New York’s super-slender towers and European slender high-rise buildings: differences in the urban context

Musiał, Robert

doi:10.35784/bud-arch.3687

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

New York’s super-slender towers and European slender high-rise buildings: differences in the urban context

Autorzy

Musiał Robert

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/bud-arch.3687

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The latest construction technologies have enabled the erection of very slender skyscrapers. This phenomenon is developing significantly in New York, but very slender high-rise buildings are also being designed on other continents. The aim of this paper is to characterize existing and planned slender European skyscrapers. The study examined the location of slender high-rise buildings and their relationship with their surroundings. It sought differences and similarities in the location of slender European skyscrapers within the urban fabric compared to American skyscrapers. The presented examples of slender skyscrapers in Europe illustrate the diversity of their locations, the character of the areas in which they are designed, and the buildings themselves. The analysis of their relationship with the surroundings revealed many differences compared to New York's super-slender towers, such as the presence of open space, location at significant distances from other buildings, and even location in landscapes dominated by nature. Only some slender European high-rise buildings are designed in high-density development, which may resemble New York's super-slender towers.

Słowa kluczowe

skyscraper super-slender tower slender skyscraper New York Europe

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej

Czasopismo

Budownictwo i Architektura

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Vol. 22, no 4

Strony

39--69

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 103 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Musiał Robert

