Evaluation of biogas production and usage potential

• Autorzy: Kalinichenko A. , Havrysh V. , Perebyynis V.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/eces-2016-0027

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ocena potencjału produkcji i wykorzystania biogazu

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of the research is the development of theoretical and methodical bases for determining the feasibility of plant raw materials growing for its further bioconversion into energy resources and technological materials to maximize profit from business activities. Monograph, statistics, modelling and abstract logical methods have been used during the research. Directions of biogas usage have been examined. Biogas yields from different crops have been analyzed. It has been determined that high methane yields can be provided from root crops, grain crops, and several green forage plants. So, forage beet and maize can provide more than 5,500 m3 of biogas per hectare. Attention is paid to the use of by-products of biogas plants, especially carbon dioxide. Carbon dioxide is an important commodity and can increase profitability of biogas plant operating. It can be used for different purposes (food industry, chemical industry, medicine, fumigation, etc). The most important parameters of the biogas upgrading technologies have been analyzed. If output of an upgrade module is more than 500 nm3/h, investment costs of different available technologies are almost equal. According to experts, it is economically feasible to use anaerobic digestion biogas systems to upgrade biomethane provided their performance is equivalent to 3,000 litres of diesel fuel per day. The economic and mathematical models have been suggested to determine the feasibility of growing plant materials to maximize the gross profit. The target function is the maximum gross income from biogas utilization. It has the following limitations: annual production of biogas, consumption of electricity, heat and motor fuels. The mathematical model takes into account both meeting own requirement and selling surplus energy resources and co-products including carbon dioxide. In case of diesel fuel substitution, an ignition dose of diesel fuels has been considered. The algorithm for making a decision on construction of a biogas plant has been offered.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biogas; biogas plant; methane; upgrading of biogas; objective function; efficiency; economic and mathematical model; motor fuel; crop; energy resources

PL

biogaz; biogazownia roślin; metan; modyfikacja biogazu; wydajność; model ekonomiczny; model matematyczny; paliwo silnikowe; plon; zasoby energii

• Wydawca: Towarzystwo Chemii i Inżynierii Ekologicznej
• Czasopismo: Ecological Chemistry and Engineering. S
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 23, nr 3
• Strony: 387--400
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 29 poz., rys., wykr., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kalinichenko A.

• University of Opole, ul. R. Dmowskiego 7-9, 45-365 Opole, Poland, phone [phone]
• Poltava State Agrarian Academy, ul. Skovorody 1/3, 36003 Poltava, Ukraine

autor

Havrysh V.

• Mykolayiv National Agrarian University (Ukraine), 9 Georgiy Gongadze Str., Mykolayiv, Ukraine, 54020, phone [phone]

autor

Perebyynis V.

• Poltava University of Economics and Trade (Ukraine), 3 Koval Str., Poltava, Ukraine, 36014, phone [phone]

