Agronomic Bio-fortification of Zinc Improves the Yield and Quality of Fodder Oat

• Autorzy: Asif Muhammad , Asad Muhammad Sohaib , Safdar Muhammad Ehsan , Khan Imran , Akhtar Naeem , Hassan Muhammad Arish , Moosa Muhammad , Baoyi Zhao , Almoallim Hesham S. , Ansari Mohammad Javed

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/187146

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Oat is an important winter fodder crop grown in large areas all over the world. Oat is a good source of nutrition and energy, but it is poor in zinc. Presently, livestock is suffering from malnutrition due to a deficiency of zinc, which has a greater impact on livestock and ultimately on human health. An easy and cost-effective approach to adding nutrients to plants without altering their genetic makeup is agronomic biofortification. Application of nutrients to oat via bio-fortification may enhance the overall biomass production and quality of fodder. Hence, a field study was performed to understand the impact of bio-fortification with zinc on quality along with biomass production of oats. Treatment comprised of control (No Zn), Zn at 4 kg soil application, Zn at 6 kg soil application, Zn at 8 kg soil application, Zn at 4 kg soil application+0.5% zinc sulfate as foliar application, Zn at 6 kg soil application+0.5% zinc sulfate as foliar application and Zn at 8 kg soil application+0.5% zinc sulfate as foliar application. The study revealed that Zn at 6 kg soil application+0.5% zinc sulfate foliar application produced maximum plant height (207.7 cm), leaf area index (15.78), crop growth rate (9.1 gm^-2day^-1), stem diameter (0.073 cm), number of tillers (204), fresh fodder yield (76.6 t·ha^-1), dry matter yield (32.27 t·ha^-1), ash contents (10.3%) and plant zinc contents (70.0 ppm). Control treatment produced maximum crude fiber contents (40.70%), acid detergent fiber contents (35.77%), and neutral detergent fiber contents (72.71%). In conclusion, the bio-fortification of zinc not only enhanced the biomass and yield of oat but also increased the availability of zinc in plants.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

biofortification; growth; oat quality; zinc concentration

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 25, nr 6
• Strony: 153--163
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 47 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Asif Muhammad

• Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan

autor

Asad Muhammad Sohaib

• Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan

autor

Safdar Muhammad Ehsan

• Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan

autor

Khan Imran

• Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan

autor

Akhtar Naeem

• Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Sargodha 40100, Pakistan

autor

Hassan Muhammad Arish

• Center of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology (CABB), University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan

autor

Moosa Muhammad

• Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan

autor

Baoyi Zhao

• Shuangfeng Agriculture and Rural Bureau, Hunan Province, Loudi, 417000, China

autor

Almoallim Hesham S.

• Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, PO Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

autor

Ansari Mohammad Javed

• Department of Botany, Hindu College Moradabad (Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand University Bareilly), 244001, India

