Going Green Supply Chain Management During COVID-19, Assessing the Best Supplier Selection Criteria: A Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Approach

• Autorzy: Khokhar Maryam , Zia Sayma , Islam Tahir , Sharma Anshuman , Iqbal Wasim , Irshad Muhammad

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.35784/pe.2022.1.04

Warianty tytułu

PL

W kierunku zrównoważonego zarządzania łańcuchami dostaw podczas pandemii COVID-19, ocena kryteriów wyboru najlepszych dostawców: analiza Potrójnej Linii Przewodniej (TBL)

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

In the past ten years, sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) attach great importance due to consumers, for-profit and profitless organizations, laws and regulations to the social and corporate responsibilities of consumers, so it has been recognized by practitioners and scholars. Supplier selection, environmental effect like a lockdown, and social cooperation and other SSCM programs can play an important part in realizing the triple bottom line (TBL) of economic, environmental, social assistances. In supply chain management (SCM), the sustainable supplier selection (SSS) and firm performance plays an important role. Traditionally, when evaluating SSS performance, organizations will consider a new framework to obtain the overall criteria/sub-criteria of the sustainability index by encapsulating sustainability. In this paper 12 sub-criteria for 3 pillars of sustainability as economic, environment and social performance is collected. Although there are many articles on SSS and evaluation, so far, research on sustainability issues is very limited. This study endeavours to propose a fuzzy multi-criteria approach to discuss SSCM planning, and studies the issue of determining a current model for SSS in the supply chain during COVID-19 based on the TBL method. For express the linguistic value of the subjective preference of experts we use triangular fuzzy numbers. By using fuzzy numbers to find standard weights for qualitative performance evaluation, then fuzzy TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) is proposed to find the ranking of SSS. However, COVID-19 has a negative role in SSS and in firm performance. The situation of lockdown due to COVID-19 has a negative effect on the performance of the organizations. An example is given of the proposed method.

PL

Zrównoważone zarządzanie łańcuchem dostaw (SSCM) staje się coraz bardziej istotne w kontekście konsumentów, organizacji nastawionych na zysk i organizacji bez zysku oraz przepisy ustawowe i wykonawcze do społecznej i korporacyjnej odpowiedzialności konsumentów. Zostało docenione przez praktyków i naukowców. Wybór dostawcy, efekt środowiskowy, taki jak blokada, oraz współpraca społeczna i inne programy SSCM mogą odgrywać ważną rolę w realizacji Potrójnej linii przewodniej (TBL) pomocy ekonomicznej, środowiskowej i społecznej. W zarządzaniu łańcuchem dostaw (SCM) zrównoważony wybór dostawców (SSS) i wydajność firmy odgrywają ważną rolę. Tradycyjnie, podczas oceny wyników SSS, organizacje będą rozważać nowe ramy w celu uzyskania ogólnych kryteriów/podkryteriów indeksu rozwoju, poprzez enkapsulację zrównoważonego rozwoju. W niniejszym artykule zebrano 12 kryteriów cząstkowych dla 3 filarów zrównoważonego rozwoju, takich jak wyniki gospodarcze, środowiskowe i społeczne. Chociaż istnieje wiele artykułów na temat SSS i ewaluacji, jak dotąd badania dotyczące kwestii zrównoważonego rozwoju są bardzo ograniczone. Niniejsze badanie ma na celu zaproponowanie rozmytego, wielokryterialnego podejścia do omówienia planowania SSCM i bada kwestię określenia obecnego modelu SSS w łańcuchu dostaw podczas COVID-19 w oparciu o metodę TBL. Aby wyrazić wartość językową subiektywnej preferencji ekspertów, używamy trójkątnych liczb rozmytych. Stosując liczby rozmyte do znalezienia standardowych wag do jakościowej oceny wydajności, proponuje się następnie rozmyte TOPSIS (Technika uporządkowania preferencji według podobieństwa do idealnego rozwiązania) w celu znalezienia rankingu SSS. Stwierdzono, że pandemia COVID-19 wywiera negatywny wpływ na SSS i wydajność firmy. Sytuacja zablokowania z powodu pandemii COVID-19 także ma negatywny wpływ na wyniki organizacji. Pomoc stanowi nowa metoda, analizowana w niniejszym artykule.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable supply chain management SSCM; triple bottom line TBL; sustainable supplier selection SSS; Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution TOPSIS; COVID-19

