Determination of the Effects of the Pre-Outfitting and Pre-Piping Assembly Operations on Shipyard Productivity

• Autorzy: Ozkok M. , Helvacioglu H. I.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The process improvement operations are very significant in shipbuilding industry as the other industries. In recent years, the shipyards attempt to improve their processes by examining their current production system and to reduce the cycle time of the interim product so that they can keep their competitive power. If the cycle time of the interim products is decrease, that may cause to increase the annual production capacity and market share of the shipyard. In order to do this, the shipyards have to analyse their own production system and carry out some improvements on it. In this study, the effects of carrying out the outfitting and piping assembly operations in earlier work stations were investigated by using a methodology presented here. The steps in the methodology were applied to a double bottom block of a container ship. It was shown that if the outfitting and the piping assembly operations are carried out in earlier stations instead of the block assembly station, this may increase the throughput by 33%. The results of the study were discussed in the final section.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pre-outfitting assembly; pre-piping assembly; simulation; ship production

• Wydawca: Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Ocean Engineering & Ship Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Maritime Research
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: nr 1
• Strony: 59--69
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 17 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Ozkok M.

• Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, 61530 Camburnu/Trabzon, TURKEY Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]

autor

Helvacioglu H. I.

• Faculty of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34469, Maslak/Istanbul, TURKEY Phone: [phone], Fax: [phone]

Bibliografia

• 1. Frankel E.G.: Impact of technological change on shipbuilding productivity, Journal of Ship Production, 1, 3, 174-183, 1985.
• 2. Inozu B., et al.: New horizons for shipbuilding process improvement, Journal of Ship Production, 22, 2, 87-98, 2006.
• 3. Eker E.: The application of the process improvement concept on the paint works, MSc Thesis, ITU Institute of Science, Istanbul, 1999.
• 4. Hardwick M., Kassel B., Crump B. and Garret S.: Improving shipyard manufacturing processes using STEP-NC, Journal of Ship Production, 21, 3, 170-176, 2005.
• 5. DiBarra C.: 5S-A tool for culture change in shipyards, Journal of Ship Production, 18, 3, 143-151, 2002.
• 6. Odabasi A.Y., Alkaner S., Olcer A. and Sukas N.: Reengineering of small and medium-sized ship production facilities: An example for Turkish Shipbuilding industry, Journal of Ship Production, 13, 1, 8-15, 1997.
• 7. Odabasi A.Y., et al.: Development and evaluation of Marmara Shipyard’s expansion program, Contract Report, Istanbul, 1993.
• 8. Larson T., and Tice J.: Lean and EMS Integration Workshop, Environmental Technologies, Ship Production Panels, USA, 2005.
• 9. Lamb T.: Simulation-based performance improvement for shipbuilding processes, Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 22, No. 2, May, pp.49-65, 2006.
• 10. Shin J.G.: A modeling and simulation of production process in subassembly lines at a shipyard, Journal of Ship Production, Vol.20, No.2, May, pp.79-83, 2004.
• 11. Shin J.G.: A concept and framework for a shipyard layout design based on simulation, Journal of Ship Production, Vol.25, No.3, August, pp.126-135, 2009.
• 12. Alkaner S.: The Modelling and Analysis of Ship Production with Simulation: Case Study, PhD Thesis, ITU Institute of Science, Istanbul, 1998.
• 13. Greenwood A.G., Hill H.W.: Simulation Optimization Decision Support System for Ship Panel Shop Operations, Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 2078-2086, 2005.
• 14. Kelton W.D., Sadowski R.P. and Sturrock D.T.: Simulation with Arena, Third edition, McGraw-Hill, 1998.
• 15. Fafandjel N., et al.: Procedure for measuring shipbuilding process optimization results after using modular outfitting concept, Urednistvo Casopisa Strojartvo, 50, 3, 141-150, 2008.
• 16. Yu H. and Ishida K.: The evaluation of the effectiveness of modular outfitting of engine room machines, Fourth International Conference on Marine Technology, 23-25 May, Poland, 391-399, 2001.
• 17. Baade R., et al.: Modular outfitting, Journal of Ship Production, 14, 3, 170-179, 1998.