Against strict headedness in syntax

Lichte, Timm

doi:10.15398/jlm.v9i2.249

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Against strict headedness in syntax

Autorzy

Lichte Timm

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15398/jlm.v9i2.249

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Strict headedness is a common idealization in the structural analysis of linguistic entities, particularly in syntax. This contribution takes a critical look at its premises and applications by demonstrating the surprising sloppiness of both the defining concepts and the test procedures, and by showing how strict headedness is nevertheless implemented as an important axiom into virtually all mainstream grammar formalisms. Subsequently, I present a non-trivial head-agnostic analysis based on Tree Unification & Constraints (TUCO) in order to show that there actually is a choice and that strict headedness can be avoided in principle.

Słowa kluczowe

grammar syntax head government dependency valency tree unification tree constraints

Wydawca

Instytut Podstaw Informatyki PAN

Czasopismo

Journal of Language Modelling

Rocznik

2021

Tom

Vol. 9, No. 2

Strony

291--348

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 101 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Lichte Timm

timm.lichte@uni-tuebingen.de

UniversityofTübingen,Germany

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9202-8320

Bibliografia

1. Anne ABEILLÉ (2003), A Lexicon- and Construction-Based Approach to Coordinations, in Stefan MÜLLER, editor, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Michigan State University, pp. 5-25, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, https://web.stanford.edu/ group/cslipublications/cslipublications/HPSG/2003/abeille.pdf.
2. Anne ABEILLÉ and Rui P. CHAVES (2021), Coordination, in Stefan MÜLLER, Anne ABEILLÉ, Robert D. BORSLEY, and Jean-Pierre KOENIG, editors, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: The Handbook, number 9 in Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax, pp. 725-776, Language Science Press, Berlin, doi:10.5281/zenodo.5599848.
3. Anne ABEILLÉ and Owen RAMBOW (2000), Tree Adjoining Grammar: An Overview, in Anne ABEILLÉ and Owen RAMBOW, editors, Tree Adjoining Grammars: Formalisms, Linguistic Analyses and Processing, number 107 in CSLI Lecture Notes, pp. 1-68, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
4. Anthony E. ADES and Mark J. STEEDMAN (1982), On the Order of Words, Linguistics and Philosophy, 4(4):517-558.
5. Vilmos ÁGEL (2000), Valenztheorie, Gunter Narr Verlag, Tübingen.
6. Kazimierz AJDUKIEWICZ (1935), Die syntaktische Konnexität, Studia Philosophica, 1:1-27.
7. Yehoshua BAR-HILLEL (1953), A Quasi-Arithmetical Notation for Syntactic Description, Language, 29(1):47-58.
8. Sascha BARGMANN (2015), Syntactically Flexible VP-Idioms and the N-after-N Construction, Poster presented at the 5th General Meeting, PARSEME, 23-24 September 2015, Iaşi, https://typo.uni-konstanz.de/parseme/index. php/2-general/138-admitted-posters-iasi-23-24-september-2015.
9. John BEAVERS (2003), More Heads and Less Categories: A New Look at Noun Phrase Structure, in Stefan MÜLLER, editor, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Michigan State University, pp. 47-67, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, http://web.stanford.edu/ group/cslipublications/cslipublications/HPSG/2003/beavers.pdf.
10. Leonard BLOOMFIELD (1935), Language, George Allen & Unwin, London.
11. Joan BRESNAN, Ash ASUDEH, Ida TOIVONEN, and Stephen WECHSLER (2016), Lexical-Functional Syntax, Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, UK, 2nd edition.
12. Marie CANDITO, Guy PERRIER, Bruno GUILLAUME, Corentin RIBEYRE, Karën FORT, Djamé SEDDAH, and Eric De La CLERGERIE (2014), Deep Syntax Annotation of the Sequoia French Treebank, in Nicoletta Calzolari (Conference CHAIR), Khalid CHOUKRI, Thierry DECLERCK, Hrafn LOFTSSON, Bente MAEGAARD, Joseph MARIANI, Asuncion MORENO, Jan ODIJK, and Stelios PIPERIDIS, editors, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Reykjavik, http: //www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/494_Paper.pdf.
13. Joan CHEN-MAIN (2006), On the Generation and Linearization of Multi-Dominance Structures, Ph.D. thesis, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
14. Noam CHOMSKY (1957), Syntactic Structures, Mouton, Den Haag.
