Pomiar przedsiębiorczości organizacyjnej w sektorze publicznym

• Autorzy: Kóska-Wolny Magdalena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.53052/pjmee.2023.6.03

Warianty tytułu

EN

Measuring organizational entrepreneurship in the public sector

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

EN

The activities of the public sector are visible at the state, regional and local levels, and its rational, effective and efficient functioning contributes to socio-economic development and af-fects the quality of life of citizens. The role of the public sector in the modern economy is systematically growing, and the management of public organizations is becoming a multi-faceted phenomenon. Entrepreneurship can be defined both through the prism of economic activity and pro-social activity. Nowadays, the role of entrepreneurship is treated as an endog-enous development factor, based both on the quality of human and social capital, as well as material and financial resources. It is gaining more and more importance, becoming a driv-ing force for economic growth, increasing the competitiveness, efficiency and innovation of organizations. Organizational entrepreneurship, despite the intensity of scientific research, has not yet been uniformly operationalized or has universally accepted measurement methods. There are no clear guidelines in constructing a tool for measuring organizational entrepreneurship. It is also impossible to create a universal, synthetic tool that is optimal for every organization. Entrepre-neurial orientation is one way to measure the entrepreneurial behavior of organizations. The aim of this work is to identify the issue of measuring organizational entrepreneurship in the public sector. It should be emphasized that the phenomenon of organizational entrepreneur-ship in public organizations, its determinants and measurement methods are still insufficiently recognized and described in the theoretical, methodological and empirical layers. One of the reasons for this state of affairs is the great diversity of the public sector, which creates a specific "system" of interconnected organizations and institutions, instruments and means for the pro-vision of public goods and services.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

przedsiębiorczość organizacyjna; sektor publiczny; orientacja przedsiębiorcza

EN

organisational entrepreneurship; public sector; entrepreneurial orientation

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Bielsko-Bialskiego
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Materials and Environmental Engineering
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 6 (26)
• Strony: 25--35
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 61 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kóska-Wolny Magdalena

• University of Economics and Humanities, Sikorskiego 4, 43-300 Bielsko-Biała, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-0014

