PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Enzymatic extraction of potato starch: A parametric optimization study using response surface methodology

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Optimized, effective and efficient methodology has been determined in this research work for the recovery of starch from potatoes. Potato starch extraction experimental results have been utilized for the parametric optimization study by using different statistical techniques. In this research work, starch extraction was conducted by employing cellulase enzyme. Response surface methodology (RSM) was put to use to perform statistical analysis to get optimum results. Five-level central composite design (CCD) consisting of three parameters was implemented to investigate the effect of enzyme concentration, contact time and broth dilution. Experiment results revealed that increment in enzyme concentration and contact time enhanced the starch recovery while dilution showed the inverse relation on the recovery of starch. Optimum starch recovery was achieved upto 89% when enzyme concentration (0.5 g/100 g) of potato meal was diluted with 10 mL of water and mixed for 4 h at 45°C.
Rocznik
Strony
48--54
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Department of chemical engineering, UET Lahore, Fsd Campus, Pakistan
  • Department of chemical engineering, UET Lahore, Fsd Campus, Pakistan
autor
  • Department of Natural Sciences and Humanities, UET Lahore, FSD Campus, Pakistan
  • Department of chemical engineering, UET Lahore, Fsd Campus, Pakistan
  • Department of chemical engineering, UET Lahore, Fsd Campus, Pakistan
  • Department of chemical engineering, UET Lahore, Fsd Campus, Pakistan
Bibliografia
  • 1. Furrer, A.N., Chegeni, M. & Ferruzzi, M.G. (2018). Impact of potato processing on nutrients, phytochemicals, and human health. Critical Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 58(1), 146–168. DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1139542.
  • 2. Slavin, J.L. (2013). Carbohydrates, Dietary Fiber, and Resistant Starch in White Vegetables: Links to Health Outcomes. Adv. Nutr. 4(3), 351–355. DOI: 10.3945/an.112.003491.
  • 3. Builders, P.F. & Arhewoh, M.I. (2016). Pharmaceutical applications of native starch in conventional drug delivery. Starch – Stärke. 68, (9–10), 864–873. DOI: 10.1002/star.201500337.
  • 4. Choi, J.M., Park, C.S., Baik, M.Y., Kim, H.S., Choi, Y.S., Choi, H.W. & Seo, D.H. (2018). Enzymatic extraction of starch from broken rice using freeze-thaw infusion with food-grade protease. Starch – Stärke. 70(1–2), 1700007. DOI: 10.1002/star.201700007.
  • 5. Koltuniewicz, A. (2010). 4.05 – Integrated Membrane Operations in Various Industrial Sectors. In Drioli, E. and L. Giorno, (Eds.). Comprehensive Membrane Science and Engineering. (pp. 109–164). Elsevier: Oxford.
  • 6. Semeijn, C. & Buwalda, P.L. (2018). Chapter 9 – Potato Starch. In Sjöö, M. and L. Nilsson, (Eds.). Starch in Food (Second Edition). (pp. 353–372). Woodhead Publishing: UK.
  • 7. Marwaha, R., Pandey, S., Kumar, D., Singh, S. & Kumar, P. (2010). Potato processing scenario in India: industrial constraints, future projections, challenges ahead and remedies – a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 47(2), 137–156. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-010-0026-0.
  • 8. Alvani, K., Qi, X., Tester, R.F. & Snape, C.E. (2011). Physico-chemical properties of potato starches. Food Chem. 125(3), 958–965. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.088.
  • 9. Martínez, P., Peña, F., Bello-Pérez, L.A., Núñez-Santiago, C., Yee-Madeira, H. & Velezmoro, C. (2019). Physicochemical, functional and morphological characterization of starches isolated from three native potatoes of the Andean region. Food Chem. X. 2, 100030. DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2019.100030.
  • 10. Alvani, K., Tester, R.F., Lin, C.L. & Qi, X. (2014). Amylolysis of native and annealed potato starches following progressive gelatinisation. Food Hydrocoll. 36, 273–277. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.10.010.