15. Noam CHOMSKY (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Noam CHOMSKY (1970), Remarks on Nominalization, in Roderick JACOBS and Peter ROSENBAUM, editors, Readings in English Transformational Grammar pp. 184-221, Ginn, Waltham, MA.
17. Noam CHOMSKY (1972), The Formal Nature of Language, in Language and Mind, pp. 115-160, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, 2nd edition.
18. Noam CHOMSKY (1981), Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.
19. Noam CHOMSKY (1986), Barriers, number 13 in Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
20. Noam CHOMSKY (2008), On Phases, in Robert FREIDIN, Carlos P. OTERO, and Maria Luisa ZUBIZARRETA, editors, Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, pp. 133-66, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Noam CHOMSKY (2013), Problems of Projection, Lingua, 130:33-49.
22. William CROFT (1996), What’s a Head?, in Johan ROORYCK and Laurie ZARING, editors, Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, pp. 35-75, Springer, Dordrecht, NL, doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_3.
23. Haskell B. CURRY (1961), Some Logical Aspects of Grammatical Structure, in Roman JAKOBSON, editor, Structure of Language and its Mathematical Aspects: Proceedings of the Twelfth Symposium in Applied Mathematics held in New York City, April 14-15, 1960, pp. 56-68.
24. Marie-Catherine DE MARNEFFE, Timothy DOZAT, Natalia SILVEIRA, Katri HAVERINEN, Filip GINTER, Joakim NIVRE, and Christopher D. MANNING (2014), Universal Stanford Dependencies: A Cross-linguistic Typology, in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’14), pp. 4585-4592, European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Reykjavik, http: //www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/pdf/1062_Paper.pdf.
25. Ralph DEBUSMANN, Denys DUCHIER, and Geert-Jan M. KRUIJFF (2004), Extensible Dependency Grammar: A New Methodology, in Geert-Jan M. KRUIJFF and Denys DUCHIER, editors, Proceedings of the COLING 2004 Workshop on Recent Advances in Dependency Grammar, pp. 70-76, Geneva, https://aclanthology.org/W04-1510.
26. Robert FRANK (2002), Phrase Structure Composition and Syntactic Dependencies, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
27. Haim GAIFMAN (1965), Dependency Systems and Phrase-structure Systems, Information and Control, 8(3):304-337, doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90232-9, also published as report p-2315, RAND Corp. Santa Monica (CA) in 1961.
28. Gerald GAZDAR (1981), Unbounded Dependencies and Coordinated Structure, Linguistic Inquiry, 12:155-184.
29. Gerald GAZDAR, Ewan KLEIN, Geoffrey K. PULLUM, and Ivan A. SAG (1985), Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
30. Kim GERDES (2004), Tree Unification Grammar: Problems and Proposals for Topology, TAG, and German, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 53:108-136, doi:10.1016/S1571-0661(05)82578-2.
31. Kim GERDES and Sylvain KAHANE (2013), Defining Dependencies (and Constituents), in Kim GERDES, Eva HAJIČOVÁ, and Leo WANNER, editors, Computational Dependency Theory, number 258 in Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 1-25, IOS Press, Amsterdam.
32. Jonathan GINZBURG and Ivan A. SAG (2001), Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives, number 123 in CSLI Lecture Notes, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA.
33. Maurice GROSS (1994), Constructing Lexicon-Grammars, in Beryl T. Sue ATKINS and Anotonio ZAMPOLLI, editors, Computational Approaches to the Lexicon, pp. 213-263, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Bruno GUILLAUME and Guy PERRIER (2009), Interaction Grammars, Research on Language and Computation, 7(2–4):171-208.
35. Zellig S. HARRIS (1951), Methods in Structural Linguistics, The University of Chicago Press.
36. Peter HELLWIG (2006), Parsing with Dependency Grammars, in Vilmos ÁGEL, Ludwig M. EICHINGER, Hans-Werner EROMS, Hans Jürgen HERINGER, and Henning LOBIN, editors, Dependenz und Valenz/Dependency and Valency. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung / An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, volume 25.2 of Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK), pp. 1081-1109, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