robert.musial@orange.pl

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3515-0610

Bibliografia

1. Willis C., “Singularly Slender: Sky Living in New York, Hong Kong, and Elsewhere”, in: Wood A., Malott D. & He J. (eds.), Cities to Megacities: Shaping Dense Vertical Urbanism: A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on urban design, sustainable cities, and tall buildings, Volume I, Proceedings of the CTBUH 2016 International Conference; Shenzen, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, China, 16-21 October 2016, Chicago: CTBUH, 2016, pp. 606–614. Google Scholar
2. Reid R.L., “Skinny ‘Scrapers”, Civil Engineering, The Magazine of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 2019. Available online: https://www.asce.org/cemagazine/skinny-scrapers [Accessed: 11 May 2020]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/ciegag.0001404 Google Scholar
3. Guruvappan M. & Byczynski N.A., “State-of-the-Art Engineering for Supertall Residential Buildings”, in: Gabel J. & Safarik D. (eds.), 50 Forward | 50 Back: The Recent History and Essential Future of Sustainable Cities, Chicago: Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, 2019, pp. 254-260. Google Scholar
4. Szołomicki J. and Gołasz-Szołomicka H., “Analysis of Technical Problems in Modern Super-slim High-rise Residential Buildings”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 20 (1), 2021, pp. 83-116. https://www.doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.2141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.2068 Google Scholar
5. Smith K., “Going Super Skinny with Concrete”, Construction Manager, February 2021, pp. 28–30. Google Scholar
6. Whittle K., “A Case Study on Designing Superslim in Melbourne”, in: Wood A., Malott D. and He J. (eds.), Cities to Megacities: Shaping Dense Vertical Urbanism: A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on urban design, sustainable cities, and tall buildings, Volume II, Proceedings of the CTBUH 2016 International Conference; Shenzen, Guangzhou, Hong Kong, China, 16-21 October 2016, Chicago: CTBUH, 2016, pp. 1208-1215. Google Scholar
7. Willis C., “The Logic of Luxury: New York’s New Super Slender Towers”, in: Wood A., Zheng S. and Johnson T. (eds.), Future Cities: Towards Sustainable Vertical Urbanism: A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on tall buildings and sustainable cities, Proceedings of the CTBUH 2014 Shanghai Conference, China, 16-19 September 2014, Chicago: CTBUH, 2014, pp. 357–364. Google Scholar
8. Willis C., “The Logic of Luxury 2.0”, in: Wood A. & Malott D. (eds.), Global Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City: A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on tall buildings and sustainable cities, Proceedings of the CTBUH 2015 International Conference, New York, USA, 26-30 October 2015, Chicago: CTBUH, 2015, pp. 24–32. Google Scholar
9. Macklowe H., “The Complex Path to Simple Elegance: The Story of 432 Park Avenue”, in: Wood A. and Malott D. (eds.), Global Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City: A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on tall buildings and sustainable cities, Proceedings of the CTBUH 2015 International Conference, New York, USA, 26-30 October 2015, Chicago: CTBUH, 2015, pp. 48–53. Google Scholar
10. Marcus S., “The New Supers: Super-Slender Towers of New York”, in: Wood A. and Malott D. (eds.), Global Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City: A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on tall buildings and sustainable cities, Proceedings of the CTBUH 2015 International Conference, New York, USA, 26-30 October 2015, Chicago: CTBUH, 2015, pp. 60–65. Google Scholar
11. Jasiński A., “Najnowsza generacja nowojorskich budynków wysokościowych: superwysokie, supersmukłe i… mieszkalne”, Przestrzeń i Forma, 28, 2016, pp. 69-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2016.28.B-03 Google Scholar
12. Generalova E.M. and Generalov V.P., “Super-slender Residental Skyscrapers in New York as a New Direction in High-rise Buildings Typology”, Urban Construction and Architecture, 4(25), 2016, pp. 85-91. https://www.doi.org/10.17673/Vestnik.2016.04.16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17673/Vestnik.2016.04.16 Google Scholar
13. Bar J.M., “Manhattan Profits (Part I): The Economics of the Superslim Skyscraper”, Building Skyline, November 19, 2017. Available online: https://buildingtheskyline.org/manhattan-profits-1/, [Accessed: 23 January 2021]. Google Scholar
14. Al-Kodmany Kheir, The Vertical City: A Sustainable Development Model, Southampton, Boston: WIT Press, 2018. Google Scholar