  • 11. Moorthy, S.N. (1991). Extraction of starches from tuber crops using ammonia. Carbohydrate Polymers. 16 (4), 391–398. DOI: 10.1016/0144-8617(91)90057-J.
  • 12. Byg, I., Diaz, J., Øgendal, L.H., Harholt, J., Jørgensen, B., Rolin, C., Svava, R. & Ulvskov, P. (2012). Large-scale extraction of rhamnogalacturonan I from industrial potato waste. Food Chem. 131(4), 1207–1216. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.106.
  • 13. Nadiha, M.N., Fazilah, A., Bhat, R. & Karim, A.A. (2010). Comparative susceptibilities of sago, potato and corn starches to alkali treatment. Food Chem. 121(4), 1053–1059. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.048.
  • 14. Carpita, N.C. & Kanabus, J. (1987). Extraction of starch by dimethyl sulfoxide and quantitation by enzymatic assay. Anal. Biochem. 161(1), 132–139. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90662-2.
  • 15. M. Mahfuzur Rahman, S., K. Rakshit, S., Effect of Endogenous and Commercial Enzyme on Improving Extraction of Sweet Potato Starch. 2004, ASAE: St. Joseph, MI.
  • 16. Sit, N., Deka, S.C. & Misra, S. (2015). Optimization of starch isolation from taro using combination of enzymes and comparison of properties of starches isolated by enzymatic and conventional methods. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52(7), 4324–4332. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-014-1462-z.
  • 17. Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C. & Anderson-Cook, C.M. (2009). Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons:
  • 18. Danmaliki, G.I., Saleh, T.A. & Shamsuddeen, A.A. (2017). Response surface methodology optimization of adsorptive desulfurization on nickel/activated carbon. Chem. Engin. J. 313, 993–1003. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.10.141.
  • 19. Box, G.E. & Draper, N.R. (1987). Empirical modelbuilding and response surfaces. John Wiley & Sons:
  • 20. Bezerra, M.A., Santelli, R.E., Oliveira, E.P., Villar, L.S. & Escaleira, L.A. (2008). Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta. 76 (5), 965–977. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019.
  • 21. Badwaik, L., Prasad, K. & Deka, S. (2012). Optimization of extraction conditions by response surface methodology for preparing partially defatted peanut. Int. Food Res. J. 19(1), 341–346. DOI: http://www.ifrj.upm.edu.my/19%20(01)%202011/(46)IFRJ-2011-160%20Badwaik.pdf.
  • 22. 10520:1997, I. (2013). Native starch – Determination of starch content – Ewers polarimetric method. 23. Javed, F., Ahmad, S.W., Rehman, A., Zafar, S. & Malik, S.R. (2014). Recovery of Rice Bran Oil Using Solid-Liquid Extraction Technique. J. Food Process Eng. 38(4), 357–362. DOI: 10.1111/jfpe.12166.
  • 24. Rehman, F.A., Ahmad, S.W., Shahzad, M., Ahmad, S. & Zia-ul-Haq, S.M. (2018). Parametric optimization of coal desulfurization through Alkaline leaching. Pol. J. Chem. Technol. 20(3), 103–109. DOI: 10.2478/pjct-2018-0045.
  • 25. Ahmad, S.W., Javed, F., Ahmad, S., Akram, M. & Rehman, A. (2016). Parametric optimization of rice bran oil extraction using response surface Methodology. Pol. J. Chem.Technol. 18, 103–109. DOI: 10.1515/pjct-2016-0055,.
  • 26. Hameed, M., Malik, S.R., Iqbal, M.F. & Mehmood, M. (2015). Extraction of starch from potato by enzymatic process. Sci. Int. 27(6), 6049–6051. DOI: http://www.sci-int.com/pdf/636372708162371552.pdf.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-565bec2d-d46f-4bf3-bde3-d5d73b52a954
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.