37. Hans Jürgen HERINGER (1993), Basic Ideas and the Classical Model, in Joachim JACOBS, Arnim VON STECHOW, Wolfgang STERNEFELD, and Theo VENNEMANN, editors, Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, volume 9.1 of Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft / Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK), pp. 298-316, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
38. Jack HOEKSEMA (1992), The Head Parameter in Morphology and Syntax, Language and Cognition, 2:119-132.
39. Richard A. HUDSON (1984), Word Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.
40. Richard A. HUDSON (1987), Zwicky on Heads, Journal of Linguistics, 23(1):109-132.
41. Richard A. HUDSON (1993), Do We Have Heads in Our Minds?, in Greville G. CORBETT, Norman M. FRASER, and Scott MCGLASHAN, editors, Heads in Grammatical Theory, pp. 266-291, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511659454.012.
42. Richard A. HUDSON (1994), Discontinuous Phrases in Dependency Grammar, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 6:89-120.
43. Richard A. HUDSON (1998), Adjunct Preposing, Wh-interrogatives and Dependency Competition, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 10:441-466.
44. Richard A. HUDSON (2004), Are Determiners Heads?, Functions of Language, 11(1):7-42.
45. Richard A. HUDSON (2007), Language Networks: The New Word Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
46. Ray S. JACKENDOFF (1977), X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
47. Joachim JACOBS (1994), Kontra Valenz, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier, Trier.
48. Otto JESPERSEN (1924), The Philosophy of Grammar, George Allen & Unwin, London.
49. Aravind K. JOSHI and Yves SCHABES (1997), Tree-Adjoining Grammars, in Grzegorz ROZENBERG and Arto SALOMAA, editors, Handbook of Formal Languages, volume 3, pp. 69-124, Springer, Berlin.
50. Aravind K. JOSHI, K. Vijay SHANKER, and David WEIR (1990), The Convergence of Mildly Context-sensitive Grammar Formalisms, CIS Technical Report MS-CIS-90-01, Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, http://repository.upenn.edu/cis_reports/539/.
51. Sylvain KAHANE (1997), Bubble Trees and Syntactic Representations, in Tilman BECKER and Hans-Ulrich KRIEGER, editors, Proceedings of the 5th Meeting on Mathematics of Language (MOL5), pp. 70-76, DFKI, Saarbrücken.
52. Sylvain KAHANE (2006), Polarized Unification Grammars, in Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 137-144, Sydney, http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P/P06/P06-1018.
53. Laura KALLMEYER and Marco KUHLMANN (2012), A Formal Model for Plausible Dependencies in Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar, in Chung-Hye HAN and Giorgio SATTA, editors, Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms (TAG+11), 26-28 September 2012, Paris, France, pp. 108-116, https://aclanthology.org/W12-4613.pdf.
54. Ron M. KAPLAN and Joan BRESNAN (1982), Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation, in Joan BRESNAN, editor, The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pp. 173-281, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Andreas KATHOL (1995), Linearization-Based German Syntax, Doctoral thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
56. András KORNAI and Geoffrey K. PULLUM (1990), The X-Bar Theory of Phrase Structure, Language, 66(1):24-50, http://www.jstor.org/stable/415278.
57. Paul R. KROEGER (2005), Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
58. Marco KUHLMANN (2010), Dependency Structures and Lexicalized Grammars: An Algebraic Approach, number 6270 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin.
59. Timm LICHTE (2012), Synchronous Tree Unification Grammar, in Chung-Hye HAN and Giorgio SATTA, editors, Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms (TAG+11), 26-28 September 2012, Paris, France, pp. 46-54, http://www.aclweb.org/anthology-new/W/W12/W12-4606.pdf.
60. Timm LICHTE (2015), Syntax und Valenz: Zur Modellierung kohärenter und elliptischer Strukturen mit Baumadjunktionsgrammatiken, number 1 in Empirically Oriented Theoretical Morphology and Syntax, Language Science Press, Berlin, doi:10.17169/langsci.b20.102.
61. Timm LICHTE and Laura KALLMEYER (2016), Same Syntax, Different Semantics: A Compositional Approach to Idiomaticity in Multi-word Expressions, in Christopher PIÑÓN, editor, Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 11, pp. 111-140, http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss11/eiss11_lichte-and-kallmeyer.pdf.
