Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
The main aim of this paper is to present the study designed to check whether negative attitudes towards interactions with robots may be influenced by demonstrating videos presenting advanced modern robots. The attitude was measured with the use of the Negative Attitude toward Interactions with Robots questionnaire (NATIR). 66 subjects participated in the study divided into the pretest, a video presentation and the post‐test. Our main findings are the following. There is a significant difference between pre‐test and post‐test NATIR scores—the attitude towards interactions with robots improved after our subjects watched a video. We also observe an effect of participants gender on NATIR results—men had more positive attitude than women.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
10--17
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
- Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Szamarzewskiego 89/AB, 60–568 Poznań , Poland, www: http://reasoning.amu.edu.pl
autor
- Reasoning Research Group, Adam Mickiewicz University, Szamarzewskiego 89/AB, 60–568 Poznań , Poland, www: http://reasoning.amu.edu.pl
Bibliografia
- [1] C. Becker‑Asano, K. Ogawa, S. Nishio, and H. Ishiguro, “Exploring the uncanny valley with geminoid hi‑1 in a real‑world application”. In: Proceedings of IADIS International conference interfaces and human computer interaction, 2010, 121–128.
- [2] L. Ciechanowski, A. Przegalinska, and K. Wegner, “The necessity of new paradigms in measuring human‑chatbot interaction”. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, 2017, 205–214, 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑60747‑4_19.
- [3] J. Dinet and R. Vivian, “Exploratory investigation of attitudes towards assistive robots for future users”, Le travail humain, vol. 77, no. 2, 2014, 105–125, 10.3917/th.772.0105.
- [4] T. Geller, “Overcoming the uncanny valley”, IEEE computer graphics and applications, vol. 28, no. 4, 2008, 11–17, 10.1109/MCG.2008.79.
- [5] J.‑C. Giger, D. Moura, N. Almeida, and N. Piçarra,“Attitudes towards Social Robots: The Role of Belief in Human Nature Uniqueness, Religiousness and Taste for Science Fiction”. In: Proceedings of II International Congress Interdisciplinarity in Social and Human Sciences, 2017.
- [6] M. A. Goodrich, A. C. Schultz, et al., “Human–robot interaction: a survey”, Foundations and Trends®in Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 1, no. 3, 2008, 203–275, 10.1561/1100000005.
- [7] J. Hudson, M. Orviska, and J. Hunady, “People’s attitudes to robots in caring for the elderly”, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 9, no. 2, 2017, 199–210, 10.1007/s12369‑016‑0384‑5.
- [8] T. Kanda and H. Ishiguro, Human‑robot interaction in social robotics, CRC Press: Boca Raton, London, New York, 2016.
- [9] J. Kätsyri, M. Mäkäräinen, and T. Takala, “Testing the ‘uncanny valley’ hypothesis in semirealistic computer‑animated film characters: An empirical evaluation of natural film stimuli”, International Journal of Human‑Computer Studies, vol. 97, 2017, 149–161, 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.09.010.
- [10] P. Łupkowski and M. Gierszewska, “Attitude towards humanoid robots and the uncanny valley hypothesis”, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, vol. 44, no. 1, 2019, 101–119, 10.2478/fcds‑2019‑0006.
- [11] P. Łupkowski, M. Rybka, D. Dziedzic, and W. Włodarczyk, “The background context condition for the uncanny valley hypothesis”, International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 11, no. 1, 2019, 25–33, 10.1007/s12369‑018‑0490‑7.
- [12] M. Mori, K. F. MacDorman, and N. Kageki, “The uncanny valley [from the field]”, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 19, no. 2, 2012, 98–100, 10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811, (Original work published in 1970 in Japaneese).
- [13] T. Nomura, T. Kanda, and T. Suzuki, “Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction”, AI & Society, vol. 20, no. 2, 2006, 138–150, 10.1007/s00146‑005‑0012‑7.
- [14] T. Nomura, T. Kanda, T. Suzuki, and K. Kato. “Exploratory investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human‑robot interaction”. In: Mobile Robots: towards New Applications. InTech, 2006.
- [15] T. T. Nomura, D. S. Syrdal, and K. Dautenhahn, “Differences on social acceptance of humanoid robots between Japan and the UK”. In: Procs 4th Int Symposium on New Frontiers in Human‑Robot Interaction, 2015.
- [16] J. Palomä ki, A. Kunnari, M. Drosinou, M. Koverola, N. Lehtonen, J. Halonen, M. Repo, and M. Laakasuo, “Evaluating the replicability of the uncanny valley effect”, Heliyon, vol. 4, no. 11, 2018, e00939, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00939.
- [17] N. Piçarra, J.‑C. Giger, G. Pochwatko, and G. Gonçalves, “Validation of the portuguese version of the negative attitudes towards robots scale”, European Review of Applied Psychology, vol. 65, no. 2, 2015, 93–104, 10.1016/j.erap.2014.11.002.
- [18] N. Piçarra, J.‑C. Giger, G. Pochwatko, and G. Gonçalves, “Making sense of social robots: A structural analysis of the layperson’s social representation of robots”, European Review of Applied Psychology, vol. 66, no. 6, 2016, 277–289, 10.1016/j.erap.2016.07.001.
- [19] N. Piçarra, J.‑C. Giger, G. Pochwatko, and J. Możaryn, “Designing social robots for interaction at work: socio‑cognitive factors underlying intention to work with social robots”, Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, vol. 10, no. 4, 2016, 17–26, 10.14313/JAMRIS_4‑2016/28.
- [20] G. Pochwatko, J.‑C. Giger, M. Różańska‑Walczuk, J. Świdrak, K. Kukiełka, J. Możaryn, and N. Piçarra, “Polish version of the negative attitude toward robots scale (NARS‑PL)”, Journal of Automation Mobile Robotics and Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, 2015, 10.14313/JAMRIS_3‑2015/25.
- [21] R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2013. Accessed on: 2020‑11‑10.
- [22] D. Ratajczyk, M. Jukiewicz, and P. Lupkowski, “Evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis based on declared emotional response and psychophysiological reaction”, Bio‑Algorithms and Med‑Systems, vol. 15, no. 2, 2019, 10.1515/bams‑2019‑0008.
- [23] N. Reich and F. Eyssel, “Attitudes towards service robots in domestic environments: The role of personality characteristics, individual interests, and demographic variables”, Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, vol. 4, no. 2, 2013, 123–130, 10.2478/pjbr‑2013‑0014.
- [24] N. Reich‑Stiebert, F. Eyssel, and C. Hohnemann, “Involve the user! Changing attitudes toward robots by user participation in a robot prototyping process”, Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 91, 2019, 290–296, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.041.
- [25] D. Syrdal, K. Dautenhahn, K. Koay, and M. Walters. The Negative Attitudes Towards Robots Scale and Reactions to Robot Behaviour in a Live Human‑Robot Interaction Study, 109–115. SSAISB, 4 2009.
- [26] A. M. Turing, “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, Mind, vol. LIX, no. 236, 1950, 443–455, 10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-5a46074f-edef-4a1b-b8d6-7b45572e89ec