Determinants of entrepreneurial intention: a comparative analysis

• Autorzy: Ragmoun Wided

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2022.25.1.22

Warianty tytułu

PL

Determinanty intencji przedsiębiorczości: analiza porównawcza

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The current research aims to investigate the relationship among economic growth, Environmental Efficiency (EE) and Entrepreneurial Intention (EI). To achieve this, the author has adopted a circular interactive system among environmental efficiency, economic growth and entrepreneurial intention for 49 developing and developed nations through panel causality analysis based on both cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity by country. The data used in this study ranged between 2001 and 2019 and was extracted from databases on the World Bank Indicators (WDIs) in addition to the Global Entrepreneurs Monitor database (GEM dataset). Based on the quantitative approach, the obtained data were analyzed using STATA. Results emphasize that a bidirectional causal association exists between economic growth and entrepreneurial intention. Findings related to environmental efficiency seem to be more restrictive. It can be concluded that an indirect and positive effect of environment efficiency on EI is significant only in high-income level countries. This paper provides new insights into the paradoxical effects and interrelations between economic growth and environmental efficiency on EI. Research confirms that entrepreneurship is a reflexive process defined through a specific mindset, and policymakers have to invest in environmental efficiency and strengthen policies to protect the environment and favor an entrepreneurial “feeling good” as a stimulator for EI. This study could also assist and guide researchers for future research to operationalize the results of the following study.

PL

Obecne badania mają na celu zbadanie związku między wzrostem gospodarczym, efektywnością środowiskową (EE) a intencjami przedsiębiorczymi (EI). Aby to osiągnąć, autor przyjął okrągły, interaktywny system między efektywnością środowiskową, wzrostem gospodarczym i intencją przedsiębiorczości dla 49 rozwijających się i rozwiniętych narodów poprzez panelową analizę przyczynowości opartą zarówno na przekrojowej zależności, jak i heterogeniczności w poszczególnych krajach. Dane wykorzystane w tym badaniu pochodziły z lat 2001-2019 i zostały pozyskane z baz danych dotyczących wskaźników Banku Światowego (WDI) oraz bazy danych Global Entrepreneurs Monitor (zestaw danych GEM). Opierając się na podejściu ilościowym, uzyskane dane przeanalizowano za pomocą programu STATA. Wyniki podkreślają, że istnieje dwukierunkowy związek przyczynowy między wzrostem gospodarczym a zamiarem przedsiębiorczości. Ustalenia związane z efektywnością środowiskową wydają się być bardziej restrykcyjne. Można stwierdzić, że pośredni i pozytywny wpływ efektywności środowiskowej na EI jest istotny tylko w krajach o wysokim poziomie dochodów. Artykuł ten dostarcza nowych informacji na temat paradoksalnych skutków i wzajemnych relacji między wzrostem gospodarczym a efektywnością środowiskową na EI. Badania potwierdzają, że przedsiębiorczość jest procesem refleksyjnym zdefiniowanym przez określony sposób myślenia, a decydenci muszą inwestować w efektywność środowiskową i wzmacniać polityki mające na celu ochronę środowiska i faworyzować przedsiębiorcze „dobre samopoczucie” jako stymulator EI. Badanie to może również pomóc i ukierunkować badaczy w przyszłych badaniach w celu zoperacjonalizowania wyników kolejnego badania.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

environmental efficiency; economic growth; entrepreneurial intention; developed countries; developing countries; Granger causality; test; causality

PL

efektywność środowiskowa; wzrost gospodarczy; intencja przedsiębiorcza; kraje rozwijające się; kraje rozwinięte; przyczynowość Grangera; test; przyczynowość

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 25, No. 1
• Strony: 361--377
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 62 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Ragmoun Wided

• Department of Business Administration, College of Business and Economics, Qassim University, Buraidah, Saudi Arabia
• Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Management of Nabeul, University of Carthage, Tunisia

