A Discussion on e-Navigation and Implementation in Turkey

• Autorzy: Aydogdu Y. , Yalcin E. , Yurtorren C. , Aksoy S.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.08.01.09

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Electronic navigation, which has great important for ship management, has taken a step with technological improvements. In the result of these enhancements, new systems appeared as well as existing systems and these systems began to be integrated each other or used data of obtaining from the others like that AIS, Radar, ECDIS etc. All these and likely future systems have been put together under the roof of enhanced navigation (e-navigation) is defined by organizations such as International Maritime Organization (IMO), International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA), General Lighthouse Authority (GLA) etc. Especially IALA guidelines serve as model future applications in Turkish waterways. In this study aim to redefine e-navigation concept based on maritime safety awareness, maritime service portfolio (MSC 85/26) and discuss possible applications.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

IALA Approach; IMO Documents; e-Navigation; e-Navigation Concept; e-Navigation Implementation Process; IALA Guidelines; Turkish Waterways; Electronic Navigation

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 8, no. 1
• Strony: 81--87
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Aydogdu Y.

• Department of Maritime Transportation and Management Engineering, ITU, Turkey

autor

Yalcin E.

• Department of Maritime Transportation and Management Engineering, ITU, Turkey

autor

Yurtorren C.

• Department of Maritime Transportation and Management Engineering, ITU, Turkey

autor

Aksoy S.

• Department of Marine Engineering, ITU, Turkey

Bibliografia

• 1. A.Norris, Paperback. 215 pp. The Nautical Institute, ECDIS and Positioning: The Second Volume of the Integrated Bridge Systems Series.
• 2. BBC, ʺChina GPS rival Beidou starts offering navigation dataʺ, 27.12.2011.
• 3. Bonnor N. 2012. A Brief History of Global Navigation Satellite Systems, The Journal of Navigation, DOI: 10.1017/S0373463311000506, Vol. 65.
• 4. Cairns B., F.R.I.N. (IALA e‐Navigation Committee Chairman), e‐Navigation Revolution and Evolution, Spring 2011 Proceedings, for more information see www.uscg.mil/proceedings.
• 5 Canadian Coast Guard e‐Navigation Strategy Report, October 2008.
• 6 Capt. Dave Gillard – CDR Paul k. Heim II. 2002. U.S. Navy Progress in Electronic Navigation, IEEE, MTS 0‐7803‐ 7534 p.1040.
• 7 Capt. Robert Mercer, M Blair Hong and Capt. Douglas, Skinner Simulated Navigation Performance with Marine Electronic Chart and Information Display Systems.
• 8 Denizhaber., Turkish LRIT System, http://www.denizhaber.com/HABER/21475/22/lritturkiye. html, accessed on 15.05.2012.
• 9 European Space Agency, information about Galileo, http://www.esa.int/esaNA/GGGMX650NDC_galileo_0.html, accessed on 03.05.2012.
• 10 General Directorate of Turkish Coast Guard performance plan of 2012 years.
• 11 General Lighthouse Authorities The United Kingdom and Ireland. 2007. Joint Navigation Requirements Policies (Delivering 2020 The Vision), pg. 45‐46.
• 12 General Lighthouse Authorities The United Kingdom and Ireland. 2011. Marine Aids to Navigation Strategy Beyond 2025 Report, Commissioners of Northern Lighthouses, Trinity House, Commissioners of Irish Lights.
• 13 GMDSS Task Force, Modernization Notes from 20 May 2010.
• 14 Hauke L. Kite‐Powell, Di Jin and Scott Farrow. 1997. Expected Safety Benefits of Electronic Charts and Integrated Navigation Systems.
• 15 IALA, Aids to Navigation Guide (Nav Guide), Edition 4, 4 December 2001, pg. 142
• 16 IALA, Aids to Navigation Manual (Nav Guide). 2010. pg. 93‐95.
• 17 IALA‐NAV56, Architecture to the “Development of an Enavıgatıon Strategy Implementatıon Plan”, 26 April 2010.
• 18 IALA Guideline 1037, Data Collection for Aids to Navigation Performance Calculation, December 2009.
• 19 IALA Guideline 1068, Provision of a Navigational Assistance Service by a Vessel Traffic Service, May 2009.
• 20 IALA, Maritime Buoyage System and Other Aids to Navigation (2010), pg. 4.
• 21 International Loran Association, Enhanced Loran Definition Document, Report Version Date: 16 October 2007.
• 22 IMO. 2010. International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and Rescue Manual, Vol. 1: Organization and Management.
• 23 IMO‐MSC 85/26/Add. 1, Annex 20, Strategy for the Development and Implementation of E‐Navigation, Resolution A.989 (25).
• 24 IMO‐MSC 86(70), Adoption of New and Amended Performance Standards for Navigational Equipment, 8 December 1998.
• 25 IMO Resolution A.857 (20) Guidelines For Vessel Traffic Services, 1997.
• 26 IMO‐Subcommitte on Safety of Navigation 53th session, Development of E‐Navigation Strategy, 14 August 2007, pg. 38.
• 27 IMO‐Subcommitte on Standards of Training and Watchkeeping 42nd session, An Approaching to ENavigation from a Seafarers’ Perspective, 3 February 2011.
• 28 IMO‐Subcommittee on Safety of Navigation 57th session, Development of an E‐nav Strategy Implementation Plan, 1 April 2011, pg. 3‐6.
• 29 Kristian S. Goulda, Bjarte K. Røedb, Evelyn‐Rose Sausc, Vilhelm F. Koefoedd, Robert S. Bridgere and Bente E. Moena. 2008. Effects of navigation method on workload and performance in simulated high‐speed ship navigation.
• 30 Korcz K.,GMDSS as a Data Communication Network for ENavigation. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 263‐268, 2008
• 31 Korcz K., Some Radiocommunication Aspects of e‐Navigation. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 93‐97, 2009
• 32 National Plan to Achieve Maritime Domain Awareness for the National Strategy for Maritime Security, October 2005, pg. 1‐11.
• 33 NATO Document, pg. 1‐14, http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFullText/RTO/AG/RTO AG‐160‐V21///AG‐160‐V21‐01.pdf, accessed on 01.11.2012.
• 34 Pillich B. (Technical Director e‐Navigation, BMT Ports and Logistics), Developing e‐Navigation, the early stages.
• 35 The Mercomms Group, for further information about, GMDSS see, http://gmdss.com, accessed on 20.12.2012.
• 36 Toncho Hristov Papanchev (2011), Modelling and Analysis of Electronic Systems with Bridge Structure, Annual Journal of Electronics, ISSN 1313‐1842.
• 37 Turkish Coast Guard‐2011 Sector Report, pg.28‐29 http://www.coastalsafety.gov.tr/userfiles/file/2011_Yili_Sektor_Raporu.pdf, accessed on 31.05.2012
• 38 Weintrit A., Telematic Approach to e‐Navigation Architecture, Springer‐Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pg. 1‐10, 2010.
• 39 Wikipedia, information about GLONASS, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLONASS#cite_note‐20,accessed on 20.05.2012.
• 40 Wikipedia, information about LRIT, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longrange_identification_and_tracking_(ships), accessed on23.12.2012.
• 41 Bradaric Z., Grzetic Z., and Pejo Brocic. 2007. Obligations and challenges for national maritime administrations concerning the latest requirement for ships to carry ECDIS equipment.