Modelowanie 3D zasięgu i pola widoku przy wykorzystaniu zdjęć lotniczych

• Autorzy: Sarnowski Ł. , Podgórski Z. , Brykała D.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.30450/201801

Warianty tytułu

EN

3D viewshed modelling using aerial photographs

• Języki publikacji: PL EN

Abstrakty

PL

Artykuł ukazuje możliwość wykorzystania współczesnych i archiwalnych stereoskopowych zdjęć lotniczych w modelowaniu 3D zasięgu i pola widoku. Do identyfikacji elementów struktury krajobrazu modyfikujących zasięg i pole widoku zastosowano numeryczny model pokrycia terenu (DSM). Stworzono go na podstawie zdjęć lotniczych, wykorzystując stację fotogrametryczną DEPHOS. Modelowanie zasięgu widoku oparto o dwa modele pokrycia terenu w zależności od odległości od pozycji obserwatora znajdującego się na drodze. Badając widoczność w małej odległości od obserwatora zastosowano DSM o dużej rozdzielczości, a w dalszej odległości od obserwatora – DSM o mniejszej dokładności, co wydatnie usprawniło przetwarzanie danych i zmniejszyło czas przeprowadzania analiz. Uzyskane wyniki badań potwierdzają konieczność uwzględniania pokrycia terenu w analizie zasięgu i pola widoku, szczególnie zadrzewień i zabudowy. Opisana procedura może być pomocna w ilościowym ustaleniu stopnia zakrycia krajobrazu, a zatem może stanowić jeden z elementów obiektywnej oceny atrakcyjności wizualnej krajobrazu. Pozwala wyodrębnić na potrzeby waloryzacji krajobrazu fragmenty obszaru realnie przez niego postrzegane i oceniane.

EN

This article discusses the possibility of using contemporary and archival stereoscopic aerial photographs in 3D viewshed modelling. The digital surface model (DSM) was used to identify the elements of the landscape structure modifying the viewshed. The model was created on the basis of aerial photographs, using the photogrammetric station DEPHOS. The viewshed modelling was based on two models of land cover, depending on the distance from the observer positioned on the road. In order to track visibility at a short distance from the observer, a high-resolution DSM was used, and further away from the observer – a DSM with lower accuracy, which significantly improved data processing and reduced the time of analysis. The obtained test results confirm the necessity of taking into account the surface of the area in viewshed analysis, especially tree stands and buildings. The described procedure may be helpful in quantifying the degree of landscape cover, and thus may be one of the elements of objectively assessing of the visual attractiveness of the landscape. It enables images of the area to be realistically perceived and assessed area for the needs of landscape valorisation.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zasięg; pole widoku; zdjęcia lotnicze; numeryczny model pokrycia terenu; DSM; GIS

EN

viewshed; aerial photographs; digital surface model; DSM; GIS

• Wydawca: Komisja Krajobrazu Kulturowego Polskiego Towarzystwa Geograficznego
• Czasopismo: Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: nr 39 (1)
• Strony: 5--24
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 67 poz., ryc., tab., map.

Twórcy

autor

Sarnowski Ł.

• Faculty of the Earth Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland

autor

Podgórski Z.

• Institute of Geography, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland

autor

Brykała D.

• Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences, Toruń, Poland

Bibliografia

• Arabatzis G., Grigoroudis E., 2010: Visitors’ satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia-Lefkimi-Souflion National Park. Forest Policy and Economics, 12 (3): 163-172. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.09.008.
• Arnot R.H., Grant K., 1981: The application of a method of terrain analysis to functional landcapability assessment and aesthetic landscape appreciation. Landscape Planning, 8 (3): 269-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3924(81)90017-4.
• Bartie P., Reitsma F., Kingham S., Mills S., 2010: Advancing visibility modelling algorithms for urban environments. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34 (6): 518–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2010.06.002.
• Batty M., 2001: Exploring isovist fields: space and shape in architectural and urban morphology. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (1): 123-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b2725.
• Bell S., 2004: Elements of Visual Design in the Landscape, 2nd Edition, Spon Press, London-New York.
• Best Management Practices for Reducing Visual Impacts of Renewable Energy Facilities on BLM-Administered Lands, 2013: United States Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
• Bigné J.E., Andreu L., Gnoth J., 2005: The theme park experience: An analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction. Tourism Management, 26 (6): 833-844. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.05.006.
• Bishop I.D., Lange E., Mahbubul A.M., 2004: Estimation of the influence of view components on high-rise apartment pricing using a public survey and GIS modeling, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31 (3): 439-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b3042.
• Brabyn L., Mark D.M., 2011: Using viewsheds, GIS, and a landscape classification to tag landscape photographs. Applied Geography, 31 (3):1115-1122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog. 2011.03.003.
• Chamberlain B.C., Meitner M.J., 2013: A route-based visibility analysis for landscape management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 111 (1): 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.004.
• Clay G.R., Daniel T.C., 2000: Scenic landscape assessment: the effects of land management jurisdiction on public perception of scenic beauty. Landscape and Urban Planning, 49 (1-2): 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00055-4
• Cooper G.R.J., 2005: Analysing potential field data using visibility. Computers & Geosciences, 31 (7): 877-881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2005.03.002.
• de Floriani L., Magillo P., 1997: Visibility computations on hierarchical triangulated terrain models. GeoInformatica, 1 (3): 219-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009708413602.
• de Floriani L., Marzano L., Puppo P.E., 1994: Line-of-sight communication on terrain models. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 8 (4): 329-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02693799408902004.
• de Montis A., Caschili S., 2012: Nuraghes and landscape planning: Coupling viewshed with complex network analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105 (3): 315-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.005.
• Depellegrin D., Blažauskas N., Egarter-Vigl L., 2014: An integrated visual impact assessment model for offshore windfarm development. Ocean & Coastal Management, 98: 95-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.019.
• Domingo-Santos J.M., De Villarán R.F., Rapp-Arrarás Í., Corral-Pazos de Provens E., 2011: The visual exposure in forest and rural landscapes: An algorithm and a GIS tool, Landscape and Urban Planning, 101 (1): 52-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.018.
• European Landscape Convention, 2000, Council of Europe. Firenze.
• Fisher P.F., 1993: Algorithm and Implementation Uncertainty in Viewshed Analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 7 (4): 331-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02693799308901965.
• Garnero G., Fabrizio E., 2015: Visibility analysis in urban spaces: a raster-based approach and case studies. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 42 (4): 688-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/b130119p.
• Granö J.G., 1929: Reine Geographie. Eine Methodologische Studie Beleuchtet mit Beispielen aus Finnland und Estland. Societas Geographica Fenniae, Acta Geographica, 2 (2), Helsinki-Helsingfors.
• Hernández J., García L., Ayuga F., 2004: Assessment of the visual impact made on the landscape by new buildings: a methodology for site selection. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68 (1): 15-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00116-6.
• Junge X., Jacot K.A., Bosshard A., Lindemann-Matthies P., 2009: Swiss people’s attitudes towards field margins for biodiversity conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation, 17 (3): 150-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2008.12.004.