Bibliografia

• 1.Acs, Z., (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations,1, 97-107.
• 2.Adedoyin, F.F., Gumede, M.I., Bekun, F.V., Etokakpan, M.U. and Balsalobre-Lorente, D., (2020). Modelling coal rent, economic growth and CO2 emissions: does regulatory quality matter in BRICS economies? Science of Total Environment, 710(3)
• 3.Ajzen, I., (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324
• 4.Albert, M., Čitbajová, J., Knapčíková, L., Behún, M. and Behúnová, A., (2019). Positive Environmental and Economic Impact of Polyvinyl Butyral Waste Material after Recycled Windscreen. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 24(2), 120-128.
• 5.Anokhin, S., Grichnik, D. and Hisrich, R. D., (2008). The Journey from Novice to Serial Entrepreneurship in China and Germany: Are the drivers the same? Managing Global Transitions, 6, 117.
• 6.Apostolopoulos N., Newbery R. and Gkartzios M., (2018). Social enterprise and community resilience: examining a Greek response to turbulent times. Journal of Rural Studies, 70
• 7.Arenius, P., Clercq, D.D.A., (2005). Network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small of Business Economy 24, 249-265.
• 8.Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C. and Lehmann, E. E., (2006). Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth, USA: Oxford University Press.
• 9.Ball, C., Kittler, M., (2019). Removing environmental market failure through support mechanisms: insights from green start-ups in the British, French and German energy sectors. Small Business Economics, 52, 831-844.
• 10.Behera, S.R., Dash, D.P., (2017). The effect of urbanization, energy consumption, and foreign direct investment on the carbon dioxide emission in the SSEA (South and Southeast Asian) region. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review, 70, 96-106.
• 11.Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. and Carlsson, B., (2010). The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34, 105-125.
• 12.Brown, T.E., Davidsson, P. and Wiklund, J., (2010). An operationalization of Stevenson’s conceptualization of entrepreneurship as opportunity-based firm behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 953-968.
• 13.Cantargiu, R., Paunescu, C. and Hadad, S., (2014). The social impact of university entrepreneurship in Romania: Is the institutional discourse replicated or adapted?, Management & Marketing, 4.
• 14.Dean, T.J., McMullen, J.S., (2002). Market failure and entrepreneurial opportunity. Academy of Health Care Management proceedings, 1-6.
• 15.Dejardin, M., (2000). Entrepreneurship and economic growth: An obvious conjunction. The Institute for Development Strategies, Indiana University Dimitratos et al., 2016
• 16.Dumitrescu, E-I.andHurlin, C., (2012).Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling 29, 1450-1460.
• 17.Dvorský, J., Petráková, Z., Zapletalíková, E. and Rózsa, Z., (2019). Entrepreneurial propensity index of university students. The case study from the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(1), 173-192.
• 18.Eckhardt, J.T, Shane, S.A., (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29, 333-349.
• 19.Entezari, Y., (2015). Building knowledge-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: case of Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1206-1215.
• 20.Fayolle A., Gailly B. and Lassas-Clerc N., (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30, 9.
• 21.Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., (2010). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach.
• 22.Fodha, M., Zaghdoud, O., (2010). Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 38, 1150-1156.
• 23.Grinevich, V., Huber, F., Karatas-Özkan, M. and Yavuz, C., (2019). Green entrepreneurship in the sharing economy: utilising a multiplicity of institutional logics. Small Business Economics, 52(6), 859-876.
• 24.Guo, Z., Aydin, A., Huang, Y. and Xue, M., (2021). Polarization characteristics of Rayleigh waves to improve seismic site effects analysis by HVSR method, Engineering Geology, 292, 106274.
• 25.Holcombe, R.G., (1998). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 1, 45-62.
• 26.Hurlin, C., (2004). Testing Granger Causality in Heterogeneous Panel Data Models with Fixed Coefficients. Document de recherche LEO, 5, 1-31.
• 27.Hussain, M. S., Musa, M. M. and Omran, A., (2019). The Impact of Regulatory Capital on Risk Taking By Pakistani Banks. Journal of Management, 2(2), 94-103.
• 28.Ikedinachi, O., (2018). Millennials empowerment: youth entrepreneurship for sustainable development. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. 15.
• 29.Iqbal, M., Abid, I., Hussain, S., Shahzad, N. and Waqas, M., (2020). The effects of regional climatic condition on the spread of COVID-19 at global scale. Science of The Total Environment, 739, 140101.
• 30.Jalil, A.; Mahmud, and Syed F. (2009). Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China, Energy Policy, 37, 5167-5172
• 31.Jiang, W., Chai, H., Shao, J. and Feng, T., (2018). Green entrepreneurial orientation for enhancing firm performance: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of. Clean. Production, 198, 1311-1323.
• 32.Kallmuenzer, A., Strobl, A., and Peters, M., (2018). Tweaking the entrepreneurial orientation-performance relationship in family firms: the effect of control mechanisms and family-related goals. Review of Managerial Science, 12(4), 855-883.
• 33.Khalifa A.H., Dhiaf M.M, (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: the UAE context, Polish journal of management studies, 14(1), 119-128