15. Dmitruk M., “Supersmukłe wieżowce na przykładzie realizacji z Nowego Jorku”, Teka Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych Oddział Polskiej Akademii Nauk w Lublinie, Nr 1, 2020, pp. 42-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.2393 Google Scholar
16. Marcus S., “Sustainability and High-Rise Buildings – 56 Leonard Street”, in: Wood A., Zheng S. and Johnson T. (eds.), Future Cities: Towards Sustainable Vertical Urbanism: A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on tall buildings and sustainable cities, Proceedings of the CTBUH 2014 Shanghai Conference, China, 16-19 September 2014, Chicago: CTBUH, 2014, pp. 685-690. Google Scholar
17. DeSimone S. and Parikh M., “Supertall, Super Slender Tower with a Multitude of Constraints: 220 Central Park South”, in: Wood A. and Malott D. (eds.), Global Interchanges: Resurgence of the Skyscraper City: A collection of state-of-the-art, multi-disciplinary papers on tall buildings and sustainable cities, Proceedings of the CTBUH 2015 International Conference, New York, USA, 26-30 October 2015, Chicago: CTBUH, 2015, pp. 72–76. Google Scholar
18. Marcus S., Oliveira G.J., Yalniz F. and Chack N., “53W53 MoMA Tower”, Structure Magazine, June 2017, pp. 40-42. Google Scholar
19. Marcus S. et al., “432 Park”, Structure Magazine, July 2018, pp. 32-33. Google Scholar
20. Smilow J., “One Seaport Tower”, Structure Magazine, June 2018, pp. 22-24. Google Scholar
21. Yalniz F., “Engineering the Supertall and Superslender 111 West 57th”, Concreto & Construcões, Ano: XLVIII Edição: 99, Jul./Set. 2020, pp. 75-80. http://doi.org/10.4322/1809-7197.2020.99.0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4322/1809-7197.2020.99.0005 Google Scholar
22. Besjak Ch. et al., “Three Supertall Slender Towers in Midtown Manhattan”, Structural Engineering International, 2021. https://www.doi.org/ 10.1080/10168664.2021.1898297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10168664.2021.1898297 Google Scholar
23. Twardowski M., Wieże mieszkalne, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Krakowskiej, 2017. Google Scholar
24. Banasik-Petri K., “Manhattan - niekończący się dialog. Przegląd wybranych wysokościowców na Manhattanie w kontekście wizji miasta Franka Lloyda Wrighta i Le Corbusiera”, Państwo i Społeczeństwo, nr 2 (XVIII), 2018, pp. 137-154. Google Scholar
25. Twardowski M., Żabicka A. and Campos Ros A., “Houses and Skyscrapers of Manhattan - a Horizontal or Vertical City?”, Technical Transactions, 9, 2019, pp. 45-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737XCT.19.094.10876 Google Scholar
26. Twardowski M. and Campos Ros A., “Nowe kierunki rozwoju architektury wież mieszkalnych na wybranych przykładach – Manhattan, Nowy Jork”, Środowisko Mieszkaniowe/Housing Environment, 34/2021, pp. 19-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/25438700SM.21.003.13642 Google Scholar
27. Longarini N. et al., “Structural Improvements for Tall Buildings under Wind Loads: Comparative Study”, Shock and Vibration, vol. 2017. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2031248, [Accessed: 19 January 2021]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2031248 Google Scholar
28. Piekarz R., Wpływ nieregularności konstrukcyjnych powłoki ramowej betonowego budynku wysokiego na jej sztywność, Rozprawa doktorska, Politechnika Wrocławska, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60257-X Google Scholar
29. Russell J.S., “Designing the Super-thin New Buildings”, Architectural Record, October 1990, pp. 105-109. Google Scholar
30. The Skyscraper Museum, “Sky High & The Logic of Luxury”, 2013. Available online: http://skyscraper.org/EXIBITIONS/SKY_HIGH/sky_high.htm, [Accessed: 7 May 2020]. Google Scholar
31. Ikonnikov A.W., Od architektury nowoczesnej do postmodernizmu, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Arkady, 1988. Google Scholar
32. Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH), Monograph on Planning and Design of Tall Buildings, Vol. Planning and Environmental Criteria for Tall Buildings, New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1981. Google Scholar
33. Wells M., Skyscrapers: Structure and Design, London: Laurence King Publishing, 2005. Google Scholar
34. Dupré J., Skyscrapers: A History of the World’s Most Extraordinary Buildings, New York: Black & Dog Leventhal Publishers, Inc., 2008. Google Scholar
35. Arczyńska M. and Pancewicz Ł., “Ikona - jak się to robi w Chicago?”, Architektura-Murator, 4 (163), 2008, pp. 22 and 24. Google Scholar
36. Jodidio P., Santiago Calatrava, Köln: Taschen/TMC, 2008. Google Scholar
37. Zieliński J., Złota 44 i inne warszawskie niebotyki, Warszawa: EKBIN Studio PR, 2015. Google Scholar