62. Timm LICHTE and Laura KALLMEYER (2017), Tree-Adjoining Grammar: A Tree-based Constructionist Grammar Framework for Natural Language Understanding, in Luc STEELS and Jerome FELDMAN, editors, The AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding, March 27-29, 2017, Stanford University (Technical Report SS-17-02), pp. 205-212, http://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/SSS/SSS17/paper/view/15330/14536.
63. Timm LICHTE, Simon PETITJEAN, Agata SAVARY, and Jakub WASZCZUK (2019), Lexical Encoding Formats for Multi-word Expressions: The Challenge of “Irregular” Regularities, in Yannick PARMENTIER and Jakub WASZCZUK, editors, Representation and Parsing of Multiword Expressions: Current Trends, number 1 in Phraseology and Multiword Expressions, pp. 1-33, Language Science Press, Berlin, doi:10.5281/zenodo.2579033.
64. John LYONS (1968), Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
65. John LYONS (1977), Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
66. Wolfgang MAIER and Timm LICHTE (2011), Characterizing Discontinuity in Constituent Treebanks, in Philippe DE GROOTE, Markus EGG, and Laura KALLMEYER, editors, Formal Grammar. 14th International Conference, FG 2009. Bordeaux, France, July 25-26, 2009. Revised Selected Papers, number 5591 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 167-182, Springer, Berlin.
67. James D. MCCAWLEY (1982), Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure, Linguistic Inquiry, 13(1):91-106.
68. Igor A. MEL’ČUK (1988), Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice, State University of New York Press, Albany.
69. Igor A. MEL’ČUK (2004), Actants in Semantics and Syntax II: Actants in Syntax, Linguistics, 42(2):247-291, doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2004.009.
70. Igor A. MEL’ČUK (2009), Dependency in Natural Language, in Alain POLGUÈRE and Igor A. MEL’ČUK, editors, Dependency in Linguistic Description, number 111 in Studies in Language Companion Series, pp. 1-110, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, doi:10.1075/slcs.111.03mel.
71. Olivier MICHALON, Corentin RIBEYRE, Marie CANDITO, and Alexis NASR (2016), Deeper Syntax for Better Semantic Parsing, in Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, December 11-16, 2016, Osaka, Japan, pp. 409-420, https://aclanthology.org/C16-1040.pdf.
72. Stefan MÜLLER (1999), An HPSG-Analysis for Free Relative Clauses in German, Grammars, 2:53-105, doi:10.1023/A:1004564801304.
73. Stefan MÜLLER (2013), Unifying Everything: Some Remarks on Simpler Syntax, Construction Grammar, Minimalism and HPSG, Language, 89(4):920-950, https://hpsg.hu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/unifying-everything.html.
74. Stefan MÜLLER (2013 [2007]), Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar: Eine Einführung, number 17 in Stauffenburg Einführungen, Stauffenburg Verlag, Tübingen, dritte überarbeitete Auflage edition, http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/hpsg-lehrbuch.html.
75. Stefan MÜLLER (2015), The CoreGram Project: Theoretical Linguistics, Theory Development, and Verification, Journal of Language Modelling, 3(1):21-86, doi:10.15398/jlm.v3i1.91.
76. Stefan MÜLLER (2020a), Grammatical Theory: From Transformational Grammar to Constraint-Based Approaches, number 1 in Textbooks in Language Sciences, Language Science Press, Berlin, fourth revised and extended edition edition, doi:10.5281/zenodo.3992307, https://langsci-press.org/catalog/book/287.
77. Stefan MÜLLER (2020b), Headless in Berlin: Headless Structures in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, in Ulrike FREYWALD and Horst SIMON, editors, In Headedness and/or Grammatical Anarchy?, pp. 1-32, Language Science Press, Berlin, https://hpsg.hu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/headless.html.
78. Stefan MÜLLER and Stephen M. WECHSLER (2014), Lexical Approaches to Argument Structure, Theoretical Linguistics, 40(1–2):1-76, http://hpsg.fu-berlin.de/~stefan/Pub/arg-st.html.
79. Joakim NIVRE (2015), Towards a Universal Grammar for Natural Language Processing, in Alexander GELBUKH, editor, Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 16th International Conference, CICLing 2015, Cairo, Egypt, April 14–20, 2015, Proceedings, Part I, pp. 3-16, Springer, Cham, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18111-0_1.
