PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Fostering employee engagement: a qualitative study of post-merger integration in the agrochemical industry

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Wspieranie zaangażowania pracowników: jakościowe badanie integracji po fuzji w branży agrochemicznej
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Employee engagement has been a topic of constant interest over the past two decades, particularly in the modern business environment where frequent mergers and acquisitions occur. This study aims to identify the driving factors influencing engagement during PMI, ultimately affecting both employee and company performance. Unfortunately, very few studies examine how PMI affects employee engagement in the context of qualitative studies, particularly in Indonesia's agrochemical sector; therefore, this study is vital. These qualitative studies are drawn from semi-structured, in-depth interviews face-to-face and via Zoom. The target informants consisted of 5 senior managers, 3 middle managers, and 4 staff members who possessed at least 1 merger and acquisition of the target company. The results were analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana methods. The results indicate work-life balance, employee resilience, the role of the leader, and career growth opportunities are the main driving factors in enhancing engagement throughout PMI. From this study, the novelty found in the impact of PMI is that employees are becoming more generalists instead of specialists in managing work, and on top of that, they are more engaged with the organization. Organizational policies may encourage employee engagement by promoting work-life balance, resilience, the role of leader, and career growth, fostering a deeper sense of employee commitment.
PL
Zaangażowanie pracowników było tematem stałego zainteresowania naukowców ostatnich dwóch dekad, szczególnie w nowoczesnym środowisku biznesowym, w którym często dochodzi do fuzji i przejęć. Niniejsze badanie ma na celu zidentyfikowanie czynników wpływających na zaangażowanie podczas PMI, co ostatecznie wpływa zarówno na pracowników, jak i wyniki firmy. Niestety, bardzo niewiele badań pokazuje, w jaki sposób PMI wpływa na zaangażowanie pracowników w kontekście badań jakościowych, szczególnie w indonezyjskim sektorze agrochemicznym; dlatego też niniejsze badanie jest kluczowe. Niniejsze badania jakościowe opierają się na półustrukturyzowanych, pogłębionych wywiadach przeprowadzonych twarzą w twarz i za pośrednictwem platformy Zoom. Finalnymi informatorami byli: 5 starszych menedżerów, 3 średnich menedżerów i 4 pracowników, którzy uczestniczyli co najmniej w 1 fuzji i przejęciu firmy docelowej. Wyniki analizowano przy użyciu metod: Milesa, Hubermana i Saldany. Wyniki wskazują, że równowaga między życiem zawodowym a prywatnym, odporność pracowników, rola lidera i możliwości rozwoju kariery są głównymi czynnikami wpływającymi na zwiększenie zaangażowania w całym PMI. Z tego badania wynika, że nowość w zakresie wpływu PMI polega na tym, że pracownicy stają się bardziej generalistami niż specjalistami w zarządzaniu pracą, a ponadto są bardziej zaangażowani w organizację. Polityka organizacyjna może zachęcać pracowników do zaangażowania poprzez promowanie równowagi między życiem zawodowym a prywatnym, odporności, roli lidera i rozwoju kariery, wzmacniając głębsze poczucie zaangażowania pracowników.
Rocznik
Strony
380--393
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 49 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • Doctoral Student, Management Department, Universitas Brawijaya; Lecturer of Management Department, Universitas Kristen Maranatha
  • Doctoral Student and Practitioner Lecture, Management Department, Universitas Brawijaya;, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Management Department, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Management Department, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Management Department, Universitas Brawijaya
Bibliografia
  • 1. Ahmed, S. S., Khan, M. M. and ur Rahman, M., (2023). Unlocking employees resilience in turbulent times: the role of spiritual leadership and meaning. Continuity and Resilience Review, 5(3), 249-26.
  • 2. Alam, I.,Singh, J. S. K. and Islam, M. U., (2021). Does supportive supervisor complements the effect of ethical leadership on employee engagement? Cogent Business and Management, 8:1978371.
  • 3. Allam, Z., (2021). Employee disengagement: A fatal consequence to organization and its ameliorative measures. International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(2), 49-52.
  • 4. Al Dilby, H. K., Farmanesh, P., (2023) Exploring the impact of virtual leadership on job satisfaction in the post-COVID-19 era: The mediating role of work-life balance and trust in leaders. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 994539.
  • 5. Al-Hosani, Y., Jabeen, F., Paul, J. and Stachowicz-Stanusch, A., (2020). Antecedents of employee alienation and its impact on individual work performance during post-merger integration (PMI). Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(6), 1085-1110.
