Geoinżynieria klimatu i geowładza jako wyzwania cywilizacyjne

Waszewski, Jan

doi:10.5604/01.3001.0054.1832

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Geoinżynieria klimatu i geowładza jako wyzwania cywilizacyjne

Autorzy

Waszewski Jan

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma

https://kwartalnikbellona.com/

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5604/01.3001.0054.1832

Warianty tytułu

Climate Geoengineering and Geopower as Civilizational Challenges

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Geoinżynieria klimatu stanowi zbiór proponowanych lub poddawanych eksperymentom wielkoskalowych rozwiązań technicznych, których celem jest modyfikacja czynników kształtujących pogodę. W niniejszym artykule geoinżynieria została omówiona jako zbiór rozwiązań mających na celu przeciwdziałanie przyczynom zmian klimatycznych wynikających z nadmiernej emisji gazów cieplarnianych. W tym sensie jest ona jednym z wymiarów bezpieczeństwa klimatycznego i wyłaniającego się pola geowładzy, czyli posiadania zdolności do kształtowania klimatu za pomocą geoinżynierii. W artykule zostały przedstawione różne koncepcje rozwiązań wyłaniających się w jej ramach, główne wyzwania z nimi związane, najważniejsi aktorzy działający w tym obszarze oraz narracje dotyczące tej tematyki.

Climate geoengineering is a collection of proposed or experimental large-scale technical solutions intended to modify the factors shaping the weather. As explored in the text, geoengineering aims to counteract the causes of climate change resulting from excessive greenhouse gases emission. In this sense, it is one of the aspects of climate security, and the emerging field of geopower i.e. the ability to modify climate by means of geoengineering. The article presents various solutions within geoengineering, the main challenges associated with them, the most important actors operating in this field, and the narratives arising around this topic.

Słowa kluczowe

zmiany klimatyczne bezpieczeństwo klimatyczne pokusa nadużycia władza grupy interesu

climate change climate security moral hazard power interest groups

Wydawca

Wojskowy Instytut Wydawniczy

Czasopismo

Kwartalnik Bellona

Rocznik

2023

Tom

Nr 3

Strony

43--62

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 32 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Waszewski Jan