PL

zrównoważone zarządzanie łańcuchem dostaw; SSCM; potrójna linia przewodnia TBL; zrównoważony wybór dostawcy SSS; technika uporządkowania preferencji według podobieństwa do rozwiązania idealnego TOPSIS; COVID-19

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 17, nr 1
• Strony: 36--51
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 80 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Khokhar Maryam

• School of Economics and Management Yanshan University, China

autor

Zia Sayma

• Bahria Business School, Department of Business Studies, Bahria University Karachi Campus, Karachi, Pakistan

autor

Islam Tahir

• Dept. of Management, Faculty of Management, Prague University of Economics and Business, Czech Republic

autor

Sharma Anshuman

• Ajman University, Department of Marketing, College of Business Administration, United Arab Emirates

autor

Iqbal Wasim

• Shenzhen University, Department of Management Science, College of Management, , China

autor

Irshad Muhammad

• Yanshan University, College of Computer Science and Technology, China

Bibliografia

• 1. A˘ N.C., ENGINOGLU S., 2011, FP-soft set theory and its applications, Annales of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics, 2, http//www.kyungmoon.com.
• 2. AGERON B., GUNASEKARAN A., SPALANZANI A., 2012, Sustainable supply management: An empirical study, International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1): 168-182, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.04.007.
• 3. ALI Y., SAAD BIN T., SABIR M., MUHAMMAD N., SALMAN A.,ZEB K., 2020, Integration of green supply chain management practices in construction supply chain of CPEC, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(1): 185-200, DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-12-2018-0211.
• 4. ALKAHTANI M., OMAIR M., KHALID Q.S., HUSSAIN G., AHMAD I., PRUNCU C., 2021, A COVID-19 Supply Chain Management Strategy Based on Variable Production under Uncertain Environment Conditions, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4): 1662, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041662.
• 5. BALOCH Z.A., TAN Q., IQBAL N., MOHSIN M., ABBAS Q., IQBAL W., CHAUDHRY I.S., 2020, Trilemma assessment of energy intensity, efficiency, and environmental index: evidence from BRICS countries, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(27): 34337-34347, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09578-3.
• 6. BERNROIDER E.W.N., STIX V., 2006, Profile distance method-a multi-attribute decision making approach for information system investments, Decision Support Systems, 42(2): 988-998, DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2005.02.006
• 7. CHIEN F.S., KAMRAN H.W., ALBASHAR G., IQBAL W., 2021, Dynamic planning, conversion, and management strategy of different renewable Energy sources: A Sustainable Solution for Severe Energy Crises in Emerging Economies, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(11): 7745-7758, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.004.
• 8. CHIOU T.Y., CHAN H.K., LETTICE F., CHUNG S.H., 2011, The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 47(6): 822-836, DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2011.05.016.
• 9. CHOU S.Y., CHANG Y.H., SHEN C.Y., 2008, A fuzzy simple additive weighting system under group decision-making for facility location selection with objective/subjective attributes, European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1): 132-145, DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.006.
• 10. DE HAAN-HOEK J., LAMBRECHTS W., SEMEIJN J., CANIËLS M.C.J., 2020, Levers of Control for Supply Chain Sustainability: Control and Governance Mechanisms in a Cross-Boundary Setting. Sustainability, 12(8): 3189, DOI: 10.3390/su12083189.
• 11. DIERS-LAWSON A., COOPE K., TENCH R., 2020, Why can CSR seem like putting lipstick on a pig? Evaluating CSR authenticity by comparing practitioner and consumer perspectives, Journal of Global Responsibility (ahead-of-print), DOI: 10.1108/jgr-02-2020-0033.
• 12. DWEIRI F., KUMAR S., KHAN S. A., JAIN V., 2016, Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry, Expert Systems with Applications, 62: 273-283, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.06.030.
• 13. FU F.Y., ALHARTHI M., BHATTI Z., SUN L., RASUL F., HANIF I.,IQBAL W., 2021, The dynamic role of energy security, energy equity and environmental sustainability in the dilemma of emission reduction and economic growth, Journal of Environmental Management, 280: 111828, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111828.