  • 6. Bernuzzia, C., Sommovigob, V. and Settia, I., (2022). The role of resilience in the work-life interface: A systematic review. Work, 73, 1147-1165.
  • 7. Brueller, N. N., Carmeli, A. and Markman, G. D., (2018). Linking merger and acquisition strategies to postmerger integration: A configurational perspective of human resource management. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1793-1818.
  • 8. Chopra, A., Sahoo, C. K. and Patel, G., (2023). Exploring the relationship between employer branding and talent retention: The mediation effect of employee engagement. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(4), 702-720.
  • 9. Cooke, F. L., Wood, G., Wang, M. and Li, A. S., (2021). Riding the tides of mergers and acquisitions by building a resilient workforce: A framework for studying the role of human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 31(3), 100747.
  • 10. Deepalakshmi, N., Deepak, T., Baruah, R., Seth, A. and Bisht, R., (2024). Employee engagement and organization performance: A human resource perspective. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(4), 5941-5948.
  • 11. Eley, D. S., Cloninger, C. R., Walters L., Laurence C., Synnott R. and Wilkinson, D., (2013). The relationship between resilience and personality traits in doctors: implications for enhancing well being. PeerJ: e216
  • 12. Houssein, A. A., Singh, J. S. K. and Arumugam, T., (2020). Retention of employees through career development, employee engagement and work-life balance: An empiricalstudy among employees in the financial sector in Djibouti, East Africa. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 12(3), 17-32.
  • 13. Howe, A., Anna, S. and Andrea, S., (2012). Towards an understanding of resilience and its relevance to medical training. Medical Education, 46(4), 349-56.
  • 14. Jamillah, K., Setyanti, S. W. L. H. and Mufidah, A., (2023). The effect of work life balance and self efficacy on employee performance with employee engagement as intervening variable. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Studies, 6(1), 304-312.
  • 15. Karaca-Atik, A., Meeuwisse, M., Gorgievski, M. and Smeets, G., (2023). Uncovering important 21st-century skills for sustainable career development of social sciences graduates: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 39, 100528.
  • 16. Khairy, H. A., (2019). How organizational merger affects employees’ engagement and job security in the hotel industry? A pre-post analysis. International Journal of Heritage, Tourism and Hospitality, 13(2), 245-262.
  • 17. Khan, Z., Soundararajan, V., Wood, G. and Ahammad, M. F., (2020). Employee emotional resilience during post-merger integration across national boundaries: Rewards and the mediating role of fairness norms. Journal of World Business, 55(2), 100888.
  • 18. Kim, W., Shuck, B. and Chai, D. S., (2021). The chicken and egg conundrum: Job satisfaction or employee engagement and implications for human resources. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 33(1), 4-24.
  • 19. Kumar, S., (2022). The impact of talent management practices on employee turnover and retention intentions. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 41(2), 21-34.
  • 20. Laihinen, R. H., (2022). Managing Positive Change: Emotions and Communication Following Acquisitions. Journal of Change Management, 22(4), 373-400.
  • 21. Lee, J. Y., Yahiaoui, D., Lee, K.-P. and Cooke, F., (2022). Global talent management and multinational subsidiaries’ resilience in the Covid‐19 crisis: Moderating roles of regional headquarters’ support and headquarters–subsidiary friction. Human Resource Management, 61(1), 355-372.
  • 22. Liang, H., Renneboog, L. and Vansteenkiste, C., (2017). Corporate employee-engagement and merger outcomes. ECGI Working Paper Series in Finance
  • 23. Li, M., Yang, F. and Akhtar, M. W., (2022). Responsible leadership effect on career success: The role of work engagement and self-enhancement motives in the education sector. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 888386.
  • 24. Lu, Y., Zhang, M. M., Yang, M. M. and Wang, Y., (2023). Sustainable human resource management practices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: Toward common good values. Human Resource Management, 62(3), 331-353.
  • 25. Mansaray, E. H., (2019). The role of leadership style in organisational change management: A Literature review. Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(1), 18-31.
  • 26. McCafferty, T., Hamilton, J., (2020). Reducing voluntary turnover through career development: strategic HRD research proposal. International Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(4), 137-142.
  • 27. McKinsey and Company., (2022). In conversation: Four keys to merger integration success. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/in-conversation-four-keys-to-merger-integration-success.
  • 28. Miles, M. B., Huberman. A. M. and Saldaña, J., (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A Methods Sourcebook. Edition 3. SAGE
  • 29. Mirvis, P., (2023). Engaging employees who care about the world: From what I need to who I am. Organizational Dynamics, 52(2), 100979.
  • 30. Na-Nan, K., Kanthong, S. and Joungtrakul, J., (2021). An empirical study on the model of self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behavior transmitted through employee engagement, organizational commitment and job satisfaction in the Thai automobile parts manufacturing industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 170.
  • 31. Odhiambo, O. J., (2020). Strategic management of HRM: Implications for organizational engagement. Annals of Contemporary Developments in Management and HR, 2(3), 1-8.
  • 32. Okojie, G., Ismail, I. R., Begum, H., Ferdous Alam, A. S. A. and Sadik-Zada, E. R., (2023). The mediating role of social support on the relationship between employee resilience and employee engagement. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15, 7950.
  • 33. Ortiz-Villajos, J. M. and Sotoca, S., (2018). Innovation and business survival: A long-term approach. Research Policy, 47(8), 1418-1436.
  • 34. Permana, A., Aima, M. H., Ariyanto, E., Nurmahdi, A., Sutawidjaya, A. H. and Endri, E., (2021). The effect of compensation and career development on lecturer job satisfaction. Accounting, 7(6), 1287-1292.
  • 35. Reddy, K. S., (2015). The state of case study approach in mergers and acquisitions literature: A bibliometric analysis. Future Business Journal, 1(1-2), 13-34.
  • 36. Shek, D. T. L., Wilkinson, A. D., (2022). Leadership and resilience: Where should we go next? Journal of Leadership Studies, 16(2), 50-55.
  • 37. Sulistiyani, E., Ardhi Hidayat, Y. and Setiawan, A., (2022). Perceived organizational support, employee work engagement and work life balance: Social exchange theory perspective. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 15(2), 133-143.
  • 38. Sung, W., Woehler, M. L., Fagan, J. M., Grosser, T. J., Floyd, T. M. and Labianca, G. J., (2017). Employees’ responses to an organizational merger: Intraindividual change in organizational identification, attachment, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 910-934.
  • 39. Susanto, P. C., Hidayat, W. W., Widyastuti, T., Rony, Z. T. and Soehaditama, J. P., (2023). Analysis of Resilience and Competence on Employee Performance through Intervening Key Performance Indicator Variables. Indonesian Journal of Business Analytics, 3(3), 899-910.
  • 40. Thanh, N. H., Quang, N. Van., (2022). Transformational, transactional, laissez-faire leadership styles and employee engagement: Evidence from Vietnam’s public sector. SAGE Open, 12(2), 21582440221.
  • 41. Truyen, B. T. H., Trang, N. P. P., (2022). Leadership styles and talent retention from higher education institutions in Vietnam. A conceptual framework. Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Management and Technovation, 28, 315-319.
  • 42. Vidyakala, K., Devipriya, V., (2021a). Impact and analysis of merger and acquisition on employee engagement. The International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Modal Analysis, 13(8), 423
  • 43. Vidyakala, K., Devipriya, M. V., (2021b). A literature review of merger and acquisition on employee perspective. Aut Aut Research Journal.
  • 44. Veriyanti, U., Nurhayati, M., (2022). The role of leader-member exchange in moderating the influence of competence, innovative behavior, and career development on employee engagement. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 7(1), 153-159.
  • 45. Wang, J., van Woerkom, M., Breevaart, K., Bakker, A. B. and Xu, S., (2023). Strengths-based leadership and employee work engagement: A multi-source study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 142, 1-13.
  • 46. Ye, S., Zhou, J., Jiang, Y. and Liu, X., (2023). Managers as the bridge: How cultural friction influences the integration of cross-border mergers and acquisitions. International Business Review, 32, 102138.
  • 47. Zahoor, N., Khan, Z. and Sinkovics, R. R., (2022). The role of emotions in cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A systematic review of the inter-disciplinary literature and future research agenda. Journal of International Management, 28, 100958.
  • 48. Zeeshan, S., Ng, S. I., Ho, J. A. and Jantan, A. H., (2021). Assessing the impact of servant leadership on employee engagement through the mediating role of self-efficacy in the Pakistani banking sector. Cogent Business and Management, 8(1), 1963029.
  • 49. Zhou G., Gul, R. and Tufail, M., (2022). Does servant leadership stimulate work engagement? The moderating role of trust in the leader. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925732.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-5b55afd9-1c63-484a-9c00-2a3e07a4a4a2
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.