Gresilient supply chain - a case study of global flows

• Autorzy: Maryniak Anna , Kliber Paweł , Pogorzelec-Glaser Katarzyna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.175.21

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: Nowadays there is still low awareness of creating specific supply chain hybrids in a planned manner. This paper focuses on a hybrid of the gresilient chain, which reflects the trend to act for the well-being of the environmental to eliminate disruptions in the flow of goods. The aim of the study is to determine the interdependence of the factors shaping the resilience of the supply chain and to determine which of them contribute the most to the creation of a green chain. Design/methodology/approach: AHP and DAMATEL were used as research tools. A study focused on the cognitive chain is extremely interesting, because it is a global chain in which the main coordinator is relatively small. The subject of the research is the international supply chain of a company that conducts research on engine oils, coolants and fuels for gas engines driving turbines, electric and wind turbines, hydraulic transmissions, etc. Findings: As a result, among other things, it was established, that speed is the factor that is most sensitive to the influence of other factors and, at the same time, the most important from the point of view of recipients. In addition, it was proven that redundancy is essential for creating resilience in the analyzed chain, while transparency is necessary for creating the green chain. It has also been shown that redundancy and cooperation work simultaneously to a great extent for the benefit of both chains. Research limitations/implications: Every supply chain requires a separate study. Practical implications: The results can help managers in implementing the gresilient strategy or in modifying it if it has already been implemented. The work carried out may contribute to the creation of a general matrix containing paths to the expected types of supply chains, taking into account the specificity of input and output connections. Social implications: Gresilient chains are part of the idea of corporate social responsibility. Originality/value: From the standpoint of building up resilience, this is an interesting case, because it is the discussed case does not fit into the concepts of popular models in which agility is promoted as the one that guarantees the resilience of the chain. The study is an expanding knowledge in the field of the gresilient chain, in which research is lacking due to the initial stage of science in this area.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

transportation; logistics; resilient supply chain; green; AHP; DEMATEL

PL

transport; logistyka; odporny łańcuch dostaw; AHP; DEMATEL

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: z. 175
• Strony: 335--356
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 70 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Maryniak Anna