• Kim Y.H., Rana S., Wise S., 2004: Exploring multiple viewshed analysis using terrain features and optimisation techniques. Computers & Geosciences, 30 (9-10): 1019-1032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2004.07.008.
• Klouček T., Lagner O., Šímová P., 2015: How does data accuracy influence the reliability of digital viewshed models? A case study with wind turbines. Applied Geography, 64: 46-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.09.005.
• Kot R., 2015: The point bonitation method for evaluating geodiversity: a guide with examples (Polish Lowland). Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography, 97 (2): 375-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geoa.12079.
• Kot R., Leśniak K., 2017: Impact of different roughness coefficients applied to relief diversity evaluation: Chełmno Lakeland (Polish Lowland). Geografiska Annaler: Series A, Physical Geography, 99 (2): 102-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/04353676.2017.1286547
• Krøgli S.O., Dramstad W.E., Skar B., 2015: World heritage and landscape change – heritage buildings and their changed visibility in the coastal landscape of Vega, Norway. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 69 (3): 121-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2015.1042910
• Kurczyński Z., 2006: Lotnicze i satelitarne obrazowanie Ziemi. T. 1, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa.
• Ladenburg J., Termansen, M., Hasler, B., 2013: Assessing acceptability of two onshore wind power development schemes: A test of viewshed effects and the cumulative effects of wind turbines. Energy, 54: 45-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.02.021.
• Lange E., 1990: Vista management in Acadia National Park. Landscape and Urban Planning, 19 (4): 353-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(90)90042-Z.
• Lee J., Stucky D., 1998: On applying viewshed analysis for determining least-cost paths on Digital Elevation Models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12 (8): 891-905. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136588198241554.
• Liu L., Zhang L.Q., Ma J.T., Zhang L., Zhang X.M., Xiao Z.Q., Yang L., 2010: An improved line-of-sight method for visibility analysis in 3D complex landscapes. Science China Information Sciences, 53 (11): 2185-2194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11432-010-4090-x.
• Llobera M., 2003: Extending GIS-based visual analysis: the concept of visualscapes. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17 (1): 25-48. http://doi.org/10.1080/713811741.
• Meienberg P., 1966: Die Landnutzungskartierung nach Pan-, Infrarotund Farbluftbildern. Ein Beitrag zur agrargeographischen Luftbildinterpretation und zu den Möglichkeiten der Luftbildphotographie. Verlag Michael Lassleben, Kallmünz.
• Middleton W.E.K., 1952: Vision through the Atmosphere. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
• Miller D., 2001: A method for estimating changes in the visibility of land cover. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54 (1-4): 93-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00128-1.
• Murgoitio J.J., Shrestha R., Glenn N.F., Spaete L.P., 2013: Improved visibility calculations with tree trunk obstruction modeling from aerial LiDAR. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (10): 1865-1883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2013.767460.
• Nijhuis S., 2011: Visual research in landscape architecture [in:] Exploring the Visual Landscape (eds.) S. Nijhuis, R. Van Lammeren, F. Van Der Hoeven. Advances in Physiognomic Landscape Research in the Netherlands. Research in Urbanism Series, 2, IOS Press, Amsterdam: 103-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.7480/rius.2.209.
• Nita J., Myga-Piątek U., 2012: Ocena walorów widokowych drogi S1 [E75] na odcinku Częstochowa-Sosnowiec. Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego, 18: 181-193. http://www.krajobraz.kulturowy.us.edu.pl/publikacje.artykuly/18.infrastruktura/16-nita, myga.pdf.
• Nutsford D., Reitsma F., Pearson A.L., Kingham, S., 2015: Personalising the viewshed: Visibility analysis from the human perspective. Applied Geography, 62: 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.004.
• Ogburn D.E., 2006: Assessing the level of visibility of cultural objects in past landscapes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33 (3): 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.005.
• Oliver R.L., Rust R.T., Varki S., 1997: Customer delight: Foundations, findings, and managerial insight. Journal of Retailing, 73 (3): 311-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90021-X.
• Orlof J., 2017: Point cloud based viewshed generation in AutoCAD Civil 3D. Technical Transactions. Computer Sciences, 12: 143-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.4467/2353737XCT.17.215.7758.
• Ozimek P., Böhm A., Ozimek A., Wańkowicz W., 2013: Planowanie przestrzeni o wysokich walorach krajobrazowych przy użyciu cyfrowych modeli terenu wraz z oceną ekonomiczną. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej im. Tadeusza Kościuszki, Kraków.
• Palmer J.F., Hoffman R.E., 2001: Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54 (1-4): 149-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00133-5.
