Exploring the circular supply chain to reduce plastic waste in Singapore

• Autorzy: Chen Ziyi , Tan Albert

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17270/J.LOG.2021.564

Warianty tytułu

PL

Łańcuch surowców wtórnych jako sposób na ograniczenie odpadów plastikowych w Singapurze

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Background: The COVID-19 changes our lifestyle and triggers the rapid development of online shopping resulting in massive use of plastic for packaging for each parcel. Hence, plastic waste management has become a worrying concern in some countries. This research proposes that the circular supply chain could be a way to reduce plastic waste with regards to the triple bottom line: economy, social, and environment. It applies the life-cycle assessment (LCA) and target sampling method. Methods: The data about plastic waste, including the production, consumption, and the end-of-life stage from target developed countries were collected and analyzed. By comparing practices applied in Germany and South Korea, this research investigates a framework for both the upstream and the downstream through the implementation of the 4R concept: reduce, reuse, recycle, and recovery. Results and conclusions: This study provides new insights of the circular supply chain from the perspective of the government, producers, and consumers and call for more attention from the demand perspective (involving more efforts from authorities and consumers) of the plastic industry instead of only concentrating on the supply perspective.

PL

Wstęp: COVID-19 zmienił nasz styl życia i wpłynął na drastyczny wzrost zakupów dokonywanych on-line, co z kolei związane jest ze znacznym wzrostem użycia opakowań plastikowych. Z tego też powodu zagadnienia gospodarki odpadami plastikowymi zdaje się być coraz ważniejszym tematem w wielu krajach. W pracy proponowane jest rozwiązanie zamkniętego obiegu opakowaniami plastikowymi na trzech poziomach: ekonomicznym, społecznym i środowiskowym. Jest to powiązane z zarządzaniem cyklem życia (LCA). Metody: Zebrano i poddano analizie dane dotyczące odpadów plastikowych, obejmujące produkcję, konsumpcję oraz cały cykl życia w krajach rozwiniętych. Poprzez porównanie stosowanych praktyk w Niemczech i Południowej Korei stworzono ramy wdrożenia koncepcji 4R: redukcja, ponowne użycie, recycling i odzyskiwanie surowców wtórnych. Wyniki i wnioski: W pracy zaprezentowano nowe spojrzenia na zamknięty łańcuch dostaw z punktu widzenia rządu, producentów oraz konsumentów oraz zwrócono uwagę na istotność uwzględniania możliwości przemysłu wyrobów plastikowych (co wymaga zaangażowania zarówno ze strony rządu jak i konsumentów) a nie tylko oczekiwań konsumentów.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

circular supply chain; plastic waste management; life-cycle assessment; 4R concept; triple bottom line; bioplastic

PL

łańcuch dostaw surowców wtórnych; zarzązanie plastikowymi odpadami; zarządzanie cyklem życia; koncepcja 4R; potrójna linia dolna; bioplastik

• Wydawca: Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki
• Czasopismo: LogForum
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 17, no. 2
• Strony: 271--286
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Chen Ziyi

