The repeatability of the instrumented timed Up & Go test: The performance of older adults and parkinson's disease patients under different conditions

• Autorzy: Viteckova Slavka , Krupicka Radim , Dusek Petr , Cejka Vaclav , Kutilek Patrik , Novak Jan , Szabo Zoltan , Růžicka Evžen

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1016/j.bbe.2019.12.001

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The Timed Up & Go (TUG) test is a simple test for gait and balance that requires no special equipment and can be part of a routine clinical examination. Combined with the development of motion capture technologies, the possibilities of assessing individual TUG sub-components (i.e. sit-to-stand, gait, turn, turn-to-sit) are increasing. The clinical evaluation of an instrumented TUG requires reliable values. We analysed the intra-session repeatability of the iTUG sit-to-stand, gait and turn parameters in three conditions: (1) single, (2) cognitive dual-tasks, and (3) manual dual-tasks in older adults and Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. The repeatability coefficient (RC) was calculated for each of the 18 parameters. The repeatability varied across subject groups, the performed tasks, and the TUG subcomponent. The gait subcomponent had 6 non-repeatable spatio-temporal parameters and 2 non-repeatable parameters for the arm swing. The parameters of the turn subcomponent can be considered as non-repeatable in both groups under the manual dual-task condition and in HC under the single-task condition. When comparing PD to HC, the repeatability of the majority of the single-task parameters was higher in PD whereas lower under dual-tasks. In PD, the major part of gait parameters had a higher repeatability under single-tasks than dual-tasks. In contrast, HC exhibited better repeatability of dual-tasks than single-tasks. Repeatability can be used to assist researchers and clinicians to select adequate parameters with respect to the purpose of motion assessment.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

reliability; repeatability coefficient; dual task; Parkinson's disease

PL

niezawodność; współczynnik powtarzalności; choroba Parkinsona

• Wydawca: Nałęcz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Elsevier
• Czasopismo: Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 40, no. 1
• Strony: 363--377
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 45 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Viteckova Slavka

• Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, nam Sitna 3105, Kladno, 272 01, Czech Republic

autor

Krupicka Radim

• Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic

autor

Dusek Petr

• Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Cejka Vaclav

• Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic

autor

Kutilek Patrik

• Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic

autor

Novak Jan

• Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

autor

Szabo Zoltan

• Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, nam Sitna 3105, Czech Republic

autor

Růžicka Evžen

• Department of Neurology and Centre of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Bibliografia