• 34.Khalifa A.H., Dhiaf M.M., (2019). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention: the UAE context. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16, 120-128
• 35.Khan, F., Yusoff, R. M., Khan, A., (2014). Demands, Burnout and Resources in Teaching a Conceptual Review. World Applied Sciences Journal, 30, 20-28.
• 36.Khoshnevis Y. S., Mohammad K., (2019). The Role of Renewable Energy on CO2 Pollutant Reduction. Environmental Research Journal, 13, 98-107.
• 37.Khursheed, A., Faisal, M, Maham, F. and Siddiqui, F., (2018). Entrepreneurial Intentions: Gem Based Empirical Analysis on the Northern Europe and Asian. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 6(2).
• 38.Ključnikov, A., Civelek, M., Čech, P. and Kloudová, J., (2019). Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs’ executives in the comparative perspective for Czechia and Turkey. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(4),773-795.
• 39.Ladyga E., (2015). Entrepreneurship as a basis of Self-management on the way to career, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 12(1), 87-95.
• 40.Liu, X., Li, X., Shi, H., Yan, Y. and Wen, X., (2021). Effect of economic growth on environmental quality: Evidence from tropical countries with different income levels. Science of The Total Environment, 774, 145-180
• 41.Lucky, E., Minai, M. S. and Rahman, H., (2013). Impact of Job Security on the Organizational Performance in a Multiethnic Environment. Research Journal of Business Management, 7, 64-70.
• 42.Mbarek, M., Benali, N. and Feki, R., (2014). Causality Relationship Between CO2 Emissions, GDP and Energy Intensity in Tunisia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 16(6), 1253-1262.
• 43.Meyer D.F., Meyer N., (2020), The relationships between entrepreneurial factors and economic growth and development: the case of selected European countries, Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(2), 268-284.
• 44.Mohmmed, A., Li, Z., Olushola A., A., Su, H., Deng, X. and Najmuddin, O., (2019). Driving factors of CO2 emissions and nexus with economic growth, development and human health in the top ten emitting countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling,148, 157-169.
• 45.Munoz, P., Cohen, B., (2018). Sustainable Entrepreneurship Research: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27, 300-322.
• 46.Naudé, W., (2009). Entrepreneurship, developing countries, and development economics: new approaches and insights. Small Business Economics, 34(1), 1-12.
• 47.Nguyen, T. T., Mia, L., Winata, L. and Chong, V. K., (2017). Effect of transformational leadership style and management control system on managerial performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 202-213.
• 48.Park, C., (2017). A study on effect of entrepreneurship on entrepreneurial intention, focusing on ICT majors. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11, 159-170.
• 49.Qureshi, M. I., Rasli, A. M., Awan, U., Ma, J., Ali, G., Alam, A. and Zaman, K., (2014). Environment and air pollution: health services bequeath to grotesque menace. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(5), 3467 - 3476
• 50.Rui, B., Karaöz, M. and Mendonça, J., (2014). The impact of human capital on the early success of necessity versus opportunity-based entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 831-847.
• 51.Sarkodie, S.A., Strezov, V., (2018). Empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 98-110.
• 52.Sautet, F., (2013). Local and Systemic Entrepreneurship: Solving the Puzzle of Entrepreneurship and Economic Development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37, 387-402.
• 53.Sinha, A., Bhattacharya, J., (2016). Confronting environmental quality and societal aspects: An environmental Kuznets curve analysis for Indian cities. International Journal of Green Economics, 10(1), 69
• 54.Tanwir, Mahrinasari M.S. and Bangsawan S., (2020). The impact of entrepreneurial and environmental factors on entrepreneurial intention of banking sector of Indonesia, Polish journal of management studies, 21(2), 412-424
• 55.Thompson, E.R., (2009). Individual entrepreneurial intent: construct, clarification and development of an international reliable metric. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 669-694.
• 56.Tilley, F., Young, C., (2009). Sustainability Entrepreneurs - Could they be the True Wealth Generators of the Future?. Greener Management International, 79-92.
• 57.Weizhou S, Hang L. and Yubing Q., (2018). Evaluation of the efficiency of the industrial environment in the provinces along the Belt and road and the study of influencing factors. Science Technology Prog Countermeas, 35(19), 155-160.
• 58.Wong, P. K, Ho, Y. and Autio, E., (2005). Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM Data. Small Business Economics, 24, 335-350.
• 59.Yoon, B.S., (2004). Determinants of entrepreneurial intentions: individual characteristics and environmental factors. Korean Academic and Industrial Society of Business Administration, 17, 89-110.
• 60.Zajkowski, R., Domańska, A., (2019). Differences in perception of regional pro-entrepreneurial policy: does obtaining support change a prospect?. Oeconomia Copernicana, 10(2), 359-384.
• 61.Zaman, K., Moemen, M.A.-E., (2017). Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions and economic development: evaluating alternative and plausible environmental hypothesis for sustainable growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Revue, 74, 1119-1130.
• 62.Zhang, S., Cueto, J., (2017). The Study of Bias in Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41, 419-454.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).