jan.waszewski@gmail.com

Centrum Badań nad Bezpieczeństwem, Akademia Sztuki Wojennej, Warszawa

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7370-3714

Bibliografia

1. Annex. Glossary [online], wersja HTML pliku, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WGIIAR5-AnnexII_FINAL.pdf/.
2. Bai Y., Cotrufo M. F., Grassland soil carbon sequestration: Current understanding, challenges, and solutions, 4.08.2022, „Science” Vol. 377, Issue 6606, s. 603-608, ResearchGate [online], https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362505682_Grassland_soil_carbon_sequestration_Current_understanding_challenges_and_solutions/.
3. Big Bad Fix. The Case Against Climate Geoengineering ETC Group [online], 30.11.2017, https://etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/files/etc_bbf_mar2018_us_v1_web.pdf/.
4. Catanoso J., Australia rejects forest biomass in first blow to wood pellet industry, Mongabay [online], 21.12.2022, https://news.mongabay.com/2022/12/australia-rejects-forest-biomass-in-first-blow-to-wood-pellet-industry/.
5. Climate Change 2023. Synthesis Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [online], 2023, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_FullVolume.pdf [dostęp: 12.12.2023].
6. Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth, Chapter 4. Governance of Research and Other Sociopolitical Considerations, National Academy of Sciences [online], 2015, https://web.whoi.edu/ocb-fert/wp-content/uploads/sites/100/2017/07/NAP_Reflecting_Sunlight_2015_202564.pdf/.
7. Dinneen P. J., Rewetting dried wetlands could stop 100 billion tons of CO2 emissions, „New Scientist”, 25.08.2022, https://www.newscientist.com/article/2335373-rewetting-dried-wetlands-could-stop-100-billion-tons-of-co2-emissions/.
8. Direct Air Capture, International Energy Agency [online], wrzesień 2022, https://www.iea.org/reports/direct-air-capture/.
9. ETC Group, Geopiracy: The Case Against Geoengineering, 17.10.2010, https://www.etcgroup.org/content/geopiracy-case-against-geoengineering [dostęp: 22.12.2022].
10. Forest bioenergy update: BECCS and its role in integrated assessment models, European Academies’ Science Advisory Council [online], 28.02.2022, https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Negative_Carbon/EASAC_BECCS_Commentary_2022_WEB_final.pdf/.
11. Greenfieldboyce, N., Scientific Pros Weigh The Cons Of Messing With Earth’s Thermostat, NPR Audience Relations [online], 10.02.2015, https://text.npr.org/2015/02/10/385065816/scientific-pros-weigh-the-cons-of-messing-with-earths-thermostat/.
12. Grisé M. et al., Climate Control. International Legal Mechanisms for Managing the Geopolitical Risks of Geoengineering, RAND Corporation [online], 2021, https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PEA1133-1.html/.
13. Keith D., A Case for Climate Engineering, Cambridge 2013. Curriculum vitae Keitha zaktualizowane w 2019 r., wersja HTML pliku, https://keith.seas.harvard.edu/files/tkg/files/dwk_cv_26_apr_2019.pdf/.
14. Keith, D., Environmental Insights Guest: David Keith, [online], 7.02.2022, wersja HTML pliku, https://heep.hks.harvard.edu/files/heep/files/david_keith_environmental_insights_podcast_transcript_2.0_2.7.2020.pdf/.
15. Lehmann J., Gaunt J., Rondon M., Bio-char Sequestration in Terrestrial Ecosystems – A Review, „Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change” 2006, t. 11, s. 403-427; https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340331153_Bio-char_Sequestration_in_Terrestrial_Ecosystems_-_A_Review/.
16. Lempert R. J., Prosnitz D., Governing Geoengineering Research. A Political and Technical Vulnerability Analysis of Potential Near-Term Options, RAND Corporation [online], 2011, https://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR846.html/.
17. Morton A., Electricity generated by burning native Australian timber no longer classified as renewable Energy, „The Guardian” [online], 15.12.2022, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/dec/16/electricity-generated-by-burning-nativeaustralian-timber-no-longer-classified-as-renewable-energy/.
18. Muff, F., Climeworks, Carbon Removed [online], 8.05.2023, https://carbonremoved.com/carbon-removal-partners/climewo/.
19. Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration: A Research Agenda, 2019, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine [online], https://www.ctc-n.org/sites/www.ctc-n.org/files/resources/negative_emission_technologies.pdf/.
20. Panko B., World’s Largest Carbon Capture Plant Opens in Iceland, Smithsonian Magazine [online], 9.09.2021, https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/worlds-largest-carbon-capture-plant-opens-iceland-180978620/.
21. Patrick S. M., Reflecting Sunlight to Reduce Climate Risk Priorities for Research and International Cooperation, Council Special Report No. 93, April 2022, https://cdn.cfr.org/sites/default/files/report_pdf/Patrick-CSR93-web.pdf/.
22. Peacock B., Native forest wood waste burning to be excluded from ‘renewable’ classification, Senate report recommends, pv magazine [online], 2.09.2022, https://www.pv-magazine-australia.com/2022/09/02/native-forest-wood-waste-burning-to-be-excluded-from-renewable-classification-senate-report-recommends/.
23. Peters A., Is regenerative agriculture the future of farming or the next greenwashing fad?, Fast Company [online], 15.11.2022, https://www.fastcompany.com/90796487/is-regenerative-agriculture-the-future-of-farming-or-the-next-greenwashing-fad/.
24. Regenerative agriculture in Europe, European Academies’ Science Advisory Council [online], 5.04.2022, https://easac.eu/fileadmin/PDF_s/reports_statements/Regenerative_Agriculture/EASAC_RegAgri_Web_290422.pdf/.
25. Rowell D., Connely L. B., A history of the term ‘moral hazard’, „The Journal of Risk and Inurance” 2012, Vol. 79, No. 4, s. 1051-1075.
26. Temple J., GOP Embraces Geoengineering… Which Terrifies Geoengineering Researchers, MIT Technology Review [online], 8.11.2017, https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/11/08/241719/gop-embraces-geoengineering-which-terrifiesgeoengineering-researchers/.
27. The Aesthetics of Geopower: Imagining Planetary Histories and Hegemonies, University of Amsterdam [online], 21.07.2023, https://aihr.uva.nl/content/news/2023/07/geopower.html/.
28. Tollefson, J., UN decision puts brakes on ocean fertilization, „Nature”, 3.06.2008 [online], https://www.nature.com/articles/453704b/.
29. Vidal J., Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering, „The Guardian” [online], 6.12.2022, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/feb/06/bill-gates-climate-scientists-geoengineering/.
30. White Paper - Sustainably Amplifying the Natural Carbon Cycle, wersja z 18.04.2023, Running Tide [online], https://docs.runningtide.com/sustainably-amplifying-the-natural-carbon-cycle/white-paper-sustainably-amplifying-the-natural-carboncycle/.
31. World’s biggest machine capturing carbon from air turned on in Iceland, „The Guardian” [online], 9.09.2021, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/sep/09/worlds-biggest-plant-to-turn-carbon-dioxide-into-rock-opens-in-iceland-orca/.
32. Zou J. et al., Rewetting global wetlands effectively reduces major greenhouse gas emissions, „Nature Geoscience” 2022, no. 15, s. 627-632, ResearchGate [online], https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362323352_Rewetting_global_wetlands_effectively_reduces_major_greenhouse_gas_emissions/.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-56617f9e-035a-4aa6-88b4-14f0a09082fd