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8718-3078

Bibliografia

• 1. Adhikari, T., Kundu, S., Biswas, A.K., Tarafdar, J.C., Subba, R.A. 2015. Characterization of zinc oxide nano particles and their effect on growth of maize (Zea mays L.) plant. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 38, 1505–1515.
• 2. Afzal, U., Zamir, M.S.I., Din, S.M.U., Bilal, A., Salahuddin, M., Khan, S.I. 2017. Impact of different zinc application methods on yield and yield components of various wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 8(13), 3502.
• 3. Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A.U., Lim, J.E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Ok, Y.S. 2014. Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere, 99, 19–33.
• 4. Amin, M.E. 2011. Effect of different nitrogen sources on growth, yield and quality of fodder maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 10, 17–23.
• 5. Angeles, A.I., Kurilich, A., Harjani, Y., Capanzana, M. 2012. The effect of a nutrient fortified oat drink on iron, zinc, vitamin A, and vitamin C status among filipino children. Engineering Technology, 70, 1052–1060.
• 6. Ashworth, D.J., Alloway, B.J. 2014. Soil mobility of sewage sludge-derived dissolved organic matter, copper, nickel and zinc. Environmental Pollution, 127, 137–144.
• 7. Bain, N., Miglani, K., Bhathal, S.K. 2018. Formulation and efficacy study of metabolic syndrome-specific ingredient mix. Nutrition and Food Science, 1, 13–19.
• 8. Ball, J., Sawyer, J., Lambert, B., Ramirez, H., Adcock, L., Wyatt, R., Costilla, J. 2016. Assessment of oat fiber content technology in ground beef intended for international meat formulations. Meat Science, 112, 120–121.
• 9. Biel, W., Jacyno, E., Kawęcka, M. 2014. Chemical composition of hulled, dehulled and naked oat grains. South African Journal of Animal Science, 44, 189–197.
• 10. Cakmak, I. 2008. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic bio fortification? Plant Soil, 302, 1–17.
• 11. Chand, N., Khan, R.U. 2017. The effect of vitamin E, L-carnitine, and ginger on production traits, immune response, and antioxidant status in two broiler strains exposed to chronic heat stress. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, 26851–26857.
• 12. Chang, Y.C., Bai, Y.L., Jin, J.Y., Yang, L.P., Zheng, Y.A.O., Xu, S.X., Zhu, C.M. 2017. Sufficiency and deficiency indices of soil available zinc for rice in the alluvial soil of the coastal yellow sea. Rice Science, 14, 223–228.
• 13. Dhaliwal, S.S., Sharma, V., Shukla, A.K., Verma, V., Behera, S.K., Singh, P., Hossain, A. 2021. Comparative efficiency of mineral, chelated and nano forms of zinc and iron for improvement of zinc and iron in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) through bio fortification. Agronomy, 11(12), 2436.
• 14. Dhaliwal, S.S., Singh, J., Taneja, P.K., Mandal, A. 2020. Remediation techniques for removal of heavy metals from the soil contaminated through different sources: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 1319–1333.
• 15. Erenoglu, E.B., Kutman, U.B., Ceylan, Y., Yildiz, B., Cakmak, I. 2011. Improved nitrogen nutrition enhances root uptake, root‐to‐shoot translocation and remobilization of zinc (65Zn) in wheat. New Phytologist, 189, 438–448.
• 16. Gupta, N., Ram, H., Kumar, B. 2016. Mechanism of Zinc absorption in plants: uptake, transport, translocation and accumulation. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 15, 89–109.
• 17. Hafeez, B.M.K.Y., Khanif, Y.M., Saleem, M. 2013. Role of zinc in plant nutrition-a review. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 3, 374–480.
• 18. Haider, B.A., Bhutta, Z.A. 2019. The effect of therapeutic zinc supplementation among young children with selected infections: a review of the evidence. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 30, 41–59.
• 19. Harris, K.D., Vanajah, T., Puvanitha, S. 2018. Effect of foliar application of Boron and Magnesium on growth and yield of green chilli (Capsicum annum L.). Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 30, 60–78.
• 20. Hegelund, J.N., Schiller, M., Kichey, T., Hansen, T.H., Pedas, P., Husted, S., Schjoerring, J.K. 2012. Barley metallothioneins: MT3 and MT4 are localized in the grain aleurone layer and show differential zinc binding. Plant Physiology, 159, 1125–1137.
• 21. Hess, S.Y., King, J.C. 2019. Effects of maternal zinc supplementation on pregnancy and lactation outcomes. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 30, 60–78.
• 22. Hosnedlova, B., Travnicek, J., Soch, M. 2017. Current view of the significance of zinc for ruminants: a review. Agricultura Tropica Subtropica (Czech Republic), 1, 25–28.
• 23. Hossain, M.E., Chakma, S., Khatun, M.M., Hasanuzzaman, M., Miah, M.Y., Biswas, M.A.A. 2011. Production systems of swine in the rural areas of Rangamati and Khagrachari districts of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Animal Science, 40, 28–33.
• 24. Hussain, A., Muhammad, D., Khan, S., Bhatti, M.B. 2013. Fodder yield and quality potential of various cultivars of oats (Arena sativa L.). Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 36, 258–260.