• [1] Mathias S, Nayak US, Isaacs B. Balance in elderly patients: the "Get-up and go'' test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986;34:119–26.
• [2] Bischoff HA, Stähelin HB, Monsch AU, Iversen MD, Weyh A, von Dechend M, et al. Identifying a cut-off point for normal mobility: a comparison of the timed `up and go' test in community-dwelling and institutionalised elderly women. Age Ageing 2003;32:315–20.
• [3] Kim M-J, Yabushita N, Kim M-K, Nemoto M, Seino S, Tanaka K. Mobility performance tests for discriminating high risk of frailty in community-dwelling older women. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010;51:192–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2009.10.007.
• [4] Savva GM, Donoghue OA, Horgan F, O'Regan C, Cronin H, Kenny RA. Using timed up-and-Go to identify frail members of the older population. J Gerontol Ser A 2013;68:441–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls190.
• [5] Davis DHJ, Rockwood MRH, Mitnitski AB, Rockwood K. Impairments in mobility and balance in relation to frailty. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2011;53:79–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2010.06.013.
• [6] Kenny RA, Rubenstein LZ, Martin RF, Tinetti ME. American geriatrics society and british geriatrics society and american academy of orthopaedic surgeons panel on falls prevention. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49:664–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49115.x.
• [7] Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002;16:1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00156-4.
• [8] Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up & go test. Phys Ther 2000;80:896–903.
• [9] Tang P-F, Yang H-J, Peng Y-C, Chen H-Y. Motor dual-task timed up & go test better identifies prefrailty individuals than single-task timed up & go test. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015;15:204–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12258.
• [10] Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Attention, frailty, and falls: the effect of a manual task on basic mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:758–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb03813.x.
• [11] Giusti Rossi P, de Andrade L, Hotta Ansai J, Silva Farche AC, Carnaz L, Dalpubel D, et al. Dual-task performance: influence of frailty, level of physical activity, and cognition. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2018. Publish Ah.
• [12] Christofoletti G, Andrade LP, Beinotti F, Borges G. Cognition and dual-task performance in older adults with Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease. Int J Gen Med 2014;7:383–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S65803.
• [13] Sprint G, Cook D, Weeks DL. Towards automating clinical assessments: a survey of the timed up and go (TUG). IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2015;8:64–77.
• [14] Smith E, Walsh L, Doyle J, Greene B, Blake C. The reliability of the quantitative timed up and go test (QTUG) measured over five consecutive days under single and dual-task conditions in community dwelling older adults. Gait Posture 2016;43:239–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.10.004.
• [15] Salarian A, Horak FB, Zampieri C, Carlson-Kuhta P, Nutt JG, Aminian K. ITUG, a sensitive and reliable measure of mobility. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010;18: 303–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2047606.
• [16] Craig JJ, Bruetsch AP, Lynch SG, Horak FB, Huisinga JM. Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017;14:43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-017-0251-0.
• [17] Newman MA, Hirsch MA, Peindl RD, Habet NA, Tsai TJ, Runyon MS, et al. Reliability of the sub-components of the instrumented timed up and go test in ambulatory children with traumatic brain injury and typically developed controls. Gait Posture 2018;63:248–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.05.014.
• [18] Cooper CA, Mikos AE, Wood MF, Kirsch-Darrow L, Jacobson CE, Okun MS, et al. Does laterality of motor impairment tell us something about cognition in Parkinson disease? Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2009;15:315–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2008.07.009.
• [19] Kaoru Takakusaki. Functional neuroanatomy for posture and gait control. JMD 2017;10:1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.14802/jmd.16062.
• [20] Raffegeau TE, Krehbiel LM, Kang N, Thijs FJ, Altmann LJP, Cauraugh JH, et al. A meta-analysis: parkinson's disease and dual-task walking. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2019;62:28–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.12.012.
• [21] Galletly R, Brauer SG. Does the type of concurrent task affect preferred and cued gait in people with Parkinson's disease? Aust J Physiother 2005;51:175–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(05)70024-6.
• [22] Wall J, Bell C, Campbell S, Davis J. The timed Get-up-and-Go test revisited: measurement of the component tasks. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37:109–13.
• [23] Salarian A, Russmann H, Vingerhoets FJG, Dehollain C, Blanc Y, Burkhard PR, et al. Gait assessment in Parkinson's disease: toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004;51:1434–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2004.827933.
• [24] Moore ST, MacDougall HG, Gracies J-M, Cohen HS, Ondo WG. Long-term monitoring of gait in Parkinson's disease. Gait Posture 2007;26:200–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.09.011.
• [25] Zampieri C, Salarian A, Carlson-Kuhta P, Aminian K, Nutt JG, Horak FB. The instrumented timed up and go test: potential outcome measure for disease modifying therapies in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2010;81:171–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.173740.
• [26] Najafi B, Aminian K, Loew F, Blanc Y, Robert PA. Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2002;49:843–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2002.800763.
• [27] Salarian A, Russmann H, Vingerhoets FJG, Burkhard PR, Aminian K. Ambulatory Monitoring of Physical Activities in Patients With Parkinson's Disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007;54:2296–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2007.896591.
• [28] Bland JM, Altman D. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of Clinical Measurement. Lancet 1986;327:307–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8.
• [29] Bland JM, Altman DG. Applying the right statistics: analyses of measurement studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:85–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.122.
• [30] Barnhart HX, Barboriak DP. Applications of the repeatability of quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical analysis of repeat data sets. Transl Oncol 2009;2:231–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1593/tlo.09268.
• [31] Mancini M, Salarian A, Carlson-Kuhta P, Zampieri C, King L, Chiari L, et al. ISway: a sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012;9:59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-59.
• [32] Kang HG, Dingwell JB. Separating the effects of age and walking speed on gait variability. Gait Posture 2008;27:572– 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.009.
• [33] Penko AL, Streicher MC, Koop MM, Dey T, Rosenfeldt AB, Bazyk AS, et al. Dual-task interference disrupts parkinson's gait across multiple cognitive domains. Neuroscience 2018;379:375–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.03.021.
• [34] Müller B, Larsen JP, Wentzel-Larsen T, Skeie GO, Tysnes O-B, for The Parkwest Study Group. Autonomic and sensory symptoms and signs in incident, untreated Parkinson's disease: Frequent but mild. Mov Disord 2011;26:65–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.23387.
• [35] Brauer SG, Morris ME. Can people with Parkinson's disease improve dual tasking when walking? Gait Posture 2010;31:229–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.011.
• [36] Yogev-Seligmann G, Giladi N, Brozgol M, Hausdorff JM. A training program to improve gait while dual tasking in patients with parkinson's disease: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:176–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.005.
• [37] Graham JE, Ostir GV, Kuo Y-F, Fisher SR, Ottenbacher KJ. Relationship between test methodology and mean velocity in timed walk tests: a review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:865–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.029.
• [38] Akram SB, Frank JS, Chenouri S. Turning behavior in healthy older adults: Is there a preference for step versus spin turns? Gait Posture 2010;31:23–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.238.
• [39] Forsell C, Conradsson D, Paquette C, Franzén E. Reducing gait speed affects axial coordination of walking turns. Gait Posture 2017;54:71–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.02.020.
• [40] van Iersel MB, Ribbers H, Munneke M, Borm GF, Rikkert MGO. The effect of cognitive dual tasks on balance during walking in physically fit elderly people. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:187–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.031.
• [41] Weiss A, Mirelman A, Buchman AS, Bennett DA, Hausdorff JM. Using a body-fixed sensor to identify subclinical gait difficulties in older adults with IADL disability: maximizing the output of the timed up and go. PLoS One 2013;8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068885.
• [42] Tateuchi H, Tsukagoshi R, Fukumoto Y, Akiyama H, So K, Kuroda Y, et al. Compensatory turning strategies while walking in patients with hip osteoarthritis. Gait Posture 2014;39:1133–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.021.
• [43] Yang W-C, Hsu W-L, Wu R-M, Lin K-H. Immediate effects of clock-turn strategy on the pattern and performance of narrow turning in persons with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther 2016;40:249–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000148.
• [44] Hausdorff JM, Rios DA, Edelberg HK. Gait variability and fall risk in community-living older adults: a 1-year prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1050–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.24893.
• [45] Schniepp R, Wuehr M, Schlick C, Huth S, Pradhan C, Dieterich M, et al. Increased gait variability is associated with the history of falls in patients with cerebellar ataxia. J Neurol 2014;261:213–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-7189-3.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).