Koncepcja działań prewencyjnych w globalnej strategii bezpieczeństwa

• Autorzy: Koziej S.

Warianty tytułu

EN

The concept of preventive engagement in the global strategy of security

• Języki publikacji: PL EN

Słowa kluczowe

PL

strategia bezpieczeństwa; terroryzm; działanie prewencyjne

EN

security strategy; terrorism; preventive measures

• Wydawca: Akademia Sztuki Wojennej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe AON
• Rocznik: 2006
• Tom: nr 3(64)
• Strony: 66--91
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 64 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Koziej S.

• Akademia obrony Narodowej

Bibliografia

• 1. Addressing contemporary security threats: What role for the United Nations, Wilton Park Conference, 23-25 February 2004.
• 2. The United Nations: threats and challenges in the 21s' ceuntry. Conference held at the First Independent University in Poland, Warsaw, 22-23 March 2004, Warszawa 2004.
• 3. C. Rutkowski, Terroryzm na zimno, „Myśl Wojskowa” 2004, nr 4, (dodatek specjalny), s. 17-18.
• 4. Bógdał-Brzezińska, M.F. Gawrycki, Cyberterroryzm i problemy bezpieczeństwa informacyjnego we współczesnym świecie, Warszawa 2003.
• 5. G. Weiman, Cyberterrorism. How Real Is the Threat, United States Institute of Peace, Washington, May 2004.
• 6. S.P. Worden, R.R. Correll, Responsie Space and Strategie Information, „Defense Horizons”, National Defense University, Washington, April 2004.
• 7. A Human Security Doctrine for Europe. The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities, 15. 09. 2004.
• 8. P. Gawliczek, J. Pawłowski, Zagrożenia asymetryczne, Warszawa 2003.
• 9. M. Madej, Globalizacja zagrożeń asymetrycznych, „Sprawy Międzynarodowe”, styczeń-marzec 2003.
• 10. M.C. Meigs, Unorthodox Thoughts about Asymmetric Warfare, „Parameters”, U.S. Army War College, Carlisle, Sumer 2003.
• 11. V. Belous, Samyje koszmarnyje tierakty jeszcze vpieriedi, „Niezavisimoje Vojennoje Obozrenie”, 3. 09. 2004.
• 12. P.D. Zimmerman, C. Loeb, Dirty Bombs: The Threat Revisited, „Horizons”, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, National Defense University, Washington, January 2004.
• 13. V. Belous, ,Jadernyj terrorizm: popytki uże byli, „Niezavisimoje Vojennoje Obozrenie”, 8. 10. 2004.
• 14. M.J. Morgan, The origins of the New Terrorism, „Parameters”, Spring 2004.
• 15. K.. Mroziewicz, Szatańskie witryny, „Polityka” z 31 lipca 2004 r.
• 16. W. Rogacin, Kto grozi Polsce, „Newsweek” z 26 lipca 2004 r.
• 17. The World’s Nuclear Arsenals, „Nuclear Issues”, Center for Defense Information, July 8, 2004.
• 18. M. Bunn, A. Wier, Preventing a Nuclear 9/11, „Washington Post”, 13 September 2004.
• 19. G.C. Buchan, D. Matonick, C. Shipbaugh, R. Mesie, Future roles of U.S. nuclear forces. Implications for U.S. strategy, RAND, Santa Monica 2003.
• 20. V. Ivanov, Atomnyj topor Usamy możet opustitsja na golovy Amerykancov, „Niezavisimoje Vojennoje Obozrenie”, 30. 07. 2004.
• 21. V. Esin, Terroristy sposobny primenit radioaktivnye zarjady, „Niezavisimaja Gazieta”, 30. 07. 2004.
• 22. B. Schaffer, If Iran is not checked, nuclear terror is next. America needs a plan, „International Herald Tribune”, 10, August, 2004.
• 23. Ch. Ferguson, W.C. Porter, The four faces of nuclear terrorism, Monterey 2004.
• 24. P. Wolfowitz, A Strategic Approach to the Challenge of Terrorism, www.defenselink.mil/speeches/2004/sp20040908.
• 25. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, Washington 2002.
• 26. National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, Washington 2003.
• 27. Eksperty predlagajut kompleks mierdoverija po straitegiczeskim vooruzeniam, Niezavisimoje Vojennoje Obozrenie”, 2.07.2004.
• 28. Russia - NATO: Strategic partners in response to emergent threats, „Russia Weekly ”, Center for Defense Information, July 16, 2004.
• 29. C.S. Gray, Maintaining effective deterrence, Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, Carlisle, August 2003.
• 30. D.L. Zajac, The best offense is a good defense: Preemption, its ramifications for the Department of Defense, [w:] National security challenges for the 21” century, U.S. Anny War College, Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle, October 2003.
• 31. D.D. Zedalis, Female suicide bombers, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle, June 2004.