38. Ostrowski R., “Ołówkowców blask”, Eurobuild, 12 (206), grudzień 2015. Available online: https://eurobuildcee.com/magazine/2621-olowkowcow-blask, [Accessed: 27 January 2021]. Google Scholar
39. Mola F., Mola E. and Pellegrini L., “Supporting a Slender Tower”, CTBUH Journal, Issue I, 2017, pp. 26-31. Google Scholar
40. Samyn P.E., “Population Density and Height of Construction”, Tall Building Conference (Urbanisme Vertical) (Preprints of Conference held in Paris, France, October 25-26), New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1973, after: CTBUH, Monograph on Planning and Design of Tall Buildings, Vol. Planning and Environmental Criteria for Tall Buildings, New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1981. Google Scholar
41. Weiss M.A., “Skyscraper Zoning: New York’s Pioneering Role”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 58:2, 1992, pp. 201-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369208975794 Google Scholar
42. Willis C., Form Follows Finance: Skyscrapers and Skylines in New York and Chicago, New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1995. Google Scholar
43. Kontokosta C.E., “Tall Buildings and Urban Expansion: Tracing the Evolution of Zoning in the United States”, Leadership and Management in Engineering, 13(3), 2013, pp. 190-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000226 Google Scholar
44. Beedle L.S., Ali M.M. and Armstrong P.J., The Skyscraper and the City: Design, Technology, and Innovation, Lewiston, New York: The Edvin Mellen Press, 2007. Google Scholar
45. Ateliers Jean Nouvel, “Tour de Vere - 53W53”. Available online: http://www.jeannouvel.com/projets/53w53/, [Accessed: 21 January 2021]. Google Scholar
46. Hamill P., “Nowy Nowy Jork”, National Geographic Polska, 12, 2015, pp. 112-127. Google Scholar
47. Wikimedia Commons. Available online: https://commons.wikimedia.org/, [Accessed: 26 July 2021]. Google Scholar
48. Wainwright O., “Super-tall, Super-skinny, Super-expensive: The ‘Pencil Towers’ of New York’s Super-rich”, The Guardian, February 5, 2019. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/feb/05/super-tall-super-skinny-super-expensive-the-pencil-towers-of-new-yorks-super-rich, [Accessed: 19 February 2021]. Google Scholar
49. SHoP Architects. Available online: https://www.shoparc.com/, [Accessed: 20 February 2021]. Google Scholar
50. Burton Ch., “The Ultra-skinny Skyscrapers of New York’s Billionaire’s Row”, GQ, 23 March 2019. Available online: https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/skyscraper-new-york, [Accessed: 14 June 2021]. Google Scholar
51. DeSimone, “Press Releases”, January 8, 2019. Available online: https://www.de-simone.com/ [Accessed: 14 June 2021]. Google Scholar
52. Lo A., “The Slender Skyscrapers Changing New York’s Skyline”, CNN Style, 12th February 2018. Available online: https://edition.cnn.com/style/article/new-york-slender-skyscrapers/index.html, [Accessed: 20 January 2021]. Google Scholar
53. Scacco M., “Madison Square Park Tower: Slender, Inverted, Remarkable”, Informed Infrastructure, November 10, 2018. Available online: https://informedinfrastructure.com/42485/madison-square-park-tower-slender-inverted-remarkable/, [Accessed: 5 July 2021]. Google Scholar
54. The Skyscraper Museum, “Slenderness: New York | Hong Kong”, 2009. Available online: https://old.skyscraper.org/PROGRAMS/slender_program.htm, [Accessed: 24 July 2021]. Google Scholar
55. WSP, “Structural Marvels Make New York’s Super-Slender Towers Possible”, July 20, 2016. Available online: https://www.wsp.com/en-GL/insights/structural-marvels-make-new-york-super-slender-towers-possible, [Accessed: 7 June 2021]. Google Scholar
56. Mayevskaya M., “Москва высотная: Сити/High-Rise Moscow: City”, Высотные Здания/Tall Buildings, 2, 2014, pp. 22-29 and 121-124. Google Scholar
57. Johnson S., Tall Building: Imagining the Skyscraper, Glendale California: Balcony Press, 2018. Google Scholar
58. Starodubtsev Y., Myers J. and Goetz L., “Case Study: Capital City Towers, Moscow”, CTBUH Journal, Issue II, 2011, pp. 12-17. Google Scholar
59. Tamošaitienė J. et al., “Complex Model for the Assessment of the Location of High-Rise Buildings in the City Urban Structure”, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, Volume 17, Issue 1, 2013, pp. 93-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2013.781968 Google Scholar
60. Zawada-Pęgiel K., “Moskiewskie Międzynarodowe Centrum Biznesu – znacząca operacja urbanistyczna Moskwy w kontekście rozwiązań zachodnioeuropejskich/ The Moscow International Business Centre – Moscow’s Major Urban Planning Operation in the Context of Western European Solutions”, Teka Komisji Urbanistyki i Architektury, PAN Oddział w Krakowie, tom XLIII/2020, pp. 73-90. Google Scholar