• 14. GATI I., KRAUSZ M., OSIPOW S.H., 1996, A Taxonomy of Difficulties in Career Decision Making, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(4): 510-526, DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.43.4.510.
• 15. GOVINDAN K., KHODAVERDI R., JAFARIAN A., 2013, A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47: 345-354, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014.
• 16. GOVINDAN K., MINA H., ESMAEILI A., GHOLAMIZANJANI S.M., 2020, An Integrated Hybrid Approach for Circular supplier selection and Closed loop Supply Chain Network Design under Uncertainty, Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317.
• 17. HALIM P.K.A., MUSLIM M., MURDIFIN I., FAISAL P.M.A., HALIM P.K.P.A., MUARA A.A., HALIM J.M., 2019, Environmental Disclosure as Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Biggest Nickel Mining in Indonesia International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy Environmental Disclosure as Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Biggest Nickel Mining in Indonesia, International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9, DOI: 10.32479/ijeep.7048.
• 18. HASHEMI S.H., KARIMI A., TAVANA M., 2015, An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis, International Journal of Production Economics, 159: 178-191, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.09.027.
• 19. HASHEMI S.S., HAJIAGHA S.H.R., ZAVADSKAS E.K., MAHDIRAJI H.A., 2016, Multicriteria group decision making with ELECTRE III method based on intervalvalued intuitionistic fuzzy information, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(2): 1554-1564, DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2015.08.011.
• 20. HOU Y., IQBAL W., MUHAMMAD S.G., IQBAL N., AHMAD S.Y., FATIMA A., 2019, Measuring Energy Efficiency and Environmental Performance: A Case of South Asia, Processes, 7(6): 325, DOI: 10.3390/pr7060325.
• 21. HOU Y., KHOKHAR M., KHAN M., ISLAM T.,HAIDER I., 2021, Put Safety First: Exploring the Role of Health and Safety Practices in Improving the Performance of SMEs, Sage Open, 11(3), DOI: 10.1177/21582440211032173.
• 22. HUNG S.J., 2011, Activity-based divergent supply chain planning for competitive advantage in the risky global environment: A DEMATEL-ANP fuzzy goal programming approach, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8): 9053-9062, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.024.
• 23. IKRAM M., ZHOU P., SHAH S A A., LIU G.Q., 2019, Do environmental management systems help improve corporate sustainable development? Evidence from manufacturing companies in Pakistan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226: 628-641, DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2019.03.265.
• 24. IQBAL M.W., KANG Y., JEON H.W., 2020, Zero waste strategy for green supply chain management with minimization of energy consumption, Journal of Cleaner Production, 245: 118827, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118827.
• 25. IQBAL S., BILAL A.R., NURUNNABI M., IQBAL W., ALFAKHRI Y., IQBAL N., 2021, It is time to control the worst: testing COVID-19 outbreak, energy consumption and CO2 emission, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(15): 19008- 19020, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-11462-z.
• 26. IQBAL W., ALTALBE A., FATIMA A., ALI A., HOU Y., 2019, A DEA Approach for Assessing the Energy, Environmental and Economic Performance of Top 20 Industrial Countries, Processes, 7(12): 902, DOI: 10.3390/pr7120902.
• 27. IQBAL W., FATIMA A., YUMEI H., ABBAS Q., IRAM R., 2020, Oil supply risk and affecting parameters associated with oil supplementation and disruption, Journal of Cleaner Production, 255: 120187, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120187.
• 28. IQBAL W., YUMEI H., ABBAS Q., HAFEEZ M., MOHSIN M., FATIMA A., SOHAIL N., 2019, Assessment of Wind Energy Potential for the Production of Renewable Hydrogen in Sindh Province of Pakistan. Processes, 7(4): 196, DOI: 10.3390/pr7040196.
• 29. IRSHAD L., ARSHAD S.M., KHOKHAR M., 2019, A Novel Localization Technique Using Luminous Flux, Applied Sciences, 9(23): 5027, DOI: 10.3390/app9235027.
• 30. KAHRAMAN C., YASIN A.N., ÇEVIK S., GÜLBAY M., AYÇA E.S., 2007, Hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS model for selection among logistics information technologies, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 20(2): 143-168, DOI: 10.1108/17410390710725742.
• 31. KALBAR P.P., KARMAKAR S., ASOLEKAR S.R., 2012, Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 113: 158-169, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.025.
• 32. KELLEY K.J., HEMPHILL T.A., THAMS Y., 2019, Corporate social responsibility, country reputation and corporate reputation: A perspective on the creation of shared value in emerging markets, Multinational Business Review, 27(2): 178-197, DOI: 10.1108/MBR-07-2017-0047.
• 33. KHOKHAR M., 2019, Occupational Health Safety Implemntation Framework for Pakistani Construction Industry, 3C Tecnología. Glosas de innovación aplicadas a la pyme, 253-285.
• 34. KHOKHAR M., HOU Y., RAFIQUE M.A., IQBAL W., 2020, Evaluating the Social Sustainability Criteria of Supply Chain Management in Manufacturing Industries: A Role of BWM in MCDM, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 15(2)2020: 185-194.
• 35. KHOKHAR M., IQBAL W., HOU Y., ABBAS M., FATIMA A., 2020, Assessing Supply Chain Performance from the Perspective of Pakistan’s Manufacturing Industry Through Social Sustainability, Processes, 8(9): 1064, DOI: 10.3390/pr8091064.
• 36. LI G.D., YAMAGUCHI D., NAGAI M., 2007, A greybased decision-making approach to the supplier selection problem, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(3-4): 573-581, DOI: j.mcm.2006.11.021.
• 37. LI S., QIAO J., CUI H., WANG S., 2020, Realizing the Environmental Benefits of Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Roles of Green Supply Chain Integration and Relational Capability, Sustainability, 12(7): 2907, DOI: 10.3390/su12072907.
• 38. LIU Y., ECKERT C., YANNOU-LE BRIS G., PETIT G., 2019, A fuzzy decision tool to evaluate the sustainable performance of suppliers in an agrifood value chain, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 127: 196-212, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.022.
• 39. MANI V., GUNASEKARAN A., DELGADO C., 2018, International Journal of Production Economics Supply chain social sustainability : Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 198: 149-164, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.032.
• 40. MANI V., JABBOUR C.J.C., MANI K.T.N., 2020, Supply chain social sustainability in small and medium manufacturing enterprises and firms’ performance: Empirical evidence from an emerging Asian economy, International Journal of Production Economics, 227: 107656, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107656.
• 41. MEMARI A., DARGI A., AKBARI J.M.R., AHMAD R., ABDUL R., 2019, Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50: 9-24, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.002.
• 42. MORSING M., SPENCE L.J., 2019, Corporate social responsibility (CSR) communication and small and medium sized enterprises: The governmentality dilemma of explicit and implicit CSR communication. Human Relations, 72(12): 1920- 1947, DOI: 10.1177/0018726718804306.
• 43. MUHAMMAD N., FANG Z., SHAH S.A.A., AKBAR M.A., ALSANAD A., GUMAEI A., SOLANGI Y.A., 2020, A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Approach for Evaluation and Selection of Sustainable Suppliers in the Avionics Industry of Pakistan, Sustainability, 12(11): 4744, DOI: 10.3390/su12114744.
• 44. NICOLETTI JUNIOR A., DE OLIVEIRA M.C., HELLENO A.L., 2018, Sustainability evaluation model for manufacturing systems based on the correlation between triple bottom line dimensions and balanced scorecard perspectives, Journal of Cleaner Production, 190: 84-93, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.136.
• 45. NIKOLAOU I. E., EVANGELINOS K. I., ALLAN S., 2013, A reverse logistics social responsibility evaluation framework based on the triple bottom line approach, Journal of Cleaner Production, 56: 173-184, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.009.
• 46. OLIVEIRA, F.N. DE, LEIRAS A., CERYNO P., 2019, Environmental risk management in supply chains: A taxonomy, a framework and future research avenues, Journal of Cleaner Production, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.032.
• 47. ÖNÜT S., KARA S.S.,IŞIK E., 2009, Long term supplier selection using a combined fuzzy MCDM approach: A case study for a telecommunication company, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2 PART 2): 3887-3895, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.045.
• 48. OPRICOVIC S., TZENG G.H., 2004, Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2): 445-455, DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1.
• 49. OSEI-KOJO A., ANDREWS N., 2020, A developmental paradox? The 'dark forces' against corporate social responsibility in Ghana’s extractive industry, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(2): 1051-1071, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-018-0233-9.
• 50. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, 2014, Pakistan Employment Trends, 1-32.
• 51. PAPACHARALAMPOUS N., PAPADIMITRIOU D., ANAGNOSTOPOULOS C., 2019, 'Walking the talk' in times of recession: the case of corporate social responsibility in Greece, Journal of Global Responsibility, 10(2): 102-118, DOI: 10.1108/jgr-11-2018-0058.
• 52. PARVEEN C.M., KUMAR A.R.P., NARASIMHA R.T.V.V. L., 2011, Integration of lean and green supply chain - Impact on manufacturing firms in improving environmental efficiencies, Proceedings of the International Conference on Green Technology and Environmental Conservation, GTEC-2011: 143- 147, DOI: 10.1109/GTEC.2011.6167659.
• 53. RASHIDI K., NOORIZADEH A., KANNAN D., CULLINANE K., 2020, Applying the triple bottom line in sustainable supplier selection: A meta-review of the state-of-the-art, Journal of Cleaner Production, 269: 122001, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122001.
• 54. REBITZER G., EKVALL T., FRISCHKNECHT R., HUNKELER D., NORRIS G., RYDBERG T., PENNINGTON D.W., 2004, Life cycle assessment Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications, Environment International, DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.11.005.
• 55. ROEHRICH J.K., HOEJMOSE S.U., OVERLAND V., 2017, Driving green supply chain management performance through supplier selection and value internalisation: A self-determination theory perspective, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 37(4): 489-509, DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-09-2015-0566.
• 56. ROY V., SCHOENHERR T., CHARAN P., 2020, Toward an organizational understanding of the transformation needed for sustainable supply chain management: The concepts of force-field and differential efforts, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(3): 100612, DOI: j.pursup.2020.100612.
• 57. SARKIS J., 2020, Supply chain sustainability: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 41(1): 63-73, DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-08-2020-0568.
• 58. SARKIS J., HELMS M.M., HERVANI A.A., 2010, Reverse logistics and social sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(6): 337-354, DOI: 10.1002/csr.220.
• 59. SHAFIQ A., AHMED M.U., MAHMOODI F., 2020, Impact of supply chain analytics and customer pressure for ethical conduct on socially responsible practices and performance: An exploratory study, International Journal of Production Economics, 225: 107571, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107571.
• 60. SHAHZAD F., DU J., KHAN I., SHAHBAZ M., MURAD M., 2020, Untangling the influence of organizational compatibility on green supply chain management efforts to boost organizational performance through information technology capabilities, Journal of Cleaner Production, 266: 122029, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122029.
• 61. SUHI S.A., ENAYET R., HAQUE T., ALI S.M., MOKTADIR M.A., PAUL S.K., 2019, Environmental sustainability assessment in supply chain: An emerging economy context, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 79: 106306, DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106306.
• 62. TEH L.C.L., CADDELL R., ALLISON E.H., FINKBEINER E. M., KITTINGER J.N., NAKAMURA K., OTA Y., 2019, The role of human rights in implementing socially responsible seafood, PLOS ONE, 14(1): e0210241, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210241.
• 63. TESTA F., CORSINI F., GUSMEROTTI N.M., IRALDO F., 2020, Predictors of organizational citizenship behavior in relation to environmental and health & safety issues, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(13): 1705-1738, DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1423099.
• 64. UEMURA R.A.Y., CANCIGLIERI JUNIOR O., ESTORILIO C.C. A., RUDEK M., 2020, Integrated product development process and green supply chain management: Contributions, limitations and applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249: 119429, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119429.
• 65. VELEVA V., HART M., GREINER T., CRUMBLEY C., 2001, Indicators of sustainable production, Journal of Cleaner Production, 9(5): 447-452, DOI: 10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00004-X.
• 66. WANG J., LIN Y.I., 2003, A fuzzy multicriteria group decision making approach to select configuration items for software development, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134(3): 343-363, DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00283-X.
• 67. YAZDANI M., KAHRAMAN C., ZARATE P., ONAR S.C., 2019, A fuzzy multi attribute decision framework with integration of QFD and grey relational analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 115: 474-485, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2018.08.017.
• 68. YEH W.C., CHUANG M.C., 2011, Using multiobjective genetic algorithm for partner selection in green supply chain problems, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4): 4244-4253, DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.091.
• 69. YOU S.-Y., ZHANG L.-J., XU X.-G., LIU H.-C., 2020, A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision Making and Multi-Objective Programming Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection and Order Allocation, Symmetry, 12(2): 302, DOI: 10.3390/sym12020302.
• 70. YU W., CHAVEZ R., FENG M., WONG C.Y., FYNES B., 2020, Green human resource management and environmental cooperation: An ability-motivationopportunity and contingency perspective, International Journal of Production Economics, 219: 224-235, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.06.013.
• 71. YUE Z., 2011, A method for group decision-making based on determining weights of decision makers using TOPSIS, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(4): 1926-1936, DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.001.
• 72. YUMEI H., IQBAL W., NURUNNABI M., ABBAS M., JINGDE W., CHAUDHRY I.S., 2021, Nexus between corporate social responsibility and firm’s perceived performance: evidence from SME sector of developing economies, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(2): 2132-2145, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10415-w.
• 73. YUMEI H.J.W.Q.G.Y.W.M.K.J.L., 2020, Considering the Patient Satisfaction and Staffing skill the Optimization of Surgical Scheduling by Particle Swarm and Genetic Algorithm, Solid State Technology: 2096-2111, http://www.solidstatetechno logy.us/index.php/JSST/article/view/4809.
• 74. ZAFAR A., ZAFAR M., SARWAR A., RAZA H., KHAN M.T., Zafar A., Zafar M., Sarwar A., Raza H., Khan M.T. (2019) A Fuzzy AHP Method for Green Supplier Selection and Evaluation, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management, eds. Xu J., Cooke F., Gen M., Ahmed S., Springer, Cham, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93351-1_105.
• 75. ZAHID M., RAHMAN H.U., ALI W., KHAN M., ALHARTHI M., IMRAN QURESHI M., JAN A., 2020, Boardroom gender diversity: Implications for corporate sustainability disclosures in Malaysia, Journal of Cleaner Production, 244: 118683, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118683.
• 76. ZAID A.A., JAARON A.A.M., TALIB B.A., 2018, The impact of green human resource management and green supply chain management practices on sustainable performance: An empirical study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 204: 965-979, DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.09.062.
• 77. ZAILANI S., JEYARAMAN K., VENGADASAN G., PREMKUMAR R., 2012, Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: A survey, International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1):, 330-340, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.008.
• 78. ZHANG Q., OO B.L., LIM B.T.H., 2019, Drivers, motivations, and barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices by construction enterprises: A review, Journal of Cleaner Production, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.050.
• 79. ZHANG Q., PAN J., JIANG Y., FENG T., 2020, The impact of green supplier integration on firm performance: The mediating role of social capital accumulation, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(2): 100579, DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100579.
• 80. ZHANG Q., CAO M., ZHANG F., LIU J., LI X., 2020, Effects of corporate social responsibility on customer satisfaction and organizational attractiveness: A signaling perspective, Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(1): 20-34, DOI: 10.1111/beer.12243.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).