• Pardo-García S., Mérida-Rodríguez M., 2017: Measurement of visual parameters of landscape using projections of photographs in GIS. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 61 (Part A): 56-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.09.005.
• Pavlikakis G.E., Tsihrintzis V.A., 2006: Perceptions and preferences of the local population in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace National Park in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77 (1-2): 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.12.008.
• Petrosillo I., Zurlini G., Corlianò M.E., Zaccarelli N., Dadamo M., 2007: Tourist perception of recreational environment and management in a marine protected area. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79 (1): 29-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.017.
• Piskorski R., 2017: Analiza widoczności z wykorzystaniem lotniczego skaningu laserowego jako wskaźnik walorów krajobrazowych na przykładzie Kopca Kościuszki w Krakowie. Mazowsze. Studia Regionalne, 20: 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.21858/msr.20.04.
• Poudyal N.C., Hodges D.G., Fenderson J., Tarkington W., 2010: Realizing the Economic Value of a Forested Landscape in a Viewshed. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 34 (2): 72-78. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/saf/sjaf/2010/00000034/00000002/art00003.
• Rogowski M., 2009: Ocena walorów widokowych szlaków turystycznych na wybranych przykładach z Dolnego Śląska. Problemy Ekologii Krajobrazu, 25: 155-163. http://paek.ukw.edu.pl/pek/index.php/PEK/article/view/1591/1401.
• Rogowski M., 2012: Ocena atrakcyjności turystycznej szlaków pieszych na wybranych przykładach z Dolnego Śląska. Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Poznań.
• Sander H.A., Manson S.M., 2007: Heights and locations of artificial structures in viewshed calculation: How close is close enough?. Landscape and Urban Planning, 82 (4): 257-270. http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.002.
• Sarnowski Ł., Brykała D., Podgórski Z., 2013: Visibility analysis in the landscape study using the Digital Photogrammetry 3D System DEPHOS – an example from Poland [in:] Scientific Technical Report, 13/04, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, p. 18. http://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-13047.
• Sarnowski Ł., Podgórski Z., Brykała D., 2016: Planning a greenway based on an evaluation of visual landscape attractiveness. Moravian Geographical Reports, 24 (3): 55-66. http://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0017.
• Sevenant M., Antrop M., 2007: Settlement models, land use and visibility in rural landscapes: Two case studies in Greece. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80 (4): 362-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.09.004.
• Supernant K., 2014: Intervisibility and Intravisibility of rock feature sites: a method for testing viewshed within and outside the socio-spatial system of the Lower Fraser River Canyon, British Columbia. Journal of Archaeological Science, 50: 497-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.08.008.
• Turner A., Doxa M., O’Sullivan D., Penn A., 2001: From isovists to visibility graphs: a methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28 (1): 103-121. http://doi.org/10.1068/b2684.
• van der Ham R.J.M., Iding J.A., 1971: De landschaps -typologie naarvisuele kenmerken. Methodiek en gebruik. Department of Landscape Architecture, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
• Wagner H., 1920: Lehrbuch der Geographie. Bd. 1, Allgemeine Erdkunde. T. 1, Einleitung – Matematische Geographie. Hahnsche Buchhandlung, Hannover.
• Wirtz J., Bateson J.E.G., 1999: Consumer Satisfaction with Services: Integrating the Environment Perspective in Services Marketing into the Traditional Disconfirmation Paradigm. Journal of Business Research, 44 (1): 55-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00178-1.
• Wirtz J., Mattila A.S., Tan R.L.P., 2000: The moderating role of target-arousal on the impact of affect on satisfaction – an examination in the context of service experiences. Journal of Retailing, 76 (3): 347-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00031-2.
• Wojciechowski K.H., 1986: Problemy percepcji i oceny estetycznej krajobrazu. Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej, Lublin.
• Yang P.P.Y., Putra S.Y., Li W., 2007: Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34 (6): 971-992. http://doi.org/10.1068/b32142.
• Yu T.X., Xiong L.Y., Cao M., Wang Z.H., Zhang Y.C., Tang G.A., 2016: A new algorithm based on Region Partitioning for Filtering candidate viewpoints of a multiple viewshed. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (11): 2171-2187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1163571.
• Zhao Y., Padmanabhan A., Wang S., 2013: A parallel computing approach to viewshed analysis of large terrain data using graphics processing units. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 27 (2): 363-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2012.692372.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).