61. Renaissance Construction. Available online: https://rencons.com/proje/neva-towers/?lang=en, [Accessed: 29 May 2021]. Google Scholar
62. SkyscraperCity.com. Available online: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/neva-towers-moscow-345-m-79-fl-297-m-65-fl.2287262/, [Accessed: 30 May 2021]. Google Scholar
63. Sergey Skuratov Architects. Available online: https://www.skuratov-arch.ru/portfolio/three-skyscrapers/?lang=en, [Accessed: 11 June 2021]. Google Scholar
64. Richard Meier & Partners Architects LLP. Available online: https://www.richardmeier.com/?projects=lilium-tower-competition-2, [Accessed: 11 May 2020]. Google Scholar
65. Dąbrowska A., “Na marginesie architektury”, Architektura-Murator, 8, 2007, pp. 6-7. Google Scholar
66. Dąbrowska A., “Na marginesie architektury”, Architektura-Murator, 2, 2008, pp. 8-9. Google Scholar
67. Oleński W., Postrzeganie krajobrazu miasta w warunkach wertykalizacji zabudowy, Rozprawa doktorska, Wydział Architektury Politechnika Krakowska, 2014. Google Scholar
68. Gibberd F., Town Design, New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1959. Google Scholar
69. Kosiński W., “Globalizacja - szanse i zagrożenia tożsamości miast”, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej: Architektura i Urbanistyka, Nr 18, 2009, pp. 7-43. Google Scholar
70. Wojtczuk M., “Wieżowiec płaski jak deska: nadwiesi się nad kamienicą”, Wyborcza.pl, 24 stycznia 2012. Available online: https://warszawa.wyborcza.pl/warszawa/1,34862,11020168,Wiezowiec_plaski_jak_deska__nadwiesi_sie_nad_kamienica.html, [Accessed: 30 January 2021]. Google Scholar
71. Goncikowski M., “Nowo projektowane budynki wysokościowe Część 2 - polskie projekty”, Builder Dodatek branżowy, wrzesień 2016, pp. 114-116. Available online: https://builderpolska.pl/2016/08/22/builder-dodatek-branzowy-wrzesien-2016/, [Accessed: 22 April 2022]. Google Scholar
72. Wojtczuk M., “110-metrowy wieżowiec cienki jak szpilka powstanie obok Świętokrzyskiej?”, Wyborcza.pl, 31 maja 2017. Available online: https://warszawa.wyborcza.pl/warszawa/7,54420,21890019,110-metrowy-wiezowiec-cienki-jak-szpilka-powstanie-obok-swietokrzyskiej.html, [Accessed: 30 January 2021]. Google Scholar
73. Nowa Warszawa, “JSK projektuje wieżowiec w miejscu PIN Tower”, 10 września 2019. Available online: https://nowawarszawa.pl/jsk-projektuje-wiezowiec-w-miejscu-pin-tower/, [Accessed: 30 January 2021]. Google Scholar
74. Uchwała Rady Miasta st. Warszawy z dnia 30 listopada 2017 w sprawie miejscowego planu zagospodarowania przestrzennego Śródmieścia Południowego w rejonie ul. Poznańskiej, Warszawa: Rada Miasta st. Warszawy, Dz. Urz. Woj. Mazowieckiego z dnia 11 grudnia 2017 Poz. 11787. Google Scholar
75. Emporis Building Database, https//www.emporis.com [Accessed: 4 May 2021]. Google Scholar
76. Short M.J., Planning for Tall Buildings, Abingdon: Routledge, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720875 Google Scholar
77. Kazimierczak J., “Gentryfikacja zabudowy miejskiej wobec rewitalizacji terenów poprzemysłowych. Przykład Wielkiego Manchesteru”, in: Jakóbczyk-Gryszkiewicz J. (ed.), XXV Konwersatorium Wiedzy o Mieście. Procesy gentryfikacji w mieście, Część I, Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2012, pp. 169-183. Google Scholar
78. Skyscrapernews.com. Available online: http://skyscrapernews.com/buildings.php?id=132, [Accessed: 16 January 2021]. Google Scholar
79. Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH), “The Skyscraper Center”. Available online: http://www.skyscrapercenter.com/, [Accessed: 16 January 2021 and 27 March 2021]. Google Scholar
80. BCC, High Places. A Planning Policy Framework for Tall Buildings, Birmingham City Council, 2003. Google Scholar
81. BCC, Birmingham Big City Plan. City Centre Masterplan, Birmingham City Council, July 2011. Available online: www.bigcityplan.org. Google Scholar
82. Glancy Nicholls Architects. Available online: http://glancynicholls.com/projects/211-broad-street/, [Accessed: 12 May 2020 and 23 February 2021]. Google Scholar
83. pbc today, “Iconic ‘Super Slender’ Skyscraper Gets the Go-ahead in Birmingham ”, February 17, 2020. Available online: https://www.pbctoday.co.uk/news/planning-construction-news/211-broad-street/71878/, [Accessed: 28 January 2021]. Google Scholar
84. Lorenzato-Lloyd A., “Super Thin Tower in Birmingham Gets Planning Thumbs-up”, Building, 18 February 2020. Available online: https://www.building.co.uk/news/super-thin-tower-in-birmingham-gets-planning-thumbs-up/5104375.article, [Accessed: 28 January 2021]. Google Scholar
85. CTBUH, “Slender Birmingham Skyscraper Receives Go-Ahead”, CTBUH Global News, 20 February 2020. Available online: https://www.ctbuh.org/news/slender-birmingham-skyscraper-receives-go-ahead, [Accessed: 16 January 2021]. Google Scholar