• Poznań University of Economics and Business; Department of Logistics

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1344-671X

autor

Kliber Paweł

• Poznań University of Economics and Business; Department of Econometrics

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7796-6418

autor

Pogorzelec-Glaser Katarzyna

• Poznań University of Economics and Business; Department of Logistics

• https://orcid.org/0000-003-3599-9689

Bibliografia

• 1. Amindoust, A. (2018). A resilient-sustainable based supplier selection model using a hybrid intelligent method. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 126, 122-135, doi.org/10.1016/ j.cie.2018.09.031.
• 2. Azadegan, A., Dooley, K.J. (2020). A typology of supply network resilience strategies: complex collaborations in a complex world. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), 17-26, doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12256.
• 3. Azadeh, A., Atrchin, N., Salehi, V., Shojaei, H. (2013). Modelling and improvement of supply chain with imprecise transportation delays and resilience factors. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 17(4), 269-282, doi.org/10.1080/ 13675567.2013.846308.
• 4. Azevedo, S.G., Govindan, K., Carvalho, H., Cruz-Machado, V. (2013). Ecosilient Index to assess the greenness and resilience of the upstream automotive supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 131-146, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.011.
• 5. Barroso, A.P., Machado, V.H., Machado, V.C. (2011). Supply chain resilience using the mapping approach. In: P. Li (ed.), Supply chain management (pp. 161-184). Rijeka: InTech, doi.org/10.5772/15006.
• 6. Belhadi, A., Mani, V., Kamble, S.S., Khan, S.A.R., Verma, S. (2021). Artificial-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation. Annals of Operations Research, 1-26, doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x.
• 7. Bhatia, M.S., Jakhar, S.K., Dora, M. (2020). Analysis of barriers to closed-loop supply chain: A case of the Indian automotive industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1-38, doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2998794.
• 8. Brandon-Jones, E., Squire, B., Autry, C.W, Petersen, K.J. (2014). A Contingent Resource-Based Perspective of Supply Chain Resilience and Robustness. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 53(3), 55-73, doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12050.
• 9. Brusset, X., Teller, C. (2017). Supply chain capabilities, risks, and resilience. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 59-68, doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.09.008.
• 10. Chang, A.Y., Hu, K.J., Hsu, P., Hsu, C.H. (2016). An integrated model for the evaluation of supply chain system complexity. 2016 4th International Symposium on Computational and Business Intelligence (ISCBI), IEEE, 15-20, doi.org/10.1109/ISCBI.2016.7743253.
• 11. Christopher, M., Peck, H. (2004). Building the Resilient Supply Chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14, doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275.
• 12. Cui, Y., Idota, H., Ota, M. (2019). Improving Supply Chain Resilience with a Hybrid System Architecture. International Conference on Multidisciplinary Social Networks Research. Singapore: Springer, 142-154, doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1758-7_12.
• 13. Das, D., Datta, A., Kumar, P., Kazancoglu, Y., Ram, M. (2021). Building supply chain resilience in the era of COVID-19: An AHP-DEMATEL approach. Operations Management Research, 1-19, doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00200-4.
• 14. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Bryde, D.J., Dwivedi, Y.K., Papadopoulos, T. (2020). Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3381-3398, doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1722860.
• 15. Ekanayake, E.M.A.C., Shen, G.Q., Kumaraswamy, M.M., Owusu, E.K. (2022). Identifying supply chain vulnerabilities in industrialized construction: an overview. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(8), 1464-1477, doi.org/10.1080/15623599. 2020.1728487.
• 16. Fahimnia, B., Jabbarzadeh, A. (2016). Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven. Transportation Research Part E: The Logistics and Transportation Review, 91, 306-324, doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.02.007.
• 17. Fontela, E., Gabus, A. (1974). DEMATEL, Innovative Methods, Rep. No. 2, Structural Analysis of the World Problematique (Methods). Geneva: Battelle Institute; Geneva Research Center.
• 18. Foroozesh, N., Karimi, B., Mousavi, S.M. (2022). Green-resilient supply chain network design for perishable products considering route risk and horizontal collaboration under robust interval-valued type-2 fuzzy uncertainty: A case study in food industry. Journal of environmental management, 307, 114470; doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114470
• 19. Gabus, A., Fontela, E. (1972). World Problems an Invitation to Further thought within the Framework of DEMATEL. Geneva: Batelle Institute; Geneva: Research Center,
• 20. Gandhi, S., Mangla, S.K., Kumar, P., Kumar, D. (2016). A combined approach using AHP and DEMATEL for evaluating success factors in implementation of green supply chain management in Indian manufacturing industries. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(6), 537-561, doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2016.1164126.
• 21. Ganguly, A., Kumar, C. (2019). Evaluating supply chain resiliency strategies in the Indian pharmaceutical sector: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (f-ahp) approach. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 11(2), 153-180, doi.org/10.13033/ijahp. v11i2.620.
