PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Home Range and Nest Arrangement of the Siberian Flying Squirrel Pteromys volans in an Urban Edge, Northern Japan

Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Forest fragmentation by urbanizing and developing roads and fields is common in Japan; thus, the Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) population may decrease in the future. This study examined the effects of urbanization on P. volans by clarifying their home ranges and nest arrangements. Ten flying squirrels were captured and radio-telemetrically tracked from 2005 to 2007 in Obihiro City in eastern Hokkaido (Northern Japan). Males had significantly larger 100% MCP (minimum convex polygon) areas (mean ± SD; 6.5 ± 5.1 ha) and 95% MCP areas (3.6 ± 1.3 ha) than females (1.8 ± 1.0 ha and 1.0 ± 0.5 ha, respectively). Also the core area of males (1.2 ± 1.1 ha) was larger than females (0.2 ± 0.2 ha), though this difference was not significant. Males and females used more nests located inside than outside of their core areas. Distance from the core area edge to the nest located outside the core was longer for males (78.6 ± 139.9 m) than for females (39.7 ± 39.9 m), but this difference was not significant. Siberian flying squirrels in urban forests likely show similar ecology with flying squirrels in consecutive forests; however, they might change their behavior to share resources with others because urban forests restrict nest and food resources.
Rocznik
Strony
159--167
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 48 poz., fot., rys., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada 2-11, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
  • Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada 2-11, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan
Bibliografia
  • 1. Aldridge H. D. J. N., Brigham R. M. 1988 – Load carrying and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat: A test of the 5% “rule” of radio-telemetry – J. Mammal. 69: 379-382.
  • 2. Alvey A. A. 2006 – Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest – Urban For Urban Gree. 5: 195-201.
  • 3. Ando M., Shiraishi S. 1993 – Gliding flight in the Japanese giant flying squirrel Petaurista leucogenys – J. Mammal. Soc. Jpn. 18: 19-32.
  • 4. Asari Y., Yanagawa H. 2006 – [Movement of the Siberian flying squirrel in fragmented woodlots] – Proc. symp. on wildlife and traffic 5: 57-64 (in Japanese).
  • 5. Asari Y., Yanagawa H. 2008 – [Daily nest site use by the Siberian flying squirrel Pteromys volans orii in fragmented small woods] – Wildlife Conserv. Jpn. 11: 7-10. (in Japanese, English summary).
  • 6. Asari Y., Yanagawa H., Oshida T. 2007 – Gliding ability of the Siberian flying squirrel Pteromys volans orii – Mamm. Study, 32: 151-154.
  • 7. Asari Y., Yanagawa H. 2016 – A preliminary study of communal nesting of Siberian flying squirrels Pteromys volans in Japan – Mamm. Study, 41: 97-100.
  • 8. Bendel P. R., Gates J. E. 1987 – Home range and microhabitat partitioning of the southern flying squirrel (Glaucomys volans) – J. Mammal. 68: 243-255.
  • 9. Börger L., Dalziel B. D., Fryxell M. 2008 – Are there general mechanisms of animal home range behaviour? A review and prospects for future research – Ecol. Lett. 11: 637-650.
  • 10. Brearley G., Bradley A., Bell S., McAlpine C. 2010 – Influence of contrasting urban edges on the abundance of arboreal mammals: A study of squirrel gliders (Petaurus norfolcensis) in southeast Queensland, Australia – Biol. Conserv. 143: 69-71.
  • 11. Burt W. H. 1943 – Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals – J. Mammal. 24: 346-352.
  • 12. Cornelis J., Hermy M. 2004 – Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders – Landscape Urban Plan. 69: 385-401.
  • 13. Di Pierro E., Molinari A., Tosi G., Wauters L. A. 2008 – Exclusive core areas and in-trasexual territoriality in Eurasian red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) revealed by incremental cluster polygon analysis – Ecol. Res. 23: 529-542.
  • 14. Dobson M., Goldingay R. L., Sharpe D. J. 2005 – Feeding behaviour of the squirrel glider in remnant habitat in Brisbane – Aust. Mammal. 27: 27-35.
  • 15. Hanski I. K. 1998 – Home range and habitat use in the declining flying squirrel, Pteromys volans, in managed forests – Wildlife Biol. 4: 33-46.
  • 16. Hanski I. K., Stevens P. C., Ihalempiä P., Selonen V. 2000 – Home-range size, movements, and nest-site use in the Siberian flying squirrel, Pteromys volans – J. Mammal. 81: 798-809.
  • 17. Holloway G. L., Malcolm J. R. 2007 – Northern and southern flying squirrel use of space within home ranges in central Ontario – For. Ecol. Manage. 242: 747-755.
  • 18. Hoset K. S., Villers A., Wistbacka R., Selonen V. 2017 – Pulsed food resources, but not forest cover, determine lifetime reproductive success in a forest-dwelling rodent – J. Anim. Ecol. 86: 1235-1245.
  • 19. Iida S., Nakashizuka T. 1995 – Forest fragmentation and its effect on species diversity in sub-urban coppice forests in Japan – For. Ecol. Manage. 73: 197-210.
  • 20. Keefe E. M., Giuliano W. M. 2004 – Effects of forest structure on the distribution of southern flying squirrels (Glaucomys volans) in urban parks – Urban Ecosyst. 7: 55-64.
  • 21. Koprowski J. L., King S. R. B., Merrick M. J. 2008 – Expanded home ranges in a peripheral population: space use by endangered Mt. Graham red squirrels – Endanger Species Res. 4: 227-232.