86. Rak G. and Pstrocka-Rak M., “Wieżowce w winnicach. Cykl życiowy nadmorskiej destynacji turystycznej na przykładzie Benidormu ”, Studia Regionalne i Lokalne, Nr 3 (45), 2011, pp. 26-58. Google Scholar
87. Regalado Tesoro F., “Introducción al Urbanismo de Benidorm y Sus Edificios de Gran Altura”, ROP, Revista de Obras Publicas, 3552, marzo 2014, pp. 49-58. Google Scholar
88. Padilla A.O., “Non-Financial Compensations: A Proposal to Refurbish the Old Residential Buildings in Benidorm (Spain)”, International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, vol. 12, (2017), Issue 3, pp. 508-516. https://www.doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-508-516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/SDP-V12-N3-508-516 Google Scholar
89. Coll Caballé X., Martínez-Medina A. and Pié Ninot R., “Oasis de Modernidad: Los Hoteles de Benidorm (1950-1975) Nuevas Tipologías Turísticas Basadas en Directrices del Movimiento Moderno”, in: Fava N. and García Vergara M. (eds.), Actas del Congreso Internacional - Territotios del Turismo: El Imaginario Turístico y la Construcción del Paisaje Contemporáneo, Barcelona: Viguera Editores, 2014, pp. 199-212. Google Scholar
90. López Fernández M. and Martínez-Medina A., “Playas y Paseos Marítmos El Nuevo Paisaje Urbano de Benidorm (1956-1986)”, in: Preliminary Proceedings. Touristic Territories: Touristic Imagery and the Construction of Contemporary Landscape, Barcelona: Viguera, 2014, pp. 681-691. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/35880 Google Scholar
91. Bueno A.P., “Benidorm e Balneário Camboriú: comparações entre ícones do turismo de sol e praia urbano”, in: Seminario Internacional de Investigación en Urbanismo, “VIII Seminario Internacional de Investigación en Urbanismo, Barcelona-Balneário Camboriú, Junio 2016”, Barcelona: DUOT, 2016. https://www.doi.org/10.5821/siiu.6348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5821/siiu.6348 Google Scholar
92. Espinosa Seguí A., “The Evolution of Tourism in Spain: The Case Study of Benidorm (Alicante)”, Human Geography Department, Universidad de Alicante, 2013. Available online: http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/27662 [Accessed: 13 April 2021]. Google Scholar
93. Martínez-Medina A. and Oliva Meyer J., “Vértigo de Altura: Elogio de un Rascacielos. La Torre Coblanca-1, Juan Guardiola Gaya. Benidorm, 1963-1965”, in: Pioneros de la Arquitectura Moderna Española. Aprender de una obra: II Congreso Nacional de Arquitectura, Madrid, 8-9 de mayo de 2015, Madrid: Fundación Alejandro de la Sota, Ministerio de Fomento, 2015, pp. 426-437. Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10045/53121 [Accessed: 4 June 2021]. Google Scholar
94. Pousse J.-F., “European Cronology 1898-20..”, in: Taillandier I., Namias O. and Pousse J.-F. (eds.), The Invention of the European Tower, Paris: Picard, 2009, pp. 80-190. Google Scholar
95. Pérez Gutiérrez M.C., Evolución del tipo estructural "Torre" en España: Madrid, Barcelona, Benidorm, Tesis Doctoral, Anexo, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura, 2009. Available online: http://oa.upm.es/5036/ [Accessed: 5 February 2021]. Google Scholar
96. Regalado F., “Los Edificos de Altura de Alicante y Benidorm”, Hormigón y Acero, vol. 42, (179), 1991, pp. 75-79. Google Scholar
97. Regalado Tesoro F., “Edificios de Gran Altura. La Experiencia Española en las Ciudades de Alicante y Benidorm”, Cuadernos TC Tribuna de la Construcción, año 2, nº 17, Valencia, 1993, pp. 9-29. Google Scholar
98. Gutiérrez de Tejada Espuelas E. and Regalado Tesoro F., “Intempo. Estructura de un Edificio de 180 metros de Altura”, Hormigón y Acero, vol. 61, núm. 257, (2010), pp. 41-55. Google Scholar
99. Morphosis. Available online: https://www.morphosis.com/architecture/2018 [Accessed: 4 May 2020]. Google Scholar
100. Konieczny R. and Malkowski T., Archiprzewodnik po Europie, Bielsko-Biała: Pascal, 2020. Google Scholar
101. Mayne T., “Intervew: Thom Mayne”. Interview conducted by K. Megson, CLADmag, Issue 3, 2017, pp. 112-119. Google Scholar
102. Hatherley O., “«Modern architecture needs projects like this»”, Dezeen, 24 April 2015. Available online: https://www.dezeen.com/2015/04/24/thom-mayne-peter-zumthor-therme-vals-skyscraper-glass-owen-hatherley-opinion-paul-scheerbart-height-bad-taste/, [Accessed: 14 February 2021]. Google Scholar
103. Meier R., “Adwokat bieli”. Interview conducted by M. Petrov, Eurobuild, 4 (156), 2011. Available online: https://eurobuildcee.com/magazine/660-adwokat-bieli, [Accessed: 22 January 2021]. Google Scholar

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-5a9c91bc-3414-40c6-ba8d-27b0b1a3f12f