Przegląd doświadczeń związanych z rozbiórką zapór wodnych na świecie oraz z usuwaniem i utylizacją osadów zgromadzonych w czaszach likwidowanych zbiorników zaporowych. Artykuł dyskusyjny. Część I

• Autorzy: Mikołajczak Tomasz , Nawrocki Przemysław

Warianty tytułu

EN

Review of experiences related to dismantling of dams in different parts of the world and to removal and disposal of deposits accumulated in the basins of the liquidated reservoirs

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Artykuł stanowi pierwszą część opracowania dotyczącego problemów związanych z rozbiórką starzejących się zapór i progów wodnych. Część pierwsza jest poświęcona genezie, historii oraz metodom rozbiórki zapór, na podstawie przeglądu literatury światowej.

EN

The article is the first part of the study regarding the problems related to dismantling of the ageing dams and barrages. The first part is devoted to the genesis, history and methods of dams demolition, based on the review of global literature.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

zapora wodna; rozbiórka zapory; zbiornik zaporowy; utylizacja osadów

EN

dam; dams demolition; reservoirs; sludge utilization

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo SIGMA-NOT
• Czasopismo: Gospodarka Wodna
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Nr 1
• Strony: 13--17
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 57 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Mikołajczak Tomasz

• Pracownia Ekspertyz i Badań Ichtiologicznych PEBI

autor

Nawrocki Przemysław

• Fundacja WWF Polska

Bibliografia

• [1] American Rivers, 2014. Projects. http://www.americanrivers.org/initiative/dams/projects/2013-dam-removals/.
• [2] ASCE. 2013. American Society Civil Engineers gives America's dams "D" grade. https://www.hydro-world.com/articles/2013/03/asce-gives-america-s-dams--d--grade.html
• [3] Bednarek A.T. 2001. Undaming Rivers: A review of the Ecological Impacts of Dam Removal. Environmental Management 27, 803-814.
• [4] Blumenthal L. 2010. U.S. hopes dam's demoition will let salmon return. Phys.Org. http://phys.org/news/2010-04-demolition-salmon.html
• [5] Born S.M., K.D. Genskow, N. Filbert, N. Hernandez-Mora, M.L. Keefer, K.A. White. 1998. Socioeconomic and Institutional dimensions of dam removals; The Wisconsin experience. Environmental Management 22, 359-370.
• [6] Burroughs B.A., D.B. Hayes, K.D. Klomp, J.F. Hansen, J. Mistak. 2009. Effects of Stronach dam removal on fluvial geomorphology in the Pine River, Michigan, United States. Geomorphology 110, 96-107.
• [7] Conyngham J., J.C. Fischenich, K.D. White. 2006. Enn gineering and Ecological Aspects of Dam Removal. Engineer Research and Development Center (ERDC) 3909 Halls Ferry Rd. Vicksburg, MS 39180-6133.
• [8] Crane M. 2015. http://phys.org/news/2015-12-river-ecosystems-mcredible-recovery.html
• [9] Dam Removal Europe. 2018. https://damremoval. eu/damremoval-projects-in-france/
• [10] Dynesius M., C. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the Northern third of the world. Science 266, 753-762.
• [11] Evans, J.E. 2015. Contaminated sediment and dam removals: Problem or opportunity? Earth and Space Sciences News. Eos, 96, doi:101029/2015EO036385.
• [12] Einsele G., M. Hinderer. 1997. Terrestrial sediment yield and the lifetimes of reservoirs, lakes and larger basins. Geologische Rundschau 86, 288-310.
• [13] Froehlich-Schmitt B. 2004. Rhine Salmon 2020. International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine (ICPR) Postfach 20 02 53 D-56002 Koblenz. ISBN: 3-935324-51-0.
• [14] G & G Associates. 2003. Klamath River dam removal investigation. Pp 1-36.
• [15] Hart D.D., T.E. Johnson, K.L. Bushaw-Newton, R.J. Horowitz, AT. Bednarek, D.F. Charles, D.A. Kreeger, D.J. Velinsky. 2002. Dam removal: Challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. Biosciences 52, 669-681.
• [16] Hart D.D., N.L. Poff 2002. A special section on dam removal and river restoration. Bioscience 52, 653-655.
• [17] Habel M., Z. Babiński. 2016. Masowa likwidacja stopni piętrzących na rzekach w Stanach Zjednoczonych - fakt czy manipulacja? Gospodarka Wodna 8, 250-255.
• [18] Hepler T.E. 2013. Engineering consideration for large dam removals. The Challenges of Dam Removal and River Restoration. The Geological Society of America Reviews in Engineering Geology vol. XXI. J.V. De Graff & J.E. Evans eds.
• [19] Hickey H. 2013. Tracking sediments' fate in largest-ever dam removal. http://depts.washington.edu/ coenv/freshwater/2013/03/tracking-sediments-fate-in-largest-ever-dam-removal/
• [20] ICF Consulting & Woodlot Alternatives. 2005. A summary of existing research on low-head dam removal projects. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
• [21] Kaufman J.H. 1992. Effects on wildlife of restoring the riverine forest in the Rodman pool area. In The case of restoring the free-flowing Ocklawaha River. Florida Defenders of the Environment. Gainesville, FL. Pp 38-41.
• [22] Kondolf G.M. 1997. Hungry water: Effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environmental Management 21, 533-551.
• [23] Lejon A.G.C., B.M. Renofalt, C. Nilsson. 2009. Conflicts associated with dam removal in Sweden. Ecology and Society 14, 4. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art4/
