, and A. Czekanski, Mechanical behaviour of 3D printed composite parts with short carbon fiber reinforcements. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020. 107: p. 104232.
98. Iragi, M., et al., Ply and interlaminar behaviours of 3D printed continuous carbon fibre-reinforced thermoplastic laminates; effects of processing conditions and microstructure. Additive Manufacturing, 2019. 30: p. 100884.
99. Caminero, M., et al., Interlaminar bonding performance of 3D printed continuous fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modelling. Polymer Testing, 2018. 68: p. 415-423.
100. Uşun, A., B.B. Vatandaş, and R. Gümrük, Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Continuous Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyether-Ether-Ketone Composites via Infrared Preheating and High Fiber Volume Fraction. Additive Manufacturing, 2024: p. 104289.
101. Hou, Z., et al., Design and 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced heterogeneous composites. Composite Structures, 2020. 237: p. 111945.
102. Billerbeck, K., C. Hägele, and J. Träger, Relation of the working curve and exposure intensity in VPP 3D-printing. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2024. 9(4): p. 1015-1023.
103. Niu, S., et al., Enhanced high-temperature dimensional accuracy by fibers in silica ceramic cores prepared through vat photopolymerization 3D printing. Ceramics International, 2024.
104. Subramani, R., et al., Selection and Optimization of Carbon-Reinforced Polyether Ether Ketone Process Parameters in 3D Printing—A Rotating Component Application. Polymers, 2024. 16(10): p. 1443.
105. Whitmore, S.A., Three-dimensional printing of “Green” fuels for low-cost small spacecraft propulsion systems. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2018. 55(1): p. 13-26.
106. Rahman, M.A., et al., 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced thermoset composites using UV curable resin. Polymer Composites, 2021. 42(11): p. 5859-5868.
107. Wu, H., et al., Evolution of Manufacturing Defects of 3D-Printed Thermoplastic Composites with Processing Parameters: A Micro-CT Analysis. Materials, 2023. 16(19): p. 6521.
108. Huang, F., et al., Microcracking Resistance of 3D Printed Fibre Composites at Cryogenic Temperatures. Additive Manufacturing, 2024: p. 104307.
109. Nishihara, K., et al., The Thermo-Mechanical Properties of Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites Exposed to a Low Earth Orbit Environment. Aerospace, 2024. 11(3): p. 201.
110. Di Trani, N., et al., Probing Physicochemical Performances of 3D Printed Carbon Fiber Composites During 8‐Month Exposure to Space Environment. Advanced Functional Materials, 2024. 34(13): p. 2310243.
111. Barrios, M. and S. Van Sciver, Thermal conductivity of rigid foam insulations for aerospace vehicles. Cryogenics, 2013. 55: p. 12-19.
112. Shemelya, C., et al., Anisotropy of thermal conductivity in 3D printed polymer matrix composites for space based cube satellites. Additive Manufacturing, 2017. 16: p. 186-196.
113. Zhan, X., et al., Mechanical, Thermal, and Electrical Properties on 3D Printed Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 2024. 6(7): p. 3787-3795.
114. Stepashkin, А., et al., 3D-printed PEEK-carbon fiber (CF) composites: Structure and thermal properties. Composites Science and Technology, 2018. 164: p. 319-326.
115. Samal, S.K., et al., 3D-printed satellite brackets: materials, manufacturing and applications. Crystals, 2022. 12(8): p. 1148.
116. Chen, Y., et al., 3D printed carbon-fibre reinforced composite lattice structures with good thermal-dimensional stability. Composites Science and Technology, 2022. 227: p. 109599.
117. Maier, R., et al., Investigation into thermomechanical response of polymer composite materials produced through additive manufacturing technologies. Materials, 2022. 15(14): p. 5069.
118. Tuli, N.T., S. Khatun, and A.B. Rashid, Unlocking the future of precision manufacturing: A comprehensive exploration of 3D printing with fiber-reinforced composites in aerospace, automotive, medical, and consumer industries. Heliyon, 2024.
119. Kausar, A. and I. Ahmad, Nanocomposites of nanocarbon functionalized carbon fibers—manufacturing to methodological applications. Advances in Materials Science, 2024. 24(1): p. 46-71.
120. Ma, T., et al., Repairing surface defects of carbon fibers: Electrostatic spraying nano-carbons on stabilized PAN-fibers and subsequent thermal annealing. Surfaces and Interfaces, 2024. 52: p. 104783.
121.Li, C.X., et al., Manufacturing Autoclave-Grade Thermoset Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Aerospace Composites without an Autoclave Using Nanoporous Materials. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2024. 16(19): p. 25280-25293.
122. Qaidi, S.M., et al., Recycling of mine tailings for the geopolymers production: A systematic review. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2022. 16: p. e00933.
123. Qaidi, S.M., et al., Engineering properties of sustainable green concrete incorporating eco-friendly aggregate of crumb rubber: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021. 324: p. 129251.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr POPUL/SP/0154/2024/02 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki II" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki (2025).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-5c35780f-fd80-4235-82b5-8ca3f2146403