• 25. Jordan-Meille, L., Holland, J.E., McGrath, S.P., Glendining, M.J., Thomas, C.L., Haefele, S.M. 2021. The grain mineral composition of barley, oat and wheat on soils with pH and soil phosphorus gradients. European Journal of Agronomy, 126, 126–281.
• 26. Kaya, C., Higgs, D. 2012. Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) cultivars to foliar application of zinc when grown in sand culture at low zinc. Scientia Horticulturae, 93, 53–64.
• 27. Khan, H.R., McDonald, G.K., Rengel, Z. 2014. Zinc fertilization and water stress affects plant water relations, stomatal conductance and osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). Plant and Soil, 267, 271–284.
• 28. Kluthcouski, P.D., Nascente, A.S., Oliveira, J. 2013. Soybean growth and yield under cover crops. Revista Ceres, 60, 249–256.
• 29. Kumar, B., Dhaliwal, S.S., Singh, S.T., Lamb, J.S., Ram, H. 2015. Herbage production, nutritional composition and quality of teosinte under Fe fertilization. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 18, 54–55.
• 30. Kumawat, S.M., Kantwa, S.R., Desai, D.H., Arif, M., Khinchi, V. 2017. Responses of dual purpose oats (Avena sativa L.) to sowing date, method and level of zinc with or without thiourea in irrigated arid ecosystem. Range Management and Agroforestry, 38, 215–220.
• 31. Liu, D., Liu, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, X., Zou, C. 2017. Agronomic approach of zinc bio fortification can increase zinc bioavailability in wheat flour and thereby reduce zinc deficiency in humans. Nutrients, 9, 465–466.
• 32. Meena, H.B., Sharma, R.P., Rawat, U.S. 2016. Status of macro-and micronutrients in some soils of Tonk district of Rajasthan. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science, 54, 508–512.
• 33. Mousavi, S.R. 2013. Zinc in crop production and interaction with phosphorus. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5, 1503–1509.
• 34. Mousavi, S.R., Galavi, M., Rezaei, M. 2013. Zinc (Zn) importance for crop production—a review. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4, 64–68.
• 35. Olsen, L.I., Palmgren, M.G. 2014. Many rivers to cross: the journey of zinc from soil to seed. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5, 30–31.
• 36. Rengel, Z., Batten, G.D., Crowley, D.D. 2019. Agronomic approaches for improving the micronutrient density in edible portions of field crops. Field Crops Research, 60, 27–40.
• 37. Rizwan, M., Ali, S., Ali, B., Adrees, M., Arshad, M., Hussain, A., Waris, A.A. 2019. Zinc and iron oxide nanoparticles improved the plant growth and reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat. Chemosphere, 214, 269–277.
• 38. Sher, A., Ul-Allah, S., Sattar, A., Ijaz, M., Qayyum, A., Manaf, A., Suleman, M. 2022. Zinc sulfate application to grass fodders (oat, barley, annual ryegrass and triticale) for increasing their yield, quality and profitability. Crop and Pasture Science, 73, 473–483.
• 39. Shivay, Y.S., Prasad, R., Singh, R.K., Pal, M. 2015. Relative efficiency of zinc-coated urea and soil and foliar application of zinc sulphate on yield, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, zinc and iron bio fortification in grains and uptake by basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, 7, 161–169.
• 40. Siebielec, G., Chaney, R.L., Kukier, U. 2017. Liming to remediate Ni contaminated soils with diverse properties and a wide range of Ni concentration. Plant and Soil, 299, 117–130.
• 41. Singh, B., Simon, A., Halsey, K., Kurup, S., Clark, S., Aradottir, G. 2020. Characterization of bird cherry‐oat aphid (Rhopalosiphum padi L.) behavior and aphid host preference in relation to partially resistant and susceptible wheat landraces. Annals of Applied Biology, 177, 184–194.
• 42. Stevens, E.J., Armstrong, K.W., Bezar, H.J., Griffin, W.B., Hampton, J.G. 2014. Fodder oats an overview. Fodder oats: a world overview, 1, 11–18.
• 43. Tahir, M., Fiaz, N., Nadeem, M.A., Khalid, F., Ali, M. 2019. Effect of different chelated zinc sources on the growth and yield of maize (Zea mays L.). Soil Environment, 28, 179–183.
• 44. Wadhwa, M., Kaur, K., Kumar, B., Bakshi, M.P.S. 2010. Comparative evaluation of non-leguminous fodders as livestock feed. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 27, 44–49.
• 45. Wissuwa, M., Ismail, A.M., Graham, R.D. 2018. Rice grain zinc concentrations as affected by genotype, native soil-zinc availability, and zinc fertilization. Plant and Soil, 306, 37–48.
• 46. Wu, G., Fanzo, J., Miller, D.D., Pingali, P., Post, M., Steiner, J.L., Thalacker, M.A.E. 2014. Production and supply of high‐quality food protein for human consumption: sustainability, challenges, and innovations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1321, 1–19.
• 47. Yosefi, K., Galavi, M., Ramrodi, M., Mousavi, S.R. 2011. Effect of bio-phosphate and chemical phosphorus fertilizer accompanied with micronutrient foliar application on growth, yield and yield components of maize. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5, 175–180.