• Curtin University, Singapore, Faculty of Management

autor

Tan Albert

• Curtin University, Singapore, Faculty of Management

Bibliografia

• 1. Arikan Ezgi B., Havva Ozsoy D., 2015. A Review: Investigation of Bioplastics. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture 9, 2. http://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2015.02.007.
• 2. Bovea M.D., Serrano J., Bruscas G.M., Gallardo A., 2006. Application of life cycle assessment to improve the environmental performance of a ceramic tile packaging system. Packaging Technology and Science 19, 2, 83-95. http://doi.org/10.1002/pts.711.
• 3. Deselnicu D.C., Militaru G., Deselnicu V., Zăinescu G., Albu L., 2018. Towards a Circular Economy – a Zero Waste Programme for Europe. http://doi.org/10.24264/icams-2018.xi.4.
• 4. Edgington T., 2019. Plastic or Paper: Which Bag is Greener? BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/business47027792.
• 5. European Commission. 2018. Packaging Waste Directive. Brussels: European Commission. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1551965345008&uri=CELEX:32 018L0852.
• 6. Filho W.L., Salvia A.L., Bonoli A., Saari U.A., Voronova V., Klõga M., Kumbhar S.S., Olszewski K., De Quevedo D.M., Barbir J., 2020. An assessment of attitudes towards plastics and bioplastics in Europe. Science of The Total Environment, 142732. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142732.
• 7. Geissdoerfer M., Savaget P., Bocken N.M., Hultink E.J., 2017. The Circular Economy - A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production 143, 757-768. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
• 8. Green Queen. 2019. Landmark PET Report: Southeast Asia Plastic Crisis Result Of Government Inaction. Green Queen. https://www.greenqueen.com.hk/ga-circular-full-circle-pet-plastic-bottle-report-southeast-asia/.
• 9. Hopewell J., Dvorak R., Kosior E., 2009. Plastics recycling: challenges and opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0311.
• 10. Hu J., Xiao Z., Zhou R., Deng W., Wang M., Ma S., 2011. Ecological utilization of leather tannery waste with circular economy model. Journal of Cleaner Production 19, 2-3, 221-228. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.018
• 11. Jambeck J.R., Geyer R., Wilcox C., Siegler, M. Perryman T.R., Andrady A., Narayan R., Law K.L., 2015. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347, 6223, 768-771. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352.
• 12. Japan Environment Quarterly. 2019. Establishing a sound material-cycle society and measures to address marine litter. Ministry of the Environment. https://www.env.go.jp/en/focus/jeq/issue/pdf/Volume20January2018.pdf.
• 13. Kakadellis S., Harris Z.M., 2020. Don’t scrap the waste: The need for broader system boundaries in bioplastic food packaging life-cycle assessment - A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production 274, 122831. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122831.
• 14. Korea times. 2018. Gov't Aims to Reduce Plastic Waste 50% by 2030. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2018/08/371_248796.html.
• 15. Korhonen J., Honkasalo A., Seppälä J.. 2018. Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics 143, 37- 46. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041.
• 16. Martinho G., Balaia N., Pires A., 2017. The Portuguese plastic carrier bag tax: The effects on consumers’ behavior." Waste Management 61, 3-12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.023.
• 17. McDowall W., Geng Y., Huang B., Barteková E., Bleischwitz R., Türkeli S., Kemp R., Doménech T., 2017. Circular Economy Policies in China and Europe. 2017. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21, 3, 651- 661. http://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12597.
• 18. Northrop E., 2014. Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. " Eastern Economic Journal 40, 3, 440-442. http://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2013.22.
• 19. Ocean Conservancy. 2017. Together for Our Ocean - International Coastal Cleanup 2017 Report. Washington, D.C: Ocean Conservancy. https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/International-Coastal-Cleanup_2017-Report.pdf.
• 20. Packaging Europe. 2017. Functional Barriers for the Use of Recycled Plastics in Multilayer Food Packaging. Packaging Europe. https://packagingeurope.com/functional-barriers-for-the-use-of-recycled-plastics/.
• 21. Szopik-Depczyńska K., Cheba K., Bąk I., Kędzierska-Szczepaniak A., Szczepaniak K., Ioppolo G., 2020. Innovation level and local development of EU regions. A new assessment approach. Land Use Policy 99, 104837. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104837.
• 22. Tan A., Boh S., 2017. Supermarkets in Talks to Charge for Plastic Bags. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/env ironment/supermarkets-in-talks-to-charge-for-plastic-bags.
• 23. Towards Zero Waste. 2020. Chapter 7 - Towards A Zero Waste Nation, Together. Singapore: Towards Zero Waste. https://www.towardszerowaste.gov.sg/zerowaste-masterplan/chapter7/.
• 24. Van Eygen E., Laner D., Fellner J., 2018. Circular economy of plastic packaging: Current practice and perspectives in Austria. Waste Management 72, 55-64. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.040.
• 25. Verghese K., Lewis H. 2007. Environmental innovation in industrial packaging: a supply chain approach." International Journal of Production Research 45, 18-19, 4381-4401. http://doi.org/10.1080/00207540701450211
• 26. Walker T.R., Xanthos D., 2018. A call for Canada to move toward zero plastic waste by reducing and recycling single-use plastics." Resources, Conservation and Recycling 133, 99-100. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.02.014.
• 27. World Economic Forum. 2016. World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2016. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2016.
• 28. Yazdanparast A., Manuj I., Swartz St.,M., 2010. Co-creating logistics value: a service-dominant logic perspective. The International Journal of Logistics Management 21, 3, 375-403. http://doi.org/10.1108/09574091011089808
• 29. Yin R.K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
• 30. Yolin Ch., 2015. Waste Management and Recycling in Japan Opportunities for European Companies (SMEs focus). Tokyo: EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation. https://www.eujapan.eu/sites/default/files/publications/docs/waste_management_recycling_japan.pdf.
• 31. Yuan Z., Bi J., Moriguichi Y., 2008. "The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China." Journal of Industrial Ecology 10, 1-2, 4-8. http://doi.org/10.1162/108819806775545321.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).