• 22. Ghomi-Avili, M., Naeini, S.G.J., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Jabbarzadeh, A. (2018). A fuzzy pricing model for a green competitive closed-loop supply chain network design in the presence of disruptions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 425-442; doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.273.
• 23. Gu, M., Yang, L., Huo, B. (2021). The impact of information technology usage on supply chain resilience and performance: An ambidexterous view. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 1-13, doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107956.
• 24. Hasani, A., Mokhtari, H., Fattahi, M. (2021). A multi-objective optimization approach for green and resilient supply chain network design: a real-life case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123199, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123199
• 25. Hladiy, G., Hrytsyshyn, A. (2020). Combined Approach to Modeling Supplier Selection. 2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 1, 179-182, doi.org/10.1109/CSIT49958.2020.9322049.
• 26. Hossain, M.K., Thakur, V., Kazancoglu, Y. (2022). Developing a resilient healthcare supply chain to prevent disruption in the wake of emergency health crisis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-10-2021-1628.
• 27. Hosseini, S., Al Khaled, A. (2019). A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(1), 207-228, doi.org/10.1007/ s10845-016-1241-y.
• 28. Hsin-Hung, W., Ya-Ning, T. (2011). An integrated approach of AHP and DEMATEL methods in evaluating the criteria of auto spare parts industry. International Journal of Systems Science, 43, 2114-2124, doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2011.564674.
• 29. Huang, L., Zhen, L., Wang, J., Zhang, X. (2022). Blockchain implementation for circular supply chain management: Evaluating critical success factors. Industrial Marketing Management, 102, 451-464, doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.02.009.
• 30. Hundal, G.S., Thiyagarajan, S., Alduraibi, M., Laux, C.M., Furterer, S.L., Cudney, E.A. Antony, J. (2021). The impact of Lean Six Sigma practices on supply chain resilience during COVID 19 disruption: a conceptual framework. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-19, doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2021.2014313.
• 31. Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A. (2021). A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 32(9), 775-788, doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768450.
• 32. Jayant, A., Agarwal, A. (2019). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, AHP and TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1240(1), p. 012010, doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1240/1/012010.
• 33. Johnson, N., Elliott, D., Drake, P. (2013). Exploring the role of social capital in facilitating supply chain resilience. Supply Chain Management, 18(3), 324-336, doi.org/10.1108/SCM- 06-2012-0203.
• 34. Jüttner, U., Maklan, S. (2011). Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: an empirical study. Supply Chain Management, 16(4), 246-259, doi.org/10.1108/ 13598541111139062.
• 35. Karbassi Yazdi, A., Mehdiabadi, A., Wanke, P.F., Monajemzadeh, N., Correa, H.L., Tan, Y. (2022). Developing supply chain resilience: a robust multi-criteria decision analysis method for transportation service provider selection under uncertainty. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 1-14, doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2022.2098543.
• 36. Kaur, H., Singh, S.P. (2022). Disaster resilient proactive and reactive intelligence procurement models for humanitarian supply chain. Production Planning & Control, 33(6-7), 576-89, doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1834124.
• 37. Kazemian, I., Torabi, S.A., Zobel, C.W., Li, Y., Baghersad, M. (2021). A multi-attribute supply chain network resilience assessment framework based on SNA-inspired indicators. Operational Research, 1-31, doi.org/10.1007/s12351-021-00644-3.
• 38. Khan, O., Estay, D.A.S. (2015). Supply chain cyber-resilience: Creating an agenda for future research. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(4), 6-12, doi.org/10.22215/timreview/885.
• 39. Kong, X.Y., Li, X.Y. (2008). Creating the resilient supply chain: The role of knowledge management resources. 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 1-4. IEEE, doi.org/10.1109/WiCom.2008.1617.
• 40. Li, Y., Diabat, A., Lu, C.C. (2020). Leagile supplier selection in Chinese textile industries: a DEMATEL approach. Annals of Operations Research, 287(1), 303-322, doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03453-2.
• 41. Maryniak, A., Bulhakova, Y., Lewoniewski, W. (2021). Resilient supply chains 4.0-a research review. 26th IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications (APCC), 99-104, doi.org/10.1109/APCC49754.2021.9609916.
• 42. Maryniak, A., Pogorzelec-Glaser, K. (2022). The nature of the intercontinental supply chain and building its resilience in a company carrying out quality analyzes of engine oils. Scientific Journals of the Maritime University of Szczecin, 72(144), 193-200.
• 43. Mohammed, A. (2020). Towards ‘gresilient’supply chain management: A quantitative study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104641.
• 44. Mohammed, A., Harris, I., Soroka, A., Nujoom, R. (2019). A hybrid MCDA-fuzzy multi-objective programming approach for a G-Resilient supply chain network design. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 127, 297-312, doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.052.
• 45. Naghshineh, B., Lotfi, M. (2019). Enhancing supply chain resilience: an empirical investigation. Continuity & Resilience Review, 1(1), 47-62, doi.org/10.1108/CRR-09-2018- 0002.
• 46. Najmi, A., Makui, A. (2010). Providing hierarchical approach for measuring supply chain performance using AHP and DEMATEL methodologies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 1(2), 199-212, doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2010.02.008.
• 47. Nasrollah, S., Najafi, S.E., Bagherzadeh, H., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M. (2023). Neural Computing and Applications, 35(3), 2647-2678, doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114470.
• 48. Negri, M., Cagno, E., Colicchia, C., Sarkis, J. (2021). Integrating sustainability and resilience in the supply chain: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Business Strategy and the environment, 30(7), 2858-2886, doi.org/10.1002/bse.2776.
• 49. Ortiz-Barrios, M., Miranda-De la Hoz, C., López-Meza, P., Petrillo, A., De Felice, F. (2019). A case of food supply chain management with AHP, DEMATEL, and TOPSIS. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 1-25, https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1693.
• 50. Ozdemir, D., Sharma, M., Dhir, A., Daim, T. (2022). Supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society, 68, 1-10, doi.org/10.1016/ j.techsoc.2021.101847.
• 51. Papadopoulos, T., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., Altay, N., Childe, S.J., Fosso-Wamba, S. (2017). The role of Big Data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 1108-1118, doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro. 2016.03.059.
• 52. Ponomarov, S.Y., Holcomb, M.C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124-143, doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873.
• 53. Rajesh, R., Ravi, V. (2015). Modeling enablers of supply chain risk mitigation in electronic supply chains: A Grey-DEMATEL approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 126-139, doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.028.
• 54. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: Mcgraw-Hill International.
• 55. Sahu, A.K., Sharma, M., Raut, R.D., Sahu, A.K., Sahu, N.K., Antony, J., Tortorella, G.L. (2022). Decision-making framework for supplier selection using an integrated MCDM approach in a lean-agile-resilient-green environment: evidence from Indian automotive sector. The TQM Journal, 1-43, doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2021-0372.
• 56. Sen, D.K., Datta, S., Mahapatra, S.S. (2017). Dominance based fuzzy decision support framework for g-resilient (ecosilient) supplier selection: an empirical modelling. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 10(6), 338-357, doi.org/10.1080/ 19397038.2017.1286410.
• 57. Sharma, V., Raut, R.D., Mangla, S.K., Narkhede, B.E., Luthra, S., Gokhale, R. (2021). A systematic literature review to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 1191-1212, doi.org/10.1002/bse.2679.
• 58. Shen, Z.M., Sun, Y. (2021). Strengthening supply chain resilience during COVID-19: A case study of JD. com. Journal of Operations Management, 1-2, doi.org/10.1002/ joom.1161.
• 59. Sheng-Li, S., Xiao-Yue, Y., Hu-Chen, L., Ping, Z. (2018). DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1-33, doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457.
• 60. Singh, N.P., Singh, S. (2019). Building supply chain risk resilience: Role of big data analytics in supply chain disruption mitigation. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(7), 2318-2342, doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0346.
• 61. Soda, S., Sachdeva, A., Garg, R.K. (2016). Literature review of multi-aspect research works carried out on the concept and implementation of GSCM. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 23(2), 223-253, doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2016.076404.
• 62. Souza, V.D., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J., Borsato, M. (2019). Exploring ecosystem network analysis to balance resilience and performance in sustainable supply chain design. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 11(1-2), 26-45, doi.org/10.1504/IJAOM.2019.098525.
• 63. Tasnim, Z., Shareef, M.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., Kumar, U., Kumar, V., Malik, F.T., Raman, R. (2022). Tourism sustainability during COVID-19: developing value chain resilience. Operations Management Research, 1-17, doi.org/10.1007/s12063-021-00250-8.
• 64. Vali-Siar, M.M., Roghanian, E. (2022). Green and Resilient Mixed Supply Chain Network Design to Reduce Environmental Impacts and Deal With Disruptions. Research Square, doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1140812/v1.
• 65. Warmbier, P., Kinra, A. (2022, May). Identifying common elements within supply chain resilience and sustainability-an exploratory study based on bibliographic analysis. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference LDIC 2022, Dynamics in Logistics. Bremen, Germany. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 65-81.
• 66. Warmbier, P., Kinra, A., Ivanov, D. (2022). Supply Chain Sustainability and Resilience-Relationship and Congruent Capability Analysis based on Paradox Theory. IFAC- PapersOnLine, 55(10), 311-316.
• 67. Wu, Hsin-Hung, Tsai, Ya-Ning (2012). An integrated approach of AHP and DEMATEL methods in evaluating the criteria of auto spare parts industry. International Journal of Systems Science, 43(11), 2114-2124, doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2011.564674.
• 68. Xiong, L., Zhong, S., Liu, S., Zhang, X., Li, Y. (2020). An approach for resilient-green supplier selection based on WASPAS, BWM, and TOPSIS under intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 1761893, 1-18, doi.org/10.1155/2020/ 1761893.
• 69. Yavari, M., Ajalli, P. (2021). Suppliers’ coalition strategy for green-Resilient supply chain network design. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 38(3), 197-212, doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2021.1883134.
• 70. Zahiri, B., Zhuang J., Mohammadi, M. (2017). Toward an integrated sustainable-resilient supply chain: A pharmaceutical case study. Transportation Research, Part E, 103, 109-142, doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.009.