80. Carl POLLARD and Ivan A. SAG (1994), Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
81. Fred POPOWICH (1989), Tree Unification Grammar, in 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 228-236, Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, doi:10.3115/981623.981651, https://aclanthology.org/P89-1028.pdf.
82. Adam PRZEPIÓRKOWSKI and Agnieszka PATEJUK (2020), From Lexical Functional Grammar to Enhanced Universal Dependencies: The UD-LFG Treebank of Polish, Language Resources and Evaluation, 54:185-221, doi:10.1007/s10579-018-9433-z.
83. Geoffrey K. PULLUM and Barbara C. SCHOLZ (2001), On the Distinction Between Model-theoretic and Generative-enumerative Syntactic Frameworks, in Philippe DE GROOTE, Glyn MORILL, and Christian RETORÉ, editors, Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics: 4th International Conference, LACL 2001 Le Croisic, France, June 27–29, 2001, pp. 17-43, Springer, Berlin, doi:10.1007/3-540-48199-0_2.
84. Andrew RADFORD (2009), An Introduction to English Sentence Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
85. Owen RAMBOW, K. VIJAY-SHANKER, and David WEIR (1995), D-Tree Grammars, in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 151-158, Association for Computational Linguistics, Cambridge, MA, doi:10.3115/981658.981679, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P95-1021.pdf.
86. Anoop SARKAR and Aravind K. JOSHI (1997), Handling Coordination in a Tree Adjoining Grammar, http://www.cs.sfu.ca/~anoop/papers/pdf/tag-coordination.pdf, longer version of paper in Proceedings of COLING 1996. Draft of August 19, 1997.
87. Harold L. SOMERS (1984), On the Validity of the Complement-adjunct Distinction in Valency Grammar, Linguistics, (22):507-530, doi:10.1515/ling.1984.22.4.507.
88. Edward P. STABLER (2011), Computational Perspectives on Minimalism, in Cedric BOECKX, editor, The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics, chapter 27, pp. 616-641, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
89. Mark STEEDMAN (2000), The Syntactic Process, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
90. Martin STOKHOF and Michiel VAN LAMBALGEN (2011), Abstractions and Idealisations: The Construction of Modern Linguistics, Theoretical Linguistics, 37:1-26, doi:10.1515/THLI.2011.001.
91. Angelika STORRER (1992), Verbvalenz. Theoretische und methodische Grundlagen ihrer Beschreibung in Grammatikographie und Lexikographie, number 126 in Reihe Germanistische Linguistik, Niemeyer, Tübingen.
92. Lucien TESNIÈRE (1959), Eléments de syntaxe structurale, Klincksieck, Paris.
93. Lucien TESNIÈRE (2015), Elements of structural syntax, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, translated by Timothy Osborne and Sylvain Kahane.
94. Willy VAN LANGENDONCK (1994), Determiners as Heads?, Cognitive Linguistics, 5(3):243-260, doi:10.1515/cogl.1994.5.3.243.
95. Willy VAN LANGENDONCK (2003), The Dependency Concept and its Foundations, in Vilmos ÁGEL, Ludwig M. EICHINGER, Hans-Werner EROMS, Hans Jürgen HERINGER, and Henning LOBIN, editors, Dependenz und Valenz/Dependency and Valency. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung/An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, volume 25.1 of Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK), pp. 170-187, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
96. Heinz VATER (1978), Probleme der Verbvalenz, Leuvense Bijdragen, 67:267-308.
97. Rulon S. WELLS (1947), Immediate Constituents, Language, 23:81-117.
98. XTAG RESEARCH GROUP (2001), A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for English, Technical report, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
99. Arnold M. ZWICKY (1985), Heads, Journal of Linguistics, 21:1-29, doi:10.1017/S0022226700010008.
100. Arnold M. ZWICKY (1986), Concatenation and Liberation, in Papers from the General Session at the Twenty-Second Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp. 65-74, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, IL.
101. Arnold M. ZWICKY (1993), Heads, Bases and Functors, in Greville G. CORBETT, Norman M. FRASER, and Scott MCGLASHAN, editors, Heads in Grammatical Theory, pp. 292-315, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023). (PL).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-5720a0fc-4a99-4f0b-973c-72657a40ff6d