Bibliografia

• [1] Виробництво і використання біогазу в Україні (Production and Use of Biogas in Ukraine). Schults R. editor. Biogasrat e.V. 2012. http://ua-energy.org/upload/files/Biogas_ukr.pdf.
• [2] Kalinichenko AV, Vakulenko YV, Galych OA. Ecological and economic aspects of feasibility of using crop products in alternative energy. Actual Probl Econom. 2014;161(11):202-208. http://eco-science.net/downloads.html.
• [3] Grim J, Nilsson D, Hansson P-A, Nordberg A. Demand-orientated power production from biogas: modeling and simulations under Swedish conditions. Energy Fuels. 2015;29(7):4066-4075. DOI: 10.1021/ef502778u.
• [4] Pazera A, Slezak R, Krzystek L, Ledakowicz S, Bochmann G, Gabauer W, et al. Biogas in Europe: Food and beverage waste potential for biogas production. Energy Fuels. 2015;29(7):4011-4021. DOI: 10.1021/ef502812s.
• [5] Daw J, Hallett K, DeWolfe J, Venner I. Energy Efficiency Strategies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities. Techn. Report NREL/TP-7A30-53341. January 2012. http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy12osti/53341.pdf.
• [6] Kemp J, Lynch D, Wilson T. Janesville’s Renewable Energy Initiative. 2016. http://www.cswea.org/papers/G1%20Kemp%20Central%20States%20Jay%20Kemp_120209_renewable%20energy.pdf.
• [7] Conventional Natural Gas Production. Alternative Fuels Data Center. - Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy. US Department of Energy. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/fuels/natural_gas_renewable.html.
• [8] Holm-Nielsen JB, Sead TA. Danish Centralised Biogas Plants. Bioenergy Department, University of Southern Denmark, May 2000. http://www.ub.edu/bioamb/PROBIOGAS/centralcodig_descrip2000.pdf.
• [9] Bramley J, Shih JC-H, Fobi L, Teferra A, Peterson C, Wang RY, et al. Agricultural biogas in the United States. A Market Assessment. Tufts University Urban & Environmental Policy & Planning. Field Project Team #6. Spring 2011. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/4105391/agricultural-biogas-in-theunited-states-a-market-tufts-university.
• [10] Eriksson P, Olsson M. The Potential of Biogas as Vehicle Fuel in Europe - A Technological Innovation Systems Analysis of the Emerging Bio-Methane Technology. Göteborg, Sweden, 2007. Report No. 2007:6. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/43365.pdf.
• [11] Kalinichenko A, Malynska L, Kalinichenko W, Sazonova N. Renewable energetic - the problem or the chance for the Ukraine? Proc ECOpole. 2014;8(1):181-188. DOI: 10.2429/proc.2014.8(1)023.
• [12] Laaber M, Kirchmay R, Madler R, Braun R. Development of an evaluation system for biogas plants. 4th Int. Symposium Anaerobic Digestion of Solid Waste. Copenhagen, Denmark: 2005. http://e-citations.ethbib.ethz.ch/view/pub:78443.
• [13] Braun R, Weiland P, Wellinger A. Biogas from Energy Crop Digestion. IEA Bioenergy, 2010. http://www.iea-biogas.net/files/daten-redaktion/download/publications/Workshops/8/5-Energy_crops.pdf.
• [14] Tilman D, Eich RP, Nops KJ. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature. 2006;441:629-632. DOI: 10.1038/nature04742.
• [15] Weiland P. Impact of competition claims for food and energy on German biogas production. Paper presented at the IEA Bio-energy Seminar. Ludlow, UK, April 17th, 2008. http://refman.energytransitionmodel.com/publications/89.
• [16] Delzeit R, Britz W, Kreins P. An Economic Assessment of Biogas Production and Land Use under the German Renewable Energy Source Act. 2012; 1767. https://www.ifw-members.ifw-kiel.de/publications/aneconomic-assessment-of-biogas-production-and-land-use-under-the-german-renewable-energy-source-act-2/KWP_Delzeit_Britz.pdf.
• [17] Vindiš P, Stajnko D, Berk P, Lakota M. Evaluation of energy crops for biogas production with a combination of simulation modeling and dex-i multicriteria method. Pol J Environ Stud. 2012;21(3):763-770. http://www.pjoes.com/pdf/21.3/Pol.J.Environ.Stud.Vol.21.No.3.763-770.pdf.
• [18] Poschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Applied Energy. 2010;87(11):3305-3321. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.05.011.
• [19] Berglund M, Borjesson P. Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production. Biomass Bioenergy. 2006;30(3):254-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.011.
• [20] Bremges A, Maus I, Belmann P, Eikmeyer F, Winkler A, Albersmeier A, et al. Deeply sequenced metagenome and metatranscriptome of a biogas-producing microbial community from an agricultural production-scale biogas plant. Gigascience. 2015; Jul 30. DOI: 10.1186/s13742-015-0073-6.
• [21] Kárászová M, Sedláková Z, Izák P. Gas permeation processes in biogas upgrading: A short review. Chem Papers. 2015;69(10):1277-1283. DOI: 10.1515/chempap-2015-0141.
• [22] Persson T, Baxter D. IEA Bioenergy Task 37 - Country Reports Summary 2014. Bioenergy. 2015. http://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/IEA-Bioenergy-Task-37-Country-Report-Summary-2014_Final.pdf.
• [23] The Coca-Cola Company Announces Adoption of HFC-Free Insulation in Refrigeration Units to Combat Global Warming. 2006. http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-coca-cola-company-announcesadoption-of-hfc-free-insulation-in-refrigeration-units-to-combat-global-warming-55899137.html.
• [24] Modine reinforces its CO2 research efforts. R744.com. 2007. http://www.r744.com/articles/489/modine_reinforces_its_co_sub_2_sub_research_efforts.
• [25] Kalinichenko A, Kopishynska O, Kopishynskyy A, Kalinichenko O. Environmental risks of shale gas production from gas-bearing area of Ukraine. J Arch Waste Manage Environ Protect. 2015;17(3):73-78. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-108d2d17-1b80-42d8-a793-19503cd2be58.
• [26] Biomethane Regions. Introduction to the Production of Biomethane from Biogas. A Guide for England and Wales. - Intelligent Energy Europe. 2013. http://www.fedarene.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/BMR_D.4.2.1.Technical_Brochure_EN.pdf.
• [27] Farm to fuel. Developers’ Guide to Biomethane as a Vehicle Fuel. Biogas Association. 2013. http://biogasassociation.ca/bioExp/images/uploads/documents/membersOnly/DeveloperGuide-BiomethaneVehicleFuel.pdf.
• [28] Fact Sheet: Biomethane production potential in the EU-27+EFTA countries compared with other biofuels. NGVA Europe. 2010. https://www.ngva.eu/downloads/fact-sheets/2020-biomethane-productionpotential.pdf.
• [29] Vehicle Conversion to Natural Gas or Biogas, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. 2012. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/12-043.htm.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę.