PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Managing corporate sustainability by revitalizing Balinese cultural identity

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Zarządzanie zrównoważoną korporacją przez rewitalizację balijskiej tożsamości kulturalnej
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
In running the sustainability of a business, Balinese Indonesia depends on a philosophy of Tri Hita Karana (three causes of well-being) guiding people to live harmoniously with others as well as their surroundings. This principle makes Bali become the most competitive and distinctive tourism business compared to other parts of Indonesia. However, the eroding market position and massive expansion of international hotel chains force the indigenous businessman to look insight from outside to maintain the business sustainability. The main objective of this study is to examine a broadercomprehensive view ofhow the company identifiessustainability impetus without neglecting the right practices and values prevalent among Balinese Indonesia.Experimental data have been acquired from native ethnic specialists and organization influential executives. The results indicate that from an internal perspective, the responsive leaderis the most determinant force.In contrast, from an external perspective, the most significant factor is the company’sdistinction. The study combines both company’s sustainability impetus from inside and outside organization and how the cultural values affect these drivers. Since cultural identity has strategic importance in Bali tourism, it is necessary to revitalize TriHita Karanaculture’s application related to strategy formulation and implementation in the hotel industry to gain a competitive advantage as well as organizational performance.
PL
Zrównoważony rozwój firm, Balijska Indonezja opiera się na filozofii Tri Hita Karana (trzy przyczyny dobrego samopoczucia), która prowadzi ludzi do harmonijnego życia z innymi, a także z otoczeniem. Ta zasada sprawia, że Bali staje się najbardziej konkurencyjnym i wyróżniającym się biznesem turystycznym w porównaniu do innych części Indonezji. Jednak niszcząca pozycja rynkowa i masowa ekspansja międzynarodowych sieci hoteli zmuszają rdzennych biznesmenów do szukania wglądu z zewnątrz w celu utrzymania stabilności biznesu. Głównym celem tego badania jest zbadanie szerszego, kompleksowego poglądu na to, w jaki sposób firma identyfikuje impuls zrównoważonego rozwoju, nie zaniedbując właściwych praktyk i wartości panujących wśród balijskiej Indonezji. Dane badawcze zostały uzyskane od rodzimych specjalistów etnicznych i wpływowych organizacji. Wyniki wskazują, że z perspektywy wewnętrznej reagujący lider jest najbardziej determinującą siłą, natomiast z perspektywy zewnętrznej najbardziej znaczącym czynnikiem jest rozróżnienie firmy. Badanie łączy w sobie impuls firmy zarówno w organizacji, jak i poza nią, oraz wpływ wartości kulturowych na te czynniki. Ponieważ tożsamość kulturowa ma strategiczne znaczenie w turystyce na Bali, konieczna jest rewitalizacja aplikacji Tri Hita Karanaculture związanej z formułowaniem i wdrażaniem strategii w branży hotelarskiej, aby uzyskać przewagę konkurencyjną, a także wyniki organizacyjne.
Rocznik
Strony
382--393
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 42 poz., tab.
Twórcy
  • Udayana University, Faculty of Economics and Business, Bali, Indonesia
autor
  • Udayana University, Faculty of Economics and Business, Bali, Indonesia
autor
  • Lambung Mangkurat University, Department of Social Science, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Lambung Mangkurat University, Department of Social Science, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
Bibliografia
  • 1. Álvarez Jaramillo, J., Zartha Sossa, J. W., & Orozco Mendoza, G. L. (2019). Barriers to sustainability for small and medium enterprises in the framework of sustainable development - Literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 512-524.
  • 2. Adityanandana, M., & Gerber, J. F. (2019). Post-growth in the tropics? Contestations over Tri Hita Karana and a tourism megaproject in Bali. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(12), 1839-1856.
  • 3. Akhtar, P. (2019). Drivers of Green Supply Chain Initiatives and their Impact on Economic Performance of Firms: Evidence from Pakistan’s Manufacturing Sector. Journal of Competitiveness, 11(2), 5-18.
  • 4. Arsawan, I. W. E., Rajiani, I., & Suryantini, S. P. (2018). Investigating knowledge transfer mechanism in five star hotels. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18, 22-32.
  • 5. Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020). Understanding the Conceptual Evolutionary Path and Theoretical Underpinnings of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(3), 760.
  • 6. Bartok, O. (2018). The Use of CSR in E-Commerce as a Way to Compete. Journal of Competitiveness, 10(4), 5-20.
  • 7. Broccardo, L., Truant, E., & Zicari, A. (2019). Internal corporate sustainability drivers: What evidence from family firms? A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 1-18.
  • 8. Budhiasa, I. G. S., & Riana, I. G. (2020). Managing Local Community Participation to Foster Sustainable Tourism Development, the Case of Bali Destination, Indonesia. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 15(1), 291-298.
  • 9. Cassano, R. (2020). Corporate Global Responsibility and Reputation Risk Management. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 129-142.
  • 10. Civelek, M., Ključnikov, A., Krajčík, V., Žufan, J. (2019). The Importance of Discount Rate and Trustfulness of A Local Currency for the Development of Local Tourism. Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(19), 77-92.
  • 11. Chong, K. L. (2020). The side effects of mass tourism: the voices of Bali islanders. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(2), 157-169.
  • 12. Das, M., Rangarajan, K., & Dutta, G. (2020). Corporate sustainability in SMEs: an Asian perspective. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14, 109-138.
  • 13. Demirel, P., &Kesidou, E. (2019). Sustainability-oriented capabilities for eco-innovation: Meeting the regulatory, technology, and market demands. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 847-857.
  • 14. Garry, T., & Harwood, T. (2017). Exploring Consumer Associations Between Corporate Reputation, Corporate Sustainability, and Product Attributes Within Utilitarian Market Contexts. International Studies of Management & Organization, 47(3), 258-275.
  • 15. Hamed, H., Apostolakis, A., Jaffry, S., Kourgiantakis, M. (2019). An Analysis of Cultural Entrepreneurship in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 3(2), 95-110. doi:10.30819/cmse.3-2.06
  • 16. Hofstede, G. (2007). A European in Asia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(1), 16-21.
  • 17. Hofenk, D., van Birgelen, M., Bloemer, J., & Semeijn, J. (2019). How and when retailers’ sustainability efforts translate into positive consumer responses: the interplay between personal and social factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 473-492.
  • 18. Jovchelovitch, S. (2019). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. Routledge.
  • 19. Kerr, T., &Wardana, A. (2019). Utopian resort living: islands of reclamation and environmental resistance in Bali and Western Australia. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 1-14.
  • 20. Lozano, R. (2019). Analysing the use of tools, initiatives, and approaches to promote sustainability in corporations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27, 982-998.
  • 21. Manning, B., Braam, G., & Reimsbach, D. (2019). Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct - Effects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 351-366.
  • 22. Obal, M., Morgan, T., & Joseph, G. (2020). Integrating sustainability into new product development: The role of organizational leadership and culture. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 30(1), 43-57.
  • 23. Plaček, M., Půček, M., Ochrana, F., Křápek, M., & Matyáš, O. H. (2019). Risk Management for Cultural Organizations.The Example of Agricultural Museums in the Czech Republic. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 3(2), 111-122. doi:10.30819/cmse.3-2.07
  • 24. Rahmawati, P. I., Jiang, M., &DeLacy, T. (2019). Framework for stakeholder collaboration in harnessing corporate social responsibility implementation in tourist destination to build community adaptive capacity to climate change. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1261-1271.
  • 25. Rajiani, I., & Kot, S. (2018). The prospective consumers of the Indonesian green aviation initiative for sustainable development in air transportation. Sustainability, 10(6), 1772.
  • 26. Rajiani, I., & Pypłacz, P. (2018). National culture as modality in managing the carbon economy in Southeast Asia. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18, 296-310.
  • 27. Ranasinghe, R. (2019). Antecedents of Job Performance of Tourism Graduates: Evidence from State University-Graduated Employees in Sri Lanka. Journal of Tourism and Services, 10(18), 16-34.
  • 28. Reicher, Z. R. (2019). Opportunities for small and medium sized enterprises in the field of corporate social responsibility. Ekonomicko-manazerske Spektrum, 13(1), 26-37.
  • 29. Riana, I. G., Rihayana, I. G., Ratih, K., & Dewi, I. A. (2019). Creating innovation through knowledge sharing and absorptive capacity. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19, 338-352.
  • 30. Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., & McNaughton, N. C. & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and researchers, London: SAGE Publications.
  • 31. Sampson, H., & Johannessen, I. A. (2020). Turning on the tap: the benefits of using ‘real-life’ vignettes in qualitative research interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(1), 56-72.
  • 32. Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2018). Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: Differentiating ethical motivations. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 241-259.
  • 33. Schönborn, G., Berlin, C., Pinzone, M., Hanisch, C., Georgoulias, K., & Lanz, M. (2019). Why social sustainability counts: The impact of corporate social sustainability culture on financial success. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 1-10.
  • 34. Soderstrom, S. B., & Weber, K. (2020). Organizational structure from interaction: Evidence from corporate sustainability efforts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(1), 226-271.
  • 35. Sukawati, T. G. R., & Astawa, I. P. (2017). Improving performance by harmonious culture approach in internal marketing. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16, 226-223.
  • 36. Thakur, V., & Mangla, S. K. (2019). Change management for sustainability: Evaluating the role of human, operational and technological factors in leading Indian firms in home appliances sector. Journal of cleaner production, 213, 847-862.
  • 37. Tian, X., & Christensen, T. (2020). Myths, instrumental reality, or cultural change? Modern service-oriented government reforms in China. International Public Management Journal, 1-18.
  • 38. van den Berg, J., Zijp, M. C., Vermeulen, W. J., & Witjes, S. (2019). Identifying change agent types and its implications for corporate sustainability integration based on worldviews and contextual factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 1125-1138.
  • 39. Wróblewski, Ł., Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z. (2018). Sustainable Consumer Behaviour in the Market of Cultural Services in Central European Countries: The Example of Poland. Sustainability, 10, 3856.
  • 40. Wróblewski, Ł., Kasperek, A. (2019). Euroregion as an Entity Stimulating the Sustainable Development of the Cross-Border Market for Cultural Services in a City Divided by a Border. Sustainability, 11, 2232.
  • 41. Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Muneer, S., Butt, B. Z., Isah-Chikaji, A., & Memon, M. A. (2019). Nexus between government initiatives, integrated strategies, internal factors and corporate sustainability practices in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118329.
  • 42. Zhulega, I. A., Gagulina, N. L., Samoylov, A. V., & Novikov, A. V. (2019). Problems of corporate economics and sustainable development in the context of the sanction world order: Living standards and live quality, Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 13(1), 83-95.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-581cc7fa-f950-4456-bc0a-4b70d7d39b56
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.