Bibliografia

• 1. Anderson B.S., Kreiser P.M., Kuratko D.F., Hornsby J.S., Eshima Y. 2015. Reconceptualizing Entrepreneurial Orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 10, 1579–1596.
• 2. Bellone C.J., Goerl G.F. 1992 Reconciling public entrepreneurship and democracy. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 130–134.
• 3. Bellone C.J., Goerl G.F. 1993. In defense of civic-regarding entrepreneurship or helping wolves to promote good citizenship. Public Administration Review, 53(4), 396–398
• 4. Borins S. 2000. Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 498–507.
• 5. Bratnicki M. 2004. Organizational Entrepreneurshipscape: Contradictions, Processes, Dimensions, Form and Questions. Wydawnictwo WSB, Dąbrowa Górnicza.
• 6. Bratnicki M. 2006. The dialectics of organizational entrepreneurship. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Katowice.
• 7. Bratnicki M. 2008. Konfiguracyjne ujęcie przedsiębiorczości organizacyjnej. Ekonomika i Organizacja Przedsiębiorstwa, 6, 17–22.
• 8. Brown T.E., Davidsson P., Wiklund J. 2001. An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 10, 953–968.
• 9. Carton R.B., Hofer C.W. 2006. Measuring Organizational Performance: Metrics for Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Research. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton.
• 10. Chandler G.N., Lyon D.W. 2001. Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 101–113.
• 11. Covin J.G., Slevin D.P. 1989. Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 1, 75–87.
• 12. Covin J.G., Slevin D.P. 1991. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–26.
• 13. Crook T.R., Shook C.L., Madden T.M., Morris M.L. 2010. A review of current construct measurement in entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(4), 387–398.
• 14. Czerski M. 2016. Otoczenie organizacji jako punkt odniesienia dla działań przedsiębiorstwa. [W:] Za-rządzanie przedsiębiorstwem w zmiennym otoczeniu w kontekście zrównoważonego rozwoju (red. K. Pujer). Exante, Wrocław.
• 15. Daft R.L. 2000. Management. 5th edition. The Dryden Press, London.
• 16. Davidsson P. 2005. Researching Entrepreneurship. Springer, New York.
• 17. Dess G.G., Lumpkin G.T. 2005. The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 1, 147–156.
• 18. Dyduch W. 2008. Pomiar przedsiębiorczości organizacyjnej. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. K. Adamieckiego, Katowice 2008.
• 19. Dyduch W., Kozłowska I. 2011. Zintegrowany system pomiaru efektywności oparty na miarach przedsiębiorczości organizacyjnej. Konferencja KZZ, Zakopane.
• 20. Dziadoń J. 1986. Typologia kryteriów oceny systemu zarządzania. [W:] Metodologiczne aspekty zarządzania (red. A. Stabryła, J. Trzcieniecki). Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Kraków.
• 21. Gębczyńska M. 2017. Konstrukt i wymiary orientacji przedsiębiorczej – analiza teoretyczna. Zeszyty Naukowe „Organizacja i Zarządzanie” / Politechnika Śląska, 101, 153–163.
• 22. Głód G. 2016. Uwarunkowania i pomiar przedsiębiorczości publicznej w jednostkach ochrony zdrowia. Difin, Warszawa.
• 23. Goosen C.J., de Coning T.J., Smit E.M. 2002. The development of a factor based instrument to measure corporate entrepreneurship: A South African Perspective. Academy of African Business Manage-ment, 33, 3, a704.
• 24. Hughes M., Morgan R.E. 2007. Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, 5, 651–661.
• 25. Ireland R.D., Reutzel C.R., Webb J.W. 2005. From the Editors: Entrepreneurship research in AMJ: What has been published, what might the future hold? Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 556–564.
• 26. Karpacz J. 2016. Implikacje konceptualizacji dla modelowania konstruktu i wskaźników orientacji przedsiębiorczej: ustalenia literaturowe. Management Forum, 4, 4, 9–15.
• 27. Kearney C., Hisrich R., Roche F. 2007. Facilitating Public Sector Corporate Entrepreneurship Process: A conceptual Model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 15, 3, 275–299.
• 28. Kearney C., Hisrich R., Roche F. 2008. A conceptual model of public sector corporate entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 295–313.
• 29. Kearney C., Hisrich R., Roche F. 2009. Public and private sector entrepreneurship: similarities, differences or a combinations? Journal and Small Business and Enterprise Development, 16, 1, 26–46.
• 30. Kearney C., Hisrich R., Roche F. 2010. Change Management Through Entrepreneurship in Public Sec-tor Enterprises. Journal of Development Entrepreneurship, 15, 4, 415–437.
• 31. Ketchen D.J. Jr 2003. From the Special Issue Editor Entrepreneurship: Past accomplishments and future challenges. Journal of Management, 29, 3, 281–283.
• 32. Khandwalla P.N. 1977. Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7, 21–45.
• 33. Kończak G. 2007. O pewnych problemach oceny błędów pomiaru. [W:] Pomiar w naukach społecznych (red. A. Iwasiewicz). WSZINS, Tychy.
• 34. Kraśnicka T. 2002. Koncepcja rozwoju przedsiębiorczości ekonomicznej i pozaekonomicznej. Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej im. Karola Adamieckiego w Katowicach, Katowice.
