Relationships between managerial concepts in inland transport companies: a fuzzy-DEMATEL approach

• Autorzy: Charłampowicz Jȩdrzej , Mańkowski Cezary

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.20858/tp.2023.19.2.05

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The axiom that the efficacy of supply chain entities is inextricably tied to the adoption of an appropriate management system is widely acknowledged. At the heart of such a system are managerial concepts. There is abundant literature with a variety of theories, concepts, methods, and tools aimed at managerial enhancement. However, there is a dearth of specific recommendations for their application, an understanding of their interdependencies, or discerning which concepts are causative and which are resultant in nature. The heterogeneous functions of supply chain participants preclude a universal bestpractice array of these managerial concepts. By focusing on the pivotal role of inland transport firms within the supply chain, this study delineates an array of managerial concepts apt for such enterprises, employing the fuzzy-DEMATEL method. This study's contribution is encapsulated in the identification of the structural, relational, and hierarchical configuration of managerial concepts that bolster the decision-making framework of inland transport management.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

management; relations; transport

PL

zarządzanie; relacje; transport

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Transport Problems
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: T. 19, z. 2
• Strony: 57--66
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Charłampowicz Jȩdrzej

• Gdynia Maritime University, Morska 81/87, Gdynia, 81-225, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3140-4679

autor

Mańkowski Cezary

• University of Gdansk, A. Krajowej 119/121, Sopot, 81-824, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5496-0507

Bibliografia

• 1. Review of Maritime Transport 2022. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2022. Available at https://unctad.org/system/files/official- document/rmt2022_en.pdf.
• 2. Yin, M. & Kim, K. H. Quantity discount pricing for container transportation services by shipping lines. Computers and Industrial Engineering. 2012. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 313-322.
• 3. Charłampowicz, J. & Grzelakowski A.S. Maritime container terminal process maturity: a methodological approach and empirical evidence. European Research Studies Journal. 2022. Vol. XXV. No. 2. P. 636-644.
• 4. Andersen, S. & Aamnes, B. Risk analysis and risk management approaches applied to the petroleum industry and their applicability to IO concepts. Safety Science. 2019. Vol. 50. No. 10. P. 2010-2019.
• 5. Charłampowicz, J. Process management as an essential component of management in the maritime container terminals: empirical evidence using Fuzzy-DEMATEL approach. European Research Studies Journal. 2023. Vol. XXVI. No. 1. P. 222-229.
• 6. Durst, S. & Hinteregger, C. & Zieba, M. The linkage between knowledge risk management and organizational performance. Journal of Business Research. 2019. Vol. 105. P. 1-10.
• 7. Gaschi-Uciecha, A. Risk management in logistics projects: selected risk identification methods. European Research Studies Journal. 2021. Vol. XXIV. No. 4. P. 672-681.
• 8. Global Trade Update 2020. New York: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2020. Available at https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ditcmisc2020d2_en.pdf.
• 9. Łącka, I. & Suproń, B. The impact of COVID-19 on road freight transport evidence from Poland. European Research Studies Journal. 2021. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 319-333.
• 10. Szuster, M. & Lotko, M. Disruptions and Risk Management in Supply Chains Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. European Research Studies Journal. 2022. Vol. XXV. No. 2B. P. 225¬234.
• 11. Krajka, M. & Cyplik, P. & Adamczak, M. The impact of blockchain technology on operational and strategic risks in the supply chain - a systematic literature review. LogForum. 2022. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 365-377.
• 12. Parker, S. & Wu, Z. & Christofides, P.D. Cybersecurity in process control, operations, and supply chain. Computers and Chemical Engineering. 2023. Vol. 171. No. 108169.
• 13. Charlampowicz, J. & Mańkowsk,i C. Economic efficiency evaluation system of maritime container terminals. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. 2020. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 21-32.
• 14. Sutanto, J. & Kankanhalli, A. & Tay, J. & Raman, K.S. & Tan, B.C.Y. Change management in interorganizational systems for the public. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2009. Vol. 25. No. 3. P. 133-176.
• 15. Fürst, E. & Oberhofer, P. Greening road freight transport: Evidence from an empirical project in Austria. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2012. Vol. 33. P. 67-73.
• 16. Jasmi, M.F.A. & Fernando, Y. Drivers of maritime green supply chain management. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018. Vol. 43. P. 366-383.
• 17. Prajogo, D. & Toy, J. & Bhattacharya, A. & Oke, A. & Cheng, T.C.E. The relationships between information management, process management and operational performance: Internal and external contexts. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018. Vol. 199. P. 95-103.
• 18. Melo, A.C.S. & Netto, M.A.C. & Filho, V.J.M.F. & Fernandes, E. Knowledge management for improving business processes: An analysis of the transport management process for indivisible exceptional cargo. Pesquisa Operacional. 2010. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 305-330.
• 19. Shafiee, M. & Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F. & Saleh, H. Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach. Applied Mathematical Modelling. 2014. Vol. 38. No. 21-22. P. 5092-5112.
• 20. Mentes, A. & Akyildiz, H. & Yetkin, M. & Turkoglu, N. A FSA based fuzzy DEMATEL approach for risk assessment of cargo ships at coasts and open seas of Turkey. Safety Science. 2015. Vol. 79. P. 1-10.
• 21. Szmelter-Jarosz, A. DEMATEL Method in supplier evaluation and selection. Transport Economics and Logistics. 2019. Vol. 82. P. 129-142.
• 22. Ullah, F. & Samad, M.E.S. & Muhammad, J.T. & Changxin, C.W. & Muhammad, I. It’s all about perceptions: A DEMATEL approach to exploring user perceptions of real estate online platforms. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2021. Vol. 12. No. 4303.
• 23. Muhammad, M.N. & Cavus, N. Fuzzy DEMATEL method for identifying LMS evaluation criteria. Procedia Computer Science. 2017. Vol. 120. No. 748.
• 24. Si, S. & You, X. & Liu, H. & Zhang, P. DEMATEL technique : a systematic review of the state-of- the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2018. Vol. 2018. No. 3696457.
• 25. Merdivenci, F. & Erturgut, R. & Coskun, A.E. A software development application for sustainable airport performance analysis. LogForum. 2021. Vol. 17. No. 1. P. 131-145.