• 32. C. Jean, Geopolityka, Wroclaw 2003.
• 33. Shift or Rift. Assessing US - EU relations after Iraq, Paris 2003.
• 34. S. Koziej, Projekt strategii bezpieczeństwa Unii Europejskiej, założenia i komentarze, „Zeszyty Naukowe”, AON, Warszawa 2003, nr 4.
• 35. S. Koziej, Prawne i strategiczne podstawy bezpieczeństwa Unii Europejskiej, „Zeszyty Naukowe”, AON, Warszawa 2004, nr 3.
• 36. R.C. Nation, Regional Studies in a Global Age, W: - U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security Policy and Strategy, edited by J. B. Bartholomes Jr, July 2004.
• 37. European defence. A proposals for a White Paper, European Union Institute for Security Studies, Paris 2004.
• 38. NATO's military concept for defence against terrorism, October 2003, http://www.nato.int/ims/docu/terrorism.htm,
• 39. NATO’s Role in Confronting International Terrorism, The Atlantic Council of the United States, Washington D.C., June 2004.
• 40. Transatlantic Security: New Realities, Changing Institutions. Report of the Warsaw Reflection Group, April 5-6, 2004. Warsaw 2004,.
• 41. French Defence Strategy, www.defense.gouv.fr/english/dl66/index.html.
• 42. Delivering Security in a Changing World. Defence White Paper, 2003.
• 43. Delivering Security in a Changing World. Future Capabilities, 2004.
• 44. Defence Policy Guidelines, Bundesministerium der Verteidigung, Berlin, 21 May 2003..
• 45. V. Ivanov, Presidient Rossii objaśnił, czto słabych bjut, „Niezavisimoje Vojennoje Obozrenie", 9.10.2004.
• 46. The Transatlantic Dialogue on Terrorism, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, August 2004.
• 47. J.F. Troxell, Military Power and the Use of Force, [w:] U.S. Army War College Guide to National Security Policy and Strategy, edited by J.B. Bartholomes Jr, July 2004.
• 48. K. Bildt, One year on: lessons from Iraq, „Chailot Paper”, nr 68, EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris 2004
• 49. W. A. Terril, The United States and Iraq’s Shi ’ite clergy: Partners or adversaries, U.S. Army War College, Strategic Studies Institute, Carlisle, February 2004.
• 50. F.A. Jabar, Postconflict Iraq. A Race for Stability, Reconstruction, and Legitimacy, Special Report, United States Institute of Peace, Washington, May 2004.
• 51. L. Diamond, What Went Wrong in Iraq, „Foreign Affairs”, July/August 2004.
• 52. B. Hoffman, Insurgency and Counterinsurgency in Iraq, „Occasional Paper”, RAND, Santa Monica, June 2004.
• 53. Bush Seeks Creation of New National Intelligence Post, http://usinfo.state.gov/is/Archive/2004/Aug/03-64957.html.
• 54. Building Civilian Capacity for U.S. Stability Operations. The Rule of Law Component, Special Report, United States Institute of Peace, Washington, May 2004.
• 55. J.P. White, J. Deutch, Building capability from the technical revolution that has happened. Report of the Belfer Centem Conference on national security transformation, Carlisle 2004.
• 56. S. Koziej, Szkic do dyskusji o przyszłej strategii poszerzonego NATO (spojrzenie z polskiej perspektywy), Toruń 1998.
• 57. Transatlantic Security: New Realities, Changing Institutions. Report of the Warsaw Reflection Group, 5-6 April 2004, Warsaw 2004,.
• 58. Human Security Doctrine for Europe, The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities, 15.09.2004, www.ue.eu.int/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/Solana/.
• 59. B. Knowlton, Kerry vows to form new alliance to help in Iraq, „International Herald Tribune”, August 2, 2004.
• 60. E. Schmitt, T. Shanker, U.S. plan for Iraq starts with taming insurgents, „International Herald Tribune”, October 09, 2004.
• 61. R.C. Orr (ed.), Winning the Peace. An American Strategy for Post-Conflict Reconstruction, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington, July 2004.
• 62. J.E. Mroz, M.R. Shulman, A public-private strategy for enhancing domestic security worldwide, New Defence Agenda, Brussels, 2004.
• 63. I.H. Daalder, J.B. Steinberg, New Rules on When to Go to War, „Financial Times”, 2 August 2004.
• 64. G. Perkovich, J. Cirincione, R Gottemoeller, J.B. Wolfsthal, J.T. Mathews, Universal compliance. A strategy for nuclear security (draft), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, June 2004, s. 37-41