• 35. Kreiser P.M., Marino L.D., Weaver K.M. 2002. Assessing the psychometric properties of the entrepreneurial orientation scale: a multi-country analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26, 4, 71–94.
• 36. Kuratko D.F., Montagno R.V., Hornsby J.S. 1990. Developing as Intrapreneurial Assessment Instrument for an Effective Corporate Entrepreneurial Environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (Special Issue), 49–58.
• 37. Lewis E. 1980. Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic political power: the organizational lives of Hyman Rickover, J. Edgar Hoover, and Robert Moses. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
• 38. Lumpkin G.T., Dess G.G. 2001. Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: the moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451.
• 39. Malik J.N., Mahmoon R.B. 2012. Facilitating corporate entrepreneurship in public sector Higher Education Institutions: A Conceptual Model. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 6, 1/2, 26–49.
• 40. Miłaszewicz D. 2014. Problemy społecznej efektywności sektora publicznego. Studia Ekonomiczne / Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, 180, cz. 2, 163–183.
• 41. Miller D., Friesen P.H. 1982. Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of stra-tegic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1, 1–25.
• 42. Miller D. 1983. The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 7, 770–791.
• 43. Monsen R., Boss R.W. 2009. The impact of strategic entrepreneurship inside the organization: examining job stress and employee retention. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1, 71–104.
• 44. Morris M.H., Jones F.F. 1999. Entrepreneurship in established organizations: The case of public sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 71–91.
• 45. Morris M.H., Kuratko D.F. 2002. Corporate Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Development Within Organizations. Harcourt College Publishers, Orlando.
• 46. Osborne D., Gaebler T. 1992. Rządzić inaczej. Jak duch przedsiębiorczości przenika i przekształca administrację publiczną. Wydawnictwo Media Rodzina, Poznań.
• 47. Pearce J.A., Fritz P., Davis P.S. 2010. Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Performance of Religious Congregations as Predicted by Rational Choice Theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1, 219–248.
• 48. Roberts N.C., King P.J. 1991. Policy Entrepreneurs: Their Activity Structure and Function in the Policy Process. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(2), 147–175.
• 49. Salavou H. 2004. The concept of innovativeness: Should we need to focus? European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(1), 33–44.
• 50. Sikorska-Wolak J., Cyburt A. 2015. Pozyskiwanie i wykorzystanie funduszy Unii Europejskiej jako przejaw przedsiębiorczości jednostek samorządu terytorialnego. Turystyka i Rozwój Regionalny, 4, 105–117.
• 51. Steinerowska-Streb I., Kraśnicka T. 2022. Orientacja przedsiębiorcza a wyniki polskich przedsiębiorstw. Przegląd Organizacji, 1(984), 19–29.
• 52. Stevenson H.H., Jarillo J.C. 1990. A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (Special Issue: Corporate Entrepreneurship), 17–27.
• 53. Steyart C., Katz J. 2004. Reclaiming the Space of Entrepreneurship in Society: Geographical, Discursive and Social Dimensions. Entrepreneurhip & Regional Development, 16(3), 179–196.
• 54. Strojny J., Prusak A. 2015. Programowanie rozwoju przedsiębiorczości przez samorząd terytorialny. Przedsiębiorczość – Edukacja, 11, 50–63.
• 55. Wach K.: Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Internationalisation Process: The Theoretical Foundations of International Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3, 2, 9–24.
• 56. Wodecka-Hyjek A. 2016. Metodyczne aspekty oceny orientacji przedsiębiorczej w organizacji. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, 7(955), 5–22.
• 57. Wójcik-Karpacz A. 2016. Dobór miar do pomiaru orientacji przedsiębiorczej: dylematy i propozycje rozwiązań. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 444, 594–608.
• 58. Wortman M.S. Jr 1986. A Unified Framework. Research Typologies and Research Prospectuses for the Interface between Entrepreneurship and Small Business. [W:] The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship (red. D.L. Sexton, R.W. Smilor). Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
• 59. Yeazdanshenas M. 2014. Designing a conceptual Framework for Organizational Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector in Iran. Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 7, 2, 365–390.
• 60. Zahra S.A., Neubaum D.O. 1998. Environmental odversity and the Entrepreneurial Activities of New Ventures. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurial, 3, 2, 123–140.
• 61. Zerbinati S., Souitaris V. 2005. Entrepreneurship in the public sector: A framework of analysis in European local government. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 17, 1, 43–64.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).