  • 22. Lampia S., Kvist L., Wistbacka R., Orell M. 2009 – Genetic diversity and population differentiation in the endangered Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) in a fragmented landscape – Eur. J. Wildlife Res. 55: 397-406.
  • 23. Mäkeläinen S., Schrader M., Hanski I. K. 2015 – Factors explaining the occurrence of the Siberian flying squirrel in urban forest landscape – Urban Ecosyst. 18: 223-238.
  • 24. Mäkeläinen S., de Knegt H. J., Ovaskainen O., Hanski I. K. 2016 – Home-range use patterns and movements of the Siberian flying squirrel in urban forests: Effects of habitat composition and connectivity – Movement Ecol. 4: 1-14.
  • 25. Malanson G. P., Armstrong M. P. 1996 – Dispersal probability and forest diversity in a fragmented landscape – Ecol. Model. 87: 91-102.
  • 26. Mccleery R. A., Lopez R. R., Silvy N. J., Kahlick S. N. 2007 – Habitat use of fox squirrels in an urban environment – J. Wildl. Manage. 71: 1149-1157.
  • 27. McPherson E. G., Nowak D., Heisler G., Grimmond S., Souch C., Grant R., Rown-tree R. 1997 – Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project – Urban Ecosyst. 1: 49-61.
  • 28. Menzel J. M., Ford W. M., Edwards J. W., Terry T. M. 2006 – Home range and habitat use of the vulnerable Virginia northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus fuscus in the central Appalachian Mountains, USA – Oryx 40: 204-210.
  • 29. Miyashita T., Shinkai A., Chida T. 1998 – The effects of forest fragmentation on web spider communities in urban areas – Biol. Conserv. 86: 357-364.
  • 30. Nelson J. 1995 – Determinants of male spacing behavior in microtines: an experimental manipulation of female spatial distribution and density – Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37: 217-223.
  • 31. Parker T. S., Nilon C. H. 2008 – Gray squirrel density, habitat suitability, and behavior in urban parks – Urban Ecosyst. 11: 243-255.
  • 32. Pasch B., Koprowski J. L. 2006 – Sex differences in space of Chiricahua fox squirrels – J. Mammal. 87: 380-386.
  • 33. Selonen V., Fey K., Hämäläinen S. 2018 – Increased differentiation between individuals, but no genetic isolation from adjacent rural individuals in an urban red squirrel population – Urban Ecosyst. 21: 1067-1074.
  • 34. Selonen V., Hanski I. K., Stevens P. C. 2001 – Space use of the Siberian flying squirrel Pteromys volans in fragmented forest landscapes – Ecography, 24: 588-600.
  • 35. Selonen V., Painter J. N., Rantala S., Hanski I. K. 2013 – Mating system and reproductive success in the Siberian flying squirrel – J. Mammal. 94: 1266-1273.
  • 36. Selonen V., Wistbacka R. 2017 – Role of breeding and natal movements in lifetime dispersal of a forest-dwelling rodent – Ecol. Evol. 7: 2204-2213.
  • 37. Schradin C., Schmohl G., Rödel H. G., Schoepf I., Treffler S. M., Brenner J., Bleeker M., König B., Pillay N. 2010 – Female home range size is regulated by resource distribution and intraspecific competition: a long-term field study – Anim. Behav. 79: 195-203.
  • 38. Sheperd B. F., Swihart R. K. 1995 – Spatial dynamics of fox squirrels (Sciurus niger) in fragmented landscapes – Can. J. Zool. 73: 2098-2105.
  • 39. Sharpe D. J., Goldingay R. L. 2007 – Home range of the Australian squirrel glider, Petaurus norfolcensis (Diprotodontia) – J. Mammal. 88: 1515-1522.
  • 40. Stockley P., Bro-Jørgensen J. 2011 – Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals – Biol. Rev. 86: 341-366.
  • 41. Swihart R. K., Slade N. A. 1985 – Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home range size – J. Wildl. Manage. 49: 1019-1025.
  • 42. Taulman J. F., Smith K. G. 2004 – Home range and habitat selection of southern flying squirrels in fragmented forests – Mamm. Biol. 69: 11-27.
  • 43. Thorington R. W. Jr., Koprowski J. L., Steele M. A., Whatton J. F. 2012 – Squirrels of the World – John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 459 pp.
  • 44. Uchida K., Suzuki K., Shimamoto T., Yanagawa H., Koizumi I. 2015 – Seasonal variation of flight initiation distance in Eurasian red squirrels in urban versus rural habitat – J. Zool. 298: 225-231.
  • 45. Vernes K. 2001 – Gliding performance of the northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus) in mix forest of eastern Canada – J. Mammal. 82: 1026-1033.
  • 46. Wauters L. A., Bertolino S., Adamo M., van Dongen S., Tosi G. 2005 – Food shortage disrupts social organization: the case of red squirrels in conifer forests – Evol. Ecol. 19: 375-404.
  • 47. Wilson J. A., Kelt D. A., Van Vuren D. H. 2008 – Home range and activity of northern flying squirrels (Glaucomys sabrinus) in the Sierra Nevada – Southwest Nat. 53: 21-28.
  • 48. Yamaguchi Y., Yanagawa H. 1995 – [Field observations on circadian activities of the flying squirrel, Pteromys volans orii] – Mammal. Sci. 34: 139-149 (in Japanese, English summary).
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-57e2a73e-3bf9-411d-8b13-314d291f6ee7
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.