• [24] Lovett R.A. 2014. Rivers on the run. Nature 511, 521-523.
• [25] Linn E.C. 2015. Egypt's Nile River Delta Is Sinking Into the Sea. Newseek, Nov. 2015.
• [26] Łajczak A. 1995. Studium nad zamulaniem wybranych zbiorników zaporowych w dorzeczu Wisły. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, 1995. Monografie Komitetu Gospodarki Wodnej Polskiej Akademii Nauk ISSN 0867-7816; z. 8.
• [27] Major J.J., J.E. O'Connor, C.J. Podolak, M.K. Keith, G.E. Grant, K.R. Spicer, S. Pittman, H.M. Bragg, J.R. Wallick, D.Q. Tanner, A. Rhode, P.R. Wilcock. 2012. Geomorphicresponse of the Sandy River, Oregon, to removal of Marmot Dam. U. S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 1792 (64 pp.).
• [28] Marks J.C. 2007. Gdy tamy runą. Świat Nauki (Scientific American). Nr 4(188), 70-75.
• [29] McClain S., L. Craig. 2015. Dam removal in the Mid-Atlantic: Regional trends in removal and science. Mid-Atlantic Stream Restoration Conference. September 2015.
• [30] Miller K. 2015. Two years after dam's removal, Penobscot River flourishes. The Portland Press Herald. http://www.pressherald.com/2015/09/27/a-river-revived-the-penobscot-river-two-years- after-dams-removal/
• [31] Mussman E.K., D. Zabowski, S.A. Acker. 2008. Predicting secondary reservoir sediment erosion and stabilisation following dam removal. Northwest Science 82, 236-245.
• [32] Noonan M.J., J.W.A. Grant, C.D. Jackson. 2012. A quantitative assessment of fish passage efficiency. Fish and Fisheries 13, 450-464.
• [33] NOAA Habitat Conservation 2012. http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/highlights/elwhariverafterdam- removal.html
• [34] O'Connor J.E., J.J. Duda, G.E. Grant. 2015. 1000 dams down and counting. Science 348, 496-497.
• [35] Oey M. 2015. Effective mitigation of sedimentation on riparian riverbeds and salmonid populations after dam removal. Master's Projects Paper 132, University of San Fracisco, USF Scholarship Repository, pp.62.
• [36] Palimieri A., F. Shah, A. Dinar. 2001. Economics of reservoir sedimentation and sustainable management of dams. I. Environ. Management 61, 149-163.
• [37] Pearson A.J., N.P. Snyder, M. Collins. 2011. Rates and processes of channel response to dam removal with a sand-filled impoundment. Water Resour. Res. 47, W08504. http://dx.doi. org/101029/2010WR009733.
• [38] Poff N.L., D.D. Hart. 2002. How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. BioScience 52, 659-668.
• [39] Pringle C.M. 2001. Hydrologic connectivity and the management of biological reserves: A global perspective. Ecological Applications 11, 981-998.
• [40] Randle T.J., T.E. Helpler. 2006. USSD guidelines for dam decommissioning projects. Pp. 855-870.
• [41] Shafroth P.B., J.M. Friedman, T. Auble, M.L. Scott, J.H. Braatne. 2002. Potential response of riparian vegetation to dam removal. BioScience 52, 703-712.
• [42] Schiermeier Q. 2018. Dam removal restores rivers; Huge European demolition projects offer hope for fragmented ecosystems. Nature, 557, 290-292.
• [43] Shuman J.R. 1995. Environmental considerations for assessing dam removal alternativesfor river restoration. Regul. River 11, 249-261.
• [44] Smith S.E., A. Abdel-Kader. 1988. Coastal Erosion along the Egyptian Delta. Journal of Coastal Research 4, 245-255.
• [45] Stanley E.H., M.W. Doyle. 2003. Trading off: the ecological effects of dam removal. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1, 15-22.
• [46] Stroud P.L. 2012. Sediment Strategies: Choosing a Sediment Management Option for Dam Removal. HydroWorld.com.
• [47] Tanabe N. 2014. Arase Dam: Japan's First Dam Removal Project Underway. Japan For Sustainability Newsletter No. 147 (November 2014). https://www. japanfs.org/en/news/archives/news_id035105. html
• [48] Task Committee on Guidelines for Retirement of Dams and Hydroelectric facilities (TCGRDHF). 1997. New York; American Society of Civil Engineers.
• [49] The Wild Trout Trust. 2014. Spain-leading the way in Europe for dam removal. https://www.wildtrout. org/news/spain-leading-way-europe-dam-removal
• [50] Thomas Blate J. 2018. Dam good year for dam remowal in 2017. https://www.americanrivers. org/2018/02/dam-removal-in-2017/
• [51] Vikimanche. 2017. https://www.wikimanche.fr/Barrage_de_la_Roche-qui-Boit
• [52] Weitkamp D.E., M. Katz. 1980. A review of dissolved gas supersaturation literature. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 109, 659-702.
• [53] Wendee N. 2012. Lessons of the Elwha River: Man- aging Health Hazards during Dam Rmoval. Environmental Health Perspectives. 120, 431-435. http:// ehp.niehs.nih.gov/120-a430/
• [54] Wik S.J. 1995. Reservoir drawdown: Case study in flow changes to potentially improve fisheries. Journal of Energy Engineering 121, 89-96.
• [55] World Commission on Dams (WCD). 2001. Dams and development; a new framework for decisions-making. London; Earthscan Publications.
• [56] WWF 2006. Living Planet Report 2006. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/living_planet_report.pdf
• [57] Xin G. 2012. French Dam Removal Opens Way for Atlantic Salmon. https://www.internationalrivers. org/resources/french-dam-removal-opens-way-for